Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of bag extraction to prevent wound infection on umbilical port site wound on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for gallbladder stones. Complications due to laparoscopic procedure are rare, but rate of wound infection in some studies is about 8 %. From January 2007 to December 2008, 320 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed at our hospital, and in 4.7 % of them, wound infection of the umbilical trocar was identified. We believe that this infection rate could be lower and that it is necessary to implement a new technique to reduce the wound infection. The aim of the study was to evaluate the benefits of bag extraction of gallbladder to prevent the wound infection.

Methods

Two-arm, parallel, 1:1, randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN38095251). All patients suffering from symptomatic gallbladder stones of low risk were enrolled for this study and were divided into two groups in basics gallbladder extraction: with (80 patients) or, as usually, without bag (76 patients). All patients with cholecystitis or accidental gallbladder perforation were excluded. We compared all the results to establish whether meaningful differences were found.

Results

The final sample analysed (156 patients) consisted of 121 women and 35 men; there were 80 in the control group and 76 in the study group. There were 15 (9.6 %) diagnosed wound infections, eight cases in the study group and seven in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences.

Conclusions

The determinant of wound infection in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not the direct contact of the gallbladder with the wound; therefore, bag extraction is not necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Comajuncosas J et al (2014) Risk factors for umbilical trocar site incisional hernia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective 3-year follow-up study. Am J Surg 207(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mouret P (1991) From the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the frontiers of laparoscopic surgery: the future prospectives. Dig Surg 8:124–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deziel DJ, Milikian KW, Economou SG et al (1993) Complicactions of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77604 cases. Am J Surg 165:9–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Triantafyllidis I et al (2009) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our experience in a district general hospital. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 6:449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coda A, Bossoti M, Ferri F et al (2000) Incisional hernia and fascial defect following laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:34–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E et al (1997) Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 21:529–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nassar AH, Ashkar KA, Rashed AA et al (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomyand the umbilicus. Br J Surg 84:630–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Azurin DJ, Go LS, Arroyo LR et al (1995) Trocar site herniation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the significance of an incidental preexisting umbilical hernia. Am Surg 61:718–720

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wirkowski A, Pesta W (2008) Pulapki cholecystektomii laparoskopowejd doswiadczenia wlasne. Wideochirurg Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 3:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crist DW, Gadacz TR (1993) Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 73:265–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramachandran CS (1998) Umbilical hernial defects encountered before and after abdominal laparoscopic procedures. Int Surg 83:171–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Armañanzas L, Ruiz-Tovar J, Arroyo A, García-Peche P, Armañanzas E, Diez M, Galindo I, Calpena R (2014) Prophylactic mesh vs suture in the closure of the umbilical trocar site after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high-risk patients for incisional hernia. A randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 218(5):960–968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harling R, Moorjani N, Perry C, MacGowan AP, Thompson MH (2000) A prospective, randomised trial of prophylactic antibiotics versus bag extraction in the prophylaxis of wound infection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:408–410

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. McGuckin M, Shea JA, Schwartz JS (1999) Infection and antimicrobial use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:624–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guidelines for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999: Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:250–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shea JA et al (1998) Indications for and outcomes of cholecystectomy: a comparison of the pre and post laparoscopic eras. Ann Surg 227:343–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. The Southern Surgeon’s Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shindholimath VV, Seenu V, Parshad R, Chaudhry R, Kumar A (2003) Factors influencing wound infection following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Trop Gastroenterol 24:90–92

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Uchiyama K et al (2003) Preoperative antimicrobial administration for prevention of postoperative infections in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 48:1955–1959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Abassi AA, Farghaly MM, Ahmed HL, Mobasher LL, Al-Manee MS (2001) Infections after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of infected bile and infected gallbladder wall. Eur J Surg 167:268–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang WT et al (2006) The impact of the role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 191:721–725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuthe SA, Kaman L, Verma GR, Singh R (2006) Evaluation of the role of prophylactic antibiotics in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy a prospective randomized trial. Trop Gastroenterol 27(1):54–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Choudhary A, Bechtold ML, Puli SR, Othman MO, Roy PK (2008) Role of prophylactic antibiotics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1847–1853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McGuckin M, Shea J, Schwartz JS (1999) Infection and antimicrobial use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20(9):624–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Diez J, Arozamena CJ, Ferraina P, Franci JM, Ferreres A, Lardies JM, Gutierrez VP (1996) Relation between postoperative infections and gallbladder bile leakage during laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 10(5):529–532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Awami SM, Al-Breiki H, Abdul-Khader AS, Twum-Danso K, Grant C, Wosornu L (1991) Wound infection following biliary surgery. A prospective study. Int Surg 76:77–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gold-Deutch R, Mashiach R, Boldur I, Ferszt M, Negri M, Halperin Z, Lin G, Sackier J, Halevy A (1996) How does infected bile affect the postoperative course of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 172:272–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chuang SC et al (2004) Risks factors for wound infections after cholecystectomy. J Formos Med Assoc 103:607–612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aga E, Keinan-Boker L, Eithan A, Mais T, Rabinovich A, Nassar F (2015) Surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: incidence and risk factors. A prospective cohort study. Infect Dis (Lond) 47(11):761–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Koek MB, Wille JC, Isken MR, Voss A, van Benthem BH (2015) Post-discharge surveillance (PDS) for surgical site infections: a good method is more important than a long duration. Euro Surveill 20(8):21042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sato N, Shibao K, Mori Y, Higure A, Yamaguchi K (2015) Postoperative complications following single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective analysis in 360 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 29(3):708–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all of the doctors, nurses, and pathologists who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Comajuncosas.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Jordi Comajuncosas, Judit Hermoso, Jaime Jimeno, Pere Gris, Rolando Orbeal, Antonio Cruz, and David Parés have declared no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Comajuncosas, J., Hermoso, J., Jimeno, J. et al. Effect of bag extraction to prevent wound infection on umbilical port site wound on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Surg Endosc 31, 249–254 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4965-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4965-z

Keywords

Navigation