Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of treatment outcomes of endoscopic stenting for colonic and extracolonic malignant obstruction

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) have been used as a bridging or palliative treatment for malignant colorectal obstruction. Colonic obstruction also may arise from advanced extracolonic malignancy, but the clinical outcomes of stent placement for extracolonic malignancy are unclear. This study compared the clinical outcomes of SEMS between patients with colorectal cancer and those with extracolonic malignancy.

Methods

Patients who underwent endoscopic SEMS placement for a malignant colorectal obstruction were enrolled at Seoul National University Hospital from April 2005 and August 2011. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed in terms of success rate, complications, and duration of stent patency.

Results

Endoscopic SEMS placements were performed for colorectal cancer in 149 patients and for extracolonic malignancy in 60 patients. The causes of obstruction in extracolonic malignancy were advanced gastric cancer in 39 patients (65 %), pancreatic cancer in nine patients (15 %), ovarian cancer in three patients (5 %) and other causes in nine patients (15 %). The clinical success rates were similar between the two groups (92.6 vs 86.7 %; p = 0.688), and multivariate analysis showed no significant risk factor for unsuccessful endoscopic SEMS placement. Reobstruction in palliative endoscopic SEMS placement occurred for 16 patients with colorectal cancer (21.9 %) and 18 patients with extracolonic malignancy (30 %) during a median follow-up period of 90 days (p = 0.288). The rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (4.1 vs 8.3 %; p = 0.467). The median duration of stent patency was 193 ± 42 days for the patients with colorectal cancer and 186 ± 31 days for the patients with extracolonic malignancy (p = 0.253). The duration of stent patency was not affected by underlying malignancy, previous surgery, or palliative chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Endoscopic SEMS placement is highly effective and comparable for palliation of obstruction in extracolonic malignancy and colorectal cancer in terms of clinical success, complications, and duration of patency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buechter KJ et al (1988) Surgical management of the acutely obstructed colon: a review of 127 cases. Am J Surg 156:163–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu SKM et al (1997) Operation in patients with incurable colon cancer: is it worthwhile? Dis Colon Rectum 40:11–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khot U et al (2002) Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of colorectal stents. Br J Surg 89:1096–1102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhardwaj R, Parker M (2003) Palliative therapy of colorectal carcinoma: stent or surgery? Colorectal Dis 5:518–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dohmoto M (1991) New method: endoscopic implantation of rectal stent in palliative treatment of malignant stenosis. Endoscopia Digestiva 3:1507–1512

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee HJ et al (2011) Long-term outcome of palliative therapy for malignant colorectal obstruction in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancers: endoscopic stenting versus surgery. Gastrointest Endosc 73:535–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pothuri B et al (2004) The use of colorectal stents for palliation of large bowel obstruction due to recurrent gynecologic cancer. Gynecol Oncol 95:513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Watson A et al (2005) Outcomes after placement of colorectal stents. Colorectal Dis 7:70–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Im JP et al (2008) Clinical outcomes and patency of self-expanding metal stents in patients with malignant colorectal obstruction: a prospective single center study. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:789–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Faragher I, Chaitowitz I, Stupart D (2008) Long-term results of palliative stenting or surgery for incurable obstructing colon cancer. Colorectal Dis 10:668–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karoui M et al (2007) Stents for palliation of obstructive metastatic colon cancer: impact on management and chemotherapy administration. Arch Surg 142:619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Caceres A et al (2008) Colorectal stents for palliation of large bowel obstructions in recurrent gynecologic cancer: an updated series. Gynecol Oncol 108:482–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jae Shin S et al (2008) Clinical application of self-expandable metallic stent for treatment of colorectal obstruction caused by extrinsic invasive tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 51:578–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keswani RN et al (2009) Stenting for malignant colonic obstruction: a comparison of efficacy and complications in colonic versus extracolonic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 69:675–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sebastian S et al (2004) Pooled analysis of the efficacy and safety of self-expanding metal stenting in malignant colorectal obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol 99:2051–2057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Repici A et al (2007) Ultraflex precision colonic stent placement for palliation of malignant colonic obstruction: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 66:920–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Paúl Díaz L et al (1999) Palliative treatment of malignant colorectal strictures with metallic stents. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 22:29–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Song H et al (2007) A dual-design expandable colorectal stent for malignant colorectal obstruction: results of a multicenter study. Endoscopy 39:448–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tomiki Y et al (2004) Comparison of stent placement and colostomy as palliative treatment for inoperable malignant colorectal obstruction. Surg Endosc 18:1572–1577

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Watt AM et al (2007) Self-expanding metallic stents for relieving malignant colorectal obstruction: a systematic review. Ann Surg 246:24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cho YK et al (2011) Clinical outcome of self-expandable metal stent placement in the management of malignant proximal colon obstruction. Gut Liver 5:165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Ji Yeon Kim, Sang Gyun Kim, Jong Pil Im, Joo Sung Kim, and Hyun Chae Jung have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Yeon Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J.Y., Kim, S.G., Im, J.P. et al. Comparison of treatment outcomes of endoscopic stenting for colonic and extracolonic malignant obstruction. Surg Endosc 27, 272–277 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2439-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2439-5

Keywords

Navigation