Abstract
Background
Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) has the postoperative advantages of a better quality of life and less weight loss than distal gastrectomy. However, postoperative delayed gastric emptying (DGE) due to antral hypomotility can be a problem. Although preserving the infra-pyloric vein (IPV) is reported to improve congestion of the antrum and prevent DGE, the benefits of this procedure have not been confirmed. The present study aimed to clarify the preventive effect on DGE of preserving the IPV.
Methods
A total of 148 patients [IPV-preserved (IPVP): 78 patients and IPV-non-preserved (IPVN): 70 patients] who underwent laparoscopic and robotic PPG (LRPPG) for early gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathologic characteristics and incidence of DGE were compared between the groups. The nutritional risk index (NRI) at 1, 2, and 3 years after the operation and the relapse-free survival (RFS) were also compared.
Results
There were no significant differences in the clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups. DGE was observed in 15 of 148 patients (10.1%). The incidence of DGE did not differ markedly between the 2 groups (IPVP vs. IPVN; 11.5% vs. 8.6% p = 0.596). There were no significant differences in other complications between the groups either (IPVP vs. IPVN; 19.2% vs. 21.4%; p = 0.838). The NRI and 3-year RFS were not significantly different between the two groups.
Conclusion
Regarding LRPPG, preserving the IPV did not help prevent DGE and resulted in no significant difference in the outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maki T et al (1967) Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy as an improved operation for gastric ulcer. Surgery 61(6):838–845
Kodama M, Koyama K (1991) Indications for pylorus preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer located in the middle third of the stomach. World J Surg 15(5):628–633 discussion 633-4
Kodera Y et al (2001) Lymph node metastasis in cancer of the middle-third stomach: criteria for treatment with a pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. Surg Today 31(3):196–203
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2017) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 20(1):1–19
Isozaki H et al (1996) Postoperative evaluation of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 83(2):266–269
Nishikawa K et al (2002) Functional characteristics of the pylorus in patients undergoing pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surgery 131(6):613–624
Shibata C et al (2012) Current status of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer: a questionnaire survey and review of literatures. World J Surg 36(4):858–863
Morita S et al (2008) Outcome of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg 95(9):1131–1135
Kodama M et al (1995) Early postoperative evaluation of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg 19(3):456–460 discussion 461
Tomita R, Fujisaki S, Tanjoh K (2003) Pathophysiological studies on the relationship between postgastrectomy syndrome and gastric emptying function at 5 years after pylorus-preserving distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Surg 27(6):725–733
Nunobe S et al (2007) Symptom evaluation of long-term postoperative outcomes after pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 10(3):167–172
Jiang X et al (2011) Long-term outcome and survival with laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 25(4):1182–1186
Koeda K et al (2016) Intracorporeal reconstruction after laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for middle-third early gastric cancer: a hybrid technique using linear stapler and manual suturing. Langenbecks Arch Surg 401(3):397–402
Kiyokawa T et al (2017) Preserving infrapyloric vein reduces postoperative gastric stasis after laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 402(1):49–56
Suh YS et al (2014) Laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy is better than laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for middle-third early gastric cancer. Ann Surg 259(3):485–493
Edge SB (2010) The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 17(6):1471–1474
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
Hikage M et al (2018) Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for cT1 gastric cancer. World J Surg 42(6):1803–1810
Tokunaga M et al (2014) Early phase II study of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 17(3):542–547
Fujiya K et al (2018) Impact of malnutrition after gastrectomy for gastric cancer on long-term survival. Ann Surg Oncol 25(4):974–983
Nishizawa N et al (2016) Anatomical knowledge for the infra-pyloric vein preservation during the laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. Dig Surg 33(5):363–370
Sawai K et al (1995) Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection based on anatomical variations of the infrapyloric artery. Am J Surg 170(3):285–288
Haruta S et al (2015) Anatomical considerations of the infrapyloric artery and its associated lymph nodes during laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. Gastric Cancer 18(4):876–880
Lu YF et al (1999) Vagus effect on pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol 5(2):177–178
Nakane Y et al (2002) Length of the antral segment in pylorus-preserving gastrectomy. Br J Surg 89(2):220–224
Le Blanc-Louvry I et al (2003) An impaired accommodation of the proximal stomach to a meal is associated with symptoms after distal gastrectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 98(12):2642–2647
Namikawa T et al (2015) Factors that minimize postgastrectomy symptoms following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: assessment using a newly developed scale (PGSAS-45). Gastric Cancer 18(2):397–406
Parkman HP (2015) Idiopathic gastroparesis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 44(1):59–68
Stein B, Everhart KK, Lacy BE (2015) Gastroparesis: a review of current diagnosis and treatment options. J Clin Gastroenterol 49(7):550–558
Han DS et al (2015) Comparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 22(7):2323–2328
Furukawa H et al (2018) Preservation of the celiac branch of the vagal nerve for pylorus-preserving gastrectomy: is it meaningful? Gastric Cancer 21(3):516–523
Kumagai K et al (2015) Totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the middle stomach: technical report and surgical outcomes. Gastric Cancer 18(1):183–187
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to Dr. Naotake Yanagisawa for his help in the statistical analyses, particularly propensity score matching.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Sanae Kaji, Rie Makuuchi, Tomoyuki Irino, Yutaka Tanizawa, Etsuro Bando, Taiichi Kawamura, Hayato Omori, Keiichi Fujiya, Noriyuki Nishiwaki, Kenichiro Furukawa, Kenichi Nakamura, Yusuke Koseki, Yuhei Waki, Raito Asaoka, and Masanori Terashima have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaji, S., Makuuchi, R., Irino, T. et al. Preventive effect on delayed gastric emptying of preserving the infra-pyloric vein in laparoscopic pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 34, 3853–3860 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07151-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07151-9