Skip to main content
Log in

Mortality after emergency versus elective groin hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Emergency groin hernia repair is associated with increased mortality risk, but the actual risk is unknown. Therefore, this review aimed to investigate 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality in adult patients who had undergone emergency or elective groin hernia repair.

Methods

This review was reported following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and a protocol (CRD42021244412) was registered to PROSPERO. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL in April 2021. Studies were included if they reported 30- or 90-day mortality following an emergency or elective groin hernia repair. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible, and subgroup analyses were made for bowel resection, sex, and hernia type. According to the study design, the risk of bias was assessed using either the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Results

Thirty-seven studies with 30,740 patients receiving emergency repair and 457,253 receiving elective repair were included. The 30-day mortality ranged from 0–11.8% to 0–1.7% following emergency and elective repair, respectively. The risk of 30-day mortality following emergency repair was estimated to be 26-fold higher than after elective repair (RR = 26.0, 95% CI 21.6–31.4, I2 = 0%). A subgroup meta-analysis on bowel resection in emergency repair estimated 30-day mortality to be 7.9% (95% CI 6.5–9.3%, I2 = 6.4%). Subgroup analyses on sex and hernia type showed no differences regarding the mortality risk in elective surgery. However, femoral hernia and female sex significantly increased the risk of mortality in emergency surgery, both given by a risk ratio of 1.7.

Conclusion

The overall mortality after emergency groin hernia repair is 26-fold higher than after elective repair, but the increased risk is attributable mostly to female and femoral hernias.

Trial registration

PROSPERO protocol (CRD42021244412).

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are reported in the article, or electronic resources, why there are no supplementary data for data sharing.

References

  1. Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ (1996) Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol 25:835–839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nilsson H, Stylianidis G, Haapamäki M, Nilsson E, Nordin P (2007) Mortality after groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg 245:656–660

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Reinke CE, Matthews BD (2020) What’s new in the management of incarcerated hernia. J Gastrointest Surg 24:221–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Birindelli A, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, van Ramshorst GH, Campanelli G, Khokha V, Moore EE, Peitzman A, Velmahos G, Moore FA, Leppaniemi A, Burlew CC, Biffl WL, Koike K, Kluger Y, Fraga GP, Ordonez CA, Novello M, Agresta F, Sakakushev B, Gerych I, Wani I, Kelly MD, Gomes CA, Faro MP Jr, Tarasconi A, Demetrashvili Z, Lee JG, Vettoretto N, Guercioni G, Persiani R, Tranà C, Cui Y, Kok KYY, Ghnnam WM, Abbas AE, Sato N, Marwah S, Rangarajan M, Ben-Ishay O, Adesunkanmi ARK, Lohse HAS, Kenig J, Mandalà S, Coimbra R, Bhangu A, Suggett N, Biondi A, Portolani N, Baiocchi G, Kirkpatrick AW, Scibé R, Sugrue M, Chiara O, Catena F (2017) 2017 update of the WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias. World J Emerg Surg 12:37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kjaergaard J, Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H (2010) Mortality following emergency groin hernia surgery in Denmark. Hernia 14:351–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mcgugan E, Burton H, Nixon SJ, Thompson AM (2000) Deaths following hernia surgery: room for improvement. J R Coll Surg Edinb 45:183–186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lundström KJ, Sandblom G, Smedberg S, Nordin P (2012) Risk factors for complications in groin hernia surgery: a national register study. Ann Surg 255:784–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, Malmstrøm J, Andersen FH, Wara P, Juul P, Callesen T, Collaboration DHD (2001) Quality assessment of 26 304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective Nationwide Study. Lancet 358:1124–1128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Saeter AH, Fonnes S, Andresen K, Rosenberg J (2021) Mortality after emergency versus elective groin hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021244412. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=244412. Accessed 3 Jan 2022

  11. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2021) Rayyan QCRI. https://rayyan.qcri.org/reviews. Accessed 3 Jan 2022

  12. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R (2005) Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 331:1064–1065

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/nosgen.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2022

  14. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4. https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software-cochrane-reviews/revman. Accessed 3 Jan 2022

  16. Wallace BC, Schmid CH, Lau J, Trikalinos TA (2009) Meta-analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data. BMC Med Res Methodol 9:80

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (eds) (2021) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed 3 Jan 2022

  18. Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Rosenberg J (2015) Performing and evaluating meta-analyses. Surgery 157:189–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O’Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann HJ, Edejer T, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S, GRADE Working Group (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490–1494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schünemann HJ, Higgins JPT, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Skoetz N, Guyatt GH (2021) Chapter 14: completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed 3 Jan 2022

  21. Bowling K, Reynolds P, Rait J, Srinivas G, Andrews S (2016) Inside or out? A comparison of complication rates between open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 30:S206

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen JH, Wu JC, Yin WY, Lee CH (2017) Bilateral primary inguinal hernia repair in Taiwanese adults: a nationwide database analysis. Formos J Surg 50:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Deysine M (2006) Inguinal herniorrhaphy: 25-year results of technical improvements leading to reduced morbidity in 4,029 patients. Hernia 10:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arnold MR, Coakley KM, Fromke EJ, Groene SA, Prasad T, Colavita PD, Augenstein VA, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2019) Long-term assessment of surgical and quality of life outcomes between lightweight and standard (heavyweight) three-dimensional contoured mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgery 165:820–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huntington CR, Wormer BA, Cox TC, Blair LJ, Lincourt AE, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT (2015) Local anesthesia in open inguinal hernia repair improves postoperative quality of life compared to general anesthesia: a prospective, international study. Am Surg 81:704–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ilonzo N, Gribben J, Neifert S, Pettke E, Leithman IM (2019) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in women: trends, disparities, and postoperative outcomes. Am J Surg 218:726–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kapiris SA, Brough WA, Royston CM, O’Boyle C, Sedman PC (2001) Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. A 7-year two-center experience in 3017 patients. Surg Endosc 15:972–975

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kark AE, Kurzer MN, Belsham PA (1998) Three thousand one hundred seventy-five primary inguinal hernia repairs: advantages of ambulatory open mesh repair using local anesthesia. J Am Coll Surg 186:447–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350:1819–1827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pokala B, Armijo PR, Flores L, Hennings D, Oleynikov D (2019) Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is superior to open: a national database review. Hernia 23:593–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Riber C, Alstrup N, Nymann T, Bogstad JW, Wille-Jørgensen P, Tønnesen H (1996) Postoperative thromboembolism after day-case herniorrhaphy. Br J Surg 83:420–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers FB, Guzman EA (2011) Inguinal hernia repair in a community setting: implications for the elderly. Hernia 15:37–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alvarez JA, Baldonedo RF, Bear IG, Solís JAS, Alvarez P, Jorge JI (2004) Incarcerated groin hernias in adults: presentation and outcome. Hernia 8:121–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ceresoli M, Carissimi F, Nigro A, Fransvea P, Lepre L, Braga M, Costa G, List of Elderly Risk Assessment and Surgical Outcome (ERASO) Collaborative Study Group endorsed by SICUT, ACOI, SICG, SICE, and Italian Chapter of WSES (2020) Emergency hernia repair in the elderly: multivariate analysis of morbidity and mortality from an Italian registry. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02269-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chung PJ, Lee JS, Tam S, Schwartzman A, Bernstein MO, Dresner L (2017) Predicting 30-day postoperative mortality for emergent anterior abdominal wall hernia repairs using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Hernia 21:323–333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Derici H, Unalp HR, Bozdag AD, Nazli O, Tansug T, Kamer E (2007) Factors affecting morbidity and mortality in incarcerated abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 11:341–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Duan SJ, Ding NY, Liu HS, Qian L, Zhang SY, Gai XY (2015) A novel bowel necrosis classification system and examination of patient outcomes in incarcerated groin hernia patients. Int Surg 100:96–100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Duan SJ, Liu HS, Niu J, Wang CX, Chen SH, Wang MH (2014) Classifications of clinical and bowel morphological changes and their relationship with characteristics of patients with incarcerated groin hernias. Med Sci Monit 20:214–218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Duan SJ, Qiu SB, Ding NY, Liu HS, Zhang NS, Wei YT (2018) Prosthetic mesh repair in the emergency management of acutely strangulated groin hernias with grade I bowel necrosis: a rational choice. Am Surg 84:215–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ge BJ, Huang Q, Liu LM, Bian HP, Fan YZ (2010) Risk factors for bowel resection and outcome in patients with incarcerated groin hernias. Hernia 14:259–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Hansen JB, Thulstrup AM, Vilstup H, Sørensen HT (2002) Danish nationwide cohort study of postoperative death in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing hernia repair. Br J Surg 89:805–806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hernández-Irizarry R, Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Moreno M, Ali SM, Lohse GM, Farley DR (2012) Trends in emergent inguinal hernia surgery in Olmsted County, MN: a population-based study. Hernia 16:397–403

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Humes DJ, Radcliffe RS, Camm C, West J (2013) Population-based study of presentation and adverse outcomes after femoral hernia surgery. Br J Surg 100:1827–1832

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lebeau R, Traoré M, Anzoua KI, Kalou ILB, N’Dri AB, Aguia B, Kakou AG, Diane B (2016) Prognostic factors of postoperative morbidity and mortality of adult strangulated groin hernia. Indian J Surg 78:192–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ozkan E, Yıldız MK, Cakır T, Dulundu E, Eriş C, Fersahoğlu MM, Topaloğlu U (2012) Incarcerated abdominal wall hernia surgery: relationship between risk factors and morbidity and mortality rates (a single center emergency surgery experience). Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 18:389–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Surek A, Gemici E, Ferahman S, Karli M, Bozkurt MA, Dural AC, Donmez T, Karabulut M, Alis H (2021) Emergency surgery of the abdominal wall hernias: risk factors that increase morbidity and mortality—a single-center experience. Hernia 25:679–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tastaldi L, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Petro CC, Ilie R, Haskins IN, Alkhatib H, Tu C, Rosenblatt S, Rosen MJ (2019) Emergent groin hernia repair: a single center 10-year experience. Surgery 165:398–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Haapaniemi S, Sandblom G, Nilsson E (1999) Mortality after elective and emergency surgery for inguinal and femoral hernia. Hernia 3:205–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Johnson KM, Newman KL, Green PK, Berry K, Cornia PB, Wu P, Beste LA, Itani K, Harris AHS, Kamath PS, Ioannou GN (2021) Incidence and risk factors of postoperative mortality and morbidity after elective versus emergent abdominal surgery in a national sample of 8193 patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg 274:e345–e354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Nilsson E, Kald A, Anderberg B, Bragmark M, Fordell R, Haapaniemi S, Heuman R, Lindhagen J, Stubberöd A, Wickbom J (1997) Hernia surgery in a defined population: a prospective three year audit. Eur J Surg 163:823–829

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Seagroatt V, Goldacre M (1994) Measures of early postoperative mortality: beyond hospital fatality rates. BMJ 309:361–365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Köckerling F, Heine T, Adolf D, Zarras K, Weyhe D, Lammers B, Mayer F, Reinpold W, Jacob D (2021) Trends in emergent groin hernia repair: an analysis from the herniamed registry. Front Surg 8:655755

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang L, Wang H, Liang X, Chen T, Chen W, Song Y, Wang J (2015) Bacteria in hernia sac: an important risk fact for surgical site infection after incarcerated hernia repair. Hernia 19:279–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wysocki A, Strzałka M, Migaczewski M, Budzyński P (2014) Short- and long-term outcomes of incarcerated inguinal hernias repaired by Lichtenstein technique. Wideochirurgia I Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 9:196–200

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sæter AH, Fonnes S, Rosenberg J, Andresen K (2022) High complication and mortality rates after emergency groin hernia repair: a nationwide register-based cohort study. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02597-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kurt N, Oncel M, Ozkan Z, Bingul S (2003) Risk and outcome of bowel resection in patients with incarcerated groin hernias: retrospective study. World J Surg 27:741–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dahlstrand U, Wollert S, Nordin P, Sandholm G, Gunnarsson U (2009) Emergency femoral hernia repair: a study based on a national register. Ann Surg 249:672–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Suppiah A, Gatt M, Barandiaran J, Heng MS, Perry EP (2007) Outcomes of emergency and elective femoral hernia surgery in four district general hospitals: a 4-year study. Hernia 11:509–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Nilsson H, Nilsson E, Angerås U, Nordin P (2011) Mortality after groin hernia surgery: delay of treatment and cause of death. Hernia 15:301–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Hou Sæter.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Authors Ann Hou Sæter, Siv Fonnes, Jacob Rosenberg, and Kristoffer Andresen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

A protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021244412) before data extraction and can be accessed here https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=244412 [10].

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 142 kb). Supplementary File 1. Search strategies for all databases

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 24 kb). Supplementary File 2. Summary of findings table

Supplementary file3 (DOCX 29 kb). Supplementary Table. Patient characteristics of the included studies

464_2022_9327_MOESM4_ESM.jpg

Supplementary file4 (JPG 26 kb). Supplementary Figure. Risk of bias assessment for the included randomised controlled trials. “+” indicates a low risk of bias, “?” indicates an unclear risk of bias, and “–“indicates a high risk of bias

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sæter, A.H., Fonnes, S., Rosenberg, J. et al. Mortality after emergency versus elective groin hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 36, 7961–7973 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09327-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09327-2

Keywords

Navigation