Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Intraspecific variations in dispersal ability of saproxylic beetles in fragmented forest patches

  • Conservation ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extrapolation of metapopulation concepts to saproxylic insects suggests that the occupancy of forest patches and the colonization of ephemeral deadwood substrates are driven by micro-evolutionary processes that are related to adaptive plasticity and intraspecific sex-dependent polymorphism of dispersal traits. We hypothesized that forest fragmentation could favor more mobile individuals within populations, but little empirical data have been published on the potentially sex-biased response of insect populations to habitat availability. We selected 88 fragmented woodlots in two European agricultural landscapes to cover different degrees of spatio-temporal fragmentation, from small, isolated and recently established woodlots to large, inter-connected ancient woodlots. In line with our hypothesis, the average wing loading (WL), used as a proxy for dispersal ability, for each of nine flight-dispersing saproxylic beetle species should be lower in recent, small, isolated woodlots than in ancient, large, inter-connected woodlots, respectively (i.e. ancient vs. recent, small vs. large, isolated vs. connected). Forest patch size did not significantly influence the average dispersal ability of beetle colonizers. However, WL of one-third of the tested species did significantly respond to forest ancientness or connectivity. Significant patterns were sex-biased, probably due to the contrasting role of males and females in species colonization dynamics. WL was lower in recent than in ancient forest plots for Melandrya barbata males, and it was lower in isolated than in connected woodlots for Tetratoma ancora and Phymatodes testaceus males. Contrary to expectations, we did not observe any decrease in polymorphism of dispersal abilities with decreasing woodlot size or increasing isolation. Our findings give support to the usefulness of gender consideration in insect conservation ecology studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander DE (2002) Nature’s flyers: birds, insects, and the biomechanics of flight. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Arribas P, Velasco J, Abellán P, Sánchez-Fernández D, Andújar C, Calosi P, Millán A, Ribera I, Bilton DT (2012) Dispersal ability rather than ecological tolerance drives differences in range size between lentic and lotic water beetles (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). J Biogeogr 39(5):984–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin-Ollivier L, Bonaccorso F, Aloysius M, Kasiki M (2003) Flight movement of Scapanes australis australis (Boisduval) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Dynastinae) in Papua New Guinea: a radiotelemetry study. Aust J Entomol 42(4):367–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berwaerts K, Dyck HV, Aerts P (2002) Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? an experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria. Funct Ecol 16(4):484–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiteau G, Colpitts B (2001) Electronic tags for the tracking of insects in flight: effect of weight on flight performance of adult Colorado potato beetles. Entomol Exp Appl 100(2):187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler DE, Benton TG (2005) Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev 80:205–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information–theoretic approach. Springer, New York

  • Buse J (2012) “Ghosts of the past”: flightless saproxylic weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) are relict species in ancient woodlands. J Insect Conserv 16(1):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clobert J, Baguette M, Benton TG, Bullock JM (eds) (2012) Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins SAO, Lindborg R, Mattsson S (2009) Land use history and site location are more important for grassland species richness than local soil properties. Nord J Bot 27:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekoninck W, Desender K, Grootaert P (2008) Establishment of ant communities in forests growing on former agricultural fields: colonisation and 25 years of management are not enough (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Eur J Entomol 105:681–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drag L, Hauck D, Pokluda P, Zimmermann K, Cizek L (2011) Demography and dispersal ability of a threatened saproxylic beetle: a mark-recapture study of the Rosalia longicorn (Rosalia alpina). PLoS One 6(6):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois G, Gouar P, Delettre Y, Brustel H, Vernon P (2010) Sex-biased and body condition dependent dispersal capacity in the endangered saproxylic beetle Osmoderma eremita (Coleoptera: Cetoniidae). J Insect Conserv 14(6):679–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupouey JL, Bachacou J, Cosserat R, Aberdam S, Vallauri D, Corvisier de Villèle MA (2007) Vers la réalisation d’une carte géoréférencée des forêts anciennes de France. Le Monde des Cartes 191:85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Estreguil C, Caudullo G, de Rigo D, san Miguel J (2013) Forest landscape in Europe: pattern, fragmentation and connectivity. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Scientific and Technical Research series, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandon S, Rousset F (1999) Evolution of stepping-stone dispersal rates. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:2507–2513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb H, Hjältén J, Ball JP, Pettersson RB, Landin J, Alvini O, Danell K (2006) Wing loading and habitat selection in forest beetles: are red-listed species poorer dispersers or more habitat-specific than common congenerics? Biol Conserv 132(2):250–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goßner M, Engel K, Jessel B (2008) Plant and arthropod communities in young oak stands: are they determined by site history? Biodivers Conserv 17(13):3165–3180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gros A, Hovestadt T, Poethke HJ (2008) Evolution of sex-biased dispersal: the role of sex-specific dispersal costs, demographic stochasticity, and inbreeding. Ecol Model 219:226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) (2004) Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations. Academic Press

  • Harrison RG (1980) Dispersal polymorphisms in insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11(1):95–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin J, Ranius T, Nilsson SG, Smith HG (2008) Restricted dispersal in a flying beetle assessed by telemetry. Biodivers Conserv 17:675–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK, Thomas CD, Blakeley DS (1999) Evolution of flight morphology in a butterfly that has recently expanded its geographic range. Oecologia 121(2):165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horak J, Vodka S, Pavlicek J, Boza P (2013) Unexpected visitors: flightless beetles in window traps. J Insect Conserv 17:441–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmler U, Arp H, Nötzold R (2010) Species richness of saproxylic beetles in woodlands is affected by dispersion ability of species, age and stand size. J Insect Conserv 14:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson HB, Baum KA, Robert T, Cronin JT (2009) Habitat-specific movement and edge-mediated behavior of the saproxylic insect Odontotaenius disjunctus (Coleoptera: Passalidae). Environ Entomol 38(5):1411–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M, Nordlander G, Jonsson M (1999) Colonization patterns of insects breeding in wood-decaying fungi. J Insect Conserv 3:145–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julliard R (2000) Sex-specific dispersal in spatially varying environment leads to habitat-dependent evolutionary stable offspring sex ratio. Behav Ecol 11:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Grégoire JC, Evans HF (2004) Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmus A, Lohmus P (2005) Coarse woody debris in mid-aged stands: abandoned agricultural versus long-term forest land. Can J For Res 35:1502–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo SE (1990) Comparative flight behavior of Diabrotica virgifera virgifera and Diabrotica barberi in the laboratory. Entomol Exp Appl 55:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg UM, Rayner JMV (1987) Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera): wing adaptions, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 316:335–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordén B, Appelqvist T (2001) Conceptual problems of ecological continuity and its bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 10(5):779–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleksa A, Chybicki IJ, Gawroński R, Svensson GP, Burczyk J (2013) Isolation by distance in saproxylic beetles may increase with niche specialization. J Insect Conserv 17(2):219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter JN, Siitonen J, Hanski I (2007) Phylogeographical patterns and genetic diversity in three species of Eurasian boreal forest beetles. Biol J Linn Soc 91:267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prugh LR, Hodges KE, Sinclair ARE, Brashares JS (2008) Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(52):20770–20775

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T (2006) Measuring the dispersal of saproxylic insects: a key characteristic for their conservation. Popul Ecol 48(3):177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rink M, Sinsch U (2007) Radio-telemetric monitoring of dispersing stag beetles: implications for conservation. J Zool 272(3):235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salom S, McLean J (1989) Influence of wind on the spring flight of Trypodendron lineatum (Oliver)(Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in a second-growth coniferous forest. Can. Entomol. 121:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvard D (2004) General biology of Bark beetles. In: Lieutier F, Day R, Battisti A, Grégoire J-C, Evans HF (eds) Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 63–88

  • Sekar S (2012) A meta-analysis of the traits affecting dispersal ability in butterflies: can wingspan be used as a proxy? J Anim Ecol 81:174–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons AD, Thomas CD (2004) Changes in dispersal during species′ range expansions. Am Nat 164(3):378–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher-Uebersax E, Durrer H (2001) Verhaltensstudien beim Hirschkäfer mittels Telemetrie und Videoaufzeichnungen (Coleoptera, Lucanus cervus L.). Mitt Naturforsch Gesellsch Basel 5:161–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Starmer WT, Wolf LL (1989) Causes of variation in wing loading among Drosophila species. Biol J Linn Soc 37(3):247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Merriam G (1995) Wing morphology of a forest damselfly is related to landscape structure. Oikos 73:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turlure C, Baguette M, Stevens VM, Maes D (2011) Species- and sex-specific adjustments of movement behavior to landscape heterogeneity in butterflies. Behav Ecol 22:967–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerkhove K, Thomaes A, Jonsson BG (2013) Chapter 2.3 Connectivity and fragmentation: island biogeography and metapopulation applied to old-growth elements. In: Kraus D, Krumm F (eds) Integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 104–115

  • Watson S (2003) Dispersal and gene flow in Prostomis atkinsoni (Coleoptera). Honours thesis. LaTrobe University, Melbourne

  • Wainright PC (1994) Functional morphology as a tool in ecological research. Ecological morphology: integrative organismal biology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 42–59

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to L. Valladares, S. Malaty, C. Mailliu, B. Nusillard, C. Moliard and A. N’Diaye (Irstea) for field and laboratory work. We thank A. Salle for help with the lab work, two anonymous reviewers and Roland Brandl for helpful comments on first drafts of this manuscript and V. Moore who checked the English language. This research was granted by the French Ministry in charge of Ecology through the “Biodiversité, Gestion Forestière et Politiques Publiques” (BGF) program (contract number: 10-MBGD-BGF-2-CVS-103 Distrafor).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ‘Forest Ecosystems’ Research Unit, National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture (Irstea), Domaine des Barres, 45290, Nogent-Sur-Vernisson, France

    C. Bouget, D. Tellez & F. Archaux

  2. UMR Dynafor 1201, Ecole d’Ingénieurs de Purpan, L’institut national polytechnique de Toulouse (INPT)–Université de Toulouse, 75 voie du Toec, BP 57611, 31076, Toulouse Cedex 03, France

    A. Brin

Authors
  1. C. Bouget
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Brin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Tellez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Archaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Bouget.

Additional information

Communicated by Roland A. Brandl.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1050 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouget, C., Brin, A., Tellez, D. et al. Intraspecific variations in dispersal ability of saproxylic beetles in fragmented forest patches. Oecologia 177, 911–920 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3162-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3162-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation