Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Costs and quality of life after endoscopic repair of inguinal hernia vs open tension-free repair: a review

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The ongoing debate about the relative merits of endoscopic (EH) vs open mesh herniorrhaphy (OH) prompts the need for comparisons of outcome measures other than recurrence. Therefore, we reviewed data on the costs, time to return to work, quality of life (QoL), and pain associated with EH and OH.

Methods

Studies comparing EH to OH and explicitly involving costs or QoL were identified and reviewed.

Results

Eighteen studies were included. Direct in-hospital costs were higher for unilateral EH. Direct out-of-hospital costs were lower after EH in some studies. Indirect costs were lower for EH. Total costs were higher for EH in three studies and lower in one study. With EH, QoL was better, pain was less, operating time was longer, and time return to work and other activities was shorter.

Conclusion

From a societal perspective, EH entails costs similar to OH but offers extra benefits to the patient in terms of QoL and pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JS Barkun MJ Wexler EJ Hinchey D Thibeault JL Meakins (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open inguinal herniorrhaphy: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial Surgery 118 703–709 Occurrence Handle7570325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. GL Beets CD Dirksen PM Go FE Geisler CG Baeten G Kootstra (1999) ArticleTitleOpen or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia? A randomized controlled trial Surg Endosc 13 323–327 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900981 Occurrence Handle10094739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. S Bringman A Ek E Haglind TJ Heikkinen A Kald F Kylberg S Ramel C Wallon B Anderberg (2001) ArticleTitleDissection balloon beneficial in bilateral, totally extraperitoneal, endoscopic hernioplasty? A randomized, prospective, multicenter study Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11 322–326 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00129689-200110000-00007 Occurrence Handle11668230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DC Brooks (1994) ArticleTitleA prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy Arch Surg 129 361–366 Occurrence Handle8154962

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. CA Courtney K Duffy MG Serpell PJ O’Dwyer (2002) ArticleTitleOutcome of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia Br J Surg 89 1310–1314 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02206.x Occurrence Handle12296903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. InstitutionalAuthorNameEU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2000) ArticleTitleMesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomised controlled trials Br J Sung 87 854–859

    Google Scholar 

  7. LP Farinas FD Griffen (2000) ArticleTitleCost containment and totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy Surg Endosc 14 37–40 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900007 Occurrence Handle10653233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. X Feliu-Pala M Martin-Gomez S Morales-Conde E Fernandez-Sallent (2001) ArticleTitleThe impact of the surgeon’s experience on the results of laparoscopic hernia repair Surg Endosc 15 1467–1470 Occurrence Handle11965467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. A Gainant R Geballa S Bouvier P Cubertafond M Mathonnet (2000) ArticleTitleProsthetic treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias via laparoscopic approach or Stoppa procedure Ann Chir 125 560–565 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0003-3944(00)00241-8 Occurrence Handle10986768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JS Goodwin Suffix2nd LW Traverso (1995) ArticleTitleA prospective cost and outcome comparison of inguinal hernia repairs: laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal versus open tension-free preperitoneal Surg Endosc 9 981–983 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00188455 Occurrence Handle7482217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. TJ Heikkinen K Haukipuro A Hulkko (1998) ArticleTitleA cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit: A randomized prospective study Surg Endosc 12 1199–1203 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900820 Occurrence Handle9745056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. AC Hindmarsh E Cheong MP Lewis M Rhodes (2003) ArticleTitleAttendance at a pain clinic with severe chronic pain after open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Br J Surg 90 1152–1154 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4213 Occurrence Handle12945086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. B Johansson B Hallerback H Glise B Anesten S Smedberg J Roman (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study) Ann Surg 230 225–231 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199908000-00013 Occurrence Handle10450737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. S Kumar RG Wilson SJ Nixon IMC Macintyre (2002) ArticleTitleChronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia Br J Surg 89 1476–1479 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02260.x Occurrence Handle12390395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. H Lau NG Patil WK Yuen F Lee (2002) ArticleTitleLearning curve for unilateral endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernioplasty Surg Endosc 16 1724–1728 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8298-0 Occurrence Handle12098025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. K Lawrence D McWhinnie A Goodwin A Gray J Gordon J Storie J Britton J Collin (1996) ArticleTitleAn economic evaluation of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair J Public Health Med 18 41–48 Occurrence Handle8785074

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. MS Liem JA Halsema Y van der Graaf AJ Schrijvers TJ van Vroonhoven (1997) ArticleTitleCost-effectiveness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphy Ann Surg 226 668–675 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199712000-00004 Occurrence Handle9409566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PMNYH, Ross S, Grant AM, EU Hernia Trialist Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004

  19. KW Millikan ML Kosik A Doolas (1994) ArticleTitleA prospective comparison of transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair versus traditional open hernia repair in a university setting Surg Laparosc Endosc 4 247–253 Occurrence Handle7952432

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. T Mikkelsen WU Mads B Lassen H Kehlet (2004) ArticleTitlePain and sensory dysfunction 6 to 12 months after inguinal herniotomy Anesth Analg 99 146–151 Occurrence Handle10.1213/01.ANE.0000115147.14626.C5 Occurrence Handle15281521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. D Moher DJ Cook S Eastwood I Olkin D Rennie DF Stroup (1999) ArticleTitleImproving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUORUM statement, quality of reporting of meta-analyses Lancet 354 1896–1890 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5 Occurrence Handle10584742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. InstitutionalAuthorName MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2001) ArticleTitleCost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial Br J Surg 88 653–661

    Google Scholar 

  23. L Neumayer A Giobbie-Hurder O Jonasson R Fitzgibbons D Dunlop J Gibbs D Reda et al. (2004) ArticleTitleOpen mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia N Engl J Med 350 1819–1827 Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJMoa040093 Occurrence Handle15107485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. AM Paganini E Lezoche F Carle F Carlei F Favretti Feliciotti R Gesuita et al. (1998) ArticleTitleA randomized, controlled clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair Surg Endosc 12 979–986 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900586 Occurrence Handle9632874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. JH Payne SuffixJr LM Grininger MT Izawa EF Podoll PJ Lindahl J Balfour (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial Arch Surg 129 973–979 Occurrence Handle8080380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. E Pikoulis C Tsigris T Diamantis S Delis P Tsatsoulis S Georgopoulos E Pavlakis et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair or tension-free mesh plug technique? A prospective study of 471 patients with 543 inguinal hernias Eur J Surg 168 587–591 Occurrence Handle12699093

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. AS Poobalan J Bruce WC Smith PM King ZH Krukowski WA Chambers (2002) ArticleTitleA review of chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy Hernia 6 178–181 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10029-002-0082-0 Occurrence Handle12424597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. B Reeves (1999) ArticleTitleHealth-technology assessment in surgery Lancet 315 S13–S15

    Google Scholar 

  29. LS Schultz (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs inguinal hernia repairs: outcomes and costs Surg Endosc 9 1307–1311 Occurrence Handle8629217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. JR Smith ML Demers R Pollack S Gregory (2001) ArticleTitleProspective comparison between laparoscopic preperitoneal herniorrhaphy and open mesh herniorrhaphy Ann Surg 67 115–117

    Google Scholar 

  31. AJ Voitk (1998) ArticleTitleThe learning curve in laparscopic inguinal hernia repair for the community general surgeon Can J Surg 41 446–450 Occurrence Handle9854534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. J Wellwood MJ Sculpher D Stoker DJ Nicholls C Geddes A Whitehead R Singh D Spiegelhalter (1998) ArticleTitleRandomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost BMJ 317 103–110 Occurrence Handle9657784

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    M. Gholghesaei, H. R. Langeveld, R. Veldkamp & H. J. Bonjer

Authors
  1. M. Gholghesaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. R. Langeveld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Veldkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. J. Bonjer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Gholghesaei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gholghesaei, M., Langeveld, H.R., Veldkamp, R. et al. Costs and quality of life after endoscopic repair of inguinal hernia vs open tension-free repair: a review. Surg Endosc 19, 816–821 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8949-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8949-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation