Skip to main content
Log in

Socioeconomic predictors of weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Successful weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) hinges on many elements including neurohormonal, anatomical, and postoperative behavioral changes. To date, the effects of socioeconomic factors have been inadequately studied. We examine several components of socioeconomic status and its relationship to weight loss after LRYGB.

Methods

Between August 2002 and July 2006, 405 LRYGB were performed by a single surgeon. Patient demographics were entered into a longitudinal, prospective database. At 1-year follow-up, 309 patients were available for analysis. Regional median household income (RMAHI) and primary insurance carrier were used as surrogates for preoperative socioeconomic status. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) test was used for statistical analysis. According to RMAHI, we divided the patients into three groups: US $20,001–40,000 (group A, n = 67), US $40,001–60,000 (group B, n = 153), and more than US $60,000 (group C, n = 89). Initial body mass index (BMI) was 52.76 ± 1.01, 51.28 ± 0.67, and 48.87 ± 0.94 kg/m2, respectively. Additionally, patients were divided according to private insurance or state-based insurance. A total of 274 patients had private insurance, with an initial mean BMI of 50.6 kg/m2, and 35 patients had state-based insurance, with an initial BMI of 53.0 kg/m2.

Results

After 1 year, weight loss in groups A, B and C was 110.6 ± 4.3, 110.0 ± 2.5, and 103.9 ± 3.6 lb with BMI decrease of 17.7 ± 0.6, 17.7 ± 0.4, and 16.9 ± 0.6 kg/m2, respectively. Weight loss in the private insurance group was 49.2 ± 0.9 kg compared with 50.2 ± 2.3 kg in the state-based group with BMI decrease of 17.4 ± 0.3 and 18.4 ± 0.8 kg/m2, respectively. There were no statistical significances in the effect of socioeconomic status, median household income, and insurance carrier on postoperative weight loss.

Conclusion

With appropriate patient selection, the socioeconomic status of patients undergoing LRYGB does not affect postoperative weight loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mason EE, Tang S, Renquist KE (1997) A decade of change in surgical obesity. National Bariatric Surgery Registry (NBSR) contributors. Obes Surg 7:189–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous (2004) The ASBS consensus conference on the state of morbid obesity; health implications for patients, health professionals and third-party payers. ASBS Consensus Conference, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

  3. Schirmer B (2006) Laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc 20(Suppl 2):S450-S455. Epub 2006 Mar 16. Review

  4. Benotti PN, Forse RA (1995) The role of gastric surgery in the multidisciplinary management of severe obesity. Am J Surg 169:361–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu LK, Benotti PN, Dwyer J (1998) Nonsurgical factors that influence the outcome of bariatric surgery: a review. Psychosom Med 60:338–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. US Census Bureau (http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en). Accessed 11 September 2008

  7. Martin L, Tan T, Holmes P et al (1991) Preoperative insurance status influences postoperative complication rates of gastric bypass. Am J Surg 161(6):625–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Melton G, Steele K, Schweitzer M et al (2008) Suboptimal weight loss after gastric bypass surgery: correlation of demographics, comorbidities, and insurance status with outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 12:250–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lutfi R, Torquati A, Sekhar N et al (2006) Predictors of success after laparoscopic gastric bypass: a multivariate analysis of socioeconomic factors. Surg Endosc 20:864–867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harvin G, Delegge M, Garrow D (2008) The impact of race on weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 18:39–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Capella R, Capella J (1993) Ethnicity, type of obesity surgery and weight loss. Obes Surg 3:375–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Buffington C, Marema R (2006) Ethnic differences in obesity and surgical weight loss between African-American and Caucasian females. Obes Surg 16:159–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanchez-Cabezudo Diaz-Guerra C, Larrad Jimenez A (2002) Analysis of weight loss with the biliopancreatic diversion of Larrad: absolute failures or relative successes? Obes Surg 12(2):249–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hafner R, Rogers J, Watts J (1990) Psychological status before and after gastric restriction as predictors of weight loss in the morbidly obese. J Psychosom Res 34:295–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stunkard A, Stinnett J, Smoller J (1986) Psychological and social aspects of the surgical treatment of obesity. Am J Psychiatry 143(4):417–429

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Margo D, Geloneze B, Delfini R et al (2008) Long-term weight regain after gastric bypass: a 5-year prospective study. Obes Surg 18(6):648–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saunders R (1999) Binge eating in gastric bypass patients before surgery. Obes Surg 9:72–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert L. Bell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akkary, E., Nerlinger, A., Yu, S. et al. Socioeconomic predictors of weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 23, 1246–1251 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0138-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0138-z

Keywords

Navigation