Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the standard of care for many conditions requiring removal of the adrenal gland. Previous studies on outcomes after LA have had limitations. This report describes the 30-day morbidity and mortality rates after LA and analyzes factors affecting operative time, hospital length of stay (LOS), and postoperative morbidity.
Methods
Patients undergoing LA in 2007and 2008 were identified from the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Using multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) and logistic regression, 52 demographic/comorbidity variables were analyzed to ascertain factors affecting operative time, LOS, and morbidity.
Results
The mean age of the 988 patients was 53.5 ± 13.7 years, and 60% of the patients were women. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the patients was 31.8 ± 7.9 kg/m2. The 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 6.8% and 0.5%, respectively. The mean and median operative times were 146.7 ± 66.8 min and 134 min, respectively. The mean and median hospital stays were 2.6 ± 3.1 days and 2 days, respectively. Compared with independent status, totally dependent functional status was associated with a 9.5-day increase in LOS (P = 0.0006) and an increased risk for postoperative morbidity (odds ratio [OR], 14.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4–91.9; P < 0.0001). Peripheral vascular disease (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 1.7–31.7; P = 0.008) also was associated with increased 30-day morbidity. Neurologic and respiratory comorbidities were associated with increased LOS (P < 0.05). American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class 4 patients had a longer operative time than ASA class 1 patients (P = 0.002).
Conclusions
The morbidity and mortality rates after LA are low. Dependent functional status and peripheral vascular disease predispose to postoperative morbidity. Dependent status, higher ASA class, and respiratory and neurologic comorbidities are associated with longer operative time and LOS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Saunders BD, Wainess RM, Dimick JB, Upchurch GR, Doherty GM, Gauger PG (2004) Trends in utilization of adrenalectomy in the United States: have indications changed? World J Surg 28:1169–1175
Murphy MM, Witkowski ER, Ng SC, McDade TP, Hill JS, Larkin AC, Whalen GF, Litwin DE, Tseng JF (2010) Trends in adrenalectomy: a recent national review. Surg Endosc. 25 March 2010. [Epub ahead of print]
Park HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA (2009) Outcomes from 3,144 adrenalectomies in the United States: which matters more, surgeon volume or specialty? Arch Surg 144:1060–1067
Song JH, Chaudhry FS, Mayo-Smith WW (2008) The incidental adrenal mass on CT: prevalence of adrenal disease in 1, 049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:1163–1168
Lee J, El-Tamer M, Schifftner T, Turrentine FE, Henderson WG, Khuri S, Hanks JB, Inabnet WB III (2008) Open and laparoscopic adrenalectomy: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 206:953–959
Brunt LM (2002) The positive impact of laparoscopic adrenalectomy on complications of adrenal surgery. Surg Endosc 16:252–257
Hallfeldt KK, Mussack T, Trupka A, Hohenbleicher F, Schmidbauer S (2003) Laparoscopic lateral adrenalectomy versus open posterior adrenalectomy for the treatment of benign adrenal tumors. Surg Endosc 17:264–267
Assalia A, Gagner M (2004) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 91:1259–1274
Kebebew E, Siperstein AE, Duh QY (2001) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the optimal surgical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11:409–413
Siperstein AE, Berber E, Engle KL, Duh QY, Clark OH (2000) Laparoscopic posterior adrenalectomy: technical considerations. Arch Surg 135:967–971
Gallagher SF, Wahi M, Haines KL, Baksh K, Enriquez J, Lee TM, Murr MM, Fabri PJ (2007) Trends in adrenalectomy rates, indications, and physician volume: a statewide analysis of 1,816 adrenalectomies. Surgery 142:1011–1021
Stavrakis AI, Ituarte PH, Ko CY, Yeh MW (2007) Surgeon volume as a predictor of outcomes in inpatient and outpatient endocrine surgery. Surgery 142:887–899
ACS NSQIP PUF (2009) Retrieved from January 2010, http://www.acsnsqip.org/puf/docs/ACS_NSQIP_Participant_User_Data_File_User_Guide.pdf
Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Barbour G, Lowry P, Irvin G, Gibbs J, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Stremple JF (1995) The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. J Am Coll Surg 180:519–531
Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Gibbs JO, Barbour G, Demakis J, Irvin G III, Stremple JF, Grover F, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Fabri PJ, Spencer J, Hammermeister K, Aust JB (1997) Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185:315–327
Daley J, Khuri SF, Henderson W, Hur K, Gibbs JO, Barbour G, Demakis J, Irvin G III, Stremple JF, Grover F, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Fabri PJ, Spencer J, Hammermeister K, Aust JB, Oprian C (1997) Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185:328–340
ACS NSQIP (2010) Retrieved from January 2010, https://acsnsqip.org/documents_section/documents_chapter4.pdf
Best WR, Khuri SF, Phelan M, Hur K, Henderson WG, Demakis JG, Daley J (2002) Identifying patient preoperative risk factors and postoperative adverse events in administrative databases: results from the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 194:257–266
Dimick JB, Welch HG, Birkmeyer JD (2004) Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size. JAMA 292:847–851
Covinsky KE, Justice AC, Rosenthal GE, Palmer RM, Landefeld CS (1997) Measuring prognosis and case mix in hospitalized elders: the importance of functional status. J Gen Intern Med 12:203–208
Zanocchi M, Maero B, Francisetti F, Giona E, Nicola E, Margolicci A, Fabris F (2003) Multidimensional assessment and risk factors for prolonged hospitalization in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res 15:305–309
Crawford RS, Cambria RP, Abularrage CJ, Conrad MF, Lancaster RT, Watkins MT, Lamuraglia GM (2010) Preoperative functional status predicts perioperative outcomes after infrainguinal bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg 51:351–359
Padula CA, Hughes C, Baumhover L (2009) Impact of a nurse-driven mobility protocol on functional decline in hospitalized older adults. J Nurs Care Qual 24:325–331
Arozullah AM, Daley J, Henderson WG, Khuri SF (2000) Multifactorial risk index for predicting postoperative respiratory failure in men after major noncardiac surgery. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 232:242–253
Gupta H, Gupta PK, Kaushik M, Miller WJ, Wichman TO, Schuller D, Morrow LE (2009) Risk factors predicting postoperative pneumonia in surgical patients. Chest 136:6S–6e
Gupta PK, Gupta H, Miller WJ, Cemaj S, Forse RA, Morrow LE (2009) Risk factors predicting postoperative respiratory failure in surgical patients. Chest 136:31S–31b
Chumillas S, Ponce JL, Delgado F, Viciano V, Mateu M (1998) Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications through respiratory rehabilitation: a controlled clinical study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79:5–9
Valeri A, Borrelli A, Presenti L, Lucchese M, Venneri F, Mannelli M, Regio S, Borrelli D (2001) Adrenal masses in neoplastic patients: the role of laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc 15:90–93
Castillo OA, Vitagliano G, Kerkebe M, Parma P, Pinto I, Diaz M (2007) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for suspected metastasis of adrenal glands: our experience. Urology 69:637–641
Ito A, Satoh M, Ohyama C, Saito S, Shintaku I, Nakano O, Aoki H, Hoshi S, Orikasa S (2002) Adrenal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: significance of adrenalectomy. Int J Urol 9:125–128
Samojlik E, Lippman AJ, Kirschner MA, Ertel NH, Park Y, Szmal E (1988) Medical adrenalectomy for advanced prostatic cancer: clinical and hormonal effects. Am J Clin Oncol 11:579–585
Strong VE, D’Angelica M, Tang L, Prete F, Gonen M, Coit D, Touijer KA, Fong Y, Brennan MF (2007) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for isolated adrenal metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3392–3400
Nursal TZ, Caliskan K, Ertorer E, Parlakgumus A, Moray G (2009) Laparoscopic treatment of primary hyperaldosteronism in a pregnant patient. Can J Surg 52:E188–E190
Kosaka K, Onoda N, Ishikawa T, Iwanaga N, Yamamasu S, Tahara H, Inaba M, Ishimura E, Ogawa Y, Hirakawa K (2006) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy on a patient with primary aldosteronism during pregnancy. Endocr J 53:461–466
Parnaby CN, Chong PS, Chisholm L, Farrow J, Connell JM, O’Dwyer PJ (2008) The role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours of 6 cm or greater. Surg Endosc 22:617–621
Castillo OA, Vitagliano G, Secin FP, Kerkebe M, Arellano L (2008) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal masses: does size matter? Urology 71:1138–1141
Hara I, Kawabata G, Hara S, Yamada Y, Tanaka K, Fujisawa M (2005) Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy according to tumor size. Int J Urol 12:1022–1027
Gagner M, Pomp A, Heniford BT, Pharand D, Lacroix A (1997) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 226:238–246
Disclosures
Prateek K Gupta, Bala Natarajan, Pradeep K Pallati, Himani Gupta, Jyothsna Sainath, and Robert J. Fitzgibbons Jr. have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ACS NSQIP Disclaimer: The ACS NSQIP and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors. This study does not represent the views or plans of the ACS or the ACS NSQIP.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, P.K., Natarajan, B., Pallati, P.K. et al. Outcomes after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 25, 784–794 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1256-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1256-y