Skip to main content
Log in

The diagnostic value of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and detection of pepsin and bile acids in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and exhaled breath condensate for identifying lung transplantation patients with GERD-induced aspiration

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is thought to lead to aspiration and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation. Unfortunately, the identification of patients with GERD who aspirate still lacks clear diagnostic indicators. The authors hypothesized that symptoms of GERD and detection of pepsin and bile acids in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) are effective for identifying lung transplantation patients with GERD-induced aspiration.

Methods

From November 2009 to November 2010, 85 lung transplantation patients undergoing surveillance bronchoscopy were prospectively enrolled. For these patients, self-reported symptoms of GERD were correlated with levels of pepsin and bile acids in BAL and EBC and with GERD status assessed by 24-h pH monitoring. The sensitivity and specificity of pepsin and bile acids in BAL and EBC also were compared with the presence of GERD in 24-h pH monitoring.

Results

The typical symptoms of GERD (heartburn and regurgitation) had modest sensitivity and specificity for detecting GERD and aspiration. The atypical symptoms of GERD (aspiration and bronchitis) showed better identification of aspiration as measured by detection of pepsin and bile acids in BAL. The sensitivity and specificity of pepsin in BAL compared with GERD by 24-h pH monitoring were respectively 60 and 45 %, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of bile acids in BAL were 67 and 80 %.

Conclusions

These data indicate that the measurement of pepsin and bile acids in BAL can provide additional data for identifying lung transplantation patients at risk for GERD-induced aspiration compared with symptoms or 24-h pH monitoring alone. These results support a diagnostic role for detecting markers of aspiration in BAL, but this must be validated in larger studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilkes DS, Egan TM, Reynolds HY (2005) Lung transplantation: opportunities for research and clinical advancement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172:944

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Christie JD, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, Benden C, Dobbels F, Kirk R, Rahmel AO, Stehlik J, Hertz MI (2011) Registry for the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-eighth official adult lung and heart/lung transplantation report—2011. J Heart Lung Transplant 30:1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown RS, Rush SH, Rosen HR (2004) Liver and intestine transplantation. Am J Transplant 4(Suppl 9):81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wynn JJ, Distant DA, Pirsch JD (2004) Kidney and pancreas transplantation. Am J Transplant 4(Suppl 9):72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pierson RN III, Barr ML, McCullough KP (2004) Thoracic organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 4(Suppl 9):93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Young LR, Hadjiliadis D, Davis RD, Palmer SM (2003) Lung transplantation exacerbates gastroesophageal reflux disease. Chest 124:1689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisichella PM, Davis CS, Lundberg PW, Lowery E, Burnham E, Alex CG, Ramirez L, Pelletiere K, Love RB, Kuo PC, Kovacs EJ (2011) The protective role of laparoscopic antireflux surgery against aspiration of pepsin after lung transplantation. Surgery 150:598–606

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Horvath I, Hunt J, Barnes PJ (2005) Exhaled breath condensate: methodological recommendations and unresolved questions. Eur Respir J 26:523–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raymondos K, Leuwer M, Haslam PL, Vangerow B, Ensink M, Tschorn H, Piepenbrock S (1999) Compositional, structural, and functional alterations in pulmonary surfactant in surgical patients after the early onset of systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis. Crit Care Med 27:82–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blondeau K, Mertens V, Vanaudenaerde BA, Verleden GM, Van Raemdonck DE, Sifrim D, Dupont LJ (2008) Gastro-oesophageal reflux and gastric aspiration in lung transplant patients with or without chronic rejection. Eur Respir J 31:707–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis CS, Shankaran V, Kovacs EJ, Gagermeier J, Dilling D, Alex CG, Love RB, Sinacore J, Fisichella PM (2010) Gastroesophageal reflux disease after lung transplantation: pathophysiology and implications for treatment. Surgery 148:737–744 discussion 744–745

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson LF, Demeester TR (1974) Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring of the distal esophagus: a quantitative measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 62:325–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oelschlager BK, Chang L, Pope CE II, Pellegrini CA (2005) Typical GERD symptoms and esophageal pH monitoring are not enough to diagnose pharyngeal reflux. J Surg Res 128:55–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1983) A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839–843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koufman JA (1991) The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope 101(4 Pt 2 Suppl. 53):1–78

    Google Scholar 

  16. Valentine VG, Robbins RC, Berry GJ, Patel HR, Reichenspurner H, Reitz BA, Theodore J (1996) Actuarial survival of heart-lung and bilateral sequential lung transplant recipients with obliterative bronchiolitis. J Heart Lung Transplant 15:371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Without the dedicated assistance of research nurses, clinical nurses, and respiratory therapists this prospectively designed study would not have been possible. We especially thank Drs. Charles G. Alex, Daniel Dilling, James Gagermeier, and Brian Canavan for their assistance with this study. P. Marco Fisichella received the 2011 SAGES Research Grant Award for the study entitled “A Noninvasive Test to Detect Markers of Aspiration After Lung Transplantation,” of which this is the final report. Elizabeth J. Kovacs support from the Dr. Ralph and Marian C. Falk Medical Research Trust and the NIH AA013527.

Disclosures

Nicholas P. Reder, Christopher S. Davis, Elizabeth J. Kovacs, and P. Marco Fisichella have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Marco Fisichella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reder, N.P., Davis, C.S., Kovacs, E.J. et al. The diagnostic value of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and detection of pepsin and bile acids in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and exhaled breath condensate for identifying lung transplantation patients with GERD-induced aspiration. Surg Endosc 28, 1794–1800 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3388-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3388-3

Keywords

Navigation