Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic electrocautery dilation of benign anastomotic colonic strictures: a single-center experience

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Benign anastomotic colonic stenosis sometimes occur after surgery and usually require surgical or endoscopic dilation. Endoscopic dilation of anastomotic colonic strictures by using balloon or bougie-type dilators has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in multiple uncontrolled series. However, few data are available on safety and efficacy of endoscopic electrocautery dilation. The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate safety and efficacy of endoscopic electrocautery dilation of postsurgical benign anastomotic colonic strictures.

Methods

Sixty patients (37 women; median age 63.6 years, range 22.6–81.7) with benign anastomotic colonic or rectal strictures treated with endoscopic electrocautery dilation between June 2001 and February 2013 were included in the study. Anastomotic stricture was defined as a narrowed anastomosis through which a standard colonoscope could not be passed. Only annular anastomotic strictures were considered suitable for electrocautery dilation which consisted of radial incisions performed with a precut sphincterotome. Treatment was considered successful if the colonic anastomosis could be passed by a standard colonoscope immediately after dilation. Recurrence was defined as anastomotic stricture reappearance during follow-up.

Results

The time interval between colorectal surgery and the first endoscopic evaluation or symptoms development was 7.3 months (1.3–60.7). Electrocautery dilation was successful in all the patients. There were no procedure-related complications. Median follow-up was 35.5 months (2.0–144.0). Anastomotic stricture recurrence was observed in three patients who were successfully treated with electrocautery dilation and Savary dilation.

Conclusions

Endoscopic electrocautery dilation is a safe and effective treatment for annular benign anastomotic postsurgical colonic strictures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luchtefeld AM, Milsom JW, Senagore A, Surrell JA, Mazier WP (1989) Colorectal anastomotic stenosis: results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum 32:733–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Irvin TT, Goligher JC (1973) Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 60:461–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morgenstern L (1981) The intestinal anastomosis with the end-to-end stapling instrument. Progress and problems, 1980. Arch Surg 166:141–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Waxman BP (1983) Large bowel anastomoses. II. The circular staplers. Br J Surg 70:64–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Araujo SE, Furtado Costa A (2008) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation of benign anastomotic strictures after oncologic anterior rectal resection. Report on 24 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 18:565–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Belvedere B, Frattaroli S, Crabone A, Viceconte G (2012) Anastomotic strictures in colorectal surgery: treatment with endoscopic balloon dilation. G Chir 33:243–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Werre A, Mulder C, van Heteren C, Bilgen ES (2000) Dilation of benign strictures following low anterior resection using Savary–Gilliard bougies. Endoscopy 32(5):385–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brandimarte G, Tursi A, Gasbarrini G (2000) Endoscopic treatment of benign anastomotic colorectal stenosis with electrocautery. Endoscopy 32(6):461–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Polese L, Vecchiato M, Frigo AC, Sarzo G, Cadrobbi R, Rizzato R, Bressan A, Merigliano S (2012) Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic stenoses and their impact on quality of life: what are the lessons to learn? Colorectal Dis 14(3):e124–e128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bouvier AM, Latournerie M, Jooste V, Lepage C, Cottet V, Faivre J (2008) The lifelong risk of metachronous colorectal cancer justifies long-term colonoscopic follow-up. Eur J Cancer 44:522–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlegel RD, Dheni N, Parc R, Caplin S, Tiret E (2001) Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. Dis Colon Rectum 44:146–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pietropaolo V, Masoni L, Ferrara M, Montori A (1990) Endoscopic dilation of colonic postoperative strictures. Surg Endosc 4:26–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Ivana Bravi, Davide Ravizza, Giancarla Fiori, Darina Tamayo, Cristina Trovato, Giuseppe De Roberto and Chiara Genco have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. Dr. Crosta is consultant and teacher of Pentax Education Center in Milan. The European Institute of Oncology receives an unrestricted grant by Pentax Italia to undertake research activities and training programs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivana Bravi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bravi, I., Ravizza, D., Fiori, G. et al. Endoscopic electrocautery dilation of benign anastomotic colonic strictures: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 30, 229–232 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4191-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4191-0

Keywords

Navigation