Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic predictors for undifferentiated histology in differentiated gastric neoplasms prior to endoscopic resection

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is often a discrepancy between results from endoscopic forceps biopsy and resected specimen. We aimed to identify endoscopic predictors for undifferentiated histology in differentiated gastric neoplasms prior to endoscopic resection.

Methods

Medical records of the patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for biopsy-proven differentiated gastric neoplasms at Seoul National University Hospital between July 2005 and July 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The lesions were divided into two groups based on the final histologic result of ESD: differentiated adenocarcinoma (DA group) and undifferentiated histology (UDH group). The discordant rate, clinicopathologic characteristics, and endoscopic factors were analyzed.

Results

A total of 1641 early gastric cancers from 1615 patients were included. Of these, 1556 (94.8 %) were diagnosed as DA and 85 (5.2 %) as UDH. The mean age was significantly lower, and number of women was higher in the UDH group than in the DA group. On multivariate analysis, age <65 years [odds ratio (OR) 1.75, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.10–2.80], female sex (OR 3.19, 95 % CI 2.00–5.08), endoscopic size >10 mm (OR 1.81, 95 % CI 1.12–2.92), depressed type (OR 2.85, 95 % CI 1.56–5.21), nodularity (OR 2.83, 95 % CI 1.59–5.05), and whitish discoloration (OR 19.64, 95 % CI 6.98–55.25) were independent predictors.

Conclusions

Female sex, age <65 years, large endoscopic size, depressed morphology, surface nodularity, and whitish discoloration were predictors for UDH. Meticulous attention should be paid to the lesions with these endoscopic predictors for determining the risk of UDH prior to endoscopic resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamilton JP, Meltzer SJ (2006) A review of the genomics of gastric cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(4):416–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. http://www.index.go.kr. Accessed 4 Sep 2014

  3. Siewert JR (2005) Gastric cancer: the dispute between East and West. Gastric Cancer 8(2):59–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi IJ (2009) Gastric cancer screening and diagnosis. Korean J Gastroenterol 54(2):67–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I, Mouri R, Hirata M, Kawamura T, Yoshihara M, Chayama K (2006) Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 64(6):877–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oda I, Saito D, Tada M, Iishi H, Tanabe S, Oyama T, Doi T, Otani Y, Fujisaki J, Ajioka Y, Hamada T, Inoue H, Gotoda T, Yoshida S (2006) A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 9(4):262–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N, Fukuda E, Ikeda K, Nishiyama H, Ohnita K, Mizuta Y, Shiozawa J, Kohno S (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut 58(3):331–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim BJ, Chang TH, Kim JJ, Min BH, Lee JH, Son HJ, Rhee PL, Rhee JC, Kim KM, Park CK (2010) Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in patients with comorbid diseases. Gut Liver 4(2):186–191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14(2):113–123

  10. Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, Ono H, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, Kato Y (2000) Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer 3(4):219–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim CG (2013) Tissue acquisition in gastric epithelial tumor prior to endoscopic resection. Clin Endosc 46(5):436–440

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim CG, Lee JY, Kook MC, Park S, Ryu KW, Lee JH, Kim YW (2011) Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia: an analysis using the Vienna classification. Endoscopy 43(6):465–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi CW, Kim HW, Shin DH, Kang DH, Hong YM, Park JH, Park SB, Cho M, Lee JH (2014) The risk factors for discrepancy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric category 3 lesion (low grade dysplasia). Dig Dis Sci 59(2):421–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee CK, Chung IK, Lee SH, Kim SP, Lee SH, Lee TH, Kim HS, Park SH, Kim SJ, Lee JH, Cho HD, Oh MH (2010) Is endoscopic forceps biopsy enough for a definitive diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25(9):1507–1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takao M, Kakushima N, Takizawa K, Tanaka M, Yamaguchi Y, Matsubayashi H, Kusafuka K, Ono H (2012) Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens. Gastric Cancer 15(1):91–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huh CW, da Jung H, Kim JH, Lee YC, Kim H, Kim H, Yoon SO, Youn YH, Park H, Lee SI, Choi SH, Cheong JH, Noh SH (2013) Signet ring cell mixed histology may show more aggressive behavior than other histologies in early gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 107(2):124–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shim CN, Kim H, Kim DW, Chung HS, Park JC, Lee H, Shin SK, Lee SK, Lee YC (2014) Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes of histologic discrepancy between differentiated and undifferentiated types after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 28(7):2097–2105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jung DH, Park YM, Kim JH, Lee YC, Youn YH, Park H, Lee SI, Kim JW, Choi SH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH (2013) Clinical implication of endoscopic gross appearance in early gastric cancer: revisited. Surg Endosc 27(10):3690–3695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kang HY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS (2010) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 24(3):509–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kwon KJ, Shim KN, Song EM, Choi JY, Kim SE, Jung HK, Jung SA (2014) Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach. Gastric Cancer 17(1):43–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi J, Kim SG, Yoon H, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2014) Eradication of Helicobacter pylori after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors does not reduce incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12(5):793–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Japanese Gastric Cancer A (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14(2):101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Participants in the Paris Workshop (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58:S3–S43

  24. Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Jameson JL, Loscalzo J (2011) Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, ed 18. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yoon H, Kim SG, Choi J, Im JP, Kim JS, Kim WH, Jung HC (2013) Risk factors of residual or recurrent tumor in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 27(5):1561–1568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bowman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND (2010) WHO classification of tumours of the disgestive system, vol 3. WHO, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tanaka M, Ono H, Hasuike N, Takizawa K (2008) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. Digestion 77(Suppl 1):23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lim H, Jung HY, Park YS, Na HK, Ahn JY, Choi JY, Lee JH, Kim MY, Choi KS, Kim DH, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH, Kim JH (2014) Discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia. Surg Endosc 28(4):1256–1262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim JH, Lee YC, Kim H, Song KH, Lee SK, Cheon JH, Kim H, Hyung WJ, Noh SH, Kim CB, Chung JB (2009) Endoscopic resection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 69(4):e1–e9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ye BD, Kim SG, Lee JY, Kim JS, Yang HK, Kim WH, Jung HC, Lee KU, Song IS (2008) Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis and endoscopic treatment strategies for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(1):46–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim HM, Pak KH, Chung MJ, Cho JH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH, Kim CB, Lee YC, Song SY, Lee SK (2011) Early gastric cancer of signet ring cell carcinoma is more amenable to endoscopic treatment than is early gastric cancer of poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma in select tumor conditions. Surg Endosc 25(9):3087–3093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Grant from the Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine.

Disclosures

Ji Min Choi, Sang Gyun Kim, Hyo-Joon Yang, Joo Hyun Lim, Jeongmin Choi, Jong Pil Im, Joo Sung Kim, Woo Ho Kim, and Hyun Chae Jung have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang Gyun Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, J.M., Kim, S.G., Yang, HJ. et al. Endoscopic predictors for undifferentiated histology in differentiated gastric neoplasms prior to endoscopic resection. Surg Endosc 30, 89–98 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4165-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4165-2

Keywords

Navigation