Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Wing morphology of a damselfly exhibits local variation in response to forest fragmentation

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental differences can lead to morphologically different subpopulations. The scale of the mosaic of morphologies should help shed light on the nature of the mechanisms at work. Previous work has shown that jewelwing damselflies have different wing sizes in different types of habitat. Our aim was to (1) describe the relationship between damselfly wing lengths and a gradient of forest fragmentation and (2) determine the spatial scale at which these morphological differences occur. We hypothesized that local adaptation would lead to differences in wing morphology over short distances. We herein test one of the several predictions that would need to be met to support this hypothesis: that wing morphology would show spatial autocorrelation at relatively short distances. We further predicted that the wing morphology would correlate to forest fragmentation. We collected jewelwing damselflies from across Indiana, USA, in habitats across a gradient of forest fragmentation. We examined the link between forest edge density and wing length using three biologically relevant landscape sizes. We then examined the distance to which wing length variation was autocorrelated using Moran’s I. We found positive linear or unimodal relationships between wing length and edge density, in both males and females, at all three landscape scales. Spatial autocorrelation in wing length indicated that variation in wing length was autocorrelated at short distances, out to 1–5 km. Our findings uphold one of the predictions stemming from the hypothesis that adaptations to local environments—habitat fragmentation here—can occur at relatively fine spatial scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Histograms of CRW data are available in the online Appendix A. Data is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Code availability

R code for the CRW is available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  • Blanquart F, Kaltz O, Nuismer SL, Gandon S (2013) A practical guide to measuring local adaptation. Ecol Lett 16:1195–1205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carman SF (2013) Indiana forest management history and practices. In: Swihart RK, Saunders MR, Kalb RA, Haulton GS, Michler CH (eds) The hardwood ecosystem experiment: a framework for studying responses to forest management. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-108, Newtown Square, PA, pp 12–23

  • Collinge SK, Forman RT (1998) A conceptual model of land conversion processes: predictions and evidence from a microlandscape experiment with grassland insects. Oikos 82:66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale MR, Fortin MJ (2014) Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Massachusetts

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dewitz J (2019) National land cover database (NLCD) 2016 products: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/p96hhbie

  • Endo C, Watanabe K (2020) Morphological variation associated with trophic niche expansion within a lake population of a benthic fish. PLoS ONE 15:e0232114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilets S (2003) Perspective: models of speciation: what have I learned in 40 years? Evolution 57:2197–2215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassall C (2015) Odonata as candidate macroecological barometers for global climate change. Freshw Sci 34:1040–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heino M, Hanski I (2001) Evolution of migration rate in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. Am Nat 157:495–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, van Etten J (2014) raster: geographic analysis and modeling with raster data. R package version 2.0–12

  • Hunter MD (2002) Landscape structure, habitat fragmentation, and the ecology of insects. Agric for Entomol 4:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson HB, Fahrig L (2012) What size is a biologically relevant landscape? Landsc Ecol 27:929–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen ID, Taylor PD (2000a) Fine-scale movement behaviors of calopterygid damselflies are influenced by landscape structure: an experimental manipulation. Oikos 88:553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen I, Taylor PD (2000b) Calopteryx damselfly dispersions arising from multiscale responses to landscape structure. Conserv Ecol. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-00211-040204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkton SD, Schultz TD (2001) Age-specific behavior and habitat selection of adult male damselflies, Calopteryx maculata (Odonata: Calopterygidae). J Insect Behav 14:545–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh I, Rowe IE, Holland JD (2013) Graph and circuit theory connectivity models of conservation biological control agents. Ecol Appl 23:1554–1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leimu R, Fischer M (2008) A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 3(12):e4010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lindestad O, Wheat CW, Nylin S, Gotthard K (2019) Local adaptation of photoperiodic plasticity maintains life cycle variation within latitudes in a butterfly. Ecology 100:e02550. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam G (1984) Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. In: Brandt J, Agger P (eds) Methodology in landscape ecological research and planning: proceedings of the 1st International Association of Landscape Ecology, Roskilde, Denmark, Oct 15–19 1984

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2020) Vegan: community ecology. R package version 2.5–5

  • Olivieri I, Gouyon PH (1997) Evolution of migration rate and other traits: the metapopulation effect. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, Massachusetts, pp 293–323

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Omernik JM (1987) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals Assoc Am Geogr 77:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pither J, Taylor PD (1998) An experimental assessment of landscape connectivity. Oikos 83:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team R (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznick D, Endler JA (1982) The impact of predation on life history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 36:160–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JL, Urban MC (2013) Strong selection barriers explain microgeographic adaptation in wild salamander populations. Evolution 67:1729–1740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JL, Urban MC, Bolnick DI, Skelly DK (2014) Microgeographic adaptation and the spatial scale of evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 29:165–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth 9:671–675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schtickzelle N, Mennechez G, Baguette M (2006) Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. Ecology 87:1057–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker NH (1996) Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology 77:1210–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP, Godfray HCJ, Beissinger SR, Benton T, Cameron DD, Carmel Y, Coomes DA, Coulson T, Emmerson MC, Hails RS, Hays GC, Hodgson DJ, Hutchings MJ, Johnson D, Jones JPG, Keeling MJ, Kokko H, Kunin WE, Lambin X, Lewis OT, Malhi Y, Mieszkowska N, Milner-Gulland EJ, Norris K, Pillimore AB, Purves DW, Reid JM, Reuman DC, Thompson K, Travis JMJ, Turnbull LA, Wardle DA, Wiegand T (2013) Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions. J Ecol 101:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD (1988) An inclusive fitness model for dispersal of offspring. J Theor Biol 130:363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD (1994) Responses of a forest damselfly to differences in landscape structure arising from habitat fragmentation. PhD dissertation, Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  • Taylor PD, Merriam G (1995) Wing morphology of a forest damselfly is related to landscape structure. Oikos 73:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Merriam G (1996) Habitat fragmentation and parasitism of a forest damselfly. Landsc Ecol 11:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Odonate Wing Digitization Project (2020) Resources. https://digitizingdragonflies.org/#resources. Accessed 1 July 2021

  • USDA (2020) Summary Report: 2017 National Resources Inventory, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology. Iowa State University, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Wollenberg AL (1977) Redundancy analysis an alternative for canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 42:207–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck H, Matthysen E (1999) Habitat fragmentation and insect flight: a changing ‘design’ in a changing landscape? Trends Ecol Evol 14:172–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanDerWal J, Falconi L, Januchowski S, Shoo L, Storlie C (2014) SDMTools: species distribution modelling tools: tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises. R Package Version 1:1–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK (1972) Longevity and mobility of adult Calopteryx maculata (Beauvois, 1805) (Zygoptera: Calopterygidae). Odonatologica 1:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK (1979) Adaptive significance of postcopulatory guarding of mates and nonmates by male Calopteryx maculata (Odonata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner DL, Liebherr JK (1992) Flightlessness in insects. Trends Ecol Evol 7:216–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS, McLellan CH, Dobson AP (1986) Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. Conserv Biol 6:237–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Willi Y, Hoffmann AA (2012) Microgeographic adaptation linked to forest fragmentation and habitat quality in the tropical fruit fly Drosophila birchii. Oikos 121:1627–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

During this research, JTG was funded by NSF DRL award #1513248 and JDH was funded by a USDA Hatch grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JTG selected the research question, conducted the field work, laboratory work, and analysis, and wrote the paper. JDH refined the research question, helped design the field work, analysis, and result interpretation, and edited the writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey D. Holland.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by Wolf M. Mooij.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 246 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goldner, J.T., Holland, J.D. Wing morphology of a damselfly exhibits local variation in response to forest fragmentation. Oecologia 202, 369–380 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05396-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05396-9

Keywords

Navigation