Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Instantaneous-to-daily GPP upscaling schemes based on a coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model: correcting the overestimation of GPP by directly using daily average meteorological inputs

  • Methods
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Daily canopy photosynthesis is usually temporally upscaled from instantaneous (i.e., seconds) photosynthesis rate. The nonlinear response of photosynthesis to meteorological variables makes the temporal scaling a significant challenge. In this study, two temporal upscaling schemes of daily photosynthesis, the integrated daily model (IDM) and the segmented daily model (SDM), are presented by considering the diurnal variations of meteorological variables based on a coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model. The two models, as well as a simple average daily model (SADM) with daily average meteorological inputs, were validated using the tower-derived gross primary production (GPP) to assess their abilities in simulating daily photosynthesis. The results showed IDM closely followed the seasonal trend of the tower-derived GPP with an average RMSE of 1.63 g C m−2 day−1, and an average Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (E) of 0.87. SDM performed similarly to IDM in GPP simulation but decreased the computation time by >66 %. SADM overestimated daily GPP by about 15 % during the growing season compared to IDM. Both IDM and SDM greatly decreased the overestimation by SADM, and improved the simulation of daily GPP by reducing the RMSE by 34 and 30 %, respectively. The results indicated that IDM and SDM are useful temporal upscaling approaches, and both are superior to SADM in daily GPP simulation because they take into account the diurnally varying responses of photosynthesis to meteorological variables. SDM is computationally more efficient, and therefore more suitable for long-term and large-scale GPP simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldocchi D (1994) An analytical solution for coupled leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance models. Tree Physiol 14:1069–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ball JT (1988) An analysis of stomatal conductance. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford

  • Barr AG, Black TA, Hogg EH, Kljun N, Morgenstern K, Nesic Z (2004) Inter-annual variability in the leaf area index of a boreal aspen-hazelnut forest in relation to net ecosystem production. Agric For Meteorol 126:237–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonan GB, Oleson KW, Fisher RA, Lasslop G, Reichstein M (2012) Reconciling leaf physiological traits and canopy flux data: use of the TRY and FLUXNET databases in the community land model version 4. J Geophys Res, vol 117. doi:10.1029/2011JG001913

  • Chen JM, Jiu J, Cihlar J, Goulden ML (1999) Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications. Ecol Modell 124:99–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JM, Govind A, Sonnentag O, Zhang Y, Barr A, Amiro B (2006) Leaf area index measurements at Fluxnet-Canada forest sites. Agric For Meteorol 140:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Black TA, Coops NC, Hilker T, Trofymow JA, Morgenstern K (2009) Assessing tower flux footprint climatology and scaling between remotely sensed and eddy covariance measurements. Bound Layer Meteorol 130:137–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar GD, Von Caemmerer S, Berry JA (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149:78–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goerner A, Reichstein M, Rambal S (2009) Tracking seasonal drought effects on ecosystem light use efficiency with satellite-based PRI in a Mediterranean forest. Remote Sens Environ 113:1101–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk M, Dolman AJ, Ammann C, Arneth A, Cescatti A, Dragoni D, Gash JHC, Gianelle D, Gioli B, Kiely G, Knohl A, Law BE, Lund M, Marcolla B, van der Molen MK, Montagnani L, Moors E, Richardson AD, Roupsard O, Verbeeck H,and Wohlfahrt G (2011) Seasonal variation of photosynthetic model parameters and leaf area index from global Fluxnet eddy covariance data. J Geophys Res G. 116. doi:10.1029/2011JG001742

  • Hunt ER, Lavigne JMB, Franklin SE (1999) Factors controlling the decline of net primary production with stand age for balsam fir in Newfoundland assessed using an ecosystem simulation model. Ecol Modell 122:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izaurralde RC, Williams JR, McGill WB, Rosenberg NJ, Jakas MCQ (2006) Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: model description and testing against long-term data. Ecol Modell 192:362–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis PG (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 273:593–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jassal RS, Black TA, Spittlehouse DL, Brümmer C, Nesic Z (2009) Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in different-aged Pacific Northwest Douglas-fir stands. Agric For Meteorol 149:1168–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin S, Zhou X, Fan J (2003) Modeling daily photosynthesis of nine major tree species in northeast China. For Ecol Manag 184:125–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kattge J, Knorr W, Raddatz T, Wirth C (2009) Quantifying photosynthetic capacity and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content for global-scale terrestrial biosphere models. Glob Change Biol 15:976–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katul GG, Palmroth S, Oren R (2009) Leaf stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit under current and CO2-enriched atmosphere explained by the economics of gas exchange. Plant Cell Environ 32:968–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball BA, Bellamy LA (1986) Generation of diurnal solar radiation, temperature and humidity patterns. Energ Agr 5:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuning R (1990) Modeling stomata1 behavior and photosynthesis of eucalyptus grandis. Aust J Plant Physiol 17:159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuning R (1995) A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 18:1129–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C (2000) Modeling trace gas emissions from agricultural ecosystems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 58:259–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim WH, Roderick ML (2012) A framework for upscaling short-term process-level understanding to longer time scales. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 9:6203–6224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Chen JM, Cihlar J, Park WM (1997) A process-based boreal ecosystem productivity simulator using remote sensing inputs. Remote Sens Environ 62:158–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkelä A, Kolari P, Karimäki J, Nikinmaa E, Perämäki M, Hari P (2006) Modeling five years of weather-driven variation of GPP in a boreal forest. Agric For Meteorol 139:382–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medlyn BE, Badek FW, de Pury DGG, Barton CVM, Broadmeadow M, Ceulemans R, De Angelis P, Forstreuter M, Jach ME, Kellomäki S, Laitat E, Marek M, Philippot S, Rey A, Strassemeyer J, Laitinen K, Liozon R, Portier B, Roberntz P, Wang K, Jstbid PG (1999) Effects of elevated [CO2] on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta-analysis of model parameters. Plant Cell Environ 22:1475–1495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, Pataki DE, Ewers BE, Phillips N, Schäfer KVR (1999) Survey and synthesis of intra-and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ 22:1515–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Birdsey R, Hom J, McCullough K (2009) Separating effects of changes in atmospheric composition, climate and land-sue on carbon sequestration of US. Mid-atlantic temperate forests. For Ecol Manag 259:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicosky DC, Winkelman LJ, Baker JM, Baker DG (1989) Accuracy of hourly air termperatures calculated from daily minima and maxima. Agric For Meteorol 46:193–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Running SW, Coughlan JC (1988) A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional application. Ecol Modell 42:125–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers PJ, Berry JA, Collatz GJ, Field CB, Hall FG (1992) Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. III. A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme. Remote Sens Environ 42:187–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PE, Law BE, Gholz HL, Clark KL, Falge E, Ellsworth DS, Goldstein DS, Monson RK, Hollinger D, Falk M, Chen J, Sparks JP (2002) Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needle leaf forests. Agric For Meteorol 113:185–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian H, Chen G, Liu M, Zhang C, Sun G, Lu C, Xu X, Ren W, Pan S, Chappelk A (2010) Model estimates of net primary productivity, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency in the terrestrial ecosystems of the southern United States during 1895–2007. For Ecol Manag 259:1311–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YP, Leuning R (1998) A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy. I: model description and comparison with a multi-layered model. Agric For Meteorol 91:89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (41371393, 51109183), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20110101120036), and the opening foundation of Institute of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University (PDKF2011YG03). We thank the Fluxnet-Canada networks, the site principal investigators, co-investigators and participants for contributing to the flux tower datasets.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Hydrology and Water Resources, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou, 310058, China

    Fumin Wang

  2. Department of Geography and Program in Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5S 3G3, ON, Canada

    Alemu Gonsamo & Jing M. Chen

  3. Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of BC, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada

    T. Andrew Black

  4. Institute of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China

    Bin Zhou

Authors
  1. Fumin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alemu Gonsamo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing M. Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Andrew Black
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bin Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumin Wang.

Additional information

Communicated by Russell Monson.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1329 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, F., Gonsamo, A., Chen, J.M. et al. Instantaneous-to-daily GPP upscaling schemes based on a coupled photosynthesis-stomatal conductance model: correcting the overestimation of GPP by directly using daily average meteorological inputs. Oecologia 176, 703–714 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3059-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3059-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation