Abstract
Background
Interest in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has expanded, and the first experiences with patients using different techniques have been reported. However, no work has addressed the learning process or the limitations of the procedures. The relation between inexperience and complications became a major concern after the introduction of laparoscopic surgery. This study investigates the learning process for a new technique using specially designed instruments in an ex vivo model before clinical application.
Methods
Specially designed instruments and a single-port technique using the Tuebingen Trainer were used to evaluate instrument and surgeon performance (learning curve) in terms of time and errors. A total of 90 procedures performed by three surgeons were evaluated. Group and individual learning curves were plotted.
Results
All the surgeons showed a reduction in both mean cholecystectomy time (subject A: 27.2 vs 16.6 min; subject B: 21.4 vs 19.22 min; subject C: 21 vs 19.7 min) and mean errors (subject A: 2.8 vs 1.6; subject B: 3.5 vs 2.6; subject C: 3.5 vs 2). A plateau was reached after approximately 15 procedures. Group learning curve analysis showed a significant reduction in time between the first group (mean, 24.97 ± 5.8 min) and last group (mean, 19.30 ± 3.09 min; F[1,28] = 11.83; p = 0.001) for 15 procedures, as well as reduced technical errors in the fifth group, from 3.7 ± 1.65 to 1.6 ± 1.04 (F[1,28] = 8.90; p < 0.01), demonstrating a learning effect. The number of optic and access port position changes were recorded, setting a standard for normal instrument performance.
Conclusion
This study shows that the tasks of cholecystectomy can be learned safely in a reasonable number of simulations with the new instruments. Although this is a new technique, prior laparoscopic surgery experience is helpful. The technique offers an advantage over those using flexible endoscopes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee VS, Chari RS, Cucchiaro G, Meyers WC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165:527–532
Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM, The West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group (1996) Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5,913 cases. Br J Surg 83:11356–11360
Dagash H, Chowdhury M, Pierro A (2003) When can I be proficient in laparoscopic surgery? A systematic review of the evidence. J Ped Surg 38:720–724
Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME, Odze RD, Rattner DW, Thompson CC (2006) Thanscolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 64:428–434
Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Oliveira AL, Carvalho GL, Filgueiras M (2008) NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc 22:542–547
Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–827
Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39:913–915
Burghardt J, Fedelein M, Borchert D, Lippkowski A, Elling D, Gellert K (2008) Transvaginal cholecystectomy: the establishment and use of a new access to the abdominal cavity for visceral surgery (in German). Caduceus News 1:19–25
Buess G, Frimberger E (2007) The dirty way to the gallbladder. Endoscopy 39:893–894
Hunter JG (2007) Invited critique. Arch Surg 142:826–827
Pomp A (2008) Notes on NOTES: the emperor is not wearing any clothes. Surg Endosc 22:283–284
Waseda M, Inaki N, Mailaender L, Buess GF (2005) An innovative trainer for surgical procedures using animal organs. Min Inv Ther Allied Technol 14:262–266
Raestrup H, Mailaender L, Roth K, Manncke K, Buess G (2000) Phantom-training courses in Tuebingen. Min Invas Ther Allied Technol 9:311–314
Buess G, Becerra Garcia FC, Misra MC (2008) Instruments for transluminal laparoscopic surgery or “NOTES.” Min Inv Ther Allied Technol. doi:10.1080/13645700802528041, November 11, 2008
Ramsay CR, Grant AM, Wallace SA, Garthwaite PH, Monk AF, Russell IT (2000) Assessment of the learning curve in health technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16:1095–1108
Waldman JD, Yourstone SA, Smith HL (2003) Learning curves in health care. Health Care Manage Rev 28:41–54
Misra M, Schiff J, Rendon G, Rothschild J, Scwaityberg S (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve: what should we expect? Surg Endosc 19:1266–1271
Voitk AJ, Tsao SGS, Ignatius S (2001) The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 182:250–253
Hamdorf JM, Hall JC (2000) Acquiring surgical skills. Br J Surg 87:28–37
Peterli R, Herzog U, Schuppisser JP, Ackermann C, Tondelli P (2000) The learning curve of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and changes in indications: one institutions’ experience with 2,650 cholecystectomies. J Laparoendosc Adv Surgical Tech 10:13–19
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Phil. Elizabeht Hermann-Decker for her help in reviewing the manuscript. The first author acknowledges the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), from which he currently is receiving a grant for his doctorate studies in Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Becerra Garcia, F.C., Misra, M.C., Bhattacharjee, H.K. et al. Experimental trial of transvaginal cholecystectomy: an ex vivo analysis of the learning process for a novel single-port technique. Surg Endosc 23, 2242–2249 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0296-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0296-z