Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of bioaugmentation on the performance of sequencing batch reactor and sludge characteristics in the treatment process of papermaking wastewater

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the differences between reinforced sequencing batch reactor, which was inoculated with superior mixed flora, and conventional sequencing batch reactor were compared in the process of treating papermaking wastewater under similar conditions. The results showed that the addition of superior mixed flora could not only shorten the sludge acclimation time, but also improve the treatment efficiency of reactor as well as make the reactor have higher ability to withstand high volume loading rate; the phenomenon of aerobic granulation only occurred in reinforced sequencing batch reactor, and superior mixed flora were the key reason that aerobic granular sludge could shape; aerobic granular sludge had many advantages over conventional activated sludge such as it possessed compacter microbial structure, better settling performance, and lower water content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rittman BE, Whiteman R (1994) Bioaugmentation: a coming of age. Wat Qua Int 1:12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quan XC, Shi HC, Wang JL, Qian Y (2003) Biodegradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol in sequencing batch reactors augmented with immobilized mixed culture. Chemosphere 50(8):1069–1074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu ZT, William WM (2001) Bioaugmentation with resin-acid-degrading bacteria enhances resin acid removal in sequencing batch reactors treating pulp mill effluents. Wat Res 35(4):883–890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morgenroth E, Sherden T, van Loosdrecht M, Heijnen JJ, Wilderer PA (1997) Aerobic granule in a sequencing batch reactor. Wat Res 31(12):3191–3194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu Y,Yang SF, Xu H, Woon KH, Lin YM, Tay JH (2003) Biosorption kinetics of cadmium(II) on aerobic granular sludge. Process Biochem 38:997–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan S, Tay JH, He YX, Tay STL (2004) The effect of hydraulic retention time on the stability of aerobically grown microbial granules. Lett Appl Microbiol 38:158–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwarzenbeck N, Borges JM, Wilderer PA (2005) Treatment of dairy effluents in an aerobic granule sequencing batch reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:711–718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arrojo B, Mosquera-Corral A, Garrido JM, Méndez R (2004) Aerobic granulation with industrial wastewater in sequencing batch reactors. Wat Res 38:3389–3399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Qin L, Liu Y, Tay JH (2004) Effect of settling time on aerobic granulation in sequencing batch reactor. Biochem Eng J 21:47–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beun JJ, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijnen JJ (2002) Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch airlift reactor. Wat Res 36(3):702–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beun JJ, Hendriks A, van Loosdrecht MCM, Morgenroth E, Wilderer PA, Heijnen JJ (1999) Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch reactor. Wat Res 33:2283–2290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tay JH, Liu QS, Liu Y (2002) Aerobic granulation in sequential sludge blanket reactor. Wat Sci Tech 46(4–5):13–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Y, Yang SF, Tay JH (2004) Improved stability of aerobic granules by selecting slow-growing nitrifying bacteria. J Biotech 108:161–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kapat A, Dey S (2000) An alternative approach to the detection of lignin: a note on the application of ELISA using polyclonal antibodies. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 22(1):75–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Akhila R, Resmi C, Senan C, Pavithran T, Emilia A (2005) Biosoftening of coir fiber using selected microorganisms. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 28(3):165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Choudhury S, Sahoo N, Manthan M, Rohela RS (1998) Fungal treatment of pulp and paper mill effluents for pollution control. J Ind Pollut Control 14(1):1–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Buzzini AP, Pires EC (2002) Cellulose pulp mill effluent treatment in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Process Biochem 38:707–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Franta JR, Wilderer PA (1997) Biological treatment of papermill wastewater by sequencing batch reactor technology to reduce residual organics. Wat Sci Technol 35(1):129–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang HL, Li ZY, Guo WY, Wang ZY, Pan F (2005) Study on the Cooperation between ligninolytic enzymes produced by superior mixed flora. J Environ Sci 17(4):620–622

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang HL, Yu GL, Liu GS, Pan F (2006) A new way to cultivate aerobic granules in the process of papermaking wastewater treatment. Biochem Eng J 28:99–103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Azwar MA, Hussain KB, Ramachandran (2006) The study of neural network-based controller for controlling dissolved oxygen concentration in a sequencing batch reactor. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 28 (4):251–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, nineteenth edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC

  23. Ghangrekar MM, Asolekar SR, Ranganathan KR (1996) Experience with UASB reactor start up under different operating condition. Wat Sci Tech 34:421–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Moy BYP, Tay JH, Toh SK (2002) High organic loading influences the physical characteristics of aerobic sludge granules. Lett Appl Microbiol 34:407–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Q, Du GC, Chen J (2004) Aerobic granule cultivated under the selective pressure as a driving force, Process Biochem 39:557–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Qin L, Tay JH, Liu Y (2004) Selection pressure is a driving force of aerobic granulation in sequencing batch reactors. Process Biochem 39:579–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Peng DC, Bernet N, Delgenes JP, Moletta R (1999) Aerobic granular sludge—a case report. Water Res 33:890–893

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu LL, Wang JL, Wen XH, Qian Y (2005) The formation and characteristics of aerobic granules in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) by seeding anaerobic granules. Process Biochem 40:5–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financed by the foundation of Henan normal university, China (No.052076) and the program for young scholars of high school of Henan Province (2005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wang Hailei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hailei, W., Guosheng, L., Ping, L. et al. The effect of bioaugmentation on the performance of sequencing batch reactor and sludge characteristics in the treatment process of papermaking wastewater. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 29, 283–289 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-006-0077-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-006-0077-9

Keywords

Navigation