Abstract
Background
This study was performed to assess the optimal display location of a flat-screen monitor for laparoscopy. It was also performed to assess the posture (objective), opinion, and preference (subjective) of subjects using a flat-screen monitor positioned in the optimal display location and a cathode-ray tube monitor on a tower next to the operating table (current situation).
Methods
Twelve surgeons performed cholecystectomies using the two display systems alternately. The postures of the operator and the assistant were assessed by an infrared video analysis system.
Results
The posture of the assistant is significantly better when using a flat-screen monitor [more neutral head flexions (p=0.036) and neutral neck torsions (p=0.012)]. No significant differences were found for the posture of the operator. The operators and assistants felt more comfortable when using a flat-screen monitor (p=0.008) and they preferred this display to the use of a monitor on a tower.
Conclusions
The use of flat-screen monitors is better for the physical and psychological comfort of the users, even though the technical performance is inferior in comparison with that of regular monitors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer W, Wittig T (1998) Influence of screen and copyholder positions on head posture, muscle activity and user judgement. Appl Ergon 29: 185–192
Berguer R (1997) The application of ergonomics in the work environment of general surgeons. Surg Ergo 12: 99–106
Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J (1997) A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 11: 139–142
Burgess-Limerick R, Mon-Williams M, Coppard VL (2000) Visual display height. Hum Factors 42: 140–150
De Wall M, van Riel MPJM, Snijders CJ (1991) The effect on sitting posture of a desk with a 10 degrees inclination for reading and writing. Ergonomics 34(5): 575–584
Greene WB, Heckman JD (1994) The cervical spine. In: The clinical measurement of joint motion. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL, 67
Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227: 481–484
Jaschinski W, Heuer H, Kylian H (1988) Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. Ergonomics 41: 1034–1049
Turville KL, Psihogios JP, Ulmer TR, Mirka GA (1998) The effects of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 degree and 40 degree recommendations. Appl Ergon 29: 239–246
Villanueva MB, Jonai H, Sotoyama M, Hisanaga N, Takeuchi Y, Saito S (1997) Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the visual display terminal. Ind Health 35(3): 330–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Veelen, M.A., Jakimowicz, J.J., Goossens, R.H.M. et al. Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems, during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 16, 674–678 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9116-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9116-4