Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peroral endoscopic myotomy compared with pneumatic dilation for newly diagnosed achalasia

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of two endoscopic techniques for treating newly diagnosed achalasia, pneumatic dilation (PD), and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

Methods

Demographics, clinical and manometric data, and outcomes were collected from the medical records of patients who received POEM or PD as the primary therapy for achalasia at our hospital from January 2012 to August 2015.

Results

Of 72 patients, 32 and 40 received POEM and PD, respectively. The two groups had similar preoperative features. On short-term follow-up, improvements in high-resolution esophageal manometry and barium esophagogram parameters were similar. For PD, the success rates at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 95, 88, 75, 72, and 60%, respectively. For POEM, these were 96, 96, 96, 93, and 93% (P = 0.013, log-rank test). On subgroup analysis, the success rate was higher with POEM than that with PD in all 3 manometric subtypes, but only that of type III was statistically significant. POEM required significantly longer operative time and hospitalization than did PD (P < 0.001). Four POEM patients experienced subcutaneous emphysema. The rate of gastroesophageal reflux was higher in patients treated by POEM (18.8%) than that in PD (10%; P = 0.286).

Conclusions

In the intermediate term, the remission rate of symptoms associated with POEM therapy was better than that with PD for newly diagnosed achalasia, especially in patients with type III achalasia. The short-term outcomes of the two therapies were similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Podas T, Eaden J, Mayberry M, Mayberry J (1998) Achalasia: a critical review of epidemiological studies. Am J Gastroenterol 93:2345–2347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Meir A, Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Hansen PD, Swanstrom LL (2001) Quality of life before and after laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Am J Surg 181:471–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zarate N, Mearin F, Baldovino F, Armengol JR, Malagelada JR (2002) Achalasia treatment in the elderly: Is botulinum toxin injection the best option? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:285–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Richter JE, Boeckxstaens GE (2011) Management of achalasia: surgery or pneumatic dilation. Gut 60:869–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, Chaussade S, Costantini M, Cuttitta A, Elizalde JI, Fumagalli U, Gaudric M, Rohof WO, Smout AJ, Tack J, Zwinderman AH, Zaninotto G, Busch OR (2011) Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med 364:1807–1816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S (2010) Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 42:265–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stavropoulos SN, Desilets DJ, Fuchs KH, Gostout CJ, Haber G, Inoue H, Kochman ML, Modayil R, Savides T, Scott DJ, Swanstrom LL, Vassiliou MC (2014) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary. Surg Endosc 28:2005–2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bechara R, Ikeda H, Inoue H (2015) Peroral endoscopic myotomy: an evolving treatment for achalasia. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:410–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Santos BF, Arafat FO, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ, Hirano I, Hungness ES (2014) Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes one year after peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) for treatment of achalasia. Surg Endosc 28:3359–3365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Inoue H, Sato H, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Sato C, Minami H, Yokomichi H, Kobayashi Y, Grimes KL, Kudo SE (2015) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: a series of 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg 221:256–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Verlaan T, Rohof WO, Bredenoord AJ, Eberl S, Rosch T, Fockens P (2013) Effect of peroral endoscopic myotomy on esophagogastric junction physiology in patients with achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc 78:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan SM, Wu JC, Teoh AY, Yip HC, Ng EK, Lau JY, Chiu PW (2016) Comparison of early outcomes and quality of life after laparoscopic Heller’s cardiomyotomy to peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia. Dig Endosc 28:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marano L, Pallabazzer G, Solito B, Santi S, Pigazzi A, De Luca R, Biondo FG, Spaziani A, Longaroni M, Di Martino N, Boccardi V, Patriti A (2016) Surgery or peroral esophageal myotomy for achalasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider AM, Louie BE, Warren HF, Farivar AS, Schembre DB, Aye RW (2016) A matched comparison of per oral endoscopic myotomy to laparoscopic heller myotomy in the treatment of achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1789–1796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rohof WO, Salvador R, Annese V, des Varannes SB, Chaussade S, Costantini M, Elizalde JI, Gaudric M, Smout AJ, Tack J, Busch OR, Zaninotto G, Boeckxstaens GE (2013) Outcomes of treatment for achalasia depend on manometric subtype. Gastroenterology 144:718–725 (quiz e13–e14)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salvador R, Costantini M, Zaninotto G, Morbin T, Rizzetto C, Zanatta L, Ceolin M, Finotti E, Nicoletti L, Da Dalt G, Cavallin F, Ancona E (2010) The preoperative manometric pattern predicts the outcome of surgical treatment for esophageal achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1635–1645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zerbib F, Roman S (2015) Current therapeutic options for esophageal motor disorders as defined by the Chicago Classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 49:451–460

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eckardt VF (2001) Clinical presentations and complications of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 11:281–292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ (2008) Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 135:1526–1533

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, Pandolfino JE (2015) The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 27:160–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Persson J, Johnsson E, Kostic S, Lundell L, Smedh U (2015) Treatment of achalasia with laparoscopic myotomy or pneumatic dilatation: long-term results of a prospective, randomized study. World J Surg 39:713–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pandolfino JE, Gawron AJ (2015) Achalasia: a systematic review. JAMA 313:1841–1852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Katzka DA, Castell DO (2011) Review article: an analysis of the efficacy, perforation rates and methods used in pneumatic dilation for achalasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 34:832–839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith CD, Stival A, Howell DL, Swafford V (2006) Endoscopic therapy for achalasia before Heller myotomy results in worse outcomes than heller myotomy alone. Ann Surg 243:579–584 (discussion 584–576)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pratap N, Kalapala R, Darisetty S, Joshi N, Ramchandani M, Banerjee R, Lakhtakia S, Gupta R, Tandan M, Rao GV, Reddy DN (2011) Achalasia cardia subtyping by high-resolution manometry predicts the therapeutic outcome of pneumatic balloon dilatation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 17:48–53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang XC, Li QL, Xu MD, Chen SY, Zhong YS, Zhang YQ, Chen WF, Ma LL, Qin WZ, Hu JW, Cai MY, Yao LQ, Zhou PH (2016) Major perioperative adverse events of peroral endoscopic myotomy: a systematic 5-year analysis. Endoscopy 48:967–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Swanstrom LL, Kurian A, Dunst CM, Sharata A, Bhayani N, Rieder E (2012) Long-term outcomes of an endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure. Ann Surg 256:659–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shutian Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Fandong Meng, Peng Li, Yongjun Wang, Ming Ji, Yongdong Wu, Li Yu, Yinglin Niu, Fujing Lv, Wei Li, Wenyan Li, Huihong Zhai, Shanshan Wu, and Shutian Zhang have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, F., Li, P., Wang, Y. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy compared with pneumatic dilation for newly diagnosed achalasia. Surg Endosc 31, 4665–4672 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5530-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5530-0

Keywords

Navigation