Abstract
The electrification of volcanic plumes has been described intermittently since at least the time of Pliny the Younger and the 79 AD eruption of Vesuvius. Although sometimes disregarded in the past as secondary effects, recent work suggests that the electrical properties of volcanic plumes reveal intrinsic and otherwise inaccessible parameters of explosive eruptions. An increasing number of volcanic lightning studies across the last decade have shown that electrification is ubiquitous in volcanic plumes. Technological advances in engineering and numerical modelling, paired with close observation of recent eruptions and dedicated laboratory studies (shock-tube and current impulse experiments), show that charge generation and electrical activity are related to the physical, chemical, and dynamic processes underpinning the eruption itself. Refining our understanding of volcanic plume electrification will continue advancing the fundamental understanding of eruptive processes to improve volcano monitoring. Realizing this goal, however, requires an interdisciplinary approach at the intersection of volcanology, atmospheric science, atmospheric electricity, and engineering. Our paper summarizes the rapid and steady progress achieved in recent volcanic lightning research and provides a vision for future developments in this growing field.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Volcanic ash plumes can produce intense electrical activity and lightning storms (Fig. 1; Rakov and Uman 2003; Mather and Harrison 2006; James et al. 2008; McNutt and Thomas 2015; Cimarelli and Genareau 2022). Increasing reports of volcanic lightning and instrumental detection following the eruptions of Augustine 2006, Redoubt 2009 and Eyjafjallajökull 2010 (Bennet et al. 2010; Thomas et al. 2010; Behnke et al. 2013) show that electrification is ubiquitous in ash plumes. The rapidly evolving knowledge of electrification phenomena at volcanoes has been proceeding hand in hand with technological advances in field-based detection and laboratory experiments as well as growing interest from the public. Social media allows global sharing of photos and videos documenting visible electrical activity in volcanic plumes even in the absence of dedicated instruments. This development has increased awareness that volcanic lightning is not just a striking feature associated with explosive eruptions but provides a new avenue to quantify the dynamics of explosive eruptions and their volcanic plumes.
Lightning detection is emerging as a new tool in the portfolio of eruption monitoring techniques. Volcanic lightning can be a near-real time indicator of explosive ash emissions due to rapid detection with remote instruments (including satellite-based sensors) and in conditions of poor visibility. Furthermore, advances in the satellite- and ground-based instruments routinely used to track lightning storms (e.g., Cummins and Murphy 2009; Rakov 2013; Nag et al. 2015) can also be applied to eruption monitoring (Poland et al. 2020). As a result, in the last few decades, multi-disciplinary research efforts have gained momentum in refining our understanding of this phenomenon and its link to eruption dynamics and hazards. The intrinsic difficulty of probing the interior of a volcanic plume emphasizes the importance of linking field and remote sensing observations to constrained laboratory experiments, where the basic mechanisms of gas-particle electrification can be systematically mapped. In addition, several key observations made possible by laboratory experiments also hold true for the natural systems, thus meaning that a many-fold approach is beneficial for fully understanding volcanic electrification processes.
This perspective piece briefly summarizes the state of the art in plume electrification and volcanic lightning gained in the last decade and projects future research on this topic outlining the expected goals in the field of volcano monitoring and the wider context of explosive volcanic eruptions.
Detection and characteristics of volcanic lightning
In the past decade, volcanic lightning research has benefited from the proliferation of a variety of lightning detection methods (Behnke and McNutt 2014). 2-D lightning locations from regional or long-range radio frequency (RF) sensor networks have enabled studies of volcanic lightning and plume charging mechanisms across the globe (e.g., Arason et al. 2011; Hargie et al. 2018; Van Eaton et al. 2016; Prata et al. 2020). 3-D very high frequency (VHF) Lightning Mapping Arrays (LMA) have been used for detailed study of volcanic lightning and the charge structure of volcanic plumes (Behnke et al. 2013; 2014). Photographs (Behnke et al. 2012; Van Eaton et al. 2022) and high-speed videos (Cimarelli et al. 2016) have provided a complementary ground truth to the RF measurements, thus providing the necessary context to define volcanic lightning types. From space, the Geostationary Lightning Mapper onboard GOES-16 offers persistent monitoring of volcanoes in the western hemisphere (Schultz et al. 2020). In addition, novel lightning monitoring instrumentation (Aizawa et al. 2011; 2016; Vossen et al. 2021; 2022) and sometimes serendipitous uses of established volcano monitoring instruments (Haney et al. 2018; 2020), further contribute to our volcanic lightning knowledge.
With increasing lightning observations, we have learned how the electrical activity evolves over the course of an explosive eruption, gaining insights into the charge structures of volcanic plumes. Generally, volcanic electrical activity manifests as vent discharges and lightning. Vent discharges typically occur in a high-rate burst within the gas-thrust region of an ash-rich plume (Thomas et al. 2010; Behnke et al. 2018), producing a characteristic VHF signal referred to as continual radio frequency (CRF; Fig. 2) (Thomas et al. 2007; Behnke et al. 2012, 2013). Vent discharges are hypothesized to be a form of streamer discharge (Behnke et al. 2018, 2021), rather than full-fledged lightning. Recent observations have shown that vent discharges commence before large-scale charge separation develops in the eruption column (Behnke et al. 2018) and that they may be enabled by the reduced atmospheric electric breakdown threshold in the near-vent region resulting from the propagation of shock waves (Méndez Harper et al. 2018; von der Linden et al. 2021). Vent discharges are correlated with the intensity of explosions (Smith et al. 2020, 2021) in which magma fragmentation and particle comminution occur (Smith et al. 2018a).
Lightning can occur throughout an eruption column, in a continuum of flashes ranging in length from tens or hundreds of meters proximal to the vent (Behnke et al. 2018; Aizawa et al. 2016; Thomas et al. 2010), to tens of kilometers in a fully developed ash cloud (Behnke et al. 2013, 2014). The locations and characteristics of lightning reveal information about the charge structure of a plume and can aid in inferring eruption styles (Fig. 1). In a typical explosive eruption, lightning often occurs within seconds of the onset of an explosion, in the gas-thrust region, where turbulence leads to a heterogeneous (Behnke et al. 2013; Aizawa et al. 2016; Cimarelli et al. 2016) and high-density charge structure (Haley et al. 2021). Over time, and in concert with the convection and eventual lateral spreading of the ash cloud, lightning increases in size, and horizontally stratified charge layers develop (Behnke et al. 2013, 2014; Behnke and Bruning 2015). Lightning rates have been correlated with increases in mass eruption rate, showing that particle acceleration, turbulence, and plume height/extent may all contribute to charging (Cimarelli et al. 2016; Hargie et al. 2018; Smith et al. 2021). In addition, lightning has been observed in association with pyroclastic flows, providing a means to differentiate changes in eruptive behavior (Van Eaton et al. 2016; Schultz et al. 2020).
Charging in volcanic plumes may also be actively detected using satellite GNSS networks such as GPS (Méndez Harper et al. 2019). Dense plumes of volcanic ash can attenuate GPS signals, providing information on microphysical and charge properties of the plumes (Aranzulla et al. 2013; Larson 2013; Grapenthin et al. 2018).
Electrification mechanisms
Lightning and other electrical phenomena associated with eruptions arise from processes that generate, separate, and concentrate charge within volcanic plumes. Electrification mechanisms evolve over the temporal and spatial development of volcanic plumes, and vary greatly with eruption style and intensity. The key mechanisms are broadly characterized by silicate charging and ice charging. Other charging mechanisms have been proposed which include the effects of magma-water interaction and water vaporization (Blanchard 1964; Björnsson et al. 1967; Büttner et al. 1997), the ambient electric field (Pähtz et al., 2010), and the radioactive decay of ash (Aplin et al. 2014) and gas (Nicoll et al. 2019).
Silicate charging
The common occurrence of electrical activity near to the vent implies that silicate charging processes begin at the earliest onset of eruption, within the vent or even the upper conduit. One process by which pyroclasts may charge in the absence of an ice phase involves the release and capture of ions (or electrons) during fragmentation and subsequent disruptive particle–particle collisions (Dickinson et al. 1981). Laboratory experiments suggest that released charge carriers may then be redistributed among particles of different aerodynamic diameters to produce large-scale charge separation required for breakdown (James et al. 2000).
Within the conduit and the near-vent region, non-disruptive collisions may also produce charging through triboelectrification, which encompasses contact and frictional electrification (Aplin et al. 2014; Méndez Harper and Dufek 2016). Triboelectricity occurs when two surfaces collide or rub and then separate. Despite being the oldest-known manifestation of electricity, there is no consensus on the charge species exchanged upon contact. Some authors suggest that tribocharging is driven by the exchange of electrons trapped in unfavorable energy states (Forward et al. 2009a,b,c), whereas others suggest that electrification may reflect the transport of ions (possibly water ions) across surfaces (Gu et al. 2013; Xie et al. 2016). Additional experiments (Baytekin et al. 2011) have revealed that microscopic bits of material are exchanged between surfaces during contacts. Such findings imply that triboelectricity and fractoelectricity may be related.
Triboelectric charging of granular materials often results in smaller, negatively charged particles and larger, positively charged particles (Forward et al. 2009c; Waitukaitis et al. 2014; Lee et al. 2015; Méndez Harper et al. 2021b). This size-dependent bipolar charging may be critical for generating discharges in proximal volcanic jets and other dusty flows (Forward et al. 2009b; Méndez Harper et al. 2018, 2021a) as particles of different sizes and opposite charge become separated through turbulence (Cimarelli et al. 2014; Behnke and Bruning 2015) or particle sedimentation (Miura et al. 2002; Zheng et al. 2003; Harrison et al. 2016).
The relationship between silicate charging and volatiles is poorly understood. Although small amounts of water may be responsible for frictional electrification through ion transfer, there is evidence that larger amounts of liquid water may effectively shut off tribocharging in a granular flow. For instance, experiments by Méndez Harper et al. (2020) showed that the magnitude of charge on agitated volcanic ash decreases with increasing humidity, consistent with the experimental findings of Toth et al. (2017). Observationally, at least one of the Alaskan eruptions of Bogoslof volcano in 2017 (event 29) produced less lightning after seawater inundated the vent (Van Eaton et al. 2020).
Overall, the current experimental and observational data suggests that fracto- and triboelectric charging are likely electrification mechanisms within the conduit and in near-vent region. These two mechanisms may be responsible for the production of electrical activity occurring near to the vent. However, additional efforts are required to determine (1) the relative efficiency between both mechanisms and whether they operate synergistically; (2) the manner in which fractocharging redistributes charge among fragments; and (3) whether or not fracto- and triboelectric charging are fundamentally end members of a broader fractotriboelectrification mechanism.
Ice charging
Although large amounts of water at the eruptive vent may be detrimental to charging, electrification may be reinvigorated by the presence of ice as volcanic plumes rise into freezing levels of the local atmosphere (generally colder than –20 °C; Genareau et al. 2018; Maters et al. 2019, 2020). Numerical simulations show that phreatomagmatic eruptions, which incorporate external water (e.g. from lakes, glaciers, hydrothermal systems), develop a mixed-phase region within the turbulent core of the upper plume. This region contains liquid water, cloud ice, and graupel/hail (Williams and McNutt 2005; Van Eaton et al. 2012, 2015, 2022), triggering thunderstorm-like ice charging mechanisms (Saunders 2008). These conditions may explain the impressive rates of volcanic lightning rivaling supercell thunderstorms (e.g., Arason et al. 2011; Behnke et al. 2013; Prata et al. 2020; Van Eaton et al. 2020). “Dry” magmatic eruptions can also produce ice in upper levels of the plume (Van Eaton et al. 2016), but lack sufficient liquid water to sustain a vigorous mixed-phase region. Mounting evidence suggests that the presence of both ice and sustained updrafts in tall plumes contribute to abundant, higher-current lightning discharges detectable by long-range sensors (Arason et al. 2011; Woodhouse and Behnke 2014; Van Eaton et al. 2020, 2022).
Evidence and effects of lightning in ashfall deposits
Lightning interacts with and modifies volcanic particles, providing a possible means of physically documenting the occurrence of lightning through the ashfall deposits. Several types of modified ash have been observed. Lightning-induced volcanic spherules (LIVS) range from 1 to 100 μm in diameter and can be solid or hollow (Genareau et al. 2015). Solid LIVS form from a single ash particle while hollow LIVS form from detachment of an expanding gas bubble from a larger pumiceous particle (Genareau et al. 2019a). Their upper size limit is compatible with the timescale of ash melting by lightning discharges (Wadsworth et al. 2017). Lightning-generated pumiceous particles observed so far are differentiated from primary fragmentation textures by their lack of microlites and smooth, glassy outer surfaces (Genareau et al. 2019a). Fulgurites in volcanic deposits are rare, probably due to the difficulty in finding and recognizing them in the field (Clocchiatti 1990; Castro et al. 2020).
Experimental generation of lightning and lightning simulation experiments
Shock-tube experiments
Particle-laden jets generated by rapid decompression in a shock-tube under controlled environmental conditions produce electrical discharges by self-charging mechanisms (Cimarelli et al. 2014). Experimental data show that vent overpressure, mass of solid ejected, and proportion of fine particles affect discharge characteristics. While the proportion of fine particles positively correlates with the total number of discharges, initial pressure and ejected mass may control the discharge size (Gaudin and Cimarelli 2019). Furthermore, increasing the total water content of the mixture dramatically reduces the occurrence of discharges in the jet (Stern et al. 2019).
Current impulse experiments
Laboratory modification of volcanic ash has been achieved through high-current (7–100 kA) electrical impulse experiments, which recreate the temperatures (~ 20,000 ℃) (Genareau et al. 2017) and magnetic fields generated in the plasma channel of natural lightning exceeding by orders of magnitude the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field. These experiments produce textures in pseudo-ash samples like those found in ashfall deposits (Genareau et al. 2020) and show that particles proximal to the lightning channel may be disassociated, melted, and fused together (Genareau et al. 2017). Although the radial zone of the channel suitable for melting is only 10% of the entire channel volume (Genareau et al. 2017), these effects will destroy or fuse together fine ash particles (Genareau et al. 2019a) and potentially modify portions of larger pyroclasts in the plume. In the experiments, melted particles tend to lack microlites and display mingled heterogeneous glass compositions with zones of element enrichment (Woods et al. 2021). Particles may also vesiculate by exsolution of residual volatiles in the glass phase, analogous to natural lightning-induced pumiceous particles (Genareau et al. 2019a). Additionally, the magnetic properties of the particles change, showing increased magnetization (Genareau et al. 2019b), similar to locations struck by cloud-to-ground lightning (Cox 1961; Sakai et al. 1998; Verrier and Rochette 2002).
Lightning detection in volcano monitoring
As with ordinary electrical discharges, volcanic lightning can pose a direct hazard to life and property (McNutt and Thomas 2015; Van Eaton et al. 2022), including destroying volcano monitoring stations. Few countries account for lightning threats in their long-term volcanic hazard maps, with the notable exceptions of Iceland and Chile. For example, hazard maps for Katla volcano indicate a volcanic lightning zone within 40 km of the vent (Icelandic Civil Protection 2017) (Fig. 3).
Volcanic lightning can also help detect and characterize explosive activity to keep aircraft out of harm’s way. Its operational use has evolved since early applications at Mount Spurr, Alaska, in 1992 (Paskievitch et al. 1995) and Grímsvötn, Iceland, in 1998 (Arason et al. 2013 and references therein). In recent years the USGS Alaska Volcano Observatory has started integrating global lightning detection into automated eruption alerts (Coombs et al. 2018). During the 2016–2017 eruption of Bogoslof volcano in the remote Aleutian Islands, lightning provided the earliest indication of ash-rich plumes in some cases (Fig. 4). However, there were also important limitations—lightning was only detected in ash plumes sustained above the local atmospheric freezing level. Thus, fewer than half of the 70 explosive events from Bogoslof created lightning that was measurable by long-range sensors (Van Eaton et al. 2020). An additional limitation is that it can be difficult to distinguish volcanic lightning from background storms in tropical regions with abundant meteorological lightning, such as the Philippines and Indonesia (Hargie et al. 2018). In the future, this challenge may be addressed by tracking spatial changes in lightning locations through time to identify the vent location and eruptive processes (Arason et al. 2013; Smith et al. 2018b; McKee et al. 2021a,b).
Despite these limitations, volcanic lightning detection fills an important gap in the suite of monitoring tools used by volcano observatories. Each of the existing monitoring approaches has strengths and weaknesses, depending on the level of in situ monitoring at a given volcano (Coombs et al. 2018). The value of long-range lightning sensors is that they can assist the early recognition of ash-rich eruptions that send a plume above freezing altitudes (Fig. 4). By comparison, there can be several to tens of minutes between satellite images available in real time and views can be obscured by cloud cover (Poland et al. 2020; Engwell et al. 2021). Infrasound signals may be affected by local wind or complex atmospheric propagation, and seismic data may not clearly distinguish eruptive and pre-eruptive ground motion (Coombs et al. 2018). Globally detected lightning is becoming increasingly integrated at volcano observatories and volcanic ash advisory centers around the world, including in Kamchatka (Shevtsov et al. 2016) and Argentina (Baissac et al. 2021). Recent recommendations for operational volcano monitoring in the USA have also been updated to include volcanic electrification (Flinders et al. under review).
Future directions in volcanic lightning research
Looking ahead, new laboratory experiments would be valuable to detail charging mechanisms under the variable conditions dictated by volcanic activity and the surrounding environment. Parameters such as grain size distribution, grain composition, temperature, pressure, and volatile content (H2O, SO2, and other species) should be further explored. Although previous experiments have provided an initial framework, the influence of volcanic particles on charging and discharge characteristics should be tested at the laboratory scale to improve interpretations of the remotely sensed datasets. We expect these experimental results may be combined with existing lightning models from meteorology to build electrification modules into high-resolution numerical simulations of volcanic plumes and their electrical behavior. Moreover, the impacts of lightning on volcanic plumes and the phases within them leave many avenues for further exploration. It has been shown that lightning alters volcanic ash properties, but it is not yet known how these physical, chemical, and magnetic changes may influence volcanic ash on a broader scale. There is also a potentially measurable effect on the atmospheric properties surrounding the discharge channel. The rapid melting of solid phases coupled with reduction/oxidation of volatile components in the volcanic plume may produce a number of unique chemical species important for various Earth system processes, including biologic activity (Navarro-González and Segura 2001).
Volcanic lightning research is rapidly moving forward through multi-disciplinary studies and technological advances. Research efforts in the coming decade will continue to extend volcanic lightning observations to a wider range of explosive activity following a multi-instrumental approach. Combining the various ground-based and satellite-based remote sensing instruments will be key to constraining lightning properties, plume dynamics, and microphysics. Paired with long-distance lightning detection, the development of miniaturized and cost-effective near-field sensors to simultaneously monitor lightning properties (e.g., electromagnetic fields, infrasonic signals) and eruption plume properties (e.g., SO2 content, grain size distribution) will enable more direct analysis of smaller eruptions where lightning may go undetected by global networks. Each of these developments will support our ability to incorporate near-real time analysis of lightning data to characterize volcanic plumes in operational settings. Constraining eruption source parameters such as plume height, mass eruption rate, and ash/water content using volcanic lightning will ultimately play a growing role in forecasting volcanic ash hazards in the atmosphere and on the ground.
The study of volcanic lightning has, so far, bridged the disciplines of geology, atmospheric science, atmospheric electricity, remote sensing, and electrical engineering. In years to come, it will likely be relevant to many other scientific fields due to the complexity of this natural phenomenon.
References
Aizawa K, Kanda W, Ogawa Y, Iguchi M, Yokoo A, Yakiwara H, Sugano T (2011) Temporal changes in electrical resistivity at Sakurajima volcano from continuous magnetotelluric observations. J Volcanol Geoth Res 199(1–2):165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.11.003
Aizawa K, Cimarelli C, Alatorre-Ibargüengoitia MA, Yokoo A, Dingwell DB, Iguchi M (2016) Physical properties of volcanic lightning: constraints from magnetotelluric and video observations at Sakurajima volcano, Japan. Earth Planet Sci Lett 444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2016.03.024
Aplin KL, Houghton IMP, Nicoll KA (2014) Electrical charging of ash in Icelandic volcanic plumes. XV International Conference on Atmospheric Electricity, 15–20 June 2014, Norman, Oklahoma, USA., (June), 1–5
Aranzulla M, Cannavò F, Scollo S, Puglisi G, Immè G (2013) Volcanic ash detection by GPS signal. GPS Solut 17:485–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0294-4
Arason T, Bennett AJ, Burgin LE (2011) Charge mechanism of volcanic lightning revealed during the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajkull. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 116(12):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008651
Arason T, Petersen GN, Bjornsson H (2013) Estimation of eruption site location using volcanic lightning. Icelandic Met Office Vedustofar Islands Report 2013–006
Baissac DM, Nicora MG, Bali LJ, Badi GA, Ávila EE (2021) Volcanic alert system by lightning detection using the WWLLN - ash cloud monitor. J S Am Earth Sci 108:103234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103234
Baytekin HT, Patashinski AZ, Branicki M, Baytekin B, Soh S, Grzybowski BA (2011) The mosaic of surface charge in contact electrification. Sci 333(6040):308–312
Behnke SA, Bruning EC (2015) Changes to the turbulent kinematics of a volcanic plume inferred from lightning data. Geophys Res Lett 42(10):4232–4239. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064199
Behnke SA, McNutt SR (2014) Using lightning observations as a volcanic eruption monitoring tool. Bull Volcanol 76(8):847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-014-0847-1
Behnke SA, Thomas RJ, Krehbiel PR, McNutt SR (2012) Spectacular lightning revealed in Mount Redoubt Eruption. Eos Trans AGU 93(20):193–194. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012EO200001
Behnke SA, Thomas RJ, McNutt SR, Schneider DJ, Krehbiel PR, Rison W, Edens HE (2013) Observations of volcanic lightning during the 2009 eruption of Redoubt Volcano. J Volcanol Geoth Res 259:214–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2011.12.010
Behnke SA, Thomas RJ, Edens HE, Krehbiel PR, Rison W (2014) The 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull: lightning and plume charge structure. J Geophys Res 119(2):833–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020781
Behnke SA, Edens HE, Thomas RJ, Smith CM, McNutt SR, Van Eaton AR, Cigala V (2018) Investigating the origin of continual radio frequency impulses during explosive volcanic eruptions. J Geophys Res: Atmos, 123(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027990
Bennett AJ, Odams P, Edwards D, Arason Þ (2010) Monitoring of lightning from the April–May 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption using a very low frequency lightning location network. Environ Res Lett 5:044013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044013
Behnke SA, Edens H, Senay S, Iguchi M, Miki D (2021) Radio frequency characteristics of volcanic lightning and vent discharges. J Geophys Res: Atmos 126 (18). https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD034495
Björnsson S, Blanchard DC, Spencer AT (1967) Charge generation due to contact of saline waters with molten lava. J Geophys Res 72:1311–1323
Blanchard DC (1964) Charge separation from saline drops on hot surfaces. Nature 201:1164–1166
Büttner R, Röder H, Zimanowski B (1997) Electrical effects generated by experimental volcanic explosions. Appl Phys Lett 70(14):1903–1905. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.118726
Castro JM, Keller F, Feisel Y, Lanari P, Helo C, Mueller SP, Thomas C (2020) Lightning-induced weathering of Cascadian volcanic peaks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 552:116595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116595
Cimarelli C, Genareau K (2022) A review of volcanic electrification of the atmosphere and volcanic lightning. J Volcanol Geotherm Res (Vol. 422). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107449
Cimarelli C, Alatorre-Ibargüengoitia MA, Kueppers U, Scheu B, Dingwell DB (2014) Experimental generation of volcanic lightning. Geol 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1130/G34802.1
Cimarelli C, Alatorre-Ibargüengoitia MA, Aizawa K, Yokoo A, Díaz-Marina A, Iguchi M, Dingwell DB (2016) Multiparametric observation of volcanic lightning: Sakurajima Volcano, Japan. Geophys Res Lett, 43(9). https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067445
Clocchiatti R (1990) Les fulgurites et roches vitrifiees de l’Etna. Eur J Mineral 2(4):479–494
Coombs ML, Wech AG, Haney MM, Lyons JJ, Schneider DJ, Schwaiger HF, Wallace KL, Fee D, Freymueller JT, Schaefer JR, Tepp G (2018) Short-term forecasting and detection of explosions during the 2016–2017 eruption of Bogoslof Volcano. Alaska Front Earth Sci 6(122):1–17
Cox AV (1961) Anomalous Remanent Magnetization of Basalt. vol. No. 1083. US Government Printing Office
Cummins K, Murphy M (2009) An overview of lightning locating systems: history, techniques, and data uses, with an in-depth look at the US NLDN. IEEE Trans Electromag Compat 51(3):499–518. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMC.2009.2023450
Dickinson JT, Donaldson EE, Park MK (1981) The emission of electrons and positive ions from fracture of materials. J Mater Sci 16(10):2897–2908. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00552976
Engwell S, Mastin L, Tupper A, Kibler J, Acethorp P, Lord G, Filgueira R (2021) Near-real-time volcanic cloud monitoring: insights into global explosive volcanic eruptive activity through analysis of Volcanic Ash Advisories. Bull Volcanol 83(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-020-01419-y
Flinder AF, Moran SC, Montgomery-Brown, Coombs ML, EK, Dietterich HR, Hurwitz S, Ingebritsen SE, Lewicki JL, Lowenstern JB, Lyons JJ, Orr TR, Poland MP, Schneider DJ, Tepp G, Thelen WA, Van Eaton AR, Anderson KR, Elias T, Fee D, Nadeau P, Kelly PJ, Kern C, Wech AG, Freymueller JT, Power JA, Werner CA (under review). Recommended capabilities and instrumentation for volcano monitoring in the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2022–XXXX
Forward KM, Lacks DJ, Sankaran RM (2009) Charge segregation depends on particle size in triboelectrically charged granular materials. Phys Rev Lett 102(2):28001
Forward KM, Lacks DJ, Sankaran RM (2009a) Particle-size dependent bipolar charging of Martian regolith simulant. Geophys Res Lett 36:L13201. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038589/abstract.10.1029/2009GL038589
Forward KM, Lacks DJ, Sankaran RM (2009b) Triboelectric charging of lunar regolith simulant. J Geophys Res: Space Physics, 114 :A10109. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014559/abstractJA014559
Gaudin D, Cimarelli C (2019) The electrification of volcanic jets and controlling parameters: a laboratory study. Earth Planet Sci Lett 513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.02.024
Genareau K, Wardman JB, Wilson TM, McNutt SR, Izbekov P (2015) Lightning-induced volcanic spherules. Geology 43(4):319–322. https://doi.org/10.1130/G36255.1
Genareau K, Gharghabi P, Gafford J, Mazzola M (2017) The elusive evidence of volcanic lightning. Sci Rep 7(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15643-8
Genareau K, Wallace KL, Gharghabi P, Gafford J (2019) Lightning effects on the grain size distribution of volcanic ash. Geophys Res Lett 46(6):3133–3141
Genareau K, Hong Y-K, Lee W, Choi M, Rostaghi-Chalaki M, Gharghabi P, Klüss J (2019) Effects of lightning on the magnetic properties of volcanic ash. Sci Rep 9(1):4726. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41265-3
Genareau K, Gharghabi P, Klüss J (2020) Influence of shock propagation on lightning evidence in volcanic ashfall deposits. Earth Planet Sci Lett 535:116124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116124
Genareau K, Cloer SM, Primm K, Tolbert MA, Woods TW (2018) Compositional and mineralogical effects on ice nucleation activity of volcanic ash. 5–7. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9070238
Grapenthin R, Hreinsdóttir S, Van Eaton AR (2018) Volcanic hail detected with GPS: The 2011 eruption of Grímsvötn volcano Iceland. Geophys Res Lett 45(22):12,236-212,243. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gl080317
Gu Z, Wei W, Su J, Yu CW (2013) The role of water content in triboelectric charging of wind-blown sand. Sci rep 3:1337
Haley S, Behnke SA, Edens H, Thomas R (2021) Observations show charge density of volcanic plumes is higher than thunderstorms. J Geophys Res: Atmos 126 (19). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035404
Haney MM, Van Eaton AR, Lyons JJ, Kramer RL, Fee D, Iezzi AM (2018) Volcanic thunder from explosive eruptions at Bogoslof Volcano Alaska. Geophys Res Lett 45(8):3429–3435. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076911
Haney MM, Van Eaton AR, Lyons JJ, Kramer RL, Fee D, Iezzi AM, Stock M (2020) Characteristics of thunder and electromagnetic pulses from volcanic lightning at Bogoslof volcano Alaska. Bull Volcanol 82(2):15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-019-1349-y
Hargie KA, Van Eaton AR, Mastin LG, Holzworth RH, Ewert JW, Pavolonis M (2018) Globally detected volcanic lightning and umbrella dynamics during the 2014 eruption of Kelud, Indonesia. J Volcanol Geoth Res 382:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.10.016
Harrison RG, Barth E, Esposito F, Merrison J, Montmessin F, Aplin KL et al (2016) Applications of electrified dust and dust devil electrodynamics to Martian atmospheric electricity. Space Sci Rev 203(1–4):299–345
Icelandic Civil Protection (2017) Katla—Mýrdalsjökull, www.almannavarnir.is/utgefid-efni/katla-myrdalsjokull/?wpdmdl=22272 (last accessed 25 March 2022)
James MR, Lane SJ, Gilbert JS (2000) Volcanic plume electrification: experimental investigation of a fracture-charging mechanism. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 105(B7):16641–16649. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900068
James MR, Wilson L, Lane SJ, Gilbert JS, Mather TA, Harrison RG, Martin RS (2008) Electrical charging of volcanic plumes. Space Sci Rev 137(1–4):399–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9362-z
Larson KM (2013) A new way to detect volcanic plumes. Geophys Res Lett 40(11):2657–2660. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50556
Lee V, Waitukaitis SR, Miskin MZ, Jaeger HM (2015) Direct observation of particle interactions and clustering in charged granular streams. Nat Phys 11(9):733–737
Maters EC, Dingwell DB, Cimarelli C, Müller D, Whale TF, Murray BJ (2019) The importance of crystalline phases in ice nucleation by volcanic ash. Atmos Chem Phys 19(8):5451–5465. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5451-2019
Maters EC, Cimarelli C, Casas AS, Dingwell DB, Murray BJ (2020) Volcanic ash ice-nucleating activity can be enhanced or depressed by ash-gas interaction in the eruption plume. Earth Planet Sci Lett 551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116587
Mather TA, Harrison RG (2006) Electrification of volcanic plumes. Surv Geophys 27(4):387–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-006-9007-2
McKee K, Smith CM, Reath K, Snee E, Maher S, Matoza RS, Carn S, Mastin L, Anderson K, Damby D, Roman DC, Degterev A, Rybin A, Chibisova M, Assink JD, de NegriLeiva R, Perttu A (2021) Evaluating the state-of-the-art in remote volcanic eruption characterization Part I: Raikoke volcano Kuril Islands. J Volcanol Geotherm Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107354
McKee K, Smith CM, Reath K, Snee E, Maher S, Matoza RS, Carn S, Roman DC, Mastin L, Anderson K, Damby D, Itikarai I, Mulina K, Saunders S, Assink JD, de NegriLeiva R, Perttu A (2021) Evaluating the state-of-the-art in remote volcanic eruption characterization Part II: Ulawun volcano Papua New Guinea. J Volcanol Geotherm Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107381
McNutt SR, Thomas RJ (2015) Volcanic Lightning. H. Sigurdsson, ed. The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes (2nd Ed.). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385938-9.00062-6
Méndez Harper J, Dufek J (2016) The effects of dynamics on the triboelectrification of volcanic ash. J Geophys Res 121(14):8209–8228. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024275
Méndez Harper J, Steffes P, Dufek J, Akins A (2019) The effect of electrostatic charge on the propagation of GPS (L-band) signals through volcanic plumes. J Geophys Res: Atmos 124(4):2260–2275. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029076
Méndez Harper J, Courtland L, Dufek J, McAdams J (2020) Microphysical effects of water content and temperature on the triboelectrification of volcanic ash on long time scales. J Geophys Res: Atmos 125(14):e2019JD031498. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031498
Méndez Harper J, Dufek J, McDonald GD (2021) Detection of spark discharges in an agitated Mars dust simulant isolated from foreign surfaces. Icarus 357:114268
Méndez Harper J, Cimarelli C, Cigala V, Kueppers U, Dufek J (2021) Charge injection into the atmosphere by explosive volcanic eruptions. Earth Planet Sci Lett 574:117162
Méndez Harper JS, Cimarelli C, Dufek J, Gaudin D, Thomas R.J (2018) Inferring compressible fluid dynamics from vent discharges during volcanic eruptions. Geophys Res Lett 45(14). https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078286
Miura T, Koyaguchi T, Tanaka Y (2002) Measurements of electric charge distribution in volcanic plumes at Sakurajima volcano Japan. Bull Volcanol 64(2):75–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-001-0182-1
Nag A, Murphy MJ, Schulz W, Cummins KL (2015) Lightning locating systems: Insights on characteristics and validation techniques. Earth Space Sci 2:65–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EA000051
Navarro-González R, Segura A (2001) Volcanic lightning and the availability of reactive nitrogen and phosphorus for chemical evolution. In First Steps in the Origin of Life in the Universe (pp. 201–210). Springer, Dordrecht
Nicoll K, Airey M, Cimarelli C, Bennett A, Harrison G, Gaudin D, Marlton G (2019) First in situ observations of gaseous volcanic plume electrification. Geophysical Research Letters. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082211
Pähtz T, Herrmann HJ, Shinbrot T (2010) Why do particle clouds generate electric charges? Nat Phys 6(5):364–368. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1631
Paskievitch JF, Murray TL, Hoblitt RP, Neal CA (1995) Lightning associated with the August 18, 1992, eruption of Crater Peak vent, Mount Spurr Volcano, Alaska, in Keith, T.E.C., The 1992 eruptions of Crater Peak vent, Mount Spurr Volcano, Alaska: U.S. Geol Surv Bull 2139:179–182. https://doi.org/10.3133/b2139
Pliny the Younger (2001) Letters of Pliny, edited by F. C. T. Bosanquet
Poland MP, Lopez T, Wright R, Pavolonis MJ (2020) Forecasting, detecting, and tracking volcanic eruptions from space. Remote Sens Earth Syst Sci 3(1–2):55–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41976-020-00034-x
Prata AT, Folch A, Prata AJ, Biondi R, Brenot H, Cimarelli C, Corradini S (2020) Anak Krakatau triggers volcanic freezer in the upper troposphere. Sci Rep 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60465-w
Rakov VA (2013) Electromagnetic methods of lightning detection. Surv Geophys 34(4):731–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-013-9251-1
Rakov VA, Uman MA (2003) Lightning. Physics and Effects. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107340886
Sakai H, Sunada S, Sakurano H (1998) Study of lightning current by remanent magnetization. Electr Eng Jpn 123(4):41–47
Saunders C (2008) Charge separation mechanisms in clouds. Space Sci Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9345-0
Schultz CJ, Andrews VP, Genareau KD, Naeger AR (2020) Observations of lightning in relation to transitions in volcanic activity during the 3 June 2018 Fuego Eruption. Sci Rep 10(1):1–12
Shevtsov BM, Firstov PP, Cherneva NV, Holzworth RH, Akbashev RR (2016) Lightning and electrical activity during the Shiveluch volcano eruption on 16 November 2014. Nat Hazard 16(3):871–874. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-871-2016
Smith CM, Van Eaton AR, Charbonnier S, McNutt SR, Behnke SA, Thomas RJ, Thompson G (2018) Correlating the electrification of volcanic plumes with ashfall textures at Sakurajima Volcano, Japan. Earth Planet Sci Lett 492:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2018.03.052
Smith CM, Thompson G, Reader S, Behnke SA, McNutt SR, Thomas R, Edens H (2020) Examining the statistical relationships between volcanic seismic, infrasound, and electrical signals: a case study of Sakurajima volcano, 2015. J Volcanol Geoth Res 402:16996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2020.106996
Smith CM, Van Eaton AR, Said R, Holzworth RH (2018b) Volcanic lightning as a monitoring tool during the 2016–2017 eruption of Bogoslof volcano, AK. Abstract presented at the International Lightning Detection Conference and International Lightning Meteorology Conference, 12–15 March, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 5 pp
Smith CM, Gaudin D, Van Eaton AR, Behnke SA, Reader S, Thomas RJ, Cimarelli C (2021) Impulsive volcanic plumes generate volcanic lightning and vent discharges : a statistical analysis of Sakurajima Volcano in 2015 Geophysical Research Letters. Geophys Res Lett 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092323
Stern S, Cimarelli C, Gaudin D, Scheu B, Dingwell DB (2019) Electrification of experimental volcanic jets with varying water content and temperature geophysical research letters. Geophys Res Lett 1:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084678
Thomas RJ, Rison W, McNutt SR, Krehbiel PR, Rison W, Edens HE, Clark E (2007) Electrical activity during the 2006 Mount St Augustine Volcanic Eruptions. Sci 315(March):1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136091
Thomas RJ, McNutt SR, Krehbiel PR, Rison W, Aulich G, Harald E, Tytgat G, Clark E (2010) Lightning and electrical activity during the 2006 eruption of Augustine volcano. The 2006 Eruption of Augustine Volcano, Alaska Power, J.A., Coombs, M.L., and Freymueller, J.T., Editors U.S. Geol Surv Prof Pap 1769:579–608
Toth JR, Phillips AK, Rajupet S, Sankaran RM, Lacks DJ (2017) Particle-size-dependent triboelectric charging in single-component granular materials: role of humidity. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(35):9839–9845
Van Eaton AR, Herzog M, Wilson CJN, McGregor J (2012) Ascent dynamics of large phreatomagmatic eruption clouds: the role of microphysics. J Geophys Res 117:B03203. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008892
Van Eaton AR, Mastin LG, Herzog M, Schwaiger HF, Schneider DJ, Wallace KL, Clarke AB (2015) Hail formation triggers rapid ash aggregation in volcanic plumes. Nat Commun 6:7860. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8860
Van Eaton AR, Amigo Á, Bertin D, Mastin LG, Giacosa RE, González J, Valderrama O, Fontijn K, Behnke SA (2016) Volcanic lightning and plume behavior reveal evolving hazards during the April 2015 eruption of Calbuco volcano Chile. Geophys Res Lett 43(7):3563–3571. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068076
Van Eaton AR, Schneider DJ, Smith CM, Haney MM, Said R, Fee D, Holzworth RH, Mastin LG (2020) Did ice-charging generate volcanic lightning during the 2016 – 2017 eruption of Bogoslof volcano, Alaska. Bull Volcanol 80(24). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-00019-01350-00445
Van Eaton AR, Smith CM, Pavolonis M, Said R (2022) Eruption dynamics leading to a volcanic thunderstorm—the January 2020 eruption of Taal volcano, Philippines. Geology. https://doi.org/10.1130/G49490.1
Verrier V, Rochette P (2002) Estimating peak currents at ground lightning impacts using remanent magnetization. Geophys Res Lett 29(18):14–21
von der Linden J, Kimblin C, McKenna I, Bagley S, Li H-C, Houim R, Kueny CS, Kuhl A, Grote D, Converse M, Vossen CEJ, Stern S, Cimarelli C, Sears J (2021) Standing shock prevents propagation of sparks in supersonic explosive flows. Commun Earth Environ 2(1):195. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00263-y
Vossen CEJ, Cimarelli C, Bennett A, Schmid M, Kueppers U, Ricci T, Taddeucci J (2022) The electrical signature of mafic explosive eruptions at Stromboli volcano Italy. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12906-x
Vossen C, Cimarelli C, Bennett A, Geisle A, Gaudin D, Miki D, Iguchi M, Dingwell DB (2021) Long-term observation of electrical discharges during persistent Vulcanian activity. Earth Planet Sci Lett 570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117084
Wadsworth FB, Vasseur J, Llewellin EW, Genareau K, Cimarelli C, Dingwell DB (2017) Size limits for rounding of volcanic ash particles heated by lightning. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth, 122(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013864
Waitukaitis SR, Lee V, Pierson JM, Forman SL, Jaeger HM (2014) Size-dependent same-material tribocharging in insulating grains. Phys Rev Lett 112(21):218001
Williams ER, McNutt SR (2005) Total water contents in volcanic eruption clouds and implications for electrification and lightning. In: Pontikis C (Ed) Research Signpost, Recent Progress in Lightning Physics, pp13
Woodhouse MJ, Behnke SA (2014) Charge structure in volcanic plumes: a comparison of plume properties predicted by an integral plume model to observations of volcanic lightning during the 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull Iceland. Bull Volcanol 76(8):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-014-0828-4
Wood TW, Genareau K, Klüss J (2021) Alteration of volcanic ash glass chemistry due to lightning. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 419:107340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107340
Xie L, Bao N, Jiang Y, Zhou J (2016) Effect of humidity on contact electrification due to collision between spherical particles. AIP Adv 6(3):2158–3226
Zheng XJ, Huang N, Zhou YH (2003) Laboratory measurement of electrification of wind‐blown sands and simulation of its effect on sand saltation movement. J Geophys Res: Atmos 108(D10)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript and constructive feedback from Cassandra Smith and Larry Mastin. CC acknowledges funding from ERC-Con Grant “VOLTA” under contract N° 864052 and DFG grant CI 254/2-1. SB was supported by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Los Alamos National Laboratory under project number 20190107ER. KG was funded by the National Science Foundation (EAR 1553878) and thanks Taylor W. Woods.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: F. Sigmundsson
This paper constitutes part of a topical collection:
Looking Backwards and Forwards in Volcanology: A Collection of Perspectives on the Trajectory of a Science
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cimarelli, C., Behnke, S., Genareau, K. et al. Volcanic electrification: recent advances and future perspectives. Bull Volcanol 84, 78 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-022-01591-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-022-01591-3