Correction to: Oecologia (2023) 201:525–536 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05324-x

The scale of Fig. 2a should be (0-50-100-150) the scale of Fig. 2b should be (0-5-10-15). Revised version of the image is updated here.

Fig. 2
figure 1

Seasonal variations in flower resources: a flower density per m2 and b floral species richness per site; and their attractiveness to pollinators at the community level: c number of interactions and d number of pollinator species; for native and exotic plants (native: orange, exotic: red). Lines indicate predictions from the GLMM presented in Table 1 (± SE), and points represent observed values. The c number of interactions and d pollinator species richness are modeled by accounting for the variations of flower resources

The original article has been corrected.