Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive techniques are becoming the gold standard approach to surgical treatment of obesity in adults. Robotic surgical systems have the potential to advance the use and development of minimally invasive procedures. To date, there is no study of outcomes following robotic-assisted gastric banding (RAGB) compared with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) in children and adolescents. This study was undertaken to compare a single surgeon’s results using the da Vinci surgical system for RAGB with those using LAGB in this group of patients.
Methods
A retrospective data analysis of 25 patients who underwent RAGB compared with 50 patients who underwent LAGB.
Results
The 75 patients were 8–21 years of age and included 42 (54.5%) girls. Patients in the two groups had similar baseline characteristics including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), and presence of comorbidities. No significant differences in complication rate, length of stay or percent excess weight loss at 1 year were found between the two groups. Mean operating time was significantly shorter for LAGB (50 min) compared with RAGB (74 min; P < 0.001).
Conclusions
This comparative study between RAGB and LAGB in children and adolescents demonstrates the feasibility and safety of RAGB. However, the procedure requires significantly more operative time than LAGB and fails to provide improved patient outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Diodato MD, Damiano RJ Jr (2003) Robotic cardiac surgery: overview. Surg Clin North Am 83:1351–1367
Falk V, Diegler A, Walther T, Autschbach R, Mohr FW (2000) Developments in robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol 15:378–387
Ballantyne GH, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83:1293–1304
Al-Qahtani AR (2007) Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in adolescent: safety and efficacy. J Pediatr Surg 42:894–897
Alqahtani A, Albassam A, Zamakhshary M, Shoukri M, Altokhais T, Aljazairi A, Alzahim A, Mallik M, Alshehri A (2010) Robot-assisted pediatric surgery: how far can we go? World J Surg 34:975–978
Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Billatos ES, Zorn KC, Gong EM, Brendler CB, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology 68:1275–1279
Woo R, Le D, Kim S, Albanese C (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic resection of a type I choldedochal cyst. J Laparoendosc Adv Tech 16:179–183
Goh PMY, Lomanto D, So JBY (2002) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16:216–217
Lorincz A, Langenburg S, Klein MD (2003) Robotics and the pediatric surgeon. Curr Opin Pediatr 15:262–266
Zhou HX, Guo YH, Yu XF, Bao SY, Liu JL, Zhang Y, Ren YG (2006) Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 5:115–118
Chaer RA, Jacobsen G, Elli F, Harris J, Goldstein A, Horgan S (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pediatric Heller’s cardiomyotomy: initial case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 14:270–273
Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R (2005) Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 174:1440–1442
Knight CG, Gidell KM, Lanning D, Lorincz A, Langenburg SE, Klein MD (2005) Laparoscopic Morgagni hernia repair in children using robotic instruments. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 15:482–486
Chandra V, Dutta S, Albanese CT (2006) Surgical robotics and image guided therapy in pediatric surgery: emerging and converging minimal access technologies. Semin Pediatr Surg 15:267–275
Mühlmann G, Klaus A, Kirchmayr W, Wykypiel H, Unger A, Höller E, Nehoda H, Aigner F, Weiss HG (2003) DaVinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic bariatric surgery: is it justified in a routine setting? Obes Surg 13:848–854
Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O, Izizaw R, Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Capelluto E, Bruyns J (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25:1467
Heller K, Gutt C, Schaeff B, Beyer PA, Markus B (2002) Use of the robot system Da Vinci for laparoscopic repair of gastrooesophageal reflux in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12:239–242
Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Bruyns J, Germay O, Leman G, Izizaw R (2001) Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) Nissan fundoplication. Surg Endosc 15:918–923
Disclosure
Author Aayed Alqahtani has no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alqahtani, A. Robotic gastric banding in children and adolescents: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 25, 3647–3651 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1772-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1772-4