Abstract
The importance of rock-derived mineral nutrients (P, K, Mn, Mg, and Ca) in plant physiological function is well established. However, one important and relatively unexplored question is whether or not the same rules of plant nutrient use efficiency apply to these essential elements even if they are not limiting to primary production. We examined conifer growth and nutrient use dynamics across sites with contrasting geologies (sedimentary and volcanic) that vary in both rock-derived mineral nutrient and N availability. Differences in bedrock geochemistry generally corresponded to differences in available soil nutrients, such that the volcanic site tended to have greater available nutrients. Foliar nutrient concentrations reflected both differences in bedrock chemistry and indices of available soil nutrients for P, K, and Mn. Aboveground biomass production did not follow expected patterns and was greater for trees growing on low nutrient sites, but only with respect to the annual woody increment. Fine litter production did not differ between sites. Finally, we found evidence for trade-offs between two commonly examined components of nutrient use efficiency (NUE): nutrient productivity (A n) and mean residence time of nutrients. However, we did not find evidence for higher plant NUE in soils with lower nutrient availability for N or rock-derived nutrients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aerts R (1990) Nutrient use efficiency in evergreen and deciduous species from heathlands. Oecologia 84:391–397
Aerts R (1996) Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? J Ecol 84:597–608
Aerts R, Chapin F III (2000) The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30:1–67
Aerts R, de Caluwe H (1994) Effects of nitrogen supply on canopy structure and leaf nitrogen distribution in Carex species. Ecology 75:1482–1490
Arthur M, Fahey T (1991) Biomass and nutrients in an Engelmann spruce—subalpine fir forest in north central Colorado: pools, annual production, and internal cycling. Can J For Res 22:315–325
Berendse F, Aerts R (1987) Nitrogen-use-efficiency: a biologically meaningful definition? Funct Ecol 1:293–296
Blair (1996) The western San Juan mountains: their geology, ecology and human history. University Press of Colorado, Niwot
Boerner R (1984) Foliar nutrient dynamics and nutrient use efficiency of four deciduous tree species in relation to site fertility. J Appl Ecol 21:1029–1040
Brady N, Weil R (2008) The nature and properties of soils, 14th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Castle S, Neff J (2009) Plant response to nutrient availability across variable bedrock geologies. Ecosystems 12:101–113
Chapin F III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260
Chapin F III, Kendrowski R (1983) Seasonal changes in nitrogen and phosphorus fractions and autumn retranslocation in evergreen and deciduous taiga trees. Ecology 64:376–391
Chapin F III, Matson P, Mooney H (2002) Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer, New York
Clark D, Brown S, Kicklighter D, Chambers J, Thomlinson F, Ni J (2001) Measuring net primary production in forests: concepts and field methods. Ecol Appl 11:356–370
Cole D, Rapp M (1981) Elemental cycling in forest ecosystems. In: Reichle D (ed) Dynamic properties of forest ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 341–409
Eckstein R, Karlsson P (2001) Variation in nitrogen-use efficiency among and within subarctic graminoids and herbs. New Phytol 150:641–651
Gillman G (1979) A proposed method for the measurement of exchange properties of highly weathered soils. Aust J Soil Res 17:129–139
Gray J, Schlesinger W (1983) Nutrient use by evergreen and deciduous shrubs in southern California: II. Experimental investigations of the relationship between growth, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen availability. J Ecol 71:43–56
Hiremath A, Ewel J, Cole T (2002) Nutrient use efficiency in three fast-growing tropical trees. For Sci 48:662–672
Johnson R (2007) Ground water flow modeling with sensitivity analyses to guide field data collection in a mountain watershed. Ground Water Monit Rem 27:75–83
Keeland B, Young P (2005) Construction and installation of dendrometer bands for periodic tree-growth measurements. U.S. Geological Survey, National Wetlands Research Center, Lafayette. http://www.nwrc.usgs.gov/Dendrometer. Accessed September, 2012
Killingbeck K (1984) Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption dynamics of five tree species in a Kansas gallery forest. Am Midl Nat 111:155–164
Killingbeck K (1996) Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77:1716–1727
Lambers H, Chapin III F, Pons T (2008) Plant physiological ecology, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Landis T, Mogren E (1975) Tree strata biomass of subalpine spruce-fir stands in southwestern Colorado. For Sci 21:9–12
Lawrence C, Painter T, Landry C, Neff J (2010) Contemporary geochemical composition and flux of aeolian dust to the San Juan Mountains, Colorado, United States. J Geophys Res 115
Litton C, Raich J, Ryan M (2007) Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Glob Change Biol 13:2089–2109
Pastor J, Aber J, McClaugherty C, Melillo J (1984) Aboveground production and N and P cycling along a nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blackhawk Island, Wisconsin. Ecology 65:256–268
Prescott C, Corbin J, Parkinson D (1989) Biomass, productivity, and nutrient-use efficiency of aboveground vegetation in four Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Can J For Res 19:309–317
Prescott C, Corbin J, Parkinson D (1992) Immobilization and availability of N and P in the forest floors of fertilized Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Plant Soil 143:1–10
Reich P, Walters M, Ellsworth D (1997) From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:13730–13734
Richardson S, Peltzer D, Allen R, McGlone M (2005) Resorption proficiency along a chronosequence: responses among communities and within species. Ecology 86:20–25
Shaver G, Melillo J (1984) Nutrient budgets of marsh plants: efficiency concepts and relation to availability. Ecology 65:1491–1510
Silla F, Escudero A (2004) Nitrogen-use efficiency: tradeoffs between N productivity and mean residence time at organ, plant and population levels. Funct Ecol 18:511–521
Silver W (1994) Is nutrient availability related to plant nutrient use in humid tropical forests? Oecologia 98:336–343
Underwood A (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Vitousek P (1982) Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. Am Nat 119:553–572
Vitousek P, Howarth R (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13:87–115
Wilson D, Maguire D (2009) Environmental basis of soil-site productivity relationships in ponderosa pine. Ecol Monogr 79:595–617
Yager D, Bove D (2002) Generalized geologic map of part of the upper Animas River watershed and vicinity, Silverton, Colorado. In: Services USGS (ed) Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2377, Denver, Colorado
Yuan Z, Liu W, Niu S, Wan S (2007) Plant nitrogen dynamicsand nitrogen-use strategies under altered nitrogen seasonalityand competition. Ann Bot 100:821–830
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the assistance with laboratory and fieldwork provided by C. Lawrence, D. Fernandez, J. Carrasco, C. Flagg, and Z. Seligman. We would like to thank W. Bowman, N. Barger, T. Zelikova, M. Keville, and B. Sullivan for their comments and advice on an early version of this manuscript. This work was support by an A. W. Mellon Foundation grant made to J. C. Neff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Mercedes Bustamante.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castle, S.C., Neff, J.C. What controls plant nutrient use in high elevation ecosystems?. Oecologia 173, 1551–1561 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2695-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2695-7