Skip to main content
Log in

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of 276 cases of primary small (≤ 2 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter data review

  • 2018 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Till present, there are still controversies over the epidemiology, pathological features, types of surgical treatment, and prognoses of primary small gastric GISTs (gGISTs).

Methods

From January 1998 to January 2015, patients with primary small gGIST admitted from four high-volume medical centers of the Southern China were enrolled and their data were analyzed to evaluate their clinicopathological features, treatment and prognostic factors to provide evidence-based medical experience for clinical practice.

Results

A total of 276 primary small gGIST cases over a period of 18 years were investigated and had a median age of 60 years (range 27–91 years old). Regarding the tumor sites, 24 (8.7%) cases were in the cardia of the stomach, 107 (38.8%) in the fundus, 117 (42.4%) in the gastric body, and 28 (10.1%) in the gastric antrum. Eleven patients (4.0%) underwent a preoperative biopsy. A total of 137 (49.6%), 75 (27.2%), and 64 (23.2%) patients underwent laparoscopic, open resection, and endoscopic resection, respectively. Sixty-four patients (23.2%) had local endoscopic resection, 172 (62.3%) had wedge resection, 7 (2.5%) had proximal gastrectomy, 19 (6.9%) had distal gastrectomy, and 14 (5.1%) had total gastrectomy. Mitotic counts were ≤ 5/50, (5–10)/50, and > 10/50 per HPF in 259 (93.8%), 7 (2.5%), and 10 (3.6%) cases, respectively. There were 259 cases (97.1%) of spindle cell type, 7 (2.5%) epithelial cell types and one case (0.4%) of mixed type. Immunohistochemistry showed 74.6% (206/276), 98.2% (271/276), and 97.4% (269/276) of the patients had co-expression of CD34+, CD117+, and DOG-1+, respectively. Thirty-nine patients underwent genetic testing (39/276, 14.1%). Three patients (1.1%) had positive resection margin. Five high-risk patients received follow-up treatment with imatinib with a median follow-up time of 38 months (range 3–156 months). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 100%, 99.6%, and 99.1%, respectively.

Conclusion

Though the incidence of primary small gGISTs increased per annum, the overall survival prognoses were high. Surgery or endoscopic resection was the primary mode of treatment. Pathological features of primary small gGISTs were similar to large gGISTs, and to achieve a timely surgical intervention, the identification of intermediate- and high-risk cases should be a future focus of study.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yan W, Zhang A, Powell MJ (2016) Genetic alteration and mutation profiling of circulating cell-free tumor DNA (cfDNA) for diagnosis and targeted therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Chin J Cancer 35:68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Valsangkar N, Sehdev A, Misra S, Zimmers TA, O’Neil BH, Koniaris LG (2015) Current management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: surgery, current biomarkers, mutations, and therapy. Surgery 158:1149–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, Reichardt A, Hartmann JT, Pink D, Ramadori G, Hohenberger P, Al-Batran SE, Schlemmer M, Bauer S, Wardelmann E, Nilsson B, Sihto H, Bono P, Kallio R, Junnila J, Alvegard T, Reichardt P (2016) Adjuvant imatinib for high-risk GI stromal tumor: analysis of a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 34:244–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishida T, Goto O, Raut CP, Yahagi N (2016) Diagnostic and treatment strategy for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer 122:3110–3118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Conrad EU 3rd, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ, Kane JM 3rd, Koon H, Mayerson J, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Meyer C, O’Donnell RJ, Pappo AS, Paz IB, Petersen IA, Pfeifer JD, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Schupak KD, Schwartz HS, Tap WD, Wayne JD, Bergman MA, Scavone J (2016) Soft tissue sarcoma, version 2.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14:758–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanda T (2016) Is a “wait-and-see” policy the best for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)? Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao Z, Wang C, Xue Q, Wang J, Shen Z, Jiang K, Shen K, Liang B, Yang X, Xie Q, Wang S, Ye Y (2017) The cut-off value of tumor size and appropriate timing of follow-up for management of minimal EUS-suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. BMC Gastroenterol 17:8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Agaimy A, Wünsch PH, Hofstaedter F, Blaszyk H, Rümmele P, Gaumann A et al (2007) Minute gastric sclerosing stromal tumors (GIST tumorlets) are common in adults and frequently show c-KIT mutations. Am J Surg Pathol 31(1):113–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mikami T, Nemoto Y, Numata Y, Hana K, Nakada N, Ichinoe M et al (2013) Small gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the stomach: identification of precursor for clinical gastrointestinal stromal tumor using c-kit and α-smooth muscle actin expression. Hum Pathol 44(12):2628–2635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR, DeMatteo RP, Ganjoo KN, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Raut CP, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Sundar HM, Trent JC, Wayne JD (2010) NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 8(Suppl 2):S1–S41 (quiz S42–S44)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abraham SC, Krasinskas AM, Hofstetter WL, Swisher SG, Wu TT (2007) “Seedling” mesenchymal tumors (gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyomas) are common incidental tumors of the esophagogastric junction. Am J Surg Pathol 31:1629–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Muenst S, Thies S, Went P, Tornillo L, Bihl MP, Dirnhofer S (2011) Frequency, phenotype, and genotype of minute gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach: an autopsy study. Hum Pathol 42:1849–1854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giuliano K, Nagarajan N, Canner J, Najafian A, Wolfgang C, Schneider E et al (2017) Gastric and small intestine gastrointestinal stromal tumors: do outcomes differ? J Surg Oncol 115(3):351–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandrasekhara V, Ahmad NA (2011) EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the GIST of the matter. Dig Dis Sci 56:1596–1598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang ZG, Zhang XS, Huang SL, Yuan XG (2012) Endoscopy dissection of small stromal tumors emerged from the muscularis propria in the upper gastrointestinal tract: preliminary study. World J Gastrointest Endosc 4:565–570

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Balde AI, Chen T, Hu Y, Redondo NJ, Liu H, Gong W, Yu J, Zhen L, Li G (2017) Safety analysis of laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for selected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 31:843–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu C, Chen T, Hu Y, Balde AI, Liu H, Yu J, Zhen L, Li G (2017) Retrospective study of laparoscopic versus open gastric resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on the propensity score matching method. Surg Endosc 31:374–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng F, Liu Z, Zhang X, Guo M, Xu G, Ren G, Hong L, Sun L, Yang J, Zhang H (2015) Comparison of endoscopic and open resection for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Transl Oncol 8:504–508

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen QF, Huang CM, Lin M, Lin JX, Lu J, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Chen QY, Cao LL, Tu RH (2016) Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a propensity score-matching analysis. Medicine 95:e3135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang JL, Zheng ZH, Wei HB, Chen TF, Liu JP, Huang Y, Wei B, Fang JF (2017) Endoscopy-assisted laparoscopic resections for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:110–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawanowa K, Sakuma Y, Sakurai S, Hishima T, Iwasaki Y, Saito K, Hosoya Y, Nakajima T, Funata N (2006) High incidence of microscopic gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach. Hum Pathol 37:1527–1535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwang SH, Park do J, Kim YH, Lee KH, Lee HS, Kim HH, Lee HJ, Yang HK, Lee KU (2009) Laparoscopic surgery for submucosal tumors located at the esophagogastric junction and the prepylorus. Surg Endosc 23(9):1980–1987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Corless CL, Ballman KV, Antonescu CR, Kolesnikova V, Maki RG, Pisters PW, Blackstein ME, Blanke CD, Demetri GD, Heinrich MC, von Mehren M, Patel S, McCarter MD, Owzar K, DeMatteo RP (2014) Pathologic and molecular features correlate with long-term outcome after adjuvant therapy of resected primary GI stromal tumor: the ACOSOG Z9001 trial. J Clin Oncol 32:1563–1570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Eisenberg BL (2013) The SSG XVIII/AIO trial: results change the current adjuvant treatment recommendations for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Clin Oncol 36:89–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang HY, Shi JF, Guo LW, Bai YN, Liao XZ, Liu GX, Mao AY, Ren JS, Sun XJ, Zhu XY, Wang L, Song BB, Du LB, Zhu L, Gong JY, Zhou Q, Liu YQ, Cao R, Mai L, Lan L, Sun XH, Ren Y, Zhou JY, Wang YZ, Qi X, Lou PA, Shi D, Li N, Zhang K, He J, Dai M (2017) Expenditure and financial burden for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer in China: a hospital-based, multicenter, cross-sectional survey. Chin J Cancer 36:41

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rutkowski P, Bylina E, Lugowska I, Teterycz P, Klimczak A, Streb J, Czarnecka AM, Osuch C (2018) Treatment outcomes in older patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). J Geriatr Oncol 9:520–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Molinas MN, Selcukbiricik M, Kanitez M, Yalcin S, Tural D, Erdamar S et al (2016) Clinical and pathological characteristics and their effect on survival in elderly patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J BUON 21(2):360

    Google Scholar 

  28. Farag S, van Coevorden F, Sneekes E, Grunhagen DJ, Reyners AKL, Boonstra PA, van der Graaf WT, Gelderblom HJ, Steeghs N (2017) Elderly patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) receive less treatment irrespective of performance score or comorbidity—a retrospective multicentre study in a large cohort of GIST patients. Eur J Cancer 86:318–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Breccia M, Luciano L, Latagliata R, Castagnetti F, Ferrero D, Cavazzini F et al (2014) Age influences initial dose and compliance to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia elderly patients but concomitant comorbidities appear to influence overall and event-free survival. Leuk Res 38(10):1173–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guo LW, Huang HY, Shi JF, Lv LH, Bai YN, Mao AY, Liao XZ, Liu GX, Ren JS, Sun XJ, Zhu XY, Zhou JY, Gong JY, Zhou Q, Zhu L, Liu YQ, Song BB, Du LB, Xing XJ, Lou PA, Sun XH, Qi X, Wu SL, Cao R, Lan L, Ren Y, Zhang K, He J, Zhang JG, Dai M, Health Economic Evaluation Working Group CSPiUC (2017) Medical expenditure for esophageal cancer in China: a 10-year multicenter retrospective survey (2002–2011). Chin J Cancer 36:73

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2016A030310328).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

ZY, XF, PZ, TC, HQ, ZZ, GL, KXT, and YL have substantial contributions to the conception and design of this study, have revised its intellectual content, and have approved of the final submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kai Xiong Tao or Yong Li.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Drs. Zifeng Yang, Xingyu Feng, Peng Zhang, Tao Chen, Haibo Qiu, Zhiwei Zhou, Guoxin Li, Kaixiong Tao, and Yong Li have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Feng, X., Zhang, P. et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of 276 cases of primary small (≤ 2 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter data review. Surg Endosc 33, 2982–2990 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6564-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6564-7

Keywords

Navigation