Skip to main content
Log in

Inferring condition in wild mammals: body condition indices confer no benefit over measuring body mass across ecological contexts

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies assume that it is beneficial for individuals of a species to be heavier, or have a higher body condition index (BCI), without accounting for the physiological relevance of variation in the composition of different body tissues. We hypothesized that the relationship between BCI and masses of physiologically important tissues (fat and lean) would be conditional on annual patterns of energy acquisition and expenditure. We studied three species with contrasting ecologies in their respective natural ranges: an obligate hibernator (Columbian ground squirrel, Urocitellus columbianus), a facultative hibernator (black-tailed prairie dog, Cynomys ludovicianus), and a food-caching non-hibernator (North American red squirrel, Tamiasciurus hudsonicus). We measured fat and lean mass in adults of both sexes using quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR). We measured body mass and two measures of skeletal structure (zygomatic width and right hind foot length) to develop sex- and species-specific BCIs, and tested the utility of BCI to predict body composition in each species. Body condition indices were more consistently, and more strongly correlated, with lean mass than fat mass. The indices were most positively correlated with fat when fat was expected to be very high (pre-hibernation prairie dogs). In all cases, however, BCI was never better than body mass alone in predicting fat or lean mass. While the accuracy of BCI in estimating fat varied across the natural histories and annual energetic patterns of the species considered, measuring body mass alone was as effective, or superior in capturing sufficient variation in fat and lean in most cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data for this study (Wishart et al. 2023) are archived on FigShare: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21899007.

Code availability

Code for analysis is available on GitHub at https://github.com/aewishart/bci-composition.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Agnes MacDonald for long-term access to her trap-line, and to the Champagne and Aishihik First Nations for allowing us to conduct fieldwork related to red squirrels within their traditional territory. Fieldwork related to prairie dogs was conducted in Treaty 4 territory, the traditional territory of the Oceti Sakowin and Niitsitpiis-stahkoii, and the homeland of the Métis Nation. Fieldwork related to ground squirrels was conducted in Treaty 7 territory, the traditional territories of the Blackfoot Confederacy (Siksika, Piikani, and Kainai First Nations), the Tsuut’ina First Nation, the Stoney Nakoda (Chiniki, Bearspaw, and Wesley First Nations) and homeland of the Métis Nation. We thank the many volunteers, graduate students, and field assistants, including Jillian Kusch, Tessie Aujla, Jack Hendrix, Ashley Mills, Emily Kelvin, Megan Miller, M. Alejandra Hurtado, and Gabriela Heyer for field data collection, and Grasslands National Park staff for assistance with permitting and logistical support. AEW thanks Dr. Kurtis Swekla and Dr. Todd Shury for professional veterinary services in developing anesthesia protocols for red squirrels.

Funding

The authors are grateful for ongoing funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (SB, JEL, AGM), Canadian Foundation for Innovation (AGM, JEL), and the National Science Foundation (BD, AGM). Fieldwork for this study was further supported by the Northern Scientific Training Program (AEW), Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid-of-Research (AEW, RS), American Society of Mammalogists Grant-in-Aid-of-Research (AEW, ALGC, RS), the American Museum of Natural History Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund (ALGC) and the Alberta Conservation Association (ALGC, RS). This is article no. 127 of the Kluane Red Squirrel Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AEW designed the study, collected data, performed data and statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. JEL participated in the design. All authors contributed to data collection, provided valuable discussion and contributions to the writing of the manuscript, and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea E. Wishart.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

All procedures were approved by the University of Saskatchewan Animal Research Ethics Board. Fieldwork was completed under permits issued by Yukon Territorial Government (red squirrels); Grasslands National Park and the Saskatchewan Ministry of the Environment (prairie dogs); and Alberta Parks (ground squirrels).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by John Loehr.

The utility of body condition indices to approximate energetically significant tissues (fat and lean mass) varies with a species' natural history, and when they are measured during the annual cycle.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 590 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wishart, A.E., Guerrero-Chacón, A.L., Smith, R. et al. Inferring condition in wild mammals: body condition indices confer no benefit over measuring body mass across ecological contexts. Oecologia 204, 161–172 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05495-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05495-7

Keywords

Navigation