Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally invasive video-assisted submandibular sialadenectomy: surgical technique and results from two institutions

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Submandibular gland excision is traditionally performed using a transcervical approach. However, innovative surgical trials have recently been conducted to investigate techniques that can prevent or reduce visible scarring and nerve injury. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of a new approach to submandibular gland excision that is based on the use of a minimally invasive video-assisted technique and an ultrasound scalpel in an endoscopic neck surgery program with a low annual flow of procedures.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 15 patients with submandibular gland disease who underwent minimally invasive video-assisted submandibular sialadenectomy performed by two surgeons at two institutions. Eight patients had proximally located salivary calculi, three had chronic sialadenitis, and four had benign neoplasms. All dissections were carried out by a single-port gasless approach, using the Miccoli technique, involving endoscope magnification and an ultrasonic scalpel.

Results

All 15 submandibular gland resections were performed successfully, with no conversions to conventional open resection. The operative time ranged from 45 to 125 min (median 84 min). A total of 67 % of patients were discharged the day after surgery, and the maximum length of stay was 3 days. One patient experienced postoperative bleeding, and one experienced postoperative infection. There was no neural injury. The incision scar healed well in all cases, and all patients reported excellent cosmetic results.

Conclusions

Endoscopic submandibular gland resection using a minimally invasive video-assisted technique, endoscopic magnification, and ultrasonic scalpel was feasible and resulted in excellent surgical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goh YH, Sethi DS (1998) Submandibular gland excision: a five-year review. J Laryngol Otol 112:269–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Winkel R, Overgaard TI, Balle VH, Charabi S (2000) Surgical results of submandibular gland excision. Ugeskr Laeger 162:5354–5357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hald J, Andreassen UK (1994) Submandibular gland excision: short- and long-term complications. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 56:87–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miloro M (1999) Intraoral submandibular gland excision. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:661–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Komatsuzaki Y, Ochi K, Sugiura N, Hyodo M, Okamoto A (2003) Video-assisted submandibular sialadenectomy using an ultrasonic scalpel. Auris Nasus Larynx 30(Suppl):S75–S78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gagner M (1996) Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg 83:875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Capaccio P, Torretta S, Pignataro L (2009) The role of adenectomy for salivary gland obstructions in the era of sialendoscopy and lithotripsy. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 42:1161–1171 (table of contents)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roh JL (2008) Removal of the submandibular gland by a submental approach: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Oral Oncol 44:295–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Roh JL (2006) Removal of the submandibular gland by a retroauricular approach. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:783–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Downton D, Qvist G (1960) Intra-oral excision of the submandibular gland. Proc R Soc Med 53:543–544

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong KH, Kim YK (2000) Intraoral removal of the submandibular gland: a new surgical approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:798–802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong KH, Yang YS (2008) Surgical results of the intraoral removal of the submandibular gland. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:530–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kauffman RM, Netterville JL, Burkey BB (2009) Transoral excision of the submandibular gland: techniques and results of nine cases. Laryngoscope 119:502–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Conte M, Materazzi G, Galleri D (2001) Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Am J Surg 181:567–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G, Donatini G (2003) Minimally invasive video assisted parathyroidectomy (MIVAP). Eur J Surg Oncol 29:188–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen MK, Chang CC (2007) Minimally invasive endoscope-assisted parotidectomy: a new approach. Laryngoscope 117:1934–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen J, Chen W, Zhang J, He F, Zhu Z, Tang S, Wang Y (2014) Endoscope-assisted second branchial cleft cyst resection via an incision along skin line on lateral neck. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:2789–2793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu B, Ding Z, Fan Y, Deng X, Guo B, Kang J, Zhong C, Yang Z, Zheng Q (2013) Video-assisted selective lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:395–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fan S, Liang FY, Chen WL, Yang ZH, Huang XM, Wang YY, Lin ZY, Zhang DM, Zhou B, Chen WX, Chai Q, Wang HJ, Pan CB, Liang QX, Yu X, Dias-Ribeiro E, Feng YH, Li JS (2014) Minimally invasive selective neck dissection: a prospective study of endoscopically assisted dissection via a small submandibular approach in cT1-2N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21:3876–3881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kessler P, Bloch-Birkholz A, Birkholz T, Neukam FW (2006) Feasibility of an endoscopic approach to the submandibular neck region—experimental and clinical results. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:103–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen MK, Su CC, Tsai YL, Chang CC (2006) Minimally invasive endoscopic resection of the submandibular gland: a new approach. Head Neck 28:1014–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Meningaud JP, Pitak-Arnnop P, Bertrand JC (2006) Endoscope-assisted submandibular sialoadenectomy: a pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1366–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baek CH, Jeong HS (2006) Endoscope-assisted submandibular sialadenectomy: a new minimally invasive approach to the submandibular gland. Am J Otolaryngol 27:306–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamza Y, Khalil R (2009) Video-assisted submandibular resection: two-step technique. Surg Endosc 23:2785–2789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M, Raffaelli M, Materazzi G (2000) Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy: lesson learned from 137 cases. J Am Coll Surg 191:613–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fernández Fernández M, Parente Arias P, Herranz González-Botas J, Martínez Vidal J (2006) Endoscopic thyroidectomy: preliminary report. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 57:291–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Deganello A, Meccariello G, Busoni M, Parrinello G, Bertolai R, Gallo O (2014) Dissection with harmonic scalpel versus cold instruments in parotid surgery. B-ENT 10:175–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tirelli G, Camilot D, Bonini P, Del Piero GC, Biasotto M, Quatela E (2015) Harmonic scalpel and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system in head and neck surgery: a prospective study on tissue heating and histological damage on nerves. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 124:852–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruscito P, Pichi B, Marchesi P, Spriano G (2007) Minimally invasive video-assisted submandibular sialoadenectomy: a preliminary report. J Craniofac Surg 18:1142–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Beahm DD, Peleaz L, Nuss DW, Schaitkin B, Sedlmayr JC, Rivera-Serrano CM, Zanation AM, Walvekar RR (2009) Surgical approaches to the submandibular gland: a review of literature. Int J Surg 7:503–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hernando M, Echarri RM, Taha M, Martin-Fragueiro L, Hernando A, Mayor GP (2012) Surgical complications of submandibular gland excision. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 63:42–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang YN, Kao CH, Lin YS, Lee JC (2013) Comparison of the intraoral and transcervical approach in submandibular gland excision. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:669–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo L. Parente Arias.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Pablo L. Parente Arias, Mario M. Fernandez Fernández, Patricia Varela Vázquez, and Beatriz de Diego Muñoz have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parente Arias, P.L., Fernández Fernández, M.M., Varela Vázquez, P. et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted submandibular sialadenectomy: surgical technique and results from two institutions. Surg Endosc 30, 3314–3320 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4604-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4604-0

Keywords

Navigation