Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous estimation of sludge biological activity and influent nitrogen load using ORP and DO dynamics

  • Original papers
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a new optimization strategy to estimate nitrifiable nitrogen concentration in wastewater, nitrification rate, denitrification rate and/or COD available for denitrification of an activated sludge process submitted to intermittent aeration. The approach uses the oxydo-reduction potential and dissolved oxygen measurements only. The parameter identification is based on a Simplex optimization of a cost function related to the error between an experimental cycle (an aerobic period followed by an anoxic one) and a simulation of a reduced model derived from ASM1. Results show very good prediction of experimental oxygen, ammonium and nitrate profiles. The estimation of nitrifiable nitrogen and removal rates has been validated both on simulated data obtained from COST action 624 benchmark and on experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We consider in the following that the return sludge is free from nitrate, then \(S_{NO_3^-}^{x}=0\)

References

  1. Al-Ghusain IA, Huang J, Hao J, Lim BS (1994) Using pH as a real-time control parameter for wastewater treatment and sludge digestion processes. Wat Sci Tech 34(4):159–168

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alex J, Beteau JF, Copp JB, Hellinga C, Jeppson U, Marsili-Libelli S, Pons MN, Spanjers H, Vanhooren H(1999) Benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants Proc. of the European Control Conference (ECC) 1999 Karlsruhe Germany Benchmark page: http://www.ensic.u-nancy.fr/COSTWWTP/

  3. Brouwer H, Klapwijk A, Keesman K (1998) Identification of activated sludge and wastewater characteristics using respirometric batch-experiments. Wat Res 32(4):1240–1254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gómez-Quintero C, Queinnec I, Babary JP (2000) A reduced nonlinear model of an activated sludge process. Proceedings of international symposium on advanced control of chemical processes, Pisa, Italy, pp 1037–1042

  5. Henze M, Leslie-Grady CP Jr, Gujer W, Marais GVR, Matsuo T (1987) Activated sludge model No. 1. IAWQ scientific and technical report. London UK 1987

  6. Jeppson U (1995) A simplified control-oriented model of the activated sludge process. Math Mod of Syst 1(1):3–16

    Google Scholar 

  7. Julien S, Lessard P, Babary JP (1999) A reduced-order model for control of a single reactor activated sludge process. Math Comp Mod of Dyn Syst 5(3):337–350

    Google Scholar 

  8. Klapwijk A, Brouwer H, Vrolijk E, Kujawa K (1998) Control of intermittently aerated nitrogen removal plants by detection endpoints of nitrification and denitrification using Respirometry only (research note). Wat Res 32(5):1700–1703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7:308–313

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paul E, Plisson-Saune S, Mauret M, Cantet J (1998) Process state evaluation of alternating oxic-anoxic activated sludge using ORP pH and DO. Wat Sci Tech 38(3):299–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Plisson-Saune S, Capdeville B, Mauret M, Deguin A, Baptiste P (1996) Real-time control of nitrogen removal using three ORP bending-points: signification control strategy and results. Wat Sci Tech 33(1):275–280

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spanjers H, Vanrolleghem PA (1995) Respirometry as a tool for rapid characterization of wastewater and activated sludge. Wat Sci Tech 31(2):105–114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spanjers H, Vanrolleghem PA, Olsson G, Dold P (1998) Respirometry in control of the activated sludge process (principles). IAWQ scientific and technical report, London UK

  14. Spérandio M, Urbain V, Audic JP, Paul E (1998) Use of carbondioxide evolution rate measurement for determining yieldcoefficient and characterising denitrifying heterotrophic biomass. Wat Sci Tech 39(1):139–146

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steffens MA, Lant PA, Newell RB (1997) A systematic approach for reducing complex biological wastewater treatment models. Wat Res 31(3):590–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vanrolleghem P, Spanjers H, Petersen B, Ginestet P, Takacs I (1999) Estimating (combinations of) activated sludge model no. 1 parameters and components by Respirometry. Wat Sci Tech 39(1):195–214

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao H, Isaacs SH, Soeberg H, Kümmel M (1994) A novel control strategy for improved nitrogen removal in an alternating activated sludge process - Part I. Wat Res 28(3):251–534

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Queinnec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Queinnec, I., Spérandio, M. Simultaneous estimation of sludge biological activity and influent nitrogen load using ORP and DO dynamics. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 27, 329–337 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-005-0411-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-005-0411-7

Keywords

Navigation