Skip to main content
Log in

Binding pancreaticogastrostomy in laparoscopic central pancreatectomy: a novel technique in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Even though more and more cases of laparoscopic central pancreatectomy (LCP) are reported (Machado et al. in Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(6):486–490, 2013; Hong et al. in World J Surg Oncol 10:223, 2012; Gonzalez et al. in JOP 14(3):273–276, 2013, Zhang et al. in J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(11):912–918, 2013; Sucandy et al. in N Am J Med Sci 2(9):438–441, 2010; Sa Cunha et al. in Surgery 142(3):405–409, 2007), the management for pancreatic stumps remains the most technically challenging part which is the same as in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), making it the bottleneck for laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. In open surgery, various pancreatic reconstruction techniques designed for either pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) or pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) have been attempted to reduce the postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), including the binding anastomosis, invented by our team, i.e., binding PG (BPG) and binding PJ, which have been proved to be effective to reduce the POPF (Hong et al. 2012; Peng et al. in Ann Surg 245(5):692–698, 2007; Peng et al. in Updates Surg 63(2):69–74, 2011). However, despite of this, few reports are seen addressing such technique for laparoscopic surgery even though laparoscopic pancreatic surgery is more performed. After a previous successful laparoscopic BPG in a case of laparoscopic CP (LCP; Hong et al. 2012) and more than 50 cases of open PD and CP (Peng et al. 2011), we further performed laparoscopic BPG in 10 consecutive cases of LCP with satisfactory outcomes.

Objective

To explore the feasibility and efficacy of LCP with BPG.

Methods

Between October 2011 and July 2014, LCP with laparoscopic BPG was performed in ten consecutive patients with lesions of benign or low malignancy at the pancreatic neck. Operative and pathological data, complications, hospital stay and details on the surgical techniques were introduced.

Results

The operations were successfully performed in all the ten cases, with no conversions. The tumor size ranged from 2.0–3.0 to 2.5–3.0 cm, average (2.50 ± 0.35) to (2.66 ± 0.35) cm, and the diameter of pancreatic duct was (1.6–2.1) mm, average (1.71 ± 0.17) mm. Operation time was 170–250 (198.50 ± 25.82) min, and blood loss was 20–300 (125 ± 107.31) mL. Three cases had grade A pancreatic fistula (PF), and one case had delayed gastric emptying, which were all managed with conservative treatment. Upper GI bleeding occurred in one case which was cured with second operation, time for the recovery of bowl movement was 3–5 (4.2 ± 0.8) days, the time for semifluid dieting was 6–10 (8.2 ± 1.5) days, and the hospital stay was 8–20 (12.8 ± 4.63) days. The postoperative fast blood sugar was (6.3 ± 1.6) mmol/L with the normal diet, which was not significantly different from the preoperative data (5.3 ± 0.5) mmol/L (P > 0.05). The postoperative pathology was as follows: five cases of cystic serous adenoma, one case of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, two cases of neuroendocrine tumor, and two cases of solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas. All the patients were followed up for 7–40 months, no recurrence happened, and no new incidence of diabetes or insufficiency of pancreatic exocrine function occurred.

Conclusions

LCP with BPG is feasible and safe; the advantages lie in its minimal invasiveness, the efficacy for avoiding PF, and the preservation of the pancreatic endocrine and exocrine function insufficiency, making it an ideal procedure for the benign or low-malignant lesions at the pancreatic neck.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Machado MA, Surjan RC, Epstein MG, Makdissi FF (2013) Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy: a review of 51 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 23(6):486–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goudard Y, Gaujoux S, Dokmak S, Cros J, Couvelard A, Palazzo M (2014) Reappraisal of central pancreatectomy: a 12 year-Single center experience. JAMA Surg 149(4):356–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez F, Mesleh MG, Lukens FJ, Wallace MB, Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA (2013) Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy and pancreaticogastrostomy for the management of a proximally migrated pancreatic stent. JOP 14(3):273–276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Michael JG, Jared T, John AC (2004) Pancreaticogastrostomy: a novel application after central pancreatectomy. J Am Coll Surg 198:871–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hong DF, Xin Y, Cai XJ, Peng SY (2012) Application of binding pancreatogastrostomy in laparoscopic central pancreatectomy. World J Surg Oncol 10:223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang R, Xu X, Yan J, Wu D, Ajoodhea H, Mou Y (2013) Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy: preliminary experience with 8 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(11):912–918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sucandy I, Pfeifer CC, Sheldon DG (2010) Laparoscopic assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction—an alternative surgical technique for central pancreatic mass resection. N Am J Med Sci 2(9):438–441

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cunha AS, Rault A, Beau C, Collet D, Masson B (2007) Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy: single institution experience of 6 patients. Surgery 142(3):405–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY, Cai XJ, Mou YP, Liu YB, Li JT (2007) Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245(5):692–698

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng SY, Wang JW, Hong DF, Liu YB, Wang YF (2011) Binding pancreaticoenteric anastomosis: from binding pancreaticojejunostomy to binding pancreaticogastrostomy. Updates Surg 63(2):69–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138(1):8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guillemin P, Bessot M (1957) Chronic calcifying pancreatitis in renal tuberculosis: pancreatojejunostomy using an original technic. Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 83(27–28):869–871

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. DiNorcia J, Ahmed L, Lee MK, Reavey PL, Yakaitis EA, Lee JA (2010) Better preservation of endocrine function after central versus distal pancreatectomy for mid-gland lesions. Surgery 148(6):1247–1256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Adham M, Giunippero A, Hervieu V, Courbière M, Partensky C (2008) Central pancreatectomy: single-center experience of 50 cases. Arch Surg 143(2):175–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Crippa S, Bassi C, Warshaw AL, Falconi M, Partelli S, Thayer SP (2007) Middle pancreatectomy: indications, short- and long-term operative outcomes. Ann Surg 246(1):69–76

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sauvanet A, Partensky C, Sastre B, Gigot JF, Fagniez GL, Tuech JJ, Millat B, Berdah S, Dousset B, Jaeck D, Treut YP, Letoublon C (2002) Medial pancreatectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 53 patients by the French Pancreas Club. Surgery 132(5):836–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A, Alves A, Lubrano J (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 261(5):882–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the fund of the Key Project of the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province: the establishment, evaluation and personalized application of binding pancreatojejunostomy/binding pancreatogastrostomy, Fund No: 2013C03046, the Key Funds for the Platform of Medicine of the Health and Family Planning Commission of Zhejiang Province, Nos: 2013ZDA004 and 2015127995, the fund from the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province, No: 2015C33112 and the fund from the Education Department of Heilongjiang Province Government, No: 12511245.

Disclosures

Drs. Defei Hong, Yingbin Liu, Shuyou Peng, Xiaodong Sun, Zhifei Wang, Jian Cheng, Guoliang Shen, Yuanbiao Zhang and Dongsheng Huang have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhifei Wang or Dongsheng Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, D., Liu, Y., Peng, S. et al. Binding pancreaticogastrostomy in laparoscopic central pancreatectomy: a novel technique in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Surg Endosc 30, 715–720 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4265-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4265-z

Keywords

Navigation