Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparison of Measurements of a Pediatric Supplement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated the flow properties of viscosity and flow rate for water and two common pediatric liquids. The flow properties of the test liquids are of interest to create a cup simulation model and “smart” prototype training cup. Two objective methods of determining flow properties were utilized: a rheometer to assess viscosity and a modified version of the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) to assess flow rate. Rheometer results concluded that the pediatric supplements were less than 50 cP at all shear rates evaluated and exhibited shear-thinning properties, placing both liquids into the “thin” category. The IDDSI, which was performed according to standardized protocol and also with experimental modifications of varying syringe volumes, determined that all three test liquids had greater than 1 mL/s flow rate across all syringe types/sizes. The experimental modification of the IDDSI with 60 mL syringe volume was found to be the most consistent and applicable with discrete values obtained across all liquids tested. A flow rate factor equation can be determined with the use of a 60 mL syringe, with our laboratory setup, to create the cup simulation model. This computer-generated cup simulation model also aims to integrate engineering with clinical practice to develop a “smart” prototype training cup equipped with software to control flow rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander RA. Oral-motor treatment for infants and young children with cerebral palsy. Semin Speech Lang. 1987;8:87–100. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1064279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arvedson J, Lefton-Greif MA. Anatomy, physiology, and development of feeding. Semin Speech Lang. 1996;17(4):261–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris S, Klein M. Pre-feeding skills: a comprehensive resource for mealtime development. 2nd ed. Austin: Pro-Ed; 2000. p. 59–95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avery A, Baxter A. ‘Change to cup’: an audit to determine parental awareness and practices in changing from bottle to cup. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2001;14:217–23. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-277X.2001.00288.x2009-3583.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maguire JL, Birken CS, Jacobson S, Peer M, Taylor C, Khambalia A, Mekky M, Thorpe KE, Parkin P. Office-based interventions to reduce bottle use among toddlers: TARGet Kids! Pragmatic, randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e343–50. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-3583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Milton J, King C. Cup introduction, drink type and vitamin supplementation in preterm babies at 11–25 months. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2012;25:148–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277x.2012.01227.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carruth B, Skinner J. Feeding behaviors and other motor development in healthy children (2–24 months). J Am Coll Nutr. 2002;21(2):88–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scarborough DR, Bailey-Van Kuren M, Frey KE, Knatz ED, Lape AR, Wambaugh NM. Study of pressure and flow rate properties of training cups to characterize parameters in a developmental context. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2010;3:187–96. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-2010-0128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. American Dental Association Division of Communications. From baby bottle to cup. JADA. 2004;135:387.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van den Hoek-Engel L, Harding C, van Gerven M, Cockerill H. Pediatric feeding and swallowing rehabilitation: an overview. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2017;10(2):95–105. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-170435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coster S, Schwarz E. Rheology and the swallow-safe bolus. Dysphagia. 1987;1:113–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02412327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Walters K, Jones WM. Measurement of Viscosity. In: Boyes W, editor. Instrumentation reference book. 4th ed. Burlington: Butterworth Heinemann; 2010. p. 69–75.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. National Dysphagia Diet Task Force (NDD). National dysphagia diet: standardization for optimal care. Chicago, IL: American Dietetic Association; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mills RH. Rheology overview: control of liquid viscosities in dysphagia management. Nutr Clin Pract. 1999;14:52–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533699014005S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Steele CM, van Lieshout P, Goff H. The rheology of liquids: a comparison of clinicians’ subjective impressions and objective measurement. Dysphagia. 2003;18:182–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-002-0104-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cichero JAY, Lam P, Steele CM, Hanson B, Chen J, Dantas RO, Duivestein J, Kayashita J, Lecko C, Murray J, Pillay M, Riquelme L, Stanschus S. Development of international terminology and definitions for texture-modified foods and thickened liquids used in dysphagia management: the IDDSI framework. Dysphagia. 2017;32:293–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9758-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abbott Laboratories Inc. Improving lives through science-based nutrition: Abbott nutrition pocket guide. The Betty Mills (2010). Accessed Electronically 27 Jan 2017.

  18. Cichero JAY, Steele C, Duivestein J, Clave P, et al. The need for international terminology and Definitions for texture modified foods and thickened liquids used in dysphagia management: foundations of a global initiative. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Reports. 2013;1:280–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-0130024-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI). Detailed descriptors, testing methods and evidence: Drink levels 0-4; 2015.

  20. Arvedson JC. Assessment of pediatric dysphagia and feeding disorders: clinical and instrumental approaches. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14:118–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Burklow KA, Phelps AN, Schultz JR, Rudoph C. Classifying complex pediatric feeding disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998;27:143–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna R. Scarborough.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: Modifications have been made to the Figure 2 and its caption and also to the 3rd subheading under the section Methods.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Creech, T.N., Bailey-Van Kuren, M., Sparks, J. et al. A Comparison of Measurements of a Pediatric Supplement. Dysphagia 34, 257–268 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9931-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9931-6

Keywords

Navigation