Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic vs conventional tension free inguinal herniorrhaphy: 2005 Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting debate

  • Review
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report summarizes the 2005 Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons’ inguinal herniorrhaphy debate. Most inguinal herniorrhaphies in the United States are performed using one of several prosthesis-based, tension-free (TFR) procedures. Approximately 15% of the procedures used are laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphies (LIH). Technical ease, lower cost, and local anesthesia are the major advantages attributed to TFR, whereas superior cosmesis, less perioperative pain, and a faster return to normal activity is attributed to LIH. The overall cost–benefit ratio, incidence of chronic pain syndromes, and relevance of a recent major trial could not be entirely settled in this debate. The importance of adequate training for surgeons undertaking LIH cannot be overemphasized. Experienced surgeons displaying equivalent results for LIH and TFR are justified in offering LIH to patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin North Am 83: 1045–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DeFrances CJ, Hall MJ, Podgornik MN (2005) National Hospital Discharge Survey. Advance data from vital and health statistics; no. 359. Hyaltsville, MD. National Center for Health Statistics

  3. Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS (2005) Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 294: 1909–1917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9: 1–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H, Strand L, Malmstrom J, Andersen FH, Wara P, Juul P, Callesen T, Danish Hernia Database Collaboration (2001) Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study. Lancet 358: 1124–1128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Dwyer PJ (2004) Current status of the debate on laparoscopic hernia repair. Br Med Bull 70: 105–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Horeyseck G, Roland F, Rolfes N (1996) “Tension-free” repair of inguinal hernia: laparoscopic (TAPP) versus open (Lichtenstein) repair. Chirurg 67: 1036–1040

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zieren J, Zieren HU, Wenger FA, Muller JM (1996) Laparoscopic or conventional repair of inguinal hernia with synthetic mesh? Langenbecks Arch Chir 381: 289–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarli L, Pietra N, Choua O, Costi R, Thenasseril B, Giunta A (1997) Prospective randomized comparative study of laparoscopic hernioplasty and Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 68: 5–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Champault GG, Rizk N, Catheline JM, Turner R, Boutelier P (1997) Inguinal hernia repair: totally preperitoneal laparoscopic approach versus Stoppa operation: randomized trial of 100 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 445–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Khoury N (1998) A randomized prospective controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair and mesh-plug hernioplasty: a study of 315 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 8: 367–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paganini AM, Lezoche E, Carle F, Carlei F, Favretti F, Feliciotti F, Gesuita R, Guerrieri M, Lomanto D, Nardovino M, Panti M, Ribichini P, Sarli L, Sottili M, Tamburini A, Taschieri A (1998) A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 12: 979–986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aitola P, Airo I, Matikainen M (1998) Laparoscopic versus open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomised trial. Ann Chir Gynaecol 87: 22–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Picchio M, Lombardi A, Zolovkins A, Mihelsons M, La Torre G (1999) Tension-free laparoscopic and open hernia repair: randomized controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 23: 1004–1007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar S, Nixon SJ, MacIntyre IM (1999) Laparoscopic or Lichtenstein repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: one unit’s experience. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44: 301–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Johansson B, Hallerback B, Glise H, Anesten B, Smedberg S, Roman J (1999) Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study) Ann Surg 230: 225–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. MRC Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group. Lancet 354: 185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beets GL, Dirksen CD, Go PM, Geisler FE, Baeten CG, Kootstra G (1999) Open or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia? A randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 13: 323–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarli L, Iusco DR, Sansebastiano G, Costi R (2001) Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias: a prospective, randomized study of open, tension-free versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11: 262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wright D, Paterson C, Scott N, Hair A, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235: 333–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pikoulis E, Tsigris C, Diamantis T, Delis S, Tsatsoulis P, Georgopoulos S, Pavlakis E, Leppaniemi AK, Bastounis E, Mantonakis S (2002) Laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair or tension-free mesh plug technique? A prospective study of 471 patients with 543 inguinal hernias. Eur J Surg 168: 587–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahon D, Decadt B, Rhodes M (2003) Prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal) vs open (mesh) repair for bilateral and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 17: 1386–1390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Andersson B, Hallen M, Leveau P, Bergenfelz A, Westerdahl J (2003) Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery 133: 464–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Douek M, Smith G, Oshowo A, Stoker DL, Wellwood JM (2003) Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five-year follow up. BMJ 326: 1012–1013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, Englund T, Westman B, Anderberg B (2003) Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 237: 142–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17: 850–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P, Kunelius P, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A (2004) Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties. Surg Endosc 18: 518–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W, Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 456 Investigators (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350: 1819–1827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2002) Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomized trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6: 2–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90: 1479–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A, Doll H, Gordon A, Gray A, Britton J, Collin J. (1995) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. BMJ 311: 981–985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vogt DM, Curet MJ, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Zucker KA (1995) Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic onlay versus conventional inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 169: 84–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336: 1541–1547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dirksen CD, Beets GL, Go PM, Geisler FE, Baeten CG, Kootstra G (1998) Bassini repair compared with laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Surg 164: 439–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tanphiphat C, Tanprayoon T, Sangsubhan C, Chatamra K (1998) Laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 12: 846–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zieren J, Zieren HU, Jacobi CA, Wenger FA, Muller JM (1998) Prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic and open tension-free inguinal hernia repair with Shouldice’s operation. Am J Surg 175: 330–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Juul P, Christensen K (1999) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 86: 316–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Leibl BJ, Daubler P, Schmedt CG, Kraft K, Bittner R (2000) Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial between laparoscopic hernioplasty and Shouldice repair. Br J Surg 87: 780–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Tschudi J, Wagner M, Klaiber C, Brugger J, Frei E, Krahenbuhl L, Inderbitzi R, Husler J, Hsu Schmitz S (2001) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice repair. Surg Endosc 15: 1263–1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wennstrom I, Berggren P, Akerud L, Jarhult J (2004) Equal results with laparoscopic and Shouldice repairs of primary inguinal hernia in men: report from a prospective randomised study. Scand J Surg 93: 34–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Arvidsson D, Berndsen FH, Larsson LG, Leijonmarck CE, Rimback G, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Spangen L, Montgomery A (2005) Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg. 92: 1085–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Voyles CR, Hamilton BJ, Johnson WD, Kano N (2002) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia trials favors open hernia repair with preperitoneal mesh prosthesis. Am J Surg 184: 6–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lo CH, Trotter D, Grossberg P (2005) Unusual complications of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair ANZ J Surg 75: 917–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Collaboration EH (2000) Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 87: 860–867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001785

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Vale L, Grant A, McCormack K, Scott NW, EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2004) Cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of surgical repair of inguinal hernia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 20: 192–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Koninger J, Redecke J, Koninger J (2004) Chronic pain after hernia repair: a randomized trial comparing Shouldice, Lichtenstein, and TAPP. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389: 361–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IM (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg. 89: 1476–1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA (2003) A review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J Pain 19: 48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H, Danish Hernia Database (2001) Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg 233: 1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Grant AM, Scott NW, O’Dwyer PJ, MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2004) Five-year follow-up of a randomized trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia Br J Surg 91: 1570–1574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Swanstrom LL (2000) Laparoscopic hernia repairs: the importance of cost as an outcome measurement at the century’s end. Surg Clin North Am 80: 1341–1351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Medical Research Council Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2001) Cost–utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 88: 653–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Stylopoulos N, Gazelle GS, Rattner DW (2003) A cost–utility analysis of treatment options for inguinal hernia in 1,513,008 adult patients. Surg Endosc 17: 180–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, Marrero R, Hammady A, Rassweiler J (2005) The effect of previous transperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy on transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173: 769–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Stolzenburg JU, Ho KM, Do M, Rabenalt R, Dorschner W, Truss MC (2005) Impact of previous surgery on endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Urology 65: 325–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hsia M, Ponsky L, Rosenblatt S, Jones JS (2004) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair complicates future pelvic oncologic surgery. Ann Surg 240: 922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Brown JA, Dahl DM (2004) Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients after laparoscopic prosthetic mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy. Urology 63: 380–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Cook H, Afzal N, Cornaby AJ (2003) Laparoscopic hernia repairs may make subsequent radical retropubic prostatectomy more hazardous. BJU Int 91: 729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Crawford ED (2003) Epidemiology of prostate cancer. Urology 62 (Suppl 1): 3–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Grunwaldt LJ, Schwaitzberg SD, Rattner DW, Jones DB (2005) Is laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair an operation of the past? J Am Coll Surg 4: 616–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellance (NICE); 2001. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/FAD_Laphernia_review_2001.pdf

  63. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. Quick Reference Guide. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2004. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/FAD_Laphernia_review_2004.pdf

  64. Edwards CC II, Bailey RW (2000) Laparoscopic hernia repair: the learning curve. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10: 149–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bittner R, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Kraft K, Leibl BJ (2002) Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89: 1062–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Lowham AS, Filipi CJ, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Stoppa R, Wantz GE, Felix EL, Crafton WB (1997) Mechanisms of hernia recurrence after preperitoneal mesh repair: traditional and laparoscopic. Ann Surg 225: 422–431

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Felix EL, Michas CA, Gonzalez MH Jr (1995) Laparoscopic hernioplasty: TAPP vs TEP. Surg Endosc 9: 984–989

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Camps J, Cornet DA, Nguyen NX, Litke BS, Annibali R, Salerno GM (1995) Laparocopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg 221: 3–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Khoury N (1995) A comparative study of laparoscopic extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy. J Laparoendosc Surg 5: 349–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Ramshaw BJ, Tucker JG, Conner T, Mason EM, Duncan TD, Lucas GW (1996) A comparison of the approaches to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 10: 29–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Kald A, Anderberg B, Smedh K, Karlsson M (1997) Transperitoneal or totally extraperitoneal approach in laparoscopic hernia repair: results of 491 consecutive herniorrhaphies. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 86–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Sarli L, Pietra N, Choua O, Costi R, Cattaneo G (1997) Laparoscopic hernia repair: a prospective comparison of TAPP and IPOM techniques. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7: 472–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Van Hee R, Goverde P, Hendricx L, Van der Schelling G, Totte E (1998) Laparoscopic transperitonela versus extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective clinical trial. Acta Chir Belg 98: 132–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Cohen RV, Alvarez G, Roll S, Garcia ME, Kawahara N, Schiavon CA, Schaffa TD, Pereira PR, Margarido NF, Rodrigues AJ (1998) Transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair? Surg Laparosc Endosc 8: 264–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Lepere M, Benchetrit S, Debaert M, Detruit B, Dufilho A, Gaujoux D, Lagoutte J, Saint Leon LM, Pavis d’Escurac X, Rico E, Sorrentino J, Therin M (2000) A multicentric comparison of transabdominal versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair using Parietex meshes. JSLS 4: 147–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Wake BL, McCormack K, Fraser C, Vale L, Perez J, Grant AM (2005) Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1: CD004703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, 601 North 30th Street, Suite 3700, Omaha, Nebraska, 68131, USA

    V. Puri & R. J. Fitzgibbons Jr

  2. Department of Surgery, UCSF Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA

    E. Felix

Authors
  1. V. Puri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Felix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. J. Fitzgibbons Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Fitzgibbons Jr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puri, V., Felix, E. & Fitzgibbons, R.J. Laparoscopic vs conventional tension free inguinal herniorrhaphy: 2005 Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) annual meeting debate. Surg Endosc 20, 1809–1816 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0073-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0073-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation