Skip to main content
Log in

Revisions after failed gastric band: sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic gastric band is an appealing bariatric operation due to its simplicity and good short-term outcomes; however, it is associated with complications (slippage, erosion, prolapse) and failure in reaching target weight loss. This study describes our experience with failed gastric bands that required a revisional procedure.

Materials and Methods

This single-center retrospective analysis includes all consecutive patients who underwent a gastric band removal and revisional surgery in our hospital from January 2008 to June 2014. A total of 81 patients were identified and divided in three groups: Group one included patients who just had the gastric band removed (43), group two consisted of patients who underwent a conversion to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (26), and group three included patients who required a conversion to Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (12). Patient demographics, date of gastric band placement, indications for revision, postoperative morbidity and mortality, operating time, blood loss, length of stay, and % excess weight loss (%EWL) were recorded. Perioperative and clinical outcomes were compared between conversions to SG and RYGB.

Results

In group two (n = 26), 21 conversions to SG were performed in concurrence with the band removal as a one-stage operation, while five procedures were performed in two-stages. There were no complications and no case was converted to open. Patients who underwent a one-stage procedure had a longer operative time, although it did not reach statistical significance. In group three, 12 patients underwent a conversion to RYGB as a revisional operation; 11 were performed as a one-stage procedure and only one patient underwent a two-stage procedure.

Conclusions

SG and RYGB are safe options to revise a failed gastric band. Both groups who received either a SG or RYGB had a low complication rate and acceptable %EWL with no statistical difference between the two.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khaodhiar L, McCowen KC, Blackburn GL (1999) Obesity and its comorbid conditions. Clin Cornerstone 2(3):17–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frezza EE, Wachtel MS (2009) The economic impact of morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 23(4):677–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Guh DP et al (2009) The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 9:88

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kashyap SR et al (2010) Bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes: weighing the impact for obese patients. Cleve Clin J Med 77(7):468–476

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer L et al (2012) Excessive weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Obes Surg 22(5):721–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sjostrom L et al (2004) Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 351(26):2683–2693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chapman AE et al (2004) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: a systematic literature review. Surgery 135(3):326–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boza C et al (2011) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB): surgical results and 5-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 25(1):292–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tice JA et al (2008) Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med 121(10):885–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elnahas A et al (2013) Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27(3):740–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Colquitt JL et al (2009) Surgery for obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003641

  12. Kellogg TA et al (2009) Patterns of readmission and reoperation within 90 days after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5(4):416–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ardestani A, Lautz DB, Tavakkolizadeh A (2011) Band revision versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion as salvage operation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis 7(1):33–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vella M, Galloway DJ (2003) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for severe obesity. Obes Surg 13(4):642–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hii MW et al (2012) Laparoscopic conversion of failed gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short-term follow-up and technical considerations. Obes Surg 22(7):1022–1028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Suter M et al (2006) A 10-year experience with laparoscopic gastric banding for morbid obesity: high long-term complication and failure rates. Obes Surg 16(7):829–835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chevallier JM et al (2004) Complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity: experience with 1,000 patients over 7 years. Obes Surg 14(3):407–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dargent J (2005) Esophageal dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: definition and strategy. Obes Surg 15(6):843–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Angrisani L et al (2003) Lap Band adjustable gastric banding system: the Italian experience with 1863 patients operated on 6 years. Surg Endosc 17(3):409–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cherian PT et al (2010) Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a retrospective analysis of 865 patients over 5 years. Surg Endosc 24(8):2031–2038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moore R et al (2009) Early results of conversion of laparoscopic adjustable gastric band to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5(4):439–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Nieuwenhove Y et al (2011) Conversion from band to bypass in two steps reduces the risk for anastomotic strictures. Obes Surg 21(4):501–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Langer FB et al (2008) Inadequate weight loss vs secondary weight regain: laparoscopic conversion from gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 18(11):1381–1386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Must A et al (1999) The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA 282(16):1523–1529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Foletto M et al (2010) Sleeve gastrectomy as revisional procedure for failed gastric banding or gastroplasty. Surg Obes Relat Dis 6(2):146–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stroh C et al (2014) Is a one-step sleeve gastrectomy indicated as a revision procedure after gastric banding? Data analysis from a quality assurance study of the surgical treatment of obesity in Germany. Obes Surg 24(1):9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Silecchia G et al (2013) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure for failed laparoscopic gastric banding with a “2-step approach: a multicenter study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10(4):626–631

  28. Yanovski SZ, Yanovski JA (2014) Long-term drug treatment for obesity: a systematic and clinical review. JAMA 311(1):74–86

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernante P et al (2006) Feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revision procedure for prior laparoscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg 16(10):1327–1330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Acholonu E et al (2009) Safety and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional approach for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg 19(12):1612–1616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Utech M et al (2013) Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Revision Procedure for Failed Gastric Banding. Zentralbl Chir 139(1):79–82

  32. Marin-Perez P et al (2014) Outcomes after laparoscopic conversion of failed adjustable gastric banding to sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Br J Surg 101(3):254–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No grant funding was obtained for this study.

Disclosures

Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia, Mario Masrur, Kristin Patton, Vivek Bindal, Shravan Sarvepalli and Enrique Elli have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonzalez-Heredia, R., Masrur, M., Patton, K. et al. Revisions after failed gastric band: sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 29, 2533–2537 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3995-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3995-7

Keywords

Navigation