Nutrients and consumers impact tree colonization differently from performance in a successional old field

Abstract

Successful colonization and growth of trees within herbaceous communities may result from different interactions with the herbaceous community. First, colonizing trees compete against larger, established herbs, while subsequent growth occurs among similarly sized or smaller herbs. This shift from colonization to growth may lead three drivers of community dynamics—nutrients, consumers, and herbaceous diversity—to differentially affect tree colonization and, later, tree performance. Initially, these drivers should favor larger, established herbs, reducing tree colonization. Later, when established trees can better compete with herbs, these drivers should benefit trees and increase their performance. In a 4-year study in a southeastern US old field, we added nutrients to, excluded aboveground consumers from, and manipulated initial richness of, the herbaceous community, and then allowed trees to naturally colonize these communities (from intact seedbanks or as seed rain) and grow. Nutrients and consumers had opposing effects on tree colonization and performance: adding nutrients and excluding consumers reduced tree colonization rate, but later increased the size of established trees (height, basal diameter). Adding nutrients and excluding consumers also restricted tree colonization to earlier years of study, which partially explained the effect of nutrient addition on plant size. Together, this shows differing impacts of nutrients and consumers: factors that initially limited tree colonization also resulted in larger established trees. This suggests that succession of grasslands that are either eutrophied or have diminished consumer pressure may experience lags and pulses in woody encroachment, leading to an extended period of herbaceous dominance followed by accelerated woody growth.