Skip to main content
Log in

It’s a predator–eat–parasite world: how characteristics of predator, parasite and environment affect consumption

  • Community ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the effects of predation on disease dynamics is increasingly important in light of the role ecological communities can play in host–parasite interactions. Surprisingly, however, few studies have characterized direct predation of parasites. Here we used an experimental approach to show that consumption of free-living parasite stages is highly context dependent, with significant influences of parasite size, predator size and foraging mode, as well as environmental condition. Among the four species of larval trematodes and two types of predators (fish and larval damselflies) studied here, parasites with larger infective stages (size >1,000 μm) were most vulnerable to predation by fish, while small-bodied fish and damselflies (size <10 mm) consumed the most infectious stages. Small parasite species (size approx. 500 μm) were less frequently consumed by both fish and larval damselflies. However, these results depended strongly on light availability; trials conducted in the dark led to significantly fewer parasites consumed overall, especially those with a size of <1,000 μm, emphasizing the importance of circadian shedding times of parasite free-living stages for predation risk. Intriguingly, active predation functioned to help limit fishes’ infection by directly penetrating parasite species. Our results are consistent with established theory developed for predation on zooplankton that emphasizes the roles of body size, visibility and predation modes and further suggest that consumer–resource theory may provide a predictive framework for when predators should significantly influence parasite transmission. These results contribute to our understanding of transmission in natural systems, the role of predator–parasite links in food webs and the evolution of parasite morphology and behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksnes DL, Nejstgaard J, Sœdberg E, Sørnes T (2004) Optical control of fish and zooplankton populations. Limnol Oceanogr 49:223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RM, Whitfield PJ, Dobson AP, Keymer AE (1978) Concomitant predation and infection processes: an experimental study. J Anim Ecol 47:891–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver PC (1939a) The morphology and life history of Petasiger nitidus Linton (Trematoda: Echinostomatidae). J Parasitol 25:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver PC (1939b) The morphology and life history of Psilostomum ondatrae Price 1931 (Trematoda: psilostomidae). J Parasitol 25:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belden LK, Wojdak JM (2011) The combined influence of trematode parasites and predatory salamanders on wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles. Oecologia 166:1077–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bence JR, Murdoch WW (1986) Prey size selection by the mosquitofish: relation to optimal diet theory. Ecology 67:324–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco S, Romo S, Villena M-J (2004) Experimental study on the diet of mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) under different ecological conditions in a shallow lake. Int Rev Hydrobiol 89:250–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borer ET, Mitchell CE, Power AG, Seabloom EW (2009) Consumers indirectly increase infection risk in grassland food webs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:503–506

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks JL, Dodson SI (1965) Predation, body size and the composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Combes C (1991) Ethological aspects of parasite transmission. Am Nat 138:866–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson SI (1974) Zooplankton competition and predation: an experimental test of the size-efficiency hypothesis. Ecology 55:605–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dronen NO Jr, Lang BZ (1974) The life cycle of Cephalogonimus salamandrus sp. n. (Digenea: cephalogonimidae) from Ambystoma tigrinum (green) from Eastern Washington. J Parasitol 60:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy MA, Housley JM, Penczykowski RM, Cáceres CE, Hall SR (2011) Unhealthy herds: indirect effects of predators enhance two drivers of disease spread. Funct Ecol 25:945–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Berthou E (1999) Food of introduced mosquitofish: ontogenetic diet shift and prey selection. J Fish Biol 55:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths D (1975) Prey availability and the food of predators. Ecology 56:1209–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas W (2003) Parasitic worms: strategies of host finding, recognition and invasion. Zoology 106:349–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall SR, Sivars-Becker L, Becker C, Duffy MA, Tessier AJ, Cáceres CE (2007) Eating yourself sick: transmission of disease as a function of foraging ecology. Ecol Lett 10:207–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanazato T, Yasuno M (1989) Zooplankton community structure driven by vertebrate and invertebrate predators. Oecologia 81:450–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper JV, Poulin R, Thieltges DW (2008) Buffering role of the intertidal anemone Anthopleura aureoradiata in cercarial transmission from snails to crabs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 367:153–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DM (1973) Predation by damselfly naiads on cladoceran populations: fluctuating intensity. Ecology 54:251–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PTJ, Preu ER, Sutherland DR, Romansic J, Han B, Blaustein AR (2006) Adding infection to injury: synergistic effects of predation and parasitism on salamander limb malformations. Ecology 87:2227–2235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PTJ, Dobson A, Lafferty KD, Marcogliese DJ, Memmott J, Orlofske SA, Poulin R, Thieltges DW (2010) When parasites become prey: ecological and epidemiological significance of eating parasites. Trends Ecol Evol 25:362–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan AT, Rebhal S, Lafferty KD, Kuris AM (2009) Small estuarine fishes feed on large trematode cercariae: lab and field investigations. J Parasitol 95:477–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keesing F, Holt RD, Ostfeld RS (2006) Effects of species diversity on disease risk. Ecol Lett 9:485–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty KD (1999) The evolution of trophic transmission. Parasitol Today 15:111–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty KD, Allesina S, Arim M, Briggs CJ, DeLeo G, Dobson AP, Dunne JA, Johnson PTJ, Kuris AM, Marcogliese DJ, Martinez ND, Memmott J, Marquet PA, McLaughlin JP, Mordecai EA, Pascual M, Poulin R, Thieltges DW (2008) Parasites in food webs: the ultimate missing links. Ecol Lett 11:533–546

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang BZ (1968) The life cycle of Cephalogonimus americanus Stafford, 1902 (Trematoda: Cephalogonimidae). J Parasitol 54:945–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang BZ (1969) Modes of infection of Rana clamitans with Cephalogonimus americanus (Trematoda). J Parasitol 55:832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MC, Welsford IG, Uglem GL (1989) Cercarial emergence of Proterometra macrostoma and P. edneyi (Digenea: azygiidae): constrasting responses to light: dark cycling. Parasitology 99:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morely NJ (2012) Cercariae (Platyhelminthes: trematoda) as neglected components of zooplankton communities in freshwater habitats. Hydrobiologia 691:7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:1–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien WJ, Slade NA, Vinyard GL (1976) Apparent size as the determinant of prey selection by bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 57:1304–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlofske SA, Jadin RC, Preston DL, Johnson PTJ (2012) Parasite transmission in complex communities: predators and alternative hosts alter pathogenic infections in amphibians. Ecology 93:1247–1253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orlofske SA, Jadin RC, Hoverman JT, Johnson PTJ (2014) Predation and disease: understanding the effects of predators at several trophic levels on pathogen transmission. Freshwater Biol. 59:1064–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld RS, Holt RD (2004) Are predators good for your health? Evaluating evidence for top-down regulation of zoonotic disease reservoirs. Front Ecol Environ 2:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer C, Holt RD, Hudson PJ, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP (2003) Keeping the herds healthy and alert: implications of predator control for infectious disease. Ecol Lett 6:797–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1982) Aquatic insect predator-prey relations. Bioscience 32:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston DL, Orlofske SA, Lambden JP, Johnson PTJ (2013) Biomass and productivity of parasites in pond ecosystems. J Anim Ecol 82:509–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz K, Kelly TC, O’Riordan RM, Culloty SC (2009) Non-host organisms affect transmission processes in two common trematode parasites of rocky shores. Mar Biol 156:2303–2311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (2008) Plague minnow or mosquito fish? A review of the biology and impacts of introduced Gambusia species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at: http://www.R-project.org

  • Schmid-Hempel P (2011) Evolutionary parasitology: the integrated study of infections, immunology, ecology, and genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Schotthoefer AM, Labak KM, Beasley VR (2007) Ribeiroia ondatrae cercariae are consumed by aquatic invertebrate predators. J Parasitol 93:1240–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thieltges DW, Jensen KT, Poulin R (2008) The role of biotic factors in the transmission of free-living endohelminth stages. Parasitology 135:407–426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thieltges DW, Amundsen P-A, Hechinger RF, Johnson PTJ, Lafferty KD, Mouritsen KN, Preston DL, Reise K, Dieter Zander C, Poulin R (2013) Parasites as prey in aquatic food webs: implications for predator infection and parasite transmission. Oikos 122:1473–1482

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DJ (1978) Prey size selection by larvae of the damselfly, Ischnura elegans (Odonata). J Anim Ecol 47:769–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright DI, O’Brien WJ (1982) Differential location of Chaoborus larvae and Daphnia by fish: the importance of motion and visible size. Am Midl Nat 108:68–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaret TM (1980) Predation and freshwater communities. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret TM, Kerfoot WC (1975) Fish predation on Bosmina longirostris: body-size selection versus visibility selection. Ecology 56:232–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank B. Kondratieff for identifying damselfly nymphs, D. Preston for collecting fish, C. Orlofske for collecting field-infected snails from Wisconsin and M. Joseph and J. Mihaljevic for statistical advice. The Johnson laboratory provided helpful feedback during manuscript preparation. This project was funded by the Society of Wetland Scientists, the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, a Beverly Sears Grant, the National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship to SAO and DEB-1149308 and 0841758 to PTJJ) and a fellowship from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. Procedures involving vertebrates were approved by the CU Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (1004.04).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah A. Orlofske.

Additional information

Communicated by Leon A. Barmuta.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 266 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 72 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orlofske, S.A., Jadin, R.C. & Johnson, P.T.J. It’s a predator–eat–parasite world: how characteristics of predator, parasite and environment affect consumption. Oecologia 178, 537–547 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3243-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3243-4

Keywords

Navigation