Abstract
Background
Recurrence of cancer and the need for several surgical treatments are the Achilles’ heel of the treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cases of cirrhosis. The difficulty of reintervention is increased by the formation of adhesions after the previous hepatectomy that can make a new surgical procedure more difficult and less safe. With a minimally invasive approach, the formation of postoperative adhesions seems to be minimized, and the adhesiolysis procedure seems to be faster and safer in terms of blood loss and risk of visceral injuries.
Methods
This report describes a series of 15 patients submitted to a laparoscopic reintervention (hepatic resection or radiofrequency ablation) for a recurrence of HCC after a previous open (group 1) or laparoscopic (group 2) procedure for a primary tumor. It aims to explain the feasibility, safety, and results of repeated laparoscopic liver surgery.
Results
The rates for overall postoperative mortality and morbidity were respectively 0% and 26.6% (4/15). No patients had a severe postoperative complication. Only one patient in group 2 presented with moderate ascites postoperatively, whereas two patients in group 1 reported atelectasis requiring physiotherapy and one experienced pneumonia, which was treated with antibiotics. In this series, the findings indicated that patients submitted first to an open hepatic resection (group 1) experience more intraabdominal adhesions. Moreover, in group 1, hypervascularized adhesions typical of cirrhotic patients were several and thicker, with a major potential risk of bleeding and bowel injuries at the time of reintervention. Although for group 2 the length of the intervention was shorter, for group 1, the operating times and safety in terms of bowel injuries were acceptable, demonstrating the feasibility of iterative laparoscopic surgery also for cirrhotic patients previously treated by the open surgical approach. The operative time for the second surgical procedure was shorter and the adhesiolysis easier for the patients previously treated with the laparoscopic approach (group 2). This underscores the advantages of the minimally invasive approach for managing the long oncologic history of cirrhotic patients.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent HCC in cirrhotic patients is a safe and feasible procedure with good short-term outcomes, but further prospective studies are needed to support these results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belli G (2004) Laparoscopic liver surgery (guest editorial). HPB 6:195–196
Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Cioffi L, Langella S, Russolillo N, Belli A (2007) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results. Surg Endosc 11:2004–2011
Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Belli A, Russolillo N, Cioffi L (2005) Laparoscopic liver resection without a Pringle maneuver for HCC in cirrhotic patients. Chir Ital 57:15–25
Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Belli A, Langella S (2005) Laparoscopic hepatic resection for completely exophytic hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:488–493
Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Belli A, Russolillo N (2004) Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC on cirrhosis. HPB 6:236–246
Belli G, Fantini C, D’Agostino A, Belli A, Cioffi L, Russolillo N (2006) Laparoscopic left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a safer and faster technique. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 13:149–154
Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F, Solbiati L, Gazelle GS (1999) Small hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection. Radiology 210:655–661
Lencioni RA, Allgaier HP, Cioni D, Olschewski M, Deibert P, Crocetti L, Frings H, Laubenberger J, Zuber I, Blum HE, Bartolozzi C (2003) Small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: randomized comparison of radio-frequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection. Radiology 228:235–240
Gilliams AR (2003) Radiofrequency ablation in the management of liver tumors. EJSO 29:9–16
Strasberg SM (2000) Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:351–355
Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, Wolff BG, Roberts PL, Smith LE, Sweeney SA, Moore M (1996) Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 183:297–306
Belli G, D’Agostino A, Fantini C, Cioffi L, Belli A, Russolillo N, Langella S (2007) Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation combined with laparoscopic liver resection for more than one HCC on cirrhosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:331–334
Gutt CN, Oniu T, Schemmer P, Mehrabi A, Buchler MW (2004) Fewer adhesions induced by laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc 18:898–906
Gurgan T, Kisnisci H, Yarali H, Develioglu O, Zeyneloglu H, Aksu T (1991) Evaluation of adhesion formation after laparoscopic treatment of polycystic ovarian disease. Fertil Steril 55:911–915
Polymeneas G, Theodosopoulos T, Stamatiadis A, Kourias E (2001) A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15:41–43
Belli G, D’Agostino A, Fantini C, Cioffi L, Belli A, Russolillo N, Langella S (2006) Laparoscopic incisional and umbilical hernia repair in cirrhotic patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16:330–333
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belli, G., Cioffi, L., Fantini, C. et al. Laparoscopic redo surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: feasibility, safety, and results. Surg Endosc 23, 1807–1811 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0344-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0344-3