Skip to main content
Log in

Anatomical measurements to optimize instrumentation for transvaginal surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Use of rigid instruments via transvaginal (TV) route has been proposed as a practical alternative to natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using flexible devices. However, its safety has not been fully evaluated for each abdominal organ with different positional relationship to the vagina. The aim of this study is to obtain baseline anatomical data necessary for safer use of rigid TV instruments, by three-dimensional (3-D) radiologic measurements.

Patients and methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 51 consecutive female Japanese patients with aortic aneurysm who underwent whole-body multidetector computed tomography as preoperative evaluation. The gallbladder (GB), esophagogastric junction (EGJ), and spleen were located on 3-D images, and the following were obtained: (1) the distance from the vagina, (2) the transverse deviation from the midline, and (3) the sagittal deviation from the “vagina–promontory (V–P)” line.

Results

The median distance from the vagina was 26.1 cm for GB, 30.6 cm for EGJ, and 31.1 cm for spleen. The transverse deviation from the midline was 17.7° for GB, 7.0° for EGJ, and 12.9° for spleen. The sagittal deviation from the V–P line was 7.6 degrees for GB, −7.0° for EGJ, and −10.3° for spleen. The percentage of “negative angle” cases, which means that the target is located “below” the V–P line, was only 9.8 % for GB versus 88 % for EGJ and spleen.

Conclusions

The intra-abdominal length of TV instruments should be more than 35 cm in Japanese population. GB is widely deviated from the midline and therefore can be safely approached even with rigid/straight instruments. Access to more midline and distant targets may suffer from interference by the sacral promontory, and be potentially dangerous in terms of risk of compression injury by rigid and straight instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A et al (2011) NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 25:1822–1826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehmann KS, Ritz JP, Wibmer A et al (2010) The German registry for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: report of the first 551 patients. Ann Surg 252:263–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA et al (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39:913–915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buess G, Becerra-Garcia F, Misra MC (2008) Instruments for transluminal laparoscopic surgery or “NOTES”. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17:331–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB et al (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. http://www.dgav.de/english/notes.html (National NOTES registry of the DGAV). Accessed 5 Jul 2012

  7. Horgan S, Cullen JP, Talamini MA et al (2009) Natural orifice surgery: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 23:1512–1518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Becerra Garcia FC, Misra MC, Bhattacharjee HK et al (2009) Experimental trial of transvaginal cholecystectomy: an ex vivo analysis of the learning process for a novel single-port technique. Surg Endosc 23:2242–2249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Santos BF, Hungness ES (2011) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: progress in humans since white paper. World J Gastroenterol 17:1655–1665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakajima K, Nishida T, Takahashi T et al (2009) Partial gastrectomy using natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for gastric submucosal tumors: early experience in humans. Surg Endosc 23:2650–2655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_height. Accessed 26 Oct 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of this article was presented at the 20th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Brussels, Belgium, on 23 June 2012. The authors acknowledge Toru Kuratani, MD and Yoshiki Sawa, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Osaka University, for providing the patient database used in this study. Funding from a Japan NOTES Research Grant 2009 is acknowledged.

Disclosures

Authors Nakajima, Souma, Takahashi, Yamasaki, Miyazaki, Mori, and Doki have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyokazu Nakajima.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakajima, K., Souma, Y., Takahashi, T. et al. Anatomical measurements to optimize instrumentation for transvaginal surgery. Surg Endosc 27, 2052–2057 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2709-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2709-2

Keywords

Navigation