Seismic velocity variations associated with the 2018 lower East Rift Zone eruption of Kīlauea, Hawaiʻi

Abstract

The 2018 lower East Rift Zone eruption of Kīlauea (Hawai‘i) marked a dramatic change in the volcano’s 35-year-long rift zone eruption. The collapse of the middle East Rift Zone vent Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō was followed by one of the volcano’s most voluminous eruptions in 500 years. Over the course of this 3-month eruption, the draining of summit-stored magma led to near-daily collapses of a portion of the caldera and ultimately up to 500 m of summit subsidence. While deformation data indicated that the summit and middle East Rift Zone were inflating for the previous several years, why Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō collapsed and what initiated down-rift dike propagation remains unclear. Using ambient noise seismic interferometry, we show that a Ml5.3 decollement earthquake beneath Kīlauea’s south flank in June 2017 induced a coseismic decrease of up to 0.30% in seismic velocity throughout the volcano. This velocity decrease may have been caused by dynamic stress–induced shallow crustal fracture, i.e., weakening to dilatant crack growth, and was greatest near Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō. Additionally, we verify a pre-eruptive increase in seismic velocity, consistent with increasing pressurization in the volcano’s shallow summit magma reservoir. This velocity increase occurred coincident with the first in a series of lower-crustal earthquake swarms, 6 days before a 2-month period of rapid summit and middle East Rift Zone inflation. The increase in up-rift magma-static pressure, combined with the pre-existing weakness from the June 2017 earthquake, may have facilitated down-rift dike propagation and the devastating 2018 eruption.

Introduction

Kīlauea volcano is the youngest and most active of the five volcanoes that form the Island of Hawai‘i. Currently, the volcano consists of a summit caldera overlying a magma reservoir complex which includes at least two storage zones, a shallow zone at 1–2 km and a deep zone between 3- and 5-km depth (Poland et al. 2014). Extending from the summit are two rift zones—the East Rift Zone (ERZ) and the Southwest Rift Zone (SWRZ) (Fig. 1). Prior to May 2018, Kīlauea had been erupting semi-continuously for the past 35 years, with activity focused at two vents: a middle East Rift Zone (MERZ) vent, Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō, located 20 km down-rift from the summit and active since 1983 (Heliker and Brantley 2002); and a summit lava lake within the Halemaʻumaʻu pit crater, active since 2008 (Patrick et al. 2018).

Fig. 1
figure1

Seismic ambient noise interferometry network map of Kīlauea, Hawai‘i. (Main) Three-component (triangle) and single-component (circle) seismometers used in the Southwest Rift Zone (yellow), summit (blues/red), and East Rift Zone (green) ambient noise interferometry (ANI) groups. The approximate extent of the two rift zones are given by the dashed lines. An InSAR interferogram spanning the final month of the eruption (July–August 2018) is overlain in the Southwest Rift Zone. Also shown are the areas of erupted lava in the Lower East Rift Zone (red) and the location and focal mechanisms for two earthquakes (focal spheres), the pre-eruptive 2017 Ml5.3, and the syn-eruptive 2018 Mw6.9. (Inset right) The summit seismic network and location of the summit lava lake (dark red) within the Halema‘uma‘u pit crater. Summit stations are colored by subgroupings (north/south); see Fig. 6 for details. Sublabels under summit stations UWE and RIMD are GPS (blue) and tiltmeter (green) station codes

On April 30, 2018, the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō eruptive phase dramatically ended when the vent collapsed and magma propagated down-rift into the lower East Rift Zone (LERZ). The collapse of Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō was followed by the opening of 24 eruptive fissures in the LERZ, eventually extending ~ 6.8 km (Neal et al. 2018). The 3-month-long LERZ eruption was one of the volcano’s most voluminous eruptions in 500 years, with lava eruption rates exceeding 100 m3/s and lava covering ~ 36 km2 (Neal et al. 2018). At the summit, the draining of summit-stored magma led to near-daily collapses of a portion of the caldera and ultimately up to 500 m of summit subsidence. While deformation data indicated that the summit and middle East Rift Zone were inflating for the previous several years (Fig. 3), why Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō collapsed and what initiated down-rift dike propagation remains unclear.

Seismic ambient noise interferometry (ANI) is a developing method for time-lapse monitoring of changes in relative seismic velocity in the shallow crust (Lecocq et al. 2014). The method expands on the well-proven technique to reconstruct empirical Green’s functions by the cross-correlation of ambient noise waveforms from seismic station pairs (Campillo and Paul 2003). These empirical Green’s functions, also referred to as noise cross-correlation functions (NCFs), are a proxy for the Earth’s response between the stations (Weaver and Lobkis 2002; Campillo and Paul 2003). ANI relies on time-progressive comparisons of NCFs made to a reference function to quantify changes in relative seismic velocity, and thereby changes in the Earth’s response, likely from changes in material properties, intensive parameters (pressure, temperature, etc.), and/or crustal structure. These changes are predominantly observed on NCFs calculated from the vertical components of seismic instrument station pairs (ZZ), indicative of changes in Rayleigh surface-wave velocity. However, changes can also be observed on horizontal components, e.g., radial-radial (RR), the subordinate Rayleigh-wave polarization, and transverse-transverse (TT), from changes in Love-wave velocity.

While the surface-wave phases of time-progressive NCFs can be compared directly to reference NCFs, ANI analyses are usually constrained to the coda-wave portions of the NCFs, where ideally multi-scattered Rayleigh and Love waves dominate the signal. These multi-scattered waves have path lengths longer than the direct arrival phases and are thereby more sensitive to changes in the medium and less affected by variations in the noise source (Grêt et al. 2005; Obermann et al. 2013). Under ideal multi-scattering conditions, without surface-to-body wave conversions (Obermann et al. 2013), the later-arriving portion of the coda-wave NCFs should not preserve along station-station pair directionality. Observed changes in seismic velocity should represent isotropic averages. However, in the early-arriving portion of the coda wave direct Rayleigh and Love wave phases may still dominate TT and RR NCFs, respectively. While these direct surface wave contributions decrease with increasing time into the well-scattered (later) coda, studies of where this transition occurs are limited (Obermann et al. 2013; Takano et al. 2019). With these caveats, anisotropic responses may be observed and interpreted for TT and RR NCFs; however, caution should be exercised when extending these interpretations to quantitative analyses.

At volcanic settings, changes in relative seismic velocity include those from seasonal hydrologic variations (Sens-Schönfelder and Wegler 2006; Haney et al. 2014; Hotovec-Ellis et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2017); magma pressurization changes, which may be accompanied with associated crack dilation or compression (Brenguier et al. 2008a; Duputel et al. 2009; Nagaoka et al. 2010; Anggono et al. 2012; Obermann et al. 2013; Donaldson et al. 2017; Donaldson et al. 2019); structural changes in the volcanic edifice due to dome or caldera collapse (Baptie 2010; Hotovec-Ellis et al. 2015); changes in the hydrothermal system (Baptie 2010; Mordret et al. 2010; Caudron et al. 2015; Taira and Brenguier 2016); and changes in poroelastic contraction from geothermal production and fluid withdrawal (Taira et al. 2018). Emplacement or removal of magma into pre-existing void space and changes in the physical properties of magma as it cools, e.g., density, bulk, and shear modulus, may also affect seismic velocities.

Here, we use results from both a real-time ANI seismic-velocity monitoring network—implemented by the US Geological Survey within days following the onset of the first LERZ fissure eruption—and two independent larger retrospective analyses, to investigate precursory conditions that may have contributed to down-rift dike propagation and describe relative seismic velocity changes observed throughout the eruption (Fig. 1).

Summary of eruption precursors and eruption onset

Starting in March 2018, three swarms of lower-crustal earthquakes were observed beneath the summit of Kīlauea (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). The first swarm began on March 7, lasted for approximately 1 day, and was focused between 6- and 12-km depth (~ 55 earthquakes, M1-2.3). The second and largest swarm began on April 11 with a similar depth range and duration, but included numerous shallow, < 6-km deep, earthquakes (~ 170 earthquakes, M1-2.3). A third, smaller swarm was observed on April 16 (~ 32 earthquakes, M1-2.2; Fig. 2). While similar swarms were common prior to 2005, the March–April 2018 swarms were three of only seven similar swarms to occur in the previous 10 years.

Fig. 2
figure2

Kīlauea Caldera and upper East Rift Zone pre-eruptive seismicity for 2 months before the May 3rd, 2018 eruption. (Main) Pre-eruptive seismicity from April 1 to May 2, 2018. Only earthquakes shallower than 15-km depth with magnitudes greater than M1.0 are shown. Earthquake sizes are scaled by magnitude and colored by depth below sea level. The April shallow-crustal earthquake swarm in the connection between the summit and upper East Rift Zone, synchronous with the Halema‘uma‘u pit-crater lava-lake overflows, is highlighted in turquoise. The approximate extent of the two rift zones is given by the dashed lines. (Inset top right) The same pre-eruptive seismicity shown in the main panel but in depth through time. Highlighted regions denote the three pre-eruptive lower crustal earthquake swarms (purple), the April shallow-crustal swarm (turquoise), and the collapse of Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō (orange). (Inset bottom right) The same extent shown in Fig. 1

(MP4 102,940 kb).

Following the March 7 swarm, beginning on approximately March 13, there was increasing positive radial tilt (~ 0.2 μrad/day) at station UWD (colocated with seismic station UWE; Figs. 1, 2 and 3) and an increase in the distance between the across-caldera GPS station-pair CRIM-UWEV (~ 0.5 cm/week; colocated with seismic stations RIMD and UWE, respectively). These indicated increasing rates of inflation at Kīlauea’s summit. Similar increases were seen at Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō (tiltmeter POC, ~ 0.7 μrad/day; GPS stations NPOC-JCUZ, 0.2 cm/week; Figs. 1 and 3). Inflation was accompanied by high lava-lake levels at both locations. At the summit, high lava-lake levels between April 21–24 produced only the third episode of lava flowing over the crater rim in the past decade—with each successive overflow representing a new high (Patrick et al. 2018). Continuing through the April overflows, there was an additional swarm of shallow-crustal earthquakes in the connection between the caldera and ERZ (Fig. 2 and Movie S1). This shallow seismicity was typical of previously observed summit inflation and high lava-lake levels and likely reflected increased pressurization in the upper ERZ, also referred to as the East Rift connector (Patrick et al. 2018; Swanson et al. 2019).

Fig. 3
figure3

Two years of relative seismic velocity variations (dv/v), radial tilt, and GPS. (Top three) Representative station-pair records for each of the three ANI groups (black) padded by their uncertainty (orange). Colored areas (blue green, yellow) are the one-sigma ranges for the stack of all station-pair records in that subgroup. Highlighted windows qualitatively outline portions of the records possibly associated with (1) earthquake induced dv/v changes (gray) or (2) the 2018 eruption time range (red). All dv/v records are for the ZZ component correlations in the 0.4–1.0-Hz frequency band using a 5-day running stack and a ten-day running boxcar smoothing filter. (Bottom) Pre-eruptive mean radial tilt changes for Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō (light green; POC, azimuth = 308°) and the summit (light blue; UWD, azimuth = 327°), and changes in GPS line lengths for a Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō (dark green; NPOC-JCUZ) and a summit (dark blue; CRIM-UWEV) GPS station pair. The UWD tilt and UWEV GPS station are collocated with the UWE seismometer (Fig. 1). Tilt station POC is located ~ 200 m SSE of GPS/seismic station NPOC (Fig. 1)

On April 27–28, Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō was filled nearly to its crater rim and high rates of inflation of the vent continued. On April 30, at ~ 2:15 pm Hawaii Standard Time (HST), the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō vent floor collapsed. This collapse was immediately followed by a down-rift propagating increase in seismicity and deformation along a large section of the ERZ as well as a gradual deflation at the summit. The first small ground cracks in and adjacent to the Leilani Estates neighborhood in LERZ, ~ 23 km away from Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō, were observed on May 2. The following day (May 3), at 10:30 am HST, a Mb5.1 earthquake caused additional collapse of Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō. Approximately 6.5 h later, at ~ 5:00 pm HST, an eruption started in the LERZ, with fissures opening in the Leilani Estates neighborhood (Neal et al. 2018). At 12:32 pm HST on May 4, a Mw6.9 earthquake occurred on the decollement beneath the south flank of the volcano—the largest earthquake to occur on the island in 43 years.

For the 2 years prior to the 2018 lower East Rift Zone eruption, deformation data indicated that the summit and middle East Rift Zone magma plumbing systems were likely inflating with magma (Fig. 3). However, the cause of the rapid increase in inflation in the 2-month period preceding this new eruption remains unclear. Possible causes include (1) an increase in magma supply into Kīlauea’s magma reservoirs, as suggested by the three pre-eruptive lower-crustal summit-earthquake swarms; (2) a decrease in the eruptive efficiency and eruption rate from Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō, which in turn promoted up-rift magma accumulation—similar to processes observed in 1992 and 2011 (Kauahikaua et al. 1996; Orr et al. 2015; Patrick et al. 2019); or (3) some combination of both. Equally important, but unknown, are the mechanisms that promoted down-rift dike propagation into the LERZ, opposed to continued eruption at the 35-year-lived Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō vent (Orr et al. 2015). Here, we use ambient noise seismic interferometry to perform a retrospective analysis focused on addressing these questions.

Methods

Source data

Within days following the start of the first LERZ fissure eruption, we implemented a pseudo-real-time seismic velocity monitoring network using ambient noise interferometry (ANI) (Lecocq et al. 2014). The motivation was to determine whether seismic velocity changes in the LERZ were indicative of propagating intrusions and potentially additional or continued fissure eruptions. At the time of the eruption, the seismic network in the LERZ was limited to three stations: two stations on opposite ends of the Leilani Estates neighborhood, separated by ~ 4 km (PHOD and KLUD), and one station 11 km further up-rift (JOKA) (Fig. 1). Only the up-rift station (JOKA) is a three-component broadband sensor (Nanometrics Trillium 120). Station PHOD, located near the Puna Geothermal Venture, northeast of the first fissure eruptions (fissures 1–15), was a three-component accelerometer (Kinemetrics Episensor, 4 g setting). Station KLUD, on the SE border of the subdivision, is a vertical short-period geophone (Mark Products L-4). To compare to synchronous changes further up-rift (~ 22 km), a fourth station was also included (JCUZ, Guralp CMG-40T).

By late May, a second ANI network was implemented for Kīlauea’s summit (15 stations, Fig. 1), and a third for the SWRZ (5 stations; Fig. 1). For retrospective analysis, following the cessation of eruptive activity, the LERZ network was expanded to include an additional five upper and middle ERZ stations. All stations are maintained by the US Geological Survey’s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory and their data were available in real time from the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS). We should note, the LERZ station PHOD was destroyed by a lava-induced forest fire on August 1, ~ 90 days after the start of the eruption. Additionally, during the eruption, a large crack opened directly beneath station KLUD. Three summit stations were also temporarily or permanently lost between May 25 and June 1 from caldera collapse (NPT) and power fluctuations (NAHU and PUHI). Although not used in this analysis, six additional seismic stations were established in the LERZ during the eruption (ERZ1-4, P07, 2816 and KIND), and were critical in real-time hazard analysis and earthquake relocation.

Relative seismic velocity change (dv/v) measurement

Noise cross-correlation functions (NCFs) were computed using two independent processing workflows, both implemented using the MSNoise software package (Lecocq et al. 2014). In the first workflow, NCFs were computed for ~ 3 years of continuous data prior to May 2018 using a data-processing scheme similar to Brenguier et al. (2008b), Taira et al. (2015) and Taira and Brenguier (2016). (1) First, instrument responses were removed from 1-day-long records, band-passed between 0.025 and 2 Hz, down-sampled to 20 Hz, split into 30-min-long segments clipped to 3 rms, and spectrally whitened in the frequency range of 0.0666–1 Hz (i.e., 1–15 s). (2) NCFs were computed for these 30-min-long segments for all possible station pairs and varying channel combinations, for a lapse time between ± 120 s. For the ERZ and SWRZ, all channel combinations were computed (i.e., ZZ, TT, RR, ZR, ZT, TR), while for the summit only self-similar combinations were calculated (ZZ, TT, RR). Daily NCFs were obtained by stacking the 30-min NCFs, which were then subsequently stacked again with a sliding window of 3, 5, 10, and 30 days. (3) Delay times were estimated between these windowed NCFs and reference NCFs, using a band-limited moving window cross-spectral (MWCS) approach (Clarke et al. 2011). Reference NCFs were defined as the 1-year average station-station NCFs from May 1, 2015, to May 1, 2016. Five MWCS frequency bands, spanning from 0.07266 to 1.0 Hz and overlapping at the approximate − 1.8-dB level (i.e., two-thirds power level), were investigated (Flinders and Shen 2017; Flinders et al. 2018). Delay time estimates were limited to the coda portions of the NCFs, defined as a window between twice the NCF-dependent minimum interstation shear-wave travel time (~ 1.5 km/s at 500 m) and the subsequent 30 s (Saccorotti et al. 2003). (4) Relative velocity changes (e.g., dv/v) were then calculated as the slope of the MWCS delay times versus time lags (e.g., dt/t). Only MWCS measurements that had a minimum coherence of 0.8 were used in the dv/v estimate.

The second processing workflow was similar to the first, but focused on vertical-component (ZZ) NCFs computed since 2017, using a different initial bandpass filter (0.01–8.0 Hz) and spectral-whitening frequency range (0.3–1 Hz). Unlike the 1-year reference functions used in the first workflow, reference NCFs were defined as the 6-month average station-station NCFs from January 1, 2017, to June 1, 2017, and a single MWCS frequency band was used (0.3–1 Hz). Additionally, constraints used to compute dt/t were varied following the procedure described in Donaldson et al. (2017); only points with an error of less than 0.1 s, a coherence of more than 0.65, and a dt of less than 0.1 s were accepted. Again, delay time estimates were limited to twice the NCF-dependent minimum interstation shear-wave travel time, which was varied from 1.5 to 2.0 km/s. The effect of this velocity produced negligible differences.

Results

Southwest rift zone

At Kīlauea’s Southwest Rift Zone (SWRZ), we observe a noticeable decrease in relative seismic velocity (dv/v) associated with a Ml5.3 earthquake on the decollement underlying the volcano’s south flank on June 8, 2017 (Fig. 3). This decrease is most pronounced in a high-frequency band (0.4–1.0 Hz) equivalent to a Rayleigh surface-wave (ZZ) depth of ~ 0.5–1.5 km (Fig. S1). This ~ 0.5% relative velocity decrease is observed on all SWRZ ZZ station-pairs and all component combinations for the across-rift pair DESD-HLPD (Fig. 3).

During the 2018 LERZ eruption, dv/v changes in the SWRZ are again the most notable in the high-frequency band of DESD-HLPD and are visible to as low as 0.25–0.43 Hz, or 1.5–4-km depth for ZZ correlations (Rayleigh) and 0.25–1.75-km depth for TT (Love; Fig. 4 and S2). Despite the high eruption-related seismic noise, NCFs for all three component combinations remained largely coherent relative to the pre-eruption time period (Fig. S2). In the high-frequency band (0.4–1.0 Hz), the dv/v component combinations ZZ and RR decrease (~ 0.4–0.75%) several weeks before the onset of the eruption, with the decrease accelerating in response to the MW6.9 earthquake on May 4 (Neal et al. 2018; Figs. 3 and 4, Movie S1). The TT combination increases for ~ 10 days following the MW6.9 then subsequently decreases (Fig. 3). Decreases on all component combinations last throughout May and could be attributed to coseismic microcrack opening. The initial opposite behavior of the TT-correlations may be explained by short-lived shallow crack closing in the across-rift direction (TT) and accompanying preferential opening in deeper vertical along-rift (RR) and horizontal (ZZ) planes. This same behavior is observed for the three component combinations for the across-rift Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō station-pair JCUZ-NPOC (Fig. 5) and is consistent with strain patterns revealed by interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) and the direction of earthquake slip (Neal et al. 2018).

Fig. 4
figure4

Eruption-related relative seismic velocity variations (dv/v) in the Southwest Rift Zone. Relative seismic velocity variations for the station pair DESD-HLPD from 3 months preceding the eruption until 2 months after. Each component correlation—ZZ (red), TT (blue), and RR (gray)—is padded by its uncertainty. DESD and HLPD are the only three-component seismometers in the SWRZ. Highlighted windows qualitatively outline portions of the record possibly associated with (1) earthquake-induced dv/v changes (green) and (2) possible anisotropic effects (orange) such as along-rift crack opening. Also shown are the May 4 MW6.9 earthquake (focal sphere) and dates of noted eruption-related events. All records are for the 0.4–1.0-Hz band using a 5-day running stack and a 10-day running boxcar smoothing filter

Fig. 5
figure5

Eruption-related relative seismic velocity variations (dv/v) at Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō. Relative seismic velocity variations for the station pair NPOC-JCUZ from 3 months preceding the eruption until 2 months after. Each component correlation—ZZ (red), TT (blue), and RR (gray)—is padded by its uncertainty. Highlighted windows qualitatively outline portions of the record possibly associated with (1) earthquake-induced dv/v changes (green) and (2) possible anisotropic effects (orange) such as along-rift crack opening. Also shown are the May 4 MW6.9 earthquake (focal sphere) and dates of noted eruption-related events. All records are for the 0.4–1.0-Hz band using a 5-day running stack and a 10-day running boxcar smoothing filter

One week after the onset of large, near-daily, caldera collapses on May 29, and accelerated summit subsidence, all three dv/v component combinations rapidly increase (Fig. 4). This increase begins in the first week of June, lasts for approximately 2 weeks, and coincidentally for the RR and TT correlations which are more sensitive to shallow changes, and ends days before the caldera collapse expanded to include a larger portion of the summit (~June 24). The cause of this increase is unclear but a possible mechanism could be poroelastic contraction from a decrease in up-rift summit magma-static pressure and consequential withdrawal of SWRZ magmatic fluids (void closing). However, this same behavior is also observed for the MERZ station pair at Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō, JCUZ-NPOC (Fig. 4).

Throughout the rest of the eruption (July–August), dv/v for the TT and ZZ correlations of DESD-HLPD remain elevated. However, dv/v for the RR correlations (Fig. 4) was decreased, mirroring in polarity the changes seen on TT/ZZ. This anisotropic behavior could be due to differences in strain in the along-rift and across-rift directions. An interferogram spanning July 7 to August 7, 2018 (Fig. 1), suggests subsidence in an elongated pattern, with a north-east major axis parallel to the SWRZ, supporting an interpretation of an anisotropic strain field (data acquired by Sentinel-1, European Space Agency). While it is unclear whether any macroscopic faulting occurred between DESD and HLPD, changes could be related to microscopic strain changes on vertically oriented cooling joints in previous emplaced lava flows (Duffield 1975). Coincidentally, this behavior ceases 7–10 days after the last caldera collapse event (August 2).

Kīlauea Caldera and the east rift zone

The decrease in dv/v associated with the June 2017 earthquake in the 0.4–1.0 Hz band is also observed throughout the East Rift Zone and possibly at the summit (Fig. 5 and 6). Additionally, prior to the May 2018 eruption, beginning in early March, a small amplitude gradual increase in dv/v is observed (Figs. 5 and 6), coincident with the first summit earthquake swarm and several days prior to increased rates of summit inflation (UWD; Fig. 3). This change culminated on ~April 20–25, then reversed, decreasing until May ~ 1, immediately preceding the collapse of Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō. Following the first week of the eruption, the northern and southern sections of the summit changed inconsistently (Fig. 6). In workflow 1, a significantly larger amplitude and increasing change in dv/v to the north compared to the south is observed. In workflow 2, the opposite is observed. These inconsistencies may be due to differing process parameters, e.g., minimum coherency limits, lower bound frequencies, or stations used. Additionally, the consistency of the NCFs during the eruption appears to be highly path-dependent with some station pairs more affected by eruption-related seismicity (Fig. S4).

Fig. 6
figure6

Eruption-related relative seismic velocity variations (dv/v) at the summit. Vertical-vertical (ZZ) relative seismic velocity variations at the summit from 3 months preceding the eruption until the 2 months after. Measurements are subdivided into two caldera subgroups (north/south). For each subgroup (north/south), we measure velocity changes using two independent workflows (see “Methods”). Workflow 1 (red/blue) stacked ten ZZ station-pair records between five stations for both the north and south subgroups (see Fig. 1 for station locations). Colored areas (light blue/red) are the one-sigma ranges for each subgroup stack. The dashed lines (August/September) indicate high signal decorrelation (unreliable). Workflow 2 (green/violet) used the same stations as workflow 1, excluding SBL in the north, and RIMD in the south. Each subgroup in workflow 2 was a stack of six ZZ station-pair records. The one sigma ranges for workflow two are given by vertical error bars. Also shown are the approximate date ranges of the summit-swarm coincident pre-eruptive dv/v increase (blue), the pre-eruptive dv/v decrease (red), and dates of noted eruption-related events. All records are for the 0.4–1.0-Hz band using a 5-day (workflow 1) or 1-day (workflow 2) running stack and a 10-day running boxcar smoothing filter

By the end of May and the onset of near-daily caldera collapses, inconsistencies in the summit responses ceased, and dv/v throughout the summit decreases. This consistent decrease is short-lived, lasting for ~ 10 days, after which an increase in dv/v continues throughout June, culminating on ~June 24 when the caldera collapses expanded to include a larger portion of the summit (Fig. 6). This cycling between decreased and increased dv/v could reflect progressive pressurization/depressurization of the shallow summit reservoir. Between June 25 and August 2, coincident with the end of caldera collapse events, dv/v decreases in the north of the summit and increases in the south. Later, dv/v estimates become too scattered for meaningful interpretation.

Following the first fissure outbreak and the collapse of Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō, we also observe decreases in dv/v in the upper and middle ERZ (Figs. 5 and 7). The decrease is largest at Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō itself, with the next largest changes occurring up-rift (upper ERZ), and no detectable change in the middle ERZ. At Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō, ZZ and RR dv/v remain decreased until the onset of daily caldera collapses, when dv/v begins to increase rapidly (Fig. 5). A corresponding slight increase in dv/v might also be interpreted in the UERZ (Fig. 7). Increased dv/v at Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō reached a maximum on ~ July 15, before decreasing over the next 2 weeks (Figs. 5 and 7). An additional cycle of increase/decrease occurs again in early August, culminating close to when caldera collapse events end. Due to the lack of pre-eruption station density in the LERZ, station quality, and high-rates of seismicity, dv/v changes throughout the LERZ were highly erratic and largely indistinguishable from the long-term average background variation.

Fig. 7
figure7

Eruption-related relative seismic velocity variations (dv/v) in the upper/middle East Rift Zone. Vertical-vertical (ZZ) relative seismic velocity variations for three East Rift Zone subgroups from 3 months preceding the eruption until the 2 months after. The upper East Rift Zone (UERZ) subgroup (orange) is a stack of nine ZZ station-pair records from five stations up-rift of Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō. The middle East Rift Zone (MERZ) subgroup (green) is a stack of four ZZ station-pair records from stations between the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō and JOKA (Fig. 1). Both the UERZ and MERZ subgroups include stations NPOC and JCUZ but exclude the NPOC-JCUZ pair. The Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō subgroup is the NPOC-JCUZ station-pair record. Colored areas (light red/green/orange) are the one-sigma ranges for each subgroup stack. Also shown are dates of noted eruption-related events. All records are for the 0.4–1.0-Hz band using a 5-day running stack and a 10-day running boxcar smoothing filter

Discussion

Pre-eruptive summit inflation

At the summit, the pre-eruptive increase in dv/v between March and April 2018 correlates with modest increased rates of summit inflation (UWD, UWE-CRIM; Fig. 3). This increase was also observed by Olivier et al. (2019) and is consistent with the model proposed by Donaldson et al. (2017) in which increasing pressure in the 1–2-km depth shallow summit magma reservoir results in localized compression and closing of cracks in the near-surface (Donaldson et al. 2017; Olivier et al. 2019). Olivier et al. (2019) also showed a separate pre-eruptive decrease in dv/v 10 days preceding the first fissure outbreak, which we also observe at both the summit and the SWRZ (Figs. 4 and 6). The decrease could result from inflation of the deeper summit magma reservoir and wider spread summit dilation, or as proposed and preferred by Olivier et al. (2019) accumulating damage induced by magma reservoir pressure exerted on the surrounding edifice.

At the summit, the pre-eruptive dv/v increase begins following the first lower-crustal (6–12 km) earthquake swarm on March 7 (Figs. 2 and 6). These swarms could be indicative of short-term increases in magma supply (Wright and Klein 2006; Dzurisin and Poland 2019) which in turn increase inflation at the summit and the MERZ near Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō. The correlation between the increase in dv/v and the first summit swarm implies rapid pressure increases in the shallow summit reservoir following an increase in magma supply into the base of the volcano’s deeper reservoir (3–5 km). The six-day delay between the first earthquake in the first lower-crustal summit swarm and the beginning of increased MERZ inflation equates to a transport speed of ~ 0.05 m/s. Assuming the volcano’s summit reservoir systems are hydraulically connected to the MERZ (Montagna and Gonnermann 2013), this transport speed is significantly slower than the propagation of magma-static pressure, implying the physical movement of magma down-rift.

Alternatively, the rapid increase in the summit and MERZ inflation rate could have resulted from a constriction between Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō‘s shallow magma storage system and its actively erupting outflow vent. Again, assuming the MERZ and summit plumbing systems are hydraulically linked, both Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō‘s eruptive vent efficiency and the vent’s elevation would influence summit pressure (Patrick et al. 2019). Patrick et al. (2019) proposed that large differences between the elevation of the summit and the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō lava lake, and/or between the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō lava lake and its outflow vent, can imply localized decreases in ERZ vent efficiency. A constriction between Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō’s shallow magma storage system and its actively erupting outflow vent could cause up-rift magma accumulation and inflation, and decreased effusion rates (Patrick et al. 2019). This style of rift zone–driven summit inflation has likely occurred previously (Kauahikaua et al. 1996; Orr et al. 2015).

While Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō‘s then erupting flow field (episode 61 g) had been waning since late 2017, any relationship to the three lower-crustal earthquake swarms (5–12 km) is ambiguous. If a constriction near Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō had been driving pressurization in the summit and MERZ, inflation would likely precede the first earthquake swarm, with the first swarm occurring in the upper ERZ (East Rift connector). Similarly, an overall deepening in the average swarm location might also be expected. However, the opposite is observed (Movie S1 and Fig. 2). The deepest swarm on March 7, preceded the change in summit and Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō vent inflation by approximately 6 days. Additionally, while the first summit earthquake swarm was quickly followed by an increase in summit dv/v, there was no corresponding change in dv/v near Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō, despite increased inflation (Fig. 2). For these reasons, we favor a “bottom-up” mechanism whereby short-term increases of magma supply into Kīlauea’s deep reservoir caused increased inflation at the summit and the MERZ near Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō. This increase in pressure ultimately leads to failure of the rift zone near Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō and the initiation of the eruption.

Promoting down-rift intrusion

Almost a year prior to the 2018 LERZ eruption, the June 2017 Ml5.3 earthquake on the decollement underlying Kīlauea’s south flank caused a coseismic dv/v decrease in both the ERZ and SWRZ (Fig. 3, Table 1). For the near Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō station-pair JCUZ-NPOC, we estimate pre- and post-earthquake 2-month dv/v averages of 0.08 ± 0.14% and 0.38 ± 0.16%, respectively, with the Ml5.3 earthquake inducing a 0.30 ± 0.21% velocity reduction. Ten months later, the pre-eruption 2-month average dv/v was 0.17 ± 0.20%, approximately half its pre-earthquake magnitude (Fig. 3). Despite considerable uncertainty, there appears to be a long-trend post-seismic recovery of ~ 0.03%/month. Stress-induced opening and closing of crack space is a commonly evoked mechanism for coseismic velocity changes (Adams and Williamson 1923; Lockner et al. 1977; Brenguier et al. 2008b, 2014; Lesage et al. 2014; Taira and Brenguier 2016). We attribute the observed coseismic dv/v decrease to increases in crack opening throughout both rift zones. At Kīlauea, this opening and closing could predominantly occur on vertically oriented cooling joints in previously emplaced lava flows (Duffield 1975). While the transient changes in dv/v occurred nearly instantaneously, in the ERZ, the long-term post-seismic recovery and healing of coseismic fracture may have never been fully completed (Fig. 3). Crustal damage caused by stresses from this earthquake could have increased the compliance of Kīlauea’s rift zones, potentially priming the ERZ for intrusion almost a year later.

Table 1 Stress estimate parameters and estimates

We estimated volumetric static stress changes (Δσs) for the June 2017 earthquake from dilatation strains (EXX + EYY + EZZ) using the Coulomb 3.3 software (Toda et al. 2011) at five locations: two in the SWRZ (DESD, HLPD), one in the upper ERZ/ERZ connector (PAUD), at Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō, and one in the LERZ (PHOD). In both Coulomb 3.3 and to convert the computed strain to stress, we used a shear modulus (G) of 25.6 GPa and a Poisson’s ratio of 0.15, based on the temperature dependence of Ryan (1987) assuming T = 140 °C, i.e., the temperature at 1-km depth in the Scientific Observation Hole 4 (SOH-4) borehole (Olson and Deymonaz 1993). The earthquake origin and focal mechanism were taken from the US Geological Survey Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (event ID: hv61792931) and National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC; event ID: us20009lc3) catalogs. The fault length and width were computed with an empirical relationship between earthquake magnitude and faulting style (Wells and Coppersmith 1994). The grid size was set to 200 m.

At these same five locations, we estimated the earthquake-induced dynamic stress changes (Δσd) using peak ground velocities (PGVs), where Δσd = (PGV/VS) G (Hill et al. 1993). For four of the five locations (excluding Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō), PGV was taken as the average of the seismometer’s northing and easting component as calculated by the NEIC ShakeMap. At the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō, PGV was not available for the three closest stations (NPOC, JCUZ, STCD) and was estimated from NEIC ShakeMap’s interpolated PGV grid (Worden et al. 2018). We used the same shear modulus (25.6 GPa) used in calculating the volumetric static stress change, with a shear wave velocity (VS) of 2.3 km/s, i.e., the velocity at 1-km depth (Saccorotti et al. 2003; Lin et al. 2014).

The magnitude of dilatational static-stress changes for the June 8, 2017, earthquake, in both the SWRZ and ERZ, was less than 1 kPa, i.e., less than those from barometric pressure changes and tides. However, dynamic stress changes from this earthquake, inferred from PGV measurements, are estimated to be 0.08–0.76 MPa, with the largest changes occurring near Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō (see Table 1). These dynamic stress changes are on the order of the “fracture toughness” for basalt, i.e., its resistance to dilatant crack growth (Kemeny and Cook 1988). Using the average flow thickness for Kīlauea of 1.1–1.86 m (Katz and Cashman 2003) as a proxy for crack length, the fracture toughness of basalt, ~ 0.9–2.5 MPa m−1/2, was almost certainly exceeded during the 2017 earthquake, particularly near Puʻu ʻŌʻō (0.91 ± 0.12 MPa m−1/2; Atkinson and Meredith 1987).

Similarly, we estimated changes in fracture toughness from dv/v, assuming they were only due to changes in shear modulus. Near Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō, the June 2017 coseismic velocity decrease of 0.30 ± 0.21% is equivalent to a change in fracture toughness of ~ 0.47 ± 0.44 MPa m−1/2, comparable to the 0.91 MPa m−1/2 estimated from PGV. Ten months later, the pre-eruption 2-month average dv/v of 0.17 ± 0.20% corresponds to a remaining residual decrease in fracture toughness of ~ 0.09 ± 0.01 MPa m−1/2. This weakening of the MERZ’s resistance to dilatant crack growth combined with increased up-rift magma-static pressure, possibly from an increased summit supply, may have facilitated down-rift dike propagation and the devastating May 2018 eruption.

Conclusion

Earthquake-volcano interactions have long been proposed at Kīlauea (Lipman et al. 1985; Walter and Amelung 2006; Montgomery-Brown et al. 2015). The effects of the 1975 MW7.7 Kalapana earthquake on Kīlauea’s shallow magma plumbing system is thought to have initiated its middle East Rift Zone eruption almost 2 years later (Lipman et al. 1985). Similarly, at Mauna Loa, static stress changes associated with large flank earthquakes (e.g., > M6.6; 1868, 1949–1951) possibly induced subsequent eruptions through decompression of the shallow magma reservoir (Walter and Amelung 2006). Here, we present a new mechanism where long-lived crustal weakening resulting from a moderate magnitude local earthquake can later promote down drift-dike propagation and possibly an eruption. This mechanism is similar to that proposed for earthquake-triggered changes in geyser eruption frequency, where dynamic stress induces changes in permeability and fracture opening and closing (Hill et al. 2002; Manga and Brodsky 2006), and dynamic stress induced changes in volcanic heat flux (Delle Donne et al. 2010). We identify two necessary conditions of this mechanism: (1) the incomplete post-seismic recovery and healing of the coseismic fracture generated during the local earthquake, and (2) a synchronous increase in up-rift magma-static pressure. Dike propagation occurs once magma-static pressure exceeds the weakened volcano’s ability to resist dilatant crack growth. During the 2018 lower East Rift Zone eruption of Kīlauea, both of these pre-eruptive conditions were met. However, whether the increase in pressure up-rift of Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō reflected an increase in magma supply remains uncertain.

While simultaneous visual and seismic monitoring of Kīlauea has been occurring since 1912, these ~ 100 years represent only a small time window of the eruptive history of Hawaiian volcanoes, and earthquake-modulated volcanism could be a common occurrence. Moderate magnitude local earthquakes could increase a volcano’s susceptibility to intrusion and/or eruption for months-to-years afterwards, i.e., until post-seismic healing is complete. Unknown yet are the effects of the syn-eruptive May 2018 MW6.9 earthquake on Mauna Loa’s and Kīlauea’s magma plumbing systems. However, both conditions required to generate dike propagation through the mechanism described here are observable in real time; increased pressurization through interpretations of tilt, GPS, and InSAR, and coseismic weakening through ambient noise interferometry. Ambient noise seismic interferometry may better enable us to characterize and identify this and other new precursory eruptive signals in near real time, proving invaluable for interpretations of ongoing unrest at these two volcanoes. While this technique has been well demonstrated scientifically, its application to real-time observatory response is still evolving and will rely on a robust seismic network and independent corroborating measurements (tilt, GPS, InSAR, etc.).

References

  1. Adams LH, Williamson ED (1923) On the compressibility of minerals and rocks at high pressures. J Frankl Inst 195:475–529

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anggono T, Nishimura T, Sato H, Ueda H, Ukawa M (2012) Spatio-temporal changes in seismic velocity associated with the 2000 activity of Miyakejima volcano as inferred from cross-correlation analyses of ambient noise. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 247-248:93–107

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson BK, Meredith PG (1987) The theory of subcritical crack growth with applications to minerals and rocks. In: Fracture Mechanics of Rock. pp 111–166

  4. Baptie BJ (2010) Lava dome collapse detected using passive seismic interferometry. Geophys Res Lett 37:L00E10

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brenguier F, Shapiro NM, Campillo M, Ferrazzini V, Duputel Z, Coutant O, Nercessian A (2008a) Towards forecasting volcanic eruptions using seismic noise. Nat Geosci 1:126–130

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brenguier F, Campillo M, Hadziioannou C, Shapiro NM, Nadeau RM, Larose E (2008b) Postseismic relaxation along the San Andreas fault at Parkfield from continuous seismological observations. Science 321:1478–1481

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brenguier F, Campillo M, Takeda T, Aoki Y, Shapiro NM, Briand X, Emoto K, Miyake H (2014) Earthquake dynamics. Mapping pressurized volcanic fluids from induced crustal seismic velocity drops. Science 345:80–82

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campillo M, Paul A (2003) Long-range correlations in the diffuse seismic coda. Science 299:547–549

    Google Scholar 

  9. Caudron C, Lecocq T, Syahbana DK, McCausland W, Watlet A, Camelbeeck T, Bernard A, Surono (2015) Stress and mass changes at a “wet” volcano: example during the 2011-2012 volcanic unrest at Kawah Ijen volcano (Indonesia). J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:5117–5134

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke D, Zaccarelli L, Shapiro NM, Brenguier F (2011) Assessment of resolution and accuracy of the moving window cross spectral technique for monitoring crustal temporal variations using ambient seismic noise. Geophys J Int 186:867–882

    Google Scholar 

  11. Delle Donne D, Harris AJL, Ripepe M, Wright W (2010) Earthquake-inducded thermal anomalies at active volcanoes. Geology 38:771–774

    Google Scholar 

  12. Donaldson C, Caudron C, Green RG, Thelen WA, White RS (2017) Relative seismic velocity variations correlate with deformation at Kīlauea volcano. Sci Adv 3:e1700219

    Google Scholar 

  13. Donaldson C, Winder T, Caudron C et al (2019) Crustal seismic velocity responds to a magmatic intrusion and seasonal loading in Iceland’s Northern Volcanic Zone. Sci Adv 5:eaax6642

    Google Scholar 

  14. Duffield WA (1975) Structure and origin of the Koae fault system, Kilauea volcano, Hawaii US Geol Surv Prof Pap 856

  15. Duputel Z, Ferrazzini V, Brenguier F, Shapiro N, Campillo M, Nercessian A (2009) Real time monitoring of relative velocity changes using ambient seismic noise at the piton de la Fournaise volcano (La Réunion) from January 2006 to June 2007. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 184:164–173

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dzurisin D, Poland MP (2019) Magma supply to Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i, from inception to now: historical perspective, current state of knowledge, and future challenges", Field Volcanology: A Tribute to the Distinguished Career of Don Swanson

  17. Flinders AF, Shen Y (2017) Seismic evidence for a possible deep crustal hot zone beneath Southwest Washington. Sci Rep 7:7400

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flinders AF, Shelly DR, Dawson PB, Hill DP, Tripoli B, Shen Y (2018) Seismic evidence for significant melt beneath the Long Valley Caldera, California, USA. Geology 46:799–802

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grêt A, Snieder R, Aster RC et al (2005) Monitoring rapid temporal change in a volcano with coda wave interferometry. Geophys Res Lett 32:L06304

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haney MM, Hotovec-Ellis AJ, Bennington NL, et al (2014) Tracking changes in volcanic systems with seismic interferometry. In: Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering 1–23

  21. Heliker CC, Brantley SR (2002) The Puʻu ʻOʻo-Kupaianaha eruption of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii, 1983 to 2003. US Geol Surv Fact Sheet:144–102

  22. Hill DP, Reasenberg PA, Michael A, Arabaz WJ, Beroza G, Brumbaugh D, Brune JN, Castro R, Davis S, dePolo D, Ellsworth WL, Gomberg J, Harmsen S, House L, Jackson SM, Johnston MJS, Jones L, Keller R, Malone S, Munguia L, Nava S, Pechmann JC, Sanford A, Simpson RW, Smith RB, Stark M, Stickney M, Vidal A, Walter S, Wong V, Zollweg J (1993) Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 landers, California, earthquake. Science 260:1617–1623

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hill DP, Pollitz F, Newhall C (2002) Earthquake–volcano interactions. Phys Today 55:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hotovec-Ellis AJ, Gomberg J, Vidale JE, Creager KC (2014) A continuous record of intereruption velocity change at Mount St. Helens from coda wave interferometry. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:2199–2214

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hotovec-Ellis AJ, Vidale JE, Gomberg J, Thelen W, Moran SC (2015) Changes in seismic velocity during the first 14 months of the 2004-2008 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:6226–6240

    Google Scholar 

  26. Katz MG, Cashman KV (2003) Hawaiian lava flows in the third dimension: identification and interpretation of pahoehoe and ′a′a distribution in the KP-1 and SOH-4 cores. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001gc000209

  27. Kauahikaua J, Mangan M, Heliker C, Mattox T (1996) A quantitative look at the demise of a basaltic vent: the death of Kupaianaha, Kilauea Volcano, Hawai’i. Bull Volcanol 57:641–648

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kemeny JM, Cook NGW (1988) Determination of rock fracture parameters from crack models for failure in compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 25:320

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lecocq T, Caudron C, Brenguier F (2014) MSNoise, a Python package for monitoring seismic velocity changes using ambient seismic noise. Seismol Res Lett 85:715–726

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lesage P, Reyes-Dávila G, Arámbula-Mendoza R (2014) Large tectonic earthquakes induce sharp temporary decreases in seismic velocity in Volcán de Colima, Mexico. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:4360–4376

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lin G, Shearer PM, Matoza RS, Okubo PG, Amelung F (2014) Three-dimensional seismic velocity structure of Mauna Loa and Kilauea volcanoes in Hawaii from local seismic tomography. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:4377–4392

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lipman PW, Lockwood JP, Okamura RT, et al (1985) Ground deformation associated with the 1975 magnitude-7.2 earthquake and resulting changes in activity of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1276

  33. Lockner DA, Walsh JB, Byerlee JD (1977) Changes in seismic velocity and attenuation during deformation of granite. J Geophys Res 82:5374–5378

    Google Scholar 

  34. Manga M, Brodsky E (2006) Seismic triggering of eruption in the far field: volcanoes and geysers. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 34:263–291

    Google Scholar 

  35. Montagna CP, Gonnermann HM (2013) Magma flow between summit and Pu‘u‘Ō‘ō at Kīlauea volcano, Hawai‘i. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14(7):2232–2246

    Google Scholar 

  36. Montgomery-Brown EK, Poland MP, Miklius A (2015) Delicate balance of magmatic-tectonic interaction at Kīlauea volcano, Hawai’i, revealed from slow slip events. In: Hawaiian Volcanoes from source to Surface. Geophysical Monograph Series 208. pp 269–288

  37. Mordret A, Jolly AD, Duputel Z, Fournier N (2010) Monitoring of phreatic eruptions using interferometry on retrieved cross-correlation function from ambient seismic noise: results from Mt. Ruapehu, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 191:46–59

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nagaoka Y, Nishida K, Aoki Y, Takeo M (2010) Temporal change of phase velocity beneath Mt. Asama, Japan, inferred from coda wave interferometry. Geophys Res Lett 37:L22311

    Google Scholar 

  39. Neal CA, Brantley SR, Antolik L et al (2018) The 2018 rift eruption and summit collapse of Kīlauea volcano. Science 363:367–374

    Google Scholar 

  40. Obermann A, Planès T, Larose E, Campillo M (2013) Imaging preeruptive and coeruptive structural and mechanical changes of a volcano with ambient seismic noise. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118:6285–6294

    Google Scholar 

  41. Olivier G, Brenguier F, Carey R, Okubo P, Donaldson C (2019) Decrease in seismic velocity observed prior to the 2018 eruption of Kīlauea volcano with ambient seismic noise interferometry. Geophys Res Lett 46:3734–3744

    Google Scholar 

  42. Olson HJ, Deymonaz JE (1993) The Hawaiian Scientific Observation Hole (SOH) Program: costs and history of a successful slim hole drilling program. Geotherm Resour Counc Trans 17:443–450

    Google Scholar 

  43. Orr TR, Poland MP, Patrick MR, et al (2015) Kīlauea’s 5–9 March 2011 Kamoamoa fissure eruption and its relation to 30 years of activity from Pu 'u 'Ō 'ō. In: Geophysical Monograph Series. pp 393–420

  44. Patrick MR, Orr TR, Swanson DA et al (2018) Lava lake activity at the summit of Kīlauea volcano in 2016. US Geol Surv Sci Investig Rep:2018–5008

  45. Patrick M, Orr T, Anderson K, Swanson D (2019) Eruptions in sync: improved constraints on Kīlauea Volcano’s hydraulic connection. Earth Planet Sci Lett 507:50–61

    Google Scholar 

  46. Poland MP, Miklius A, Montgomery-Brown EK (2014) Magma supply, storage, and transport at shield-stage Hawaiian volcanoes. In: characteristics of Hawaiian volcanoes. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1801:179–234

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ryan MP (1987) Elasticity and contractancy of Hawaiian olivine tholeiite and its role in the stability and structural evolution of subcaldera magma reservoirs and rift systems. In: Volcanism in Hawaii. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 1350:1395–1447

  48. Saccorotti G, Chouet B, Dawson P (2003) Shallow-velocity models at the Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii, determined from array analyses of tremor wavefields. Geophys J Int 152:633–648

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sens-Schönfelder C, Wegler U (2006) Passive image interferometry and seasonal variations of seismic velocities at Merapi volcano, Indonesia. Geophys Res Lett 33:L21302

    Google Scholar 

  50. Swanson DA, Fiske RS, Thornber CR, Poland MP (2019) Dikes in the Koa‘e fault system, and the Koa‘e–east rift zone structural grain at Kīlauea Volcano, Hawai‘i, Field Volcanology: a tribute to the distinguished career of Don Swanson, Geo. Soc. Amer., GSA Special Papers 538

  51. Taira T, Brenguier F (2016) Response of hydrothermal system to stress transients at Lassen Volcanic Center, California, inferred from seismic interferometry with ambient noise. Earth Planets Space 68:162

    Google Scholar 

  52. Taira T, Brenguier F, Kong Q (2015) Ambient noise-based monitoring of seismic velocity changes associated with the 2014 Mw 6.0 South Napa earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 42:6997–7004

    Google Scholar 

  53. Taira T, Nayak A, Brenguier F, Manga M (2018) Monitoring reservoir response to earthquakes and fluid extraction, Salton Sea geothermal field, California. Sci Adv 4:e1701536

    Google Scholar 

  54. Takano T, Nishimura T, Nakahara H, Ueda H, Fujita E (2019) Sensitivity of seismic velocity changes to the tidal strain at different lapse times: data analyses of a small seismic array at Izu-Oshima volcano. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 124:3011–3023

    Google Scholar 

  55. Toda S, Stein RS, Sevilgen V, Lin J (2011) Coulomb 3.3 Graphic-rich deformation and stress-change software for earthquake, tectonic, and volcano research and teaching-user guide. US Geol Surv Open File Rep:2011–1060

  56. Walter TR, Amelung F (2006) Volcano-earthquake interaction at Mauna Loa volcano, Hawaii. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 111:B003861

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wang Q-Y, Brenguier F, Campillo M, Lecointre A, Takeda T, Aoki Y (2017) Seasonal crustal seismic velocity changes throughout Japan. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 122:7987–8002

    Google Scholar 

  58. Weaver R, Lobkis O (2002) On the emergence of the Green’s function in the correlations of a diffuse field: pulse-echo using thermal phonons. Ultrasonics 40:435–439

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002

    Google Scholar 

  60. Worden CB, Bruce Worden C, Thompson EM et al (2018) Spatial and spectral interpolation of ground-motion intensity measure observations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 108:866–875

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wright TL, Klein FW (2006) Deep magma transport at Kilauea volcano, Hawaii. Lithos 87:50–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was possible only through the dedication and support of the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory’s instrumentation/technical staff and seismic-network monitoring group. The study benefited greatly from an eruption chronology by S. Ogburn and interferograms supplied by M. Poland and M. McLay. Conversations with K. Anderson, P. Dawson, and N. Nakata were crucial to the understanding of geophysical processes involved. Insightful peer reviews by A. Hotovec-Ellis, M. Patrick, G. Olivier, D. Swanson, A. Harris and G. Waite improved both the science and story. C.F. Boomer provided critical last-minute support. C. Caudron acknowledges a F.R.S-FNRS Chargé de Recherches fellowship. T. Taira acknowledges a France-Berkeley Fund (2014-0051) and a NSF Geophysics program (1053211). This work was supported by the US Geological Survey Volcano Science Center. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashton F. Flinders.

Additional information

This paper constitutes part of a topical collection: The historic events at Kilauea Volcano in 2018: summit collapse, rift zone eruption, and Mw6.9 earthquake

Editorial responsibility: G.P. Waite

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 23523 kb).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flinders, A.F., Caudron, C., Johanson, I.A. et al. Seismic velocity variations associated with the 2018 lower East Rift Zone eruption of Kīlauea, Hawaiʻi. Bull Volcanol 82, 47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-020-01380-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Kilauea
  • 2018 eruption
  • Hawaiian Volcano Observatory
  • Ambient noise
  • Seismic interferometry
  • MSNoise