Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early markers of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) have been described as good predictors of anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery, obtaining the highest diagnostic accuracy on the 5th postoperative day. However, if an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is performed, early predictors are needed in order to ensure a safe and early discharge. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of CRP, PCT, and white blood cell (WBC) count determined on first postoperative days, in predicting septic complications, especially anastomotic leak, after laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed within an ERAS program.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study including 134 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an ERAS program between 2015 and 2017. The primary endpoint investigated was anastomotic leak. CRP, PCT, and WBC count were determined in the blood sample extracted on postoperative day 1 (POD 1), POD 2 and POD 3.

Results

Anastomotic leak (AL) was detected in 6 patients (4.5%). Serum levels of CRP and PCT, but not WBC, determined on POD 1, POD 2, and POD 3 were significantly higher in patients who had AL in the postoperative course. Using ROC analysis, the best AUC of the CRP and PCT levels was on POD 3 (0.837 and 0.947, respectively). A CRP cutoff level at 163 mg/l yielded 85% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and 99% negative predictive value (NPV). A PCT cutoff level at 2.5 ng/ml achieved 85% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 44% positive predictive value, and 99% NPV.

Conclusions

CRP and PCT are relevant markers for detecting postoperative AL after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Furthermore, they can ensure an early discharge with a low probability of AL when an ERAS program is performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery/enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259e284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhuang CL, Huang DD, Chen FF, Zhou CJ, Zheng BS, Chen BC et al (2015) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within enhanced recovery after surgery programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 29:2091–2100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Welsch T, Müller SA, Ulrich A, Kischlat A, Hinz U, Kienle P et al (2007) C-reactive protein as early predictor for infectious postoperative complications in rectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1499–1507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mackay GJ, Molloy RG, O’Dwyer PJ (2011) C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative infective complications following elective colorectal resection. Colorectal Dis 13:583–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Platt J, Ramanathan M, Crosbie R, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Horgan PG et al (2012) C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative infective complications after curative resection in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 19:4168–4177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ortega-Deballon P, Radais F, Facy O, dÁthis P, Masson D, Charles PE et al (2010) C-reactive protein is an early predictor of septic complications after elective colorectal surgery. World J Surg 34:808–814

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kørner H, Nielsen HJ, Søreide JA, Nedrebø BS, Søreide K, Knapp JC (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein for intra- abdominal infections after colorectal resections. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1599–1606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Almeida AB, Faria G, Moreira H, Pinto-de-Sousa J, Correia-da-Silva P, Maia JC (2012) Elevated serum C-reactive protein as a predictive factor for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Surg 10:87–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Warschkow R, Beutner U, Steffen T, Müller SA, Schmied BM, Güller U et al (2012) Safe and early discharge after colorectal surgery due to C-reactive protein. Ann Surg 256:245–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh PP, Zeng IS, Srinivasa S, Lemanu DP, Connolly AB, Hill AG (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of use of serum C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 101:339–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Straatman J, Harmsen AMK, Cuesta MA, Berkhof J, Jansma EP, van der Peet DL (2015) Predictive value of C-reactive protein for major complications after major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and pooled-analysis. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0132995

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Takakura Y, Hinoi T, Egi H, Shimomura M, Adachi T, Saito Y et al (2013) Procalcitonin as a predictive marker for surgical site infection in elective colorectal cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:833–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia-Granero A, Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Blanco F, Puga R, Carratalá A et al (2013) Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early predictors of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a prospective observational study. Dis Colon Rectum 56:475–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giaccaglia V, Salvi PF, Antonelli MS, Nigri G, Pirozzi F, Casagranda B et al (2016) Procalcitonin reveals early dehiscence in colorectal surgery: the PREDICS study. Ann Surg 263:967–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cousin F, Ortega-Deballon P, Bourredjem A, Doussot A, Giaccaglia V, Fournel I (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for the early diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection after elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 264(2):252–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramírez JM, Blasco JA, Roig JV, Maeso-Martínez S, Casal JE, Esteban F, Spanish working group on fast track surgery (2011) Enhanced recovery in colorectal surgery: a multicentre study. BMC Surg 11:9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Arroyo A, Ramirez JM, Callejo D, Viñas X, Maeso S, Cabezali R, Miranda E, Spanish Working Group in Fast Track Surgery (GERM) (2012) Influence of size and complexity of the hospitals in an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1637–1644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Esteban F, Cerdan FJ, Garcia-Alonso M, Sanz-Lopez R, Arroyo A, Ramirez JM et al (2014) A multicentre comparison of a fast track or conventional postoperative protocol following laparoscopic or open elective surgery for colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 16:134–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moya P, Miranda E, Soriano-Irigaray L, Arroyo A, Aguilar MD, Bellón M, Muñoz JL, Candela F, Calpena R (2016) Perioperative immunonutrition in normo-nourished patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 30:4946–4953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Adams K, Papagrigoriadis S (2013) Little consensus in either definition or diagnosis of lower gastro-intestinal anastomotic leak amongst colorectal surgeons. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:967–971

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Holte K, Kehlet H (2002) Postoperative ileus: progress towards effective management. Drugs 62:2603–2615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Woeste G, Muller C, Bechstein Wo Wullstein C (2010) Increased serum levels of C-reactive protein precede anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. World J Surg 34:140–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reisinger KW, Poeze M, Hulsewé KW, van Acker BA, van Bijnen AA, Hoofwijk AG et al (2014) Accurate prediction of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery using plasma markers for intestinal damage and inflammation. J Am Coll Surg 219:744–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253:890–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pompilio E, Casigliani R, Sommariva S, Saggese MP (1989) Acute phase proteins as markers of septic risk in surgical patients. Minerva Chir 44:2185–2190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2014) Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: a systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 6:14–26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Giaccaglia V, Salvi PF, Cunsolo GV, Sparagna A, Antonelli MS, Nigri G et al (2014) Procalcitonin, as an early biomarker of colorectal anastomotic leak, facilitates enhanced recovery after surgery. J Crit Care 29:528–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Domínguez-Comesaña E, Estevez-Fernández SM, López-Gómez V, Ballinas-Miranda J, Domínguez-Fernández R (2017) Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early markers of postoperative intra-abdominal infection in patients operated on colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 32:1771–1774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lane JC, Wright S, Burch J, Kennedy RH, Jenkins JT (2013) Early prediction of adverse events in enhanced recovery based upon the host systemic inflammatory response. Colorectal Dis 15:224–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ramanathan M, MacKay G, Platt J, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2013) Impact of day 2 C-reactive protein on day 3 and 4 thresholds associated with infective complications following curative surgery for colorectal cancer. World J Surg 37:2705–2710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, Sietses C, van der Peet DL, de Lange-de Klerk ES et al (2012) Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 255:216–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Facy O, Paquette B, Orry D, Santucci N, Rat P, Rat P, Binquet C, Ortega-Deballon P (2017) Inflammatory markers as early predictors of infection after colorectal surgery: the same cut-off values in laparoscopy and laparotomy? Int J Colorectal Dis 32:857–863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Luis Muñoz.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

José Luis Muñoz, María Oliva Alvarez, Vicent Cuquerella, Elena Miranda, Carlos Picó, Raquel Flores, Marta Resalt-Pereira, Pedro Moya, Ana Pérez, and Antonio Arroyo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the local ethics committee.

Informal consent

All patients signed an informed consent form for the ERAS program and for inclusion in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muñoz, J.L., Alvarez, M.O., Cuquerella, V. et al. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early markers of anastomotic leak after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Surg Endosc 32, 4003–4010 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6144-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6144-x

Keywords

Navigation