Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: experience of 22 cases

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery has gradually expanded its applications to include pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the benefits of the laparoscopic approach are still debated. This article aims to present data regarding the efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a single center.

Methods

From March 2003 to June 2010, a total of 22 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with a totally laparoscopic approach, using a five-trocar technique. Reconstruction of the digestive tract was adapted to the aspect of the pancreatic stump, with 6 patients having Wirsung duct occlusion and 16 patients pancreaticodigestive anastomosis. Patient selection, short-term outcomes, oncologic results, and technical issues were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Mean operative time was 392 (range, 327–570) min. Conversion was required in 2 patients (9.1 %) as a result of bleeding and difficult dissection. Major intraoperative complications included an injury to the right hepatic artery (4.5 %). Postoperative mortality was 4.5 %. Surgery-related morbidity occurred in 14 patients (63.6 %) and included bleeding (n = 5), pancreatic fistula (n = 6), biliary fistula (n = 2), and dumping syndrome (n = 1). Pancreatic fistulas occurred in 4 patients with duct occlusion and in 2 patients with pancreaticojejunostomy, and they all healed with conservative treatment. Mean hospital stay was 23 (range, 12–35) days. Pathologic diagnoses were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 11), ampullary adenocarcinoma (n = 8), and duodenal adenocarcinoma (n = 3). The resection margins were all free from disease; the mean number of collected lymph nodes was 15 (range, 14–20).

Conclusions

The complexity of pancreaticoduodenectomy entails some issues, including patient selection and management of the pancreatic stump, that are not related to the approach used. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is feasible, safe, and oncologically adequate, but only if performed in selected cases by highly skilled laparoscopic surgeons. Laparoscopy does not provide any significant advantage over traditional surgery, but it may improve postoperative outcomes in the so-called excellence centers, once the learning curve has been overcome. Multicenter randomized trials are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gagner M, Palermo M (2009) Laparoscopic Wipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:726–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Vaithiswaran V, Senthilnathlan P, Parthasarathi R, Praveen Raj P (2009) Evolution in techniques of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a decade long experience from a tertiery center. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:731–740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura Y, Uchida E, Nomura T, Aimoto T, Matsumoto S, Tajiri T (2009) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: some benefits of evolving surgical techniques. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:741–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Backlund DC, Berlin JD, Parikh AA (2010) Update on adjuvant trials for pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19:391–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Doucas H, Sutton CD, Zimmerman A, Dennison AR, Berry DP (2007) Assessment of pancreatic malignancy with laparoscopy and intraoperative ultrasound. Surg Endosc 21:1147–1152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 92:539–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Suc B, Msika S, Piccinini M (2004) Octreotide in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications following elective pancreatic resection: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 139:288–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Corcione F, Miranda L, Settembre A, Capasso P, Piccolboni D, Cusano D, Bakhtri M, Manzi F (2007) Open Veress assisted technique. Results in 2700 cases. Minerva Chir 62:443–446

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Piccolboni D, Ciccone F, Settembre A, Corcione F (2008) The role of echo-laparoscopy in abdominal surgery: five years’ experience in a dedicated center. Surg Endosc 22:112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Glanemann M, Shi B, Liang F, Gang-Sun X, Bahara M, Jacob D, Neumann U, Neuhaus P (2008) Surgical strategies of treatment of malignant pancreatic tumors: extended, standard or local surgery? World J Surg Oncol 6:123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takaori K, Tanigawa N (2007) Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: the past, present, and the future. Surg Today 37:535–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fortner JG (1973) Regional resection of cancer of the pancreas: a new surgical approach. Surgery 73:307–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reddy SK, Tyler DS, Pappas TN, Clary BM (2007) Extended resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Oncologist 12:654–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fortner JG, Kim DK, Cubilla A, Turnbull A, Pahnke LD, Shils ME (1977) Regional pancreatectomy: en bloc pancreatic, portal vein and lymph node resection. Ann Surg 186:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pedrazzoli S, Di Carlo V, Dionigi R, Mosca F, Pederzoli P, Pasquali C, Kloppel G, Dhaene K, Michelassi F (1998) Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy study group. Ann Surg 228:508–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chu CK, Kooby DA (2010) Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 19:311–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakeeb A (2009) Laparoscopic pancreatic resections. Adv Surg 43:91–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandez-Cruz L (2006) Distal pancreatic resection: technical differences between open and laparoscopic approaches. HPB 8:49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ammori BJ, Ayiomamitis GD (2011) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 25:2084–2099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Mahaina A (2006) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases. Surg Endosc 20:1045–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Paye F (2010) The pancreatic stump after pancreatoduodenectomy: the “Achilles’ heel” revisited. J Vasc Surg 147:e13–e20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kleespies A, Albertsmeier M, Obeidat F, Seeliger H, Jauch KW, Bruns CJ (2008) The challenge of pancreatic anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:459–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP, Sauter PK, Bower-Cherry M, Dutkevitch S, Hyslop T, Schmidt CM, Rosato EL, Lavu H, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y, Wang WM, Wan YL, Huang YT (2005) Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 11:2456–2461

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Benzoni E, Zompicchiatti A, Saccomano E, Lorenzin D, Baccarani U, Adani G, Noce L, Uzzau A, Cedolini C, Bresadola F, Intini S (2008) Postoperative complications linked to pancreaticoduodenectomy. An analysis of pancreatic stump management. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 17:43–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tran K, Van Eijck C, Di Carlo V, Hop WC, Zerbi A, Balzano G, Jeekel H (2002) Occlusion of the pancreatic duct versus pancreaticojejunostomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 236:422–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Farsi M, Boffi B, Cantafio S, Miranda E, Bencini L, Moretti R (2007) Treatment of the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Wirsung duct occlusion versus pancreaticojejunostomy. Minerva Chir 62:225–233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimada K, Sano T, Sakamoto Y, Kosuge T (2005) Safe management of the pancreatic remnant with prolamine duct occlusion after extended pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1874–1877

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakao A, Takeda S, Inoue S, Nomoto S, Kanazumi N, Sugimoto H, Fujii T (2006) Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 30:976–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim SC, Park KT, Hwang JW, Shin HC, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Han DJ (2008) Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes for laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection and open distal pancreatic resection at a single institution. Surg Endosc 22:2261–2268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pugliese R, Scandroglio I, Sansonna F, Maggioni D, Costanzi A, Citterio D, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, Magistro C (2008) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:13–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Kooby DA (2009) Should all distal pancreatectomies performed laparoscopically? Adv Surg 43:283–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Corcione F, Cuccurullo D, Pirozzi F, Marzano E, Caracino V (2005) Duodenopancreatectomie cephalique: experience laparoscopique preliminaire relative a quatre cas consecutifs. JCC 56:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee G, Park AC (2008) Development of a more robust tool for postural stability analysis of laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 22:1087–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnston WK 3rd, Hollenback BK, Wolf JS Jr (2005) Comparison of neuromuscular injuries to the surgeon during hand-assisted and standard laparoscopic urologic surgery. J Endourol 19:377–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Prof. F. Corcione and Drs. F. Pirozzi, D. Cuccurullo, D. Piccolboni, V. Caracino, F. Galante, D. Cusano, and A. Sciuto have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Corcione.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corcione, F., Pirozzi, F., Cuccurullo, D. et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: experience of 22 cases. Surg Endosc 27, 2131–2136 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2728-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2728-z

Keywords

Navigation