Skip to main content
Log in

A proposed classification for uniform endoscopic description of surgical fundoplication

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Objective assessment of postfundoplication anatomy is of utmost importance especially if reoperative intervention is being planned. There is a lack of uniformity in the description of endoscopic findings in these patients. The purpose of this study was to propose a classification for standardized endoscopic reporting of postfundoplication anatomy.

Methods

After institutional review board approval, preoperative endoscopic findings of patients who underwent reoperative intervention from 1992 to 2011 were reviewed and classified. The classification included four factors: E (distance of GEJ to crus), S (amount of gastric tissue between the GEJ and fundoplication), F (fundoplication configuration), and P (paraesophageal hernia).

Results

The endoscopic findings of 310 patients who underwent reoperative antireflux surgery were classified using the newly proposed classification model. A significant increase in the number of procedures was noted over the years. There was no change in presenting symptoms and patterns of failure over the years. The classification model was easily applicable to previous endoscopy reports. There was good symptom association with our classification model.

Discussion

An endoscopic anatomical classification is proposed for description of failed fundoplication. With this classification, we hope to fill the gap in developing a uniform classification of failed fundoplications. Further studies addressing widespread applicability and outcome analysis are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jay AP, Watson DI (2010) Changing work patterns for benign upper gastrointestinal and biliary disease: 1994–2007. ANZ J Surg 80(7–8):519–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Finks JF, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD (2006) The rise and fall of antireflux surgery in the United States. Surg Endosc 20(11):1698–1701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spechler SJ (2004) The management of patients who have “failed” antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 99(3):552–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Juhasz A, Sundaram A, Hoshino M, Lee TH, Mittal SK (2011) Endoscopic assessment of failed fundoplication—a case for standardization. Surg Endosc 25(12):3761–3766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Broeders JA, Rijnhart-de Jong HG, Draaisma WA, Bredenoord AJ, Smout AJ, Gooszen HG (2009) Ten-year outcome of laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication: randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 250(5):698–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Galvani C, Fisichella PM, Gorodner MV, Perretta S, Patti MG (2003) Symptoms are a poor indicator of reflux status after fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: role of esophageal functions tests. Arch Surg 138(5):514–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furnee EJ, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA, Gooszen HG (2009) Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1539–1549

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khajanchee YS, O’Roukre R, Cassera MA, Gatta P, Hansen PD, Swanström LL (2007) Laparoscopic reintervention for failed antireflux surgery. Arch Surg 142(8):785–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hunter JG, Smith CD, Braunum GD, Waring JP, Trus TL, Cornwell M, Galloway K (1999) Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision. Ann Surg 230(4):595–606

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jobe BA, Kahrilas PJ, Vernon AH, Sandone C, Gopal DV, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Hill LD, Hunter JG (2004) Endoscopic appraisal of the gastroesophageal valve after antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 99(2):233–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Iqbal A, Awad Z, Simkins J, Shah R, Haider M, Salinas V, Turaga K, Karu A, Mittal SK, Filipi CJ (2006) Repair of 104 failed anti-reflux operations. Ann Surg 244(1):42–51

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Legner A, Tsuboi K, Bathla L, Lee TH, Morrow LE, Mittal SK (2011) Reoperative antireflux surgery for dysphagia. Surg Endosc 25(4):1160–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Juhasz A, Sundaram A, Hoshino M, Lee TH, Mittal SK (2012) Outcomes of surgical management of symptomatic large recurrent hiatus hernia. Surg Endosc 26(6):1501–1508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoshino M, Srinivasan A, Mittal SK (2012) High-resolution manometry patterns of lower esophageal sphincter complex in symptomatic post-fundoplication patients. J Gastrointest Surg 16(4):705–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mittal SK, Legner A, Tsuboi K, Juhasz A, Bathla L, Lee TH (2012) Roux-en-Y reconstruction is superior to redo fundoplication in a subset of patients with failed anti-reflux surgery. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2537-4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Mittal, Juhasz, Ramanan, Hoshino, Lee, and Filipi have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arpad Juhasz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mittal, S.K., Juhasz, A., Ramanan, B. et al. A proposed classification for uniform endoscopic description of surgical fundoplication. Surg Endosc 28, 1103–1109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3282-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3282-z

Keywords

Navigation