Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

SAGES white paper on the current state of community practice surgeons: re-discovering the value of our community practice surgeons

  • SAGES White Paper
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The Community Practice (CP) surgeon is the first point of access to surgical care globally and performs the majority of procedures in the USA. CP surgeons include those of various practice models, locations and communities, education and training, and much more. It is a diverse group that drives quality, access to care, research, and innovation. The SAGES CP Committee was formed to better define the role and highlight the contribution of the CP surgeon, as well as advocate for the position of CP surgeons in our society.

Methods

In 2018, a survey was distributed to the SAGES membership asking members to self-identify as either a Community Surgeon or Academic Surgeon.

Results

The majority (71%) of SAGES members surveyed self-identified as “Community Surgeons.” This was in stark contrast to the distribution of Community versus Academic Surgeons in SAGES leadership (25% versus 75%, respectively).

Conclusion

By better defining the characteristics and role of the CP, SAGES will be better informed on how to effectively engage with this large group within the society and increase its representation within the leadership. The CP Committee met on a biannual basis over a period of two years focusing on assessing their role in the SAGES organization. The committee members created the following initial goals: (1) define in a broad sense the characteristics of a CP Surgeon, (2) discuss and characterize the value of the CP surgeons, (3) highlight past and future areas of contributions of the group, and (4) delineate ways to engage and represent this subgroup. This manuscript is a culmination of the work of this committee while also serving as a way to support the initiatives and direction of SAGES leadership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woodhall JP (1957) General surgery. Arch Surg 4:152–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Community Physician. In: Titi Tudorancea Defin. https://www.tititudorancea.com/z/community_physician.htm. Accessed 1 Nov 2021

  3. Community Physician. In: Lexico. https://www.lexico.com/definition/community_physician. Accessed 1 Nov 2021

  4. Rosengart TK, Mason MC, Lemaire SA, Brandt ML, Coselli JS, Curley SA, Mattox KL, Mills JL, Sugarbaker DJ, Berger DA (2017) The American journal of surgery the seven attributes of the academic surgeon : critical aspects of the archetype and contributions to the surgical community. Am J Surg 214:165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.02.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jarman BT, Cogbill TH, Mathiason MA, O’Heron CT, Foley EF, Martin RF, Weigelt JA, Brasel KJ, Webb TP (2009) Factors correlated with surgery resident choice to practice general surgery in a rural area. J Surg Educ 66:319–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron JL, Hon FENG, Hon F (2009) John Miller Turpin Finney: the first president of the American college of surgeons. ACS 208:327–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. (2019) AHA hospital statistics. https://www.ahadata.com/aha-hospital-statistics. Accessed 6 Oct 2020

  8. Park AE, Sutton ERH, Heniford BT (2015) Minimally invasive surgery fellowship graduates: their demographics, practice patterns, and contributions. Surgery 158:1462–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adra S, Trickey A, Crosby M, Kurtzman S, Friedell M, Reines D (2012) General surgery vs fellowship: the role of independent academic medical center. J Surg Educ 69:740–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. (2021) Alliance of independent acadmic medical centers. www.aiamc.org. Accessed 9 Dec 2020

  11. Klingensmith ME, Cogbill TH, Luchette F, Biester T, Samonte K, Jones A, Lewis FR, Malangoni MA (2015) Factors influencing the decision of surgery residency graduates to pursue general surgery practice versus fellowship. Ann Surg 262:449–454. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Watkins JR, Pryor AD, Truitt MS, Jeyarajah DR (2018) Perception versus reality: elucidating motivation and expectations of current fellowship council minimally invasive surgery fellows. Surg Endosc 32:4422–4427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6184-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Charles AG, Ortiz-Pujols S, Ricketts T, Fraher E, Neuwahl S, Cairns B, Sheldon GF (2013) The employed surgeon: a changing professional paradigm. JAMA Surg 148:323–328. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cyr-Taro AE, Kotwall CA, Menon RP, Hamann MS, Nakayama DK (2008) Employment and satisfaction trends among general surgery residents from a community hospital. J Surg Educ 65:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.07.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellison EC, Pawlik TM, Way DP, Satiani B, Williams TE (2018) Ten-year reassessment of the shortage of general surgeons: increases in graduation numbers of general surgery residents are insufficient to meet the future demand for general surgeons. Surgery (United States) 164:726–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.04.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tierney J, Terhune K (2017) Expanding the national health service corps scholarship program to general surgery: a proposal to address the national shortage of general surgeons in the United States. JAMA Surg 152:315–316. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McKernan JB (1999) Origin of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the USA: personal experience. World J Surg 23:332–333

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reddick EJ, Olsen DO (1989) Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy—a comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 3:131–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00591357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgenstern L (2008) An unsung hero of the laparoscopic revolution: eddie Joe Reddick, MD. Surg Innov 15:245–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350608325119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wolff WI, Shinya H (1973) Polypectomy via the fiberoptic colonoscope: removal of neoplasms beyond reach of the sigmoidoscope. N Engl J Med 288:329–332. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197302152880701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Belyansky I, Reza Z, Sanford Z, Weltz ASPA (2018) Early operative outcomes of endoscopic (eTEP access) robotic-assisted retromuscular abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia 22:837–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Litynski G (1998) Erich muhe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2:341–346

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Reynolds W (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 5:89–94

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Southern Surgeons Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies—the southern surgeons club. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Stern V (2013) The first Lap Chole in Europe: a “criminal” is vindicated. In: Gen. Surg. News

  26. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou AI, Granderath FA (2015) Past, present, and future of minimally invasive abdominal surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2015.00052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Beasley B, Simon S, Wright S (2006) A time to be promoted. J Gen Intern Med 21:123–129

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas PA, Diener-West M, Canto MI, Martin DR, Post WS, Streiff MB (2004) Results of an academic promotion and career path survey of faculty at the Johns Hopskins University School of Medicine. Aced Med 79:258–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Intermountain Health Leadership Institute. www.intermountainhealthcare.org. Accessed 9 Dec 2020

  30. The Health Managment Academy. https://hmacademy.com. Accessed 9 Dec 2020

  31. (2020) Fast Facts on US Hospitals 2020. In: Am. Hosp. Assoc. https://www.aha.org/statistics/fast-facts-us-hospitals. Accessed 9 Dec 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

SAGES Community Practice Committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlin Halbert.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The contributing authors, Drs. Halbert, Catania, Earle, Elyash, Fearing, Gwon, Joseph, Mier, Morfesi, Shen, Slack, Towfigh, Walters, Wasco, and Youngelman, have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halbert, C., Catania, R., Earle, D. et al. SAGES white paper on the current state of community practice surgeons: re-discovering the value of our community practice surgeons. Surg Endosc 36, 3677–3685 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09204-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09204-y

Keywords

Navigation