Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear control for algae growth models in the chemostat

  • Original papers
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with output feedback control of phytoplanktonic algae growth models in the chemostat. The considered class of model is of variable yield type, meaning that the ratio between the environmental nutrient absorption rate and the cells’ growth rate varies, which is different from classical bioprocesses assumptions. On the basis of weak qualitative hypotheses on the analytical expressions of the involved biological phenomena (which guarantee robustness of the procedure toward modeling uncertainties) we propose a nonlinear controller and prove its ability to globally stabilize such processes. Finally, we illustrate our approach with numerical simulations and show its benefits for biological laboratory experiments, especially for ensuring persistence of the culture facing classical experimental problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernard O (1995) Etude expérimentale et théorique de la croissance de Dunaliella tertiolecta soumise à une limitation variable de nitrate utilisation de la dynamique transitoire pour la conception et la validation de modèles. Université Paris VI

  2. Bernard O, Gouzé JL (1995) Transient behavior of biological loop models with application to the Droop model. Math Biosci 127:19–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chicone C (1999) Ordinary differential equations with applications texts in applied mathematics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  4. Droop MR (1968)Vitamin B12 and marine ecology. IV. The kinetics of uptake growth and inhibition in Monochrysis Lutheri. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 48:689–733

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Henson MA, Seborg DE (1997) Nonlinear process control. Prenctice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khalil HK (1992) Nonlinear systems. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lange K, Oyarzun FJ (1992) The attractiveness of the Droop equations. Math Biosci 111:61–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luenberger DG (1979) Introduction to dynamic systems. Theory models and applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mailleret L (2003) Positive control for a class of nonlinear positive systems. In: Benvenutti L, De Santis A, Farina L (eds) Positive systems Lecture Notes in Control and Informations Sciences, vol 294. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 175–182

  10. Mailleret L (2004) Stabilisation globale de systèmes dynamiques positifs mal connus. Applications en biologie. Université de Nice Sophia, Antipolis

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mailleret L, Bernard O, Steyer JP (2003) Robust regulation of anaerobic digestion. Processes Water Sci Technol 48(6):87–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mailleret L, Bernard O, Steyer JP (2004) Nonlinear adaptive control for bioreactors with unknown kinetics. Automatica 40(8):1379–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Markus L (1956) Asymptotically autonomous differential systems. Annals of mathematics studies 36. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp 17–29

    Google Scholar 

  14. Monod J La technique de culture continue; théorie et applications. Annales de l’Institut Pasteur 79:390–401

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nijmeijer H, van der Schaft AJ (1991) Nonlinear dynamical control systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oyarzun FJ, Lange K (1994) The attractiveness of the Droop equations. 2. Generic uptake and growth functions. Math Biosci 121:127–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith HL (1995) Monotone dynamical systems an introduction to the theory of competitive and cooperative systems. Mathematical surveys and monographs. American Mathematical Society

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith HL, Waltman P (1995) The theory of the chemostat: dynamics of microbial competition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thieme HR (1992) Convergence results and a Poincaré-Bendixson trichotomy for asymptotically autonomous differential equations. J Math Biol 30:755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the “Action Inter EPST Bioinformatique” for its financial support (SEMPO II Project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Mailleret.

Appendices

A Nomenclature

Parameter values and units are according to [1] (for all the simulations):

Table 1 Nomenclature

B Barbalat’s lemma

Lemma 2 (Barbalat, [6])

Let \(\phi : {\mathbb R}\rightarrow {\mathbb R}\) be a uniformly continuous function on [0, ∞). Suppose that \(\lim_{t\rightarrow +\infty}\int_0^t \phi(t)\hbox{d}t\) exists and is finite. Then:

$$\lim_{t\rightarrow +\infty}\phi(t)=0$$

C Corollary of the Perron-Frobenius theorem

Definition 1, (Metzler matrix, [8])

A is a Metzler matrix iff all its off-diagonal elements are non-negative.

Corollary 1, (Perron-Frobenius, [17])

Let A be an irreducible Metzler matrix. Then, λ M , the eigenvalue of A of largest real part is real, and the elements of its associated eigenvector v M are positive. Moreover, any eigenvector of A with non-negative elements belongs to span {v M }.

Remark 4

Actually, Smith proves more in his corollary (see [17]), but the remaining results are of no use for our purpose.

D Asymptotically autonomous systems

Definition 2 [13, 19]

Consider the systems:

$$\dot x= f(t,x)$$
(13)
$$\dot y=g(y)$$
(14)

with f(x,t) and g(x) continuous in x and t and locally Lipschitz in x on an open set \(\theta\subset{\mathbb R}^n.\) System Eq. 13 is asymptotically autonomous with limit system Eq. 14 if for all compact \(K\subset\theta:\)

$$\lim_{t\rightarrow+\infty}f(t,x)=g(x),\quad \forall x \in K $$

Theorem 1 [13, 19]

Consider the asymptotically autonomous system Eq. 13 with limit system Eq. 14 . Let e be a locally asymptotically stable equilibrium of Eq. 14 and ω the ω -limit set of a bounded solution x(t,x 0) of Eq. 13 . If ω contains a point y 0 such that the forward trajectory y (t,y 0) of Eq. 14 converges to e, then:

$$\lim_{t\rightarrow+\infty}x(t)=e$$

Remark 5

Observe that in our case, each forward trajectory of the limit system Eq. 11 initiated in \(\mathcal{E}.\)converges toward \(s^\star,\) and each trajectory of the asymptotically autonomous system Eq. 12 converges to \(\mathcal{E}.\) Then, each trajectory of the asymptotically autonomous system Eq. 12 converges to \(s^\star.\)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mailleret, L., Gouzé, J.L. & Bernard, O. Nonlinear control for algae growth models in the chemostat. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 27, 319–327 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-005-0410-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-005-0410-8

Keywords

Navigation