Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic correction of umbilical hernias using a transabdominal preperitoneal approach: results of a pilot study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic repair of umbilical hernias is usually based on the open underlay procedure in which the mesh is placed intra-abdominally. To prevent complications such as adhesions, bowel obstruction and fistula formation we developed a new laparoscopic approach, placing the mesh in the preperitoneal space.

Methods

Our laparoscopic approach concerns a standardised procedure with introduction of three intra-abdominally placed trocars. The ventral abdominal wall is incised in a lengthwise manner approximately 5 cm from the umbilical defect, followed by development of the preperitoneal space, reposition of the umbilical peritoneal sac and placement and fixation of a ProleneTM mesh. The mesh is secured using transfascial ProleneTM sutures; the peritoneal defect is closed with a running VicrylTM suture. Data on 17 patients with primary umbilical hernias laparoscopically operated on between April 2002 and March 2006 are presented.

Results

The 11 men and 6 women had a mean age of 57.8 years (range 37–91 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 30.6 kg/m2 (range 23.7–37.9 kg/m2). Mean hernia size was 1.95 cm (range 1–3 cm), average mesh size was 110 cm2 (range 100–150 cm2). Mean operating time was 85.6 min (range 60–120 min). Mean hospital stay was 2.2 days (range 1–3 days). No major complications were seen. No recurrences were observed during a mean follow-up of 36.2 months (range 13–62 months).

Conclusions

The preperitoneal laparoscopic technique for umbilical hernia repair combines the advantages of a laparoscopic, minimally invasive, approach, avoiding the potential complications related to intra-abdominal mesh position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Velasco M, Garcia-Urena MA, Hidalgo M, Vega V, Cohen M, Carnero FJ (1999) Current concepts on adult umbilical hernia. Hernia 3:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson OJ, Moglen LH (1970) Umbilical hernia. A retrospective study. Calif Med 113:8–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arroyo A, García P, Pérez F, Andreu J, Candela F, Calpena R (2001) Randomized clinical trial comparing suture and mesh repair of umbilical hernia in adults. Br J Surg 88:1321–1323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hjaltason E (1981) Incarcerated hernia. Acta Chir Scand 147:263–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kulah B, Kulacoglu IH, Oruc MT, Duzgun AP, Moran M, Ozmen MM, Coskun F (2001) Presentation and outcome of incarcerated external hernias in adults. Am J Surg 181:101–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 240:578–585

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eryilmaz R, Sahin M, Tekelioglu MH (2006) Which repair in umbilical hernia of adults: primary or mesh? Int Surg 91:258–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanjay P, Reid TD, Davies EL, Arumugam PJ, Woodward A (2005) Retrospective comparison of mesh and sutured repair for adult umbilical hernias. Hernia 9:248–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Halm JA, Heisterkamp J, Veen HF, Weidema WF (2005) Long-term follow-up after umbilical hernia repair: are there risk factors for recurrence after simple and mesh repair. Hernia 9:334–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodney PP, Birkmeyer CM, Birkmeyer JD (2002) Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 137:1161–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238:391–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lau H, Patil NG (2003) Umbilical hernia in adults. Surg Endosc 17:2016–2020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McGreevy JM, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer CM, Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD (2003) A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 17:1778–1780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen NT, Lee SL, Mayer KL, Furdui GL, Ho HS (2000) Laparoscopic umbilical herniorrhaphy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:151–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright BE, Beckerman J, Cohen M, Cumming JK, Rodriguez JL (2002) Is laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair with mesh a reasonable alternative to conventional repair? Am J Surg 184:505–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yavuz N, Ipek T, As A, Kapan M, Eyuboglu E, Erguney S (2005) Laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias: our experience in 150 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15:601–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Balique JG, Benchetrit S, Bouillot JL, Flament JB, Gouillat C, Jarsaillon P, Lepère M, Mantion G, Arnaud JP, Magne E, Brunetti F (2005) Intraperitoneal treatment of incisional and umbilical hernias using an innovative composite mesh: four-year results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Hernia 9:68–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW (2002) Entero-colocutaneous fistula: a late consequence of polypropylene mesh abdominal wall repair: case report and review of the literature. Hernia 6:144–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Knook MT, van Rosmalen AC, Yoder BE, Kleinrensink GJ, Snijders CJ, Looman CW, van Steensel CJ (2001) Optimal mesh size for endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 15:1471–1477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mayo WJ (1901) An operation for the radical cure of umbilical hernia. Ann Surg 34:276–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arroyo Sebastián A, Pérez F, Serrano P, Costa D, Oliver I, Ferrer R, Lacueva J, Calpena R (2002) Is prosthetic umbilical hernia repair bound to replace primary herniorrhaphy in the adult patient? Hernia 6:175–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miserez M, Penninckx F (2002) Endoscopic totally preperitoneal ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 16:1207–1213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jarsaillon P (2000) Laparoscopic treatment of an umbilical hernia using a new composite mesh. Hernia 4:S17–S21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. DeMaria EJ, Moss JM, Sugerman HJ (2000) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthetic patch repair of ventral hernia. Prospective comparison to open prefascial polypropylene mesh repair. Surg Endosc 14:326–329

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Schumacher OP, Peiper C, Lörken M, Schumpelick V (2003) Long-term results after Spitzy’s umbilical hernia repair. Chirurg 74:50–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kurzer M, Belsham PA, Kark AE (2004) Tension-free mesh repair of umbilical hernia as a day case using local anaesthesia. Hernia 8:104–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Hok Oei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hilling, D.E., Koppert, L.B., Keijzer, R. et al. Laparoscopic correction of umbilical hernias using a transabdominal preperitoneal approach: results of a pilot study. Surg Endosc 23, 1740–1744 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0177-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0177-5

Keywords

Navigation