Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic vs. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy for Diverticulitis

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Introduction

Sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis can be technically challenging because of severe inflammation in the left-lower quadrant and pelvis. We hypothesized that hand-assisted laparoscopic technique may facilitate laparoscopic completion of this surgery while retaining the short-term benefits associated with “pure” laparoscopic surgery, in which an incision is made only for extracting the specimen. This study was designed to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent totally laparoscopic or hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis.

Methods

We reviewed our prospectively collected patient database from July 2001 to June 2004 and compared the intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomies for diverticulitis. Complicated patients (with abscess or fistulas) also were separately analyzed.

Results

The hand-assisted laparoscopic (mode age, 57 years; 48 percent male) and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (mode age, 56 years; 90 percent male) groups were similar with regard to age and gender. Overall, patients who underwent laparoscopic (n = 21) vs. hand-assisted laparoscopic (n = 21) sigmoidectomies had a significantly longer operative time (197 ± 42 vs. 171 ± 34 minutes, P = 0.04) and shorter incision length (5 ± 2.1 vs. 9.3 ± 4.1 cm, P = 0.0001). Patients with complicated diverticulitis (n = 14; abscess, colovesical fistula, enterocolic fistula) who underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomies (n=4) had a significantly longer operative time compared with hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (n = 10) group (255 ± 18 vs. 177 ± 34 minutes, P = 0.001). Conversion rate for the laparoscopic group was significantly higher (3/4 vs. 1/10, P = 0.04, Fisher exact) when complicated diverticulitis was present. There were no differences in postoperative outcomes or incision lengths in thecomplicated group.

Conclusions

Outcomes after hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis are similar to those seen in the pure laparoscopic method, with lower conversion rates and shorter operative times. Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis is an attractive alternative to a “pure” laparoscopic method in complicated cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SR Laurent B Detroz O Detry et al. (2005) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis Dis Colon Rectum 48 148–152 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M%2Fmt1WksQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15690672

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. H Scheidbach C Schneider J Rose et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic approach to sigmoid diverticulitis: changes in the spectrum of indications and results of a prospective, multicenter study on 1,545 patients Dis Colon Rectum 47 1883–1888 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0715-8 Occurrence Handle15622581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. CM Bartus T Lipof CM Sarwar et al. (2005) ArticleTitleColovesical fistula: not a contraindication to elective laparoscopic colectomy Dis Colon Rectum 48 233–236 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0849-8 Occurrence Handle15616751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. K Nakajima SW Lee C Cocilovo et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total colectomy: hand-assisted vs. standard technique Surg Endosc 18 582–586 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8648-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3nslShtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15026921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang YJ, Marcello PW, Rusin LC, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: helping hand or hindrance? Surg Endosc 2005;23 (Epub head of print).

  6. DE Rivadeneira PW Marcello PL Roberts et al. (2004) ArticleTitleBenefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study Dis Colon Rectum 47 1371–1376 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-0587-y Occurrence Handle15484352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. EM Targarona E Gracia J Garriga et al. (2002) ArticleTitleProspective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy Surg Endosc 16 234–239 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383jtVWrtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11967670

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anonymous. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs.standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:896–901.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang W. Lee M.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S.W., Yoo, J., Dujovny, N. et al. Laparoscopic vs. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy for Diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 49, 464–469 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0500-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0500-y

Key words

Navigation