Abstract
Background
Laparoscopic colectomy (LC) is slowly becoming the standard of care for elective resections. However, the use of LC in the emergency setting is relatively unstudied. The authors describe their experience with a series of emergent and urgent LC cases for a variety of colorectal pathologies.
Methods
This study reviewed 20 consecutive patients who had a laparoscopic emergent or urgent colectomy over a 2-year period. Patient demographics, indications for surgery, operative details, and postoperative complications were examined.
Results
Two cases were converted to open procedure, and the mean operative time was 162 min (median, 163 min). The average postoperative length of hospital stay was 8.1 days (median, 6 days). There was one reoperation and three readmissions within 30 days, with no mortality during the follow-up period. Six patients required intensive care unit (ICU) stays after surgery, and 40% of the patients had one or more postoperative complications.
Conclusions
With increasing experience, LC is a feasible option in nonelective situations. Further prospective and comparative studies will improve our understanding of the outcomes for emergency LC.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of nonmetastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229
Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726
Garrett KA, Champagne BJ, Valerian BT, Peterson D, Lee EC (2008) A single training center’s experience with 200 consecutive cases of diverticulitis: can all patients be approached laparoscopically? Surg Endosc 22(11):2503–2508
Lee SW, Yoo J, Dujovny N, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2006) Laparoscopic vs hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49:464–469
Ng SS, Yiu RY, Li JC, Lee JF, Leung KL (2006) Emergency laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colon carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 16:350–354
Koea JB, Guillem JG, Conlon KC, Minsky B, Saltz L, Cohen A (2000) Role of laparoscopy in the initial multimodality management of patients with near-obstructing rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 4:105–108
Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK, Brady K, Goormastic M, Fazio VW (2001) Laparoscopic total colectomy for acute colitis: a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1441–1445
Bleier JI, Moon V, Feingold D, Whelan RL, Arnell T, Sonoda T, Milsom JW, Lee SW (2008) Initial repair of iatrogenic colon perforation using laparoscopic methods. Surg Endosc 22:646–649
Fowkes L, Krishna K, Menon A, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2008) Laparoscopic emergency and elective surgery for ulcerative colitis. Colorectal Dis 10:373–378
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by grant T32 HS00059 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. In addition, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. provided unrestricted research funds that provided salary support for J.S.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Champagne, B., Stulberg, J.J., Fan, Z. et al. The feasibility of laparoscopic colectomy in urgent and emergent settings. Surg Endosc 23, 1791–1796 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0227-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0227-z