Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Dear Editor,
We welcome the interesting comments made by the French surgeons. The idea of the article was to show that the transvaginal route is a feasible alternative in Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). The fact that it can only be applied in females is definitely a limiting factor. Until safer routes for NOTES are described, at least female patients can benefit. Several surgeons have used the transvaginal approach, and have found it viable [1–6]. I do not know if it is fair enough to say that all female patients do not prefer the transvaginal route based on a questionnaire answered by just 125 subjects. As the article states, the inherent danger of a potentially fatal gastric perforation is always present in the transgastric approach, especially since there is no foolproof method of gastrotomy closure as yet. Were the dangers of the transgastric approach clearly explained to these 125 subjects? In the transvaginal route, postoperative pain during sexual intercourse is an issue to contend with, but this was not a problem in any of our patients. Besides, only randomized controlled trials comparing the different routes can provide solid evidence, and I dare say that human trials would currently be premature. For now, we have to be satisfied with small case series.
Yes, the debate continues.
References
Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Oliveira AL, Carvalho GL, Filgueiras M (2008) NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc 22(2):542–547
Zorrón R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Lopes Carvalho G, Lacerda Oliveira A (2007) NOTES. Transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case. Surg Innov 14(4):279–283
Decarli L, Zorron R, Branco A, Lima FC, Tang M, Pioneer SR, Zanin I Jr, Schulte AA, Bigolin AV, Gagner M (2008) Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) Transvaginal cholecystectomy in a morbidly obese patient. Obes Surg 18:886–889
Forgione A, Maggioni D, Sansonna F, Ferrari C, Di Lernia S, Citterio D, Magistro C, Frigerio L, Pugliese R (2008) Transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy in human beings: preliminary results. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(3):345–351
Scott DJ, Tang SJ, Fernandez R, Bergs R, Goova MT, Zeltser I, Kehdy FJ, Cadeddu JA (2007) Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc 21(12):2308–2316
Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142(9):823–826
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Palanivelu, C., Rangarajan, M. Reply to: Re: “NOTES: Where have we been and where are we going” (2008; 22(5):1143–1145) and “Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans: a unique approach to NOTES, world’s first” (2008; 22(5):1343–1347). Surg Endosc 23, 668 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0176-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0176-6