Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Bayesian network prediction model for gallbladder polyps with malignant potential based on preoperative ultrasound

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

It is important to identify gallbladder polyps (GPs) with malignant potential and avoid unnecessary cholecystectomy by constructing prediction model. The aim of the study is to develop a Bayesian network (BN) prediction model for GPs with malignant potential in a long diameter of 8–15 mm based on preoperative ultrasound.

Methods

The independent risk factors for GPs with malignant potential were screened by χ2 test and Logistic regression model. Prediction model was established and validated using data from 1296 patients with GPs who underwent cholecystectomy from January 2015 to December 2019 at 11 tertiary hospitals in China. A BN model was established based on the independent risk variables.

Results

Independent risk factors for GPs with malignant potential included age, number of polyps, polyp size (long diameter), polyp size (short diameter), and fundus. The BN prediction model identified relationships between polyp size (long diameter) and three other variables [polyp size (short diameter), fundus and number of polyps]. Each variable was assigned scores under different status and the probabilities of GPs with malignant potential were classified as [0–0.2), [0.2–0.5), [0.5–0.8) and [0.8–1] according to the total points of [− 337, − 234], [− 197, − 145], [− 123, − 108], and [− 62,500], respectively. The AUC was 77.38% and 75.13%, and the model accuracy was 75.58% and 80.47% for the BN model in the training set and testing set, respectively.

Conclusion

A BN prediction model was accurate and practical for predicting GPs with malignant potential patients in a long diameter of 8–15 mm undergoing cholecystectomy based on preoperative ultrasound.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu XS, Chen T, Gu LH, Guo YF, Li CY, Li FH, Wang J (2018) Ultrasound-based scoring system for differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 33(6):1295–1299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrén-Sandberg A (2012) Diagnosis and management of gallbladder polyps. N Am J Med Sci 4(5):203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi YS, Do JH, Seo SW, Lee SE, Oh HC, Min YJ, Kang H (2016) Prevalence and risk factors of gallbladder polypoid lesions in a healthy population. Yonsei Med J 57(6):1370–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park CH, Chung MJ, Oh TG, Park JY, Bang S, Park SW, Kim H, Hwang HK, Lee WJ, Song SY (2013) Differential diagnosis between gallbladder adenomas and cholesterol polyps on contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography. Surg Endosc 27(4):1414–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwon W, Jang JY, Lee SE, Hwang DW, Kim SW (2009) Clinicopathologic features of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder and risk factors of gallbladder cancer. J Korean Med Sci 24(3):481–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Do SI, Lee HW, Sohn JH, Kim K (2017) Clinicopathologic characteristics of young patients with gallbladder cancer. Pathol Res Pract 213(3):189–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matos AS, Baptista HN, Pinheiro C, Martinho F (2010) Gallbladder polyps: how should they be treated and when? Rev Assoc Med Bras 56(3):318–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo J, Wu G, Zhou Z (2015) Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: report of 160 cases with special reference to diagnosis and treatment in China. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8(9):11569–11578

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fujiwara K, Abe A, Masatsugu T, Hirano T, Sada M (2020) Effect of gallbladder polyp size on the prediction and detection of gallbladder cancer. Surg Endosc 35(9):5179–5185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chou SC, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE (2017) Polypoid lesions of the gallbladder: analysis of 1204 patients with long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc 31(7):2776–2782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mccain RS, Diamond A, Jones C, Coleman HG (2018) Current practices and future prospects for the management of gallbladder polyps: a topical review. World J Gastroenterol 24(26):2844–2852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim JS, Lee JK, Kim Y, Lee SM (2016) US characteristics for the prediction of neoplasm in gallbladder polyps 10 mm or larger. Eur Radiol 26(4):1134–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi TW, Kim JH, Park SJ, Ahn SJ, Joo I, Han JK (2018) Risk stratification of gallbladder polyps larger than 10 mm using high-resolution ultrasonography and texture analysis. Eur Radiol 28(1):196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarici IS, Duzgun O (2017) Gallbladder polypoid lesions >15mm as indicators of T1b gallbladder cancer risk. Arab J Gastroenterol 18(3):156–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Valibouze C, El AM, Truant S, Leroy C, Millet G, Pruvot FR, Zerbib P (2020) The management of gallbladder polyps. J Visc Surg 157(5):410–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiles R, Thoeni RF, Barbu ST, Vashist YK, Rafaelsen SR, Dewhurst C, Arvanitakis M, Lahaye M, Soltes M, Perinel J, Roberts SA (2017) Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps: Joint guidelines between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques(EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery-European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Eur Radiol 27(9):3856–3866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman N, Geiger D, Goldszmidt M (1997) Bayesian network classifiers. Mach Learn 29(2–3):131–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park JC, Lee JY (2018) How to build nomogram for type 2 diabetes using a nave Bayesian classifier technique. J Appl Stat 45(13–16):2999–3011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morrison DG (1969) On the interpretation of discriminant analysis. J Market Res 6:156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hundal R, Shaffer EA (2014) Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and outcome. Clin Epidemiol 6:99–109

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen M, Cao J, Bai Y, Tong C, Lin J, Jindal V, Barchi LC, Nadalin S, Yang SX, Pesce A, Panaro F, Ariche A, Kai K, Memeo R, Bekaii-Saab T, Cai X (2019) Development and validation of a nomogram for early detection of malignant gallbladder lesions. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 10(10):e98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang JI, Lee JK, Ahn DG, Park JK, Lee KH, Lee KT, Chi SA, Jung SH (2018) Predictive model for neoplastic potential of gallbladder polyp. J Clin Gastroenterol 52(3):273–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu Y, Li Q, Cai Z, Zhang Y, Qiu Y, Yang N, Song T, Li S, Lou J, Li J, Mao X, Chen C, Zhang D, Si S, Geng Z, Tang Z (2020) Survival prediction for gallbladder carcinoma after curative resection: comparison of nomogram and Bayesian network models. Eur J Surg Oncol 46(11):2106–2113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geng ZM, Cai ZQ, Zhang Z, Tang ZH, Xue F, Chen C, Zhang D, Li Q, Zhang R, Li WZ, Wang L, Si SB (2019) Estimating survival benefit of adjuvant therapy based on a Bayesian network prediction model in curatively resected advanced gallbladder adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 25(37):5655–5666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cong LL, Cai ZQ, Guo P, Chen C, Liu DC, Li WZ, Wang L, Zhao Y, Si SB, Geng ZM (2017) Decision of surgical approach for advanced gallbladder adenocarcinoma based on a Bayesian network. J Surg Oncol 116(8):1123–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Babu BI, Dennison AR, Garcea G (2015) Management and diagnosis of gallbladder polyps: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400(4):455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang D, Li Q, Zhang X, Jia P, Wang X, Geng X, Zhang Y, Li J, Yao C, Liu Y, Guo Z, Yang R, Lei D, Yang C, Hao Q, Yang W, Geng Z (2021) Establishment of a nomogram prediction model for long diameter 10–15 mm gallbladder polyps with malignant tendency. Surgery 170(3):664–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 62076194; the Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province, No. 2017ZDXM-SF-055 and No.2017KW-060; Clinical Research Fund of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. XJTU1AF-CRF-2018–022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhimin Geng or Dong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Qi Li, Jingwei Zhang, Zhiqiang Cai, Pengbo Jia, Xintuan Wang, Xilin Geng, Yu Zhang, Da Lei, Junhui Li, Wenbin Yang, Rui Yang, Xiaodi Zhang, Chenglin Yang, Chunhe Yao, Qiwei Hao, Yimin Liu, Zhihua Guo, Shubin Si, Zhimin Geng and Dong Zhang have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Zhang, J., Cai, Z. et al. A Bayesian network prediction model for gallbladder polyps with malignant potential based on preoperative ultrasound. Surg Endosc 37, 518–527 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09532-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09532-z

Keywords

Navigation