Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety, hazards and ergonomics in the operating room

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective for this study was to address the lack of information regarding the working conditions in the operating room (OR). Safety issues in the OR need to be discussed not only for the sake of patients, but also for personnel, as hazards may occur for all persons within the OR.

Methods

To evaluate the workplace conditions in the operating room, a survey was conducted among surgeons working in German hospitals. Sixty questions were asked regarding the personal profile, the architectural situation, the devices and instruments as well as working posture and associated pain.

Results

The survey showed elementary ergonomic deficiencies within all fields. Surgeons stated that these deficiencies lead to potential hazards for patients and personnel, potentially on a frequent basis. 97% of the surveyed surgeons see ergonomic improvement in the operating room as necessary.

Conclusion

The survey results display a high potential for improvement within all fields. Therefore, industry, surgeons and their professional organizations are asked to work on the optimization of the workplace conditions in the operating room in terms of improvement of quality and efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation Human Factors Engineering Committee (2001) Human factors design process for medical devices. ANSI/AAMI HE-74, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:466–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. International Electrotechnical Commission (2004) Medical electrical equipment – Part 1–6: General requirements for safety – Collateral standard: Usability (EN 60601–1–6). Beuth Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Federal Health Monitoring System (2004) http://www.gbe-bund.de. Cited 12 Dec 2004

  5. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (eds) (2000) To err is human - building a safer health system. Committee on quality of health care in America, Institute of medicine. National Academy, Washington, D.C.

  6. Matern U, Faist M, Kehl K, Giebmeyer C, Buess G (2005) Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 19:436–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patkin M (2003) What surgeons want in operating rooms. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 12:256–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Veelen MA, Nederlof EAL, Goossens RHM, Schot CJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2003) Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 17:1077–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Veelen MA, Jakimowicz JJ, Goossens RHM, Meijer DW, Bussmann JBJ (2002) Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 16:674–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wauben LS, van Veelen MS, Gossot D, Goossens RH (2006) Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire of 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc 20:1268–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Matern.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matern, U., Koneczny, S. Safety, hazards and ergonomics in the operating room. Surg Endosc 21, 1965–1969 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9396-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9396-4

Keywords

Navigation