Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of pore throats in controlling the permeability of magmatic foams

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Volcanology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vesiculation of hydrous melts at 1 atm was studied in situ by synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy at the TOMCAT beamline of the Swiss Light Source (Villigen, Switzerland). Water-undersaturated basaltic, andesitic, trachyandesitic, and dacitic glasses were synthesized at high pressures and then laser heated at 1 atm. on the beamline, causing vesiculation. The porosity, bubble number density, size distributions of bubbles, and pore throats, as well as their tortuosity and connectivity, were measured in three-dimensional tomographic reconstructions of sample volumes, which were also used for lattice Boltzmann simulations of viscous permeabilities. Connectivity of bubbles by pore throats varied from ~ 100 to 105 mm−3, and for each sample correlated with porosity and permeability. Consideration of the results of this and previous studies of the viscous permeabilities of aphyric and crystal-poor magmatic samples demonstrated that at similar porosities permeability can vary by orders of magnitude, even for similar compositions. Comparison of the permeability relationships from this study with previous models (Degruyter et al., Bull Vulcanol 72:63–74, 2010; Burgisser et al., Earth Planet Sci Lett 470:37–47, 2017) relating porosity, characteristic pore-throat diameters, and tortuosity demonstrated good agreement. Modifying the Burgisser et al. model by using the maximum pore-throat diameter, instead of the average diameter, as the characteristic diameter reproduced the lattice Boltzmann permeabilities to within 1 order of magnitude. Correlations between average bubble diameters and maximum pore-throat diameters, and between porosity and tortuosity, in our experiments produced relationships that allow application of the modified Burgisser et al. model to predict permeability based only upon the average bubble diameter and porosity. These experimental results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that increasing bubble growth rates result in decreasing permeability of equivalent porosity foams. This effect of growth rate substantially contributes to the multiple orders of magnitude variations in the permeabilities of vesicular magmas at similar porosities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archie GE (1942) The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans Am Inst Mineral Meteorol 146:54–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai L, Baker DR, Hill RJ (2010) Permeability of vesicular Stromboli basaltic glass: lattice Boltzmann simulations and laboratory measurements. J Geophys Res 115:B07201. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB007047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai L, Baker DR, Polacci M, Hill RJ (2011) In-situ degassing study on crystal-bearing Stromboli basaltic magmas: implications for Stromboli eruptions. Geophys Res Lett 38:L17309

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker DR (2004) Piston-cylinder calibration at 400 to 500 MPa: a comparison of using water solubility in albite melt and NaCl melting. Am Mineral 89:1553–1556

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker DR, Eggler DH (1987) Compositions of anhydrous and hydrous melts coexisting with plagioclase, augite, and olivine or low-Ca pyroxene from 1 atm. to 8 kbar: application to the Aleutian volcanic center of Atka. Am Mineral 72:12–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Blower JD (2001) Factors controlling permeability-porosity relationships in magmas. Bull Volcanol 63:497–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouvet de Maisonneuve C, Bachmann O, Burgisser A (2008) Characterization of juvenile pyroclasts from the Kos Plateau Tuff (Aegean Arc): insights into the eruptive dynamics of a large rhyolitic eruption. Bull Volcanol 71:643–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-008-0250-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun F, Mancini L, Kasae P, Favretto S, Dreossi D, Tromba G (2010) Pore3D: a software library for quantitative analysis of porous media. Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res A 615:326–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgisser A, Gardner JE (2004) Experimental constraints on degassing and permeability in volcanic conduit flow. Bull Volcanol 67:42–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-004-0359-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgisser A, Chevalier L, Gardner JE, Castro JM (2017) The percolation threshold and permeability evolution of ascending magmas. Earth Planet Sci Lett 470:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman PC (1937) Fluid flow through a granular bed. Trans Inst Chem Eng London 15:150–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro JM, Burgisser A, Schipper CI, Mancini S (2012) Mechanisms of bubble coalescence in silicic magmas. Bull Volcanol 74:2339–2352

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombier M, Wadsworth FB, Gurioli L, Scheu B, Kueppers U, Di Muro A, Dingwell DB (2017) The evolution of pore connectivity in volcanic rocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 462:99–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Consiglio R, Baker DR, Paul G, Stanley HE (2003) Continuum percolation thresholds for mixtures of spheres of different sizes. Physica A 319:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox SJ, Graner F (2004) Three-dimensional bubble clusters: shape, packing, and growth rate. Phys Rev E 69:031409

    Google Scholar 

  • Degruyter W, Bachmann O, Burgisser A (2010) Controls on magma permeability in the volcanic conduit during the climatic phase of the Kos Plateau Tuff eruption (Aegean Arc). Bull Vulcanol 72:63–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Domb C (1972) A note on the series expansion method for clustering problems. Biometrika 59:209–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd B, Campbell GH, Marr RB, Nagarkar V, Tipnis S, Axe L, Siddons DP (1999) Developments in synchrotron x-ray computed tomography at the National Synchrotron Light Source. Developments in X-Ray Tomography II, Proc SPIE 3772:224–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagents SA, Gregg TKP, Lopes RMC (2013) Modeling volcanic processes: the physics and mathematics of volcanism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 421

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquharson J, Heap MJ, Varley NR, Baud P, Reushclé T (2015) Permeability and porosity relationships of edifice-forming andesites: a combined field and laboratory study. Jour Volcan Geotherm Res 297:52–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson DJ, Gonnermann HM, Ruprech P, Plank T, Hauri EH, Houghton BF, Swanson DA (2016) Magma decompression rates during explosive eruptions of Kilauea volcano, Hawaii, recorded by melt embayments. Bull Volcanol 78:71

    Google Scholar 

  • Fife JL, Rappaz M, Pistone M, Celcer T, Mikuljan G, Stampanoni M (2012) Development of a laser-based heating system for in-situ synchrotron-based x-ray tomographic microscopy. J Synchrotron Radiat 19:352–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin M-A, Riddle J, Desjardins-Langlais Y, Baker DR (2015) The effect of water on the sulfur concentration at sulfide saturation (SCSS) in natural melts. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 160:100–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Garboczi EJ, Snyder KA, Douglas JF, Thorpe MF (1995) Geometrical percolation threshold of overlapping ellipsoids. Phys Rev E 52:819–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano D, Nichols ARL, Dingwell DB (2005) Glass transition temperatures of natural hydrous melts: a relationship with shear viscosity and implications for the welding process. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 142:105–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano D, Russell JK, Dingwell DB (2008) Viscosity of magmatic liquids: a model. Earth Planet Sci Lett 278:123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RJ, Koch DL, Ladd AJC (2001) The first effects of fluid inertia on flows in ordered and random arrays of spheres. J Fluid Mech 448:213–241. Ziff. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112001005948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RJ, Koch DL (2002) The transition from steady to weakly turbulent flow in a close-packed ordered array of spheres. J Fluid Mech 465:59–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112002008947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys MCS, Menand T, Blundy JD, Klimm K (2008) Magma ascent rates in explosive eruptions: constraints from H2O diffusion in melt inclusions. Earth Planet Sci Lett 270:25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Klug C, Cashman KV (1996) Permeability development in vesiculating magmas: implications for fragmentation. Bull Volcanol 58:87–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraynik AM, Reinelt DA, van Swol F (2004) Structure of random foam. Phys Rev Lett 93:208301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.208301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushnir ARL, Martel C, Bourdier J-L, Heap MJ, Reushclé T, Erdmann S, Komorowski J-C, Cholik N (2016) Probing permeability and microstructure: unravelling the role of a low-permeability dome on the explosivity of Merapi (Indonesia). Jour Volcan Geotherm Res 316:56–71

    Google Scholar 

  • LaRue A (2012) Bubble size distributions and magma-water interaction at Eyjafjallajökull volcano, Iceland. M.Sc. Thesis, McGill University

  • La Spina G, Polacci M, Burton M, de’ Michieli Vitturi M (2017) Numerical investigation of permeability models for low viscosity magmas: application to the 2007 Stromboli effusive eruption. Earth Planet Sci Lett 473:279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindoo A, Larsen JF, Cashman KV, Dunn AL, Neill OK (2016) An experimental study of permeability development as a function of crystal-free melt viscosity. Earth Planet Sci Lett 435:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindoo A, Larsen JF, Cashman KV, Oppenheimer J (2017) Crystal controls on permeability development and degassing in basaltic andesite magma. Geology 45:831–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Samaha N-T, Baker DR (2007) Sulfur concentration at sulfide saturation (SCSS) in magmatic silicate melts. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:1783–1799

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz CD, Ziff RM (2001) Precise determination of the critical percolation threshold for the three-dimensional 'Swiss cheese' model using a growth algorithm. J Chem Phys 114:3659–3661

    Google Scholar 

  • Marone F, Stampanoni M (2012) Regridding reconstruction algorithm for real time tomographic imaging. J Synchrotron Radiat 19:1029–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokso R, Marone F, Stampanoni M (2010) Real time tomography at the Swiss Light Source. AIP Conf Proc 1234:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokso R, Schlepuetz CM, Theidel G, Billich H, Schmid E, Celcer T, Mikuljan G, Sala L, Marone F, Schlumpf N, Stampanoni M (2017) GigaFRoST: the gigabit fast readout system for tomography. J Synchrotron Radiat. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577517013522

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller S, Melnik O, Spieler O, Scheu B, Dingwell DB (2005) Permeability and degassing of dome lavas undergoing rapid decompression: an experimental determination. Bull Volcanol 67:526–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller S, Scheu B, Spieler O, Dingwell DB (2008) Permeability control on magma fragmentation. Geology 36:499–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Navon O, Lyakhovsky V (1998) Vesiculation processes in silicic magmas. In: Gilbert, J.S., Sparks, R.S.J. (Eds.), The physics of explosive volcanic eruptions. Geol Soc Spec Pub Lond 145: 27–50

  • Newman MEJ (2005) Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipt’s law. Contemp Phys 46:323–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen CT, Gonnermann HM, Chen Y, Huber C, Maiorano AA, Gouldstone A, Dufek J (2013) Film drainage and the lifetime of bubbles. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14:3616–3631. https://doi.org/10.1002/ggge.20198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni H, Zhang L (2018) A general model of water diffusivity in calcalkaline silicate melts and glasses. Chem Geol 478:60–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Odgaard A, Gundersen HJG (1993) Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3-D reconstructions. Bone 14:173–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata R, Odagaki T, Okazaki K (2005) Effects of poly-dispersity on continuum percolation. J Phs Condens Matter 17:4531–4538

    Google Scholar 

  • Papale P, Moretti R, Barbato D (2006) The compositional dependence of the saturation surface of H2O + CO2 fluids in silicate melts. Chem Geol 229:78–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Polacci M, Baker DR, Bai L, Mancini L (2008) Large vesicles record pathways of degassing at basaltic volcanoes. Bull Volcanol 70:1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-007-0184-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polacci M, Baker DR, La Rue A, Mancini L, Allard P (2012) Degassing behaviour of vesiculated basaltic magmas: an example from Ambrym volcano, Vanuatu Arc. Jour Volcan Geotherm Res 233-234:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Polacci M, Bouvet de Maisonneuve C, Giordano D, Piochi M, Mancini L, Degruyter W, Bachmann O (2014) Permeability measurements of Campi Flegrei pyroclastic products: an example from the Campanian ignimbrite and Monte Nuovo eruptions. J Volcan Geotherm Res 2272:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivers ML, Wang Y (2006) Recent developments in microtomography at GeoSoilEnviroCARS. Developments in X-Ray Tomography V, Proc SPIE 6318:J3180. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.681144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rust AC, Cashman KV (2004) Permeability of vesicular silicic magma: inertial and hysteresis effects. Earth Planet Sci Lett 228:93–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust AC, Cashman KV (2011) Permeability controls on expansion and size distributions of pyroclasts. J Geophys Res 116:B11202

    Google Scholar 

  • Saar MO, Manga M (1999) Permeability-porosity relationship in vesicular basalts. Geophys Res Lett 26:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A, Rempel AW, Cashman KV (2012) Conduit degassing and thermal controls on eruption styles at Mount St. Helens. Earth Planet Sci Lett 357-358:347–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks RSJ (2003) Dynamics of magma degassing. In: Oppenheimer C, Pyle DM, and Barclay J (eds) Volcanic Degassing. Geol Soc Lond, Spec Publ 213:5–22

  • Spieler O, Kennedy B, Kueppers U, Dingwell DB, Scheu B, Taddeucci J (2004) The fragmentation threshold of pyroclastic rocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 226:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer D, Aharony A (1994) Introduction to percolation theory, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, p 181

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi S, Nakashima S, Tomiya A (2008) Permeability measurements of natural and experimental volcanic materials with a simple permeameter: toward and understanding of magmatic degassing processes. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 177:329–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi S, Tomiya A, Shinohara H (2009) Degassing conditions for permeable silicic magmas: implications from decompression experiments with constant rates. Earth Planet Sci Lett 283:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thovert JF, Salles J, Adler PM (1993) Computerized characterization of the geometry of real porous media: their discretization, analysis and interpretation. J Microsc 170:65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright HMN, Cashman KV, Gottesfeld EH, Roberts JJ (2009) Pore structure of volcanic clasts: measurements of permeability and electrical conductivity. Earth Planet Sci Lett 280:93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama T, Takeuchi S (2009) Porosimetry of vesicular volcanic products by a water-expulsion method and the relationship of pore characteristics to permeability. J Geophys Res 114:B0221. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zandomeneghi D, Voltolini M, Mancini L, Brun F, Dreossi D, Polacci M (2010) Quantitative analysis of X-ray microtomography images of geomaterials: application to volcanic rocks. Geosphere 6:793–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J-Q, Chen Y-F, Wang L, Rayani CM (2019) Universal relationship between viscous and inertial permeability of geologica porous media. Geophys Res Lett 46:1441–1448

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziff RM, Torquato S (2017) Percolation of disorderd jammed sphere packings. J Phys A Math Theor 50:085001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa5664

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All of the members of the TOMCAT team and of the Swiss Light Source at the Paul Scherrer Institut are thanked for their creation of the facility that allowed this study to be done and their continuing dedication to providing support to external users of the beamline. D.R. Baker thanks NSERC for their continued support for his research through the Discovery Grant Program. We also thank the editors, K. Cashman and J. Taddeucci, and the reviewers, H. Wright, L. Chevalier, and A. Burgisser, for their detailed and thoughtful comments that significantly improved the presentation of our research in this contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Don R. Baker.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: K.V. Cashman; Deputy Executive Editor: J. Tadeucci

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLS 5365 kb)

ESM 2

(GIF 4394 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 1312 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baker, D.R., Brun, F., Mancini, L. et al. The importance of pore throats in controlling the permeability of magmatic foams. Bull Volcanol 81, 54 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-019-1311-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-019-1311-z

Keywords

Navigation