Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Temporal variability within disturbance events regulates their effects on natural communities

  • Community ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Disturbances are processes inherently variable in time and space. This variability comprises a key determinant of ecosystem responses to disturbance. Temporal patterns can, however, vary significantly both among and within individual disturbance events. While recent research has demonstrated an importance of the former, studies on the effects of variability within perturbations have consistently confounded temporal variability with other disturbance attributes (e.g. overall intensity or duration). We established a field experiment to test explicitly the hypothesis that the temporal pattern within perturbations can drive ecosystem responses independently of other disturbance traits. We examined the effects of two disturbance regimes comprising sediment pulses of contrasting temporal pattern (constant and temporally variable intensities) on the benthic invertebrate assemblage of a headwater stream. The overall intensity, duration, timing and frequency of the perturbations were, however, identical. Invertebrates drifting during the temporally variable pulses were more abundant and differed in taxonomic and trophic structure than those exposed to constant perturbations. Moreover, whereas temporal patterns of disturbance events had no immediate effect on benthic invertebrate assemblages in situ, assemblages exposed to the constant perturbations took longer to recover from sediment disturbances than those exposed to temporally variable perturbations. Our results demonstrate that variability in the temporal pattern of intensity within individual perturbations can regulate, independently of other disturbance attributes, the extent and type of ecosystem responses to, and recovery from, disturbances. Effective environmental management and policy therefore necessitate the explicit quantification of temporal patterns of intensity both within and among perturbations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Gorley RN (2007) PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: guide to software and statistical methods, 1st edn. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Atalah J, Otto SA, Anderson MJ, Costello MJ, Lenz M, Wahl M (2007) Temporal variance of disturbance did not affect diversity and structure of a marine fouling community in north-eastern New Zealand. Mar Biol 157:199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banas D, Masson G, Leglize L, Usseglio-Polatera P, Boyd CE (2008) Assessment of sediment concentration and nutrient loads in effluents drained from extensively managed fishponds in France. Environ Pollut 152:679–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bender EA, Case TJ, Gilpin ME (1984) Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practice. Ecology 65:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti-Cecchi L (2000) Variance in ecological consumer–resource interactions. Nature 407:370–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti-Cecchi L (2003) The importance of the variance around the mean effect size of ecological processes. Ecology 84:2335–2346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti-Cecchi L, Bertocci I, Vaselli S, Maggi E (2006) Temporal variance reverses the impact of high mean intensity of stress in climate change experiments. Ecology 87:2489–2499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertocci I, Maggi E, Vaselli S, Benedetti-Cecchi L (2005) Contrasting effects of mean intensity and temporal variation of disturbance on a rocky seashore. Ecology 86:2061–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:326–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broekhuizen N, Parkyn S, Miller D (2001) Fine sediment effects on feeding and growth in the invertebrate grazers Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gastropoda, Hydrobiidae) and Deleatidium sp. (Ephemeroptera, Leptophlebiidae). Hydrobiologia 457:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge J, Fitzpatrick M (1993) Estimating the number of species: a review. J Am Stat Assoc 88:364–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler MJ IV (1989) Community responses to variable predation: field studies with sunfish and freshwater macroinvertebrates. Ecol Monogr 59:311–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III et al (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 1st edn. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, D’Arge R (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crosa G, Castelli E, Gentili G, Espa P (2010) Effects of suspended sediments from reservoir flushing on fish and macroinvertebrates in an alpine stream. Aquat Sci 72:85–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Culp JM, Wrona FJ, Davies RW (1986) Response of stream benthos and drift to fine sediment deposition versus transport. Can J Zool 64:1345–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culp JM, Wrona FJ, Davies RW (1987) Response of stream benthos and drift to fine sediment deposition versus transport. Can J Zool 64:1345–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM, Klaine SJ, Butcher JB (2006) Implications of pulsed chemical exposures for aquatic life criteria and wastewater permit limits. Environ Sci Technol 40:5132–5138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue I, García Molinos J (2009) Impacts of increased sediment loads on the ecology of lakes. Biol Rev 84:517–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue I, Styles D, Coson C, Irvine K (2005) Importance of spatial and temporal patterns for assessment of risk of diffuse nutrient emissions to surface waters. J Hydrol 304:183–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot JM (2002) Time spent in the drift by downstream dispersing invertebrates in a Lake District stream. Freshw Biol 47:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraterrigo JM, Rusak JA (2008) Disturbance-driven changes in the variability of ecological patterns and processes. Ecol Lett 11:756–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • García Molinos J, Donohue I (2009) Differential contribution of concentration and exposure time to sediment dose effects on stream biota. J N Am Benthol Soc 28:110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García Molinos J, Donohue I (2010) Interactions among temporal patterns determine the effects of multiple stressors. Ecol Appl 20:1794–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins C, Vericat D, Batalla RJ (2007a) When is stream invertebrate drift catastrophic? The role of hydraulics and sediment transport in initiating drift during flood events. Freshw Biol 52:2369–2384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins C, Vericat D, Batalla RJ, Gomez CM (2007b) Shaking and moving: low rates of sediment transport trigger mass drift of stream invertebrates. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins C, Batalla RJ, Vericat D (2010) Invertebrate drift and benthic exhaustion during disturbance: response of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) to increasing shear stress and river-bed instability. River Res Appl 26:499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasby TM, Underwood AJ (1996) Sampling to differentiate between pulse and press perturbations. Environ Monit Assess 42:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomi T, Kobayashi S, Negishi JN, Imaizumi F (2010) Short-term responses of macroinvertebrate drift following experimental sediment flushing in a Japanese headwater channel. Landsc Ecol Eng 6:257–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman P et al (2006) Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt JE, Norkko J (2007) Incorporating temporal variability of stressors into studies: an example using suspension-feeding bivalves and elevated suspended sediment concentrations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 341:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imbert JB, Perry JA (2000) Drift and benthic invertebrate responses to stepwise and abrupt increases in non-scouring flow. Hydrobiologia 436:191–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine JR, Henriques PR (1984) A preliminary investigation on effects of fluctuating flows on invertebrates of the Hawea River, a large regulated river in New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 18:283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James ABW, Dewson ZS, Death RG (2008) The effect of experimental flow reductions on macroinvertebrate drift in natural and streamside channels. River Res Appl 24:22–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klironomos JN et al (2005) Abrupt rise in atmospheric CO2 overestimates community response in a model plant–soil system. Nature 433:621–624

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaswamy J, Bunyan M, Mehta VK, Jain N, Karanth KU (2006) Impact of iron ore mining on suspended sediment response in a tropical catchment in Kudremukh, Western Ghats, India. Forest Ecol Manag 224:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake PS (2000) Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemly AD (1982) Modification of benthic insect communities in polluted streams: combined effects of sedimentation and nutrient enrichment. Hydrobiologia 87:229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I, Ghurye SG, Hoeffding W, Madow WG, Mann HB (eds) Contributions to probability and statistics: essays in honour of Harold Hotelling. Stanford University Press, Menlo Park, pp 278–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisle TE (1989) Sediment transport and resulting deposition in spawning gravels, north coastal California. Water Resour Res 25:1303–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1998) Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for Science. Science 279:491–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall NA, Bailey PCE (2004) Impact of secondary salinisation on freshwater ecosystems: effects of contrasting, experimental, short-term releases of saline wastewater on marcoinvertebrates in a lowland stream. Mar Freshw Res 55:509–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matthaei CD, Weller F, Kelly DW, Townsend CR (2006) Impacts of fine sediment addition to tussock, pasture, dairy and deer farming streams in New Zealand. Freshw Biol 51:2154–2172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauchly JW (1940) Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Ann Math Stat 11:204–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle BH, Anderson MJ (2001) Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe DJ, Gotelli NJ (2000) Effects of disturbance frequency, intensity, and area on assemblages of stream macroinvertebrates. Oecologia 124:270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt RW, Cummins KW (1996) An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 3rd edn. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathikonda S, Ackleh AS, Hasenstein KH, Mopper S (2009) Invasion, disturbance, and competition: modeling the fate of coastal plant populations. Conserv Biol 23:164–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peeters E, Brugmans B, Beijer J, Franken R (2006) Effect of silt, water and periphyton quality on survival and growth of the mayfly Heptagenia sulphurea. Aquat Ecol 40:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, 1st edn. Academic Press, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt WJ, Connell JH (2003) Natural disturbances and directional replacement of species. Ecol Monogr 73:507–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter TL et al (2006) Combined effects of constant versus variable intensity simulated rainfall and reduced tillage management on cotton pre-emergence herbicide runoff. J Environ Qual 35:1894–1902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JV, Sandgren CD (1983) The effect of temporal environmental heterogeneity on community structure: a replicated experimental study. Oecologia 57:98–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxburgh SH, Shea K, Wilson JB (2004) The intermediate disturbance hypothesis: patch dynamics and mechanisms of species coexistence. Ecology 85:359–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruane NM, Huisman EA, Komen J (2002) The influence of feeding history on the acute stress response of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture 210:245–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabo JL, Post DM (2008) Quantifying periodic, stochastic, and catastrophic environmental variation. Ecol Monogr 78:19–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwilk DW (2003) Flammability is a niche construction trait: canopy architecture affects fire intensity. Am Nat 162:725–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw EA, Richardson JS (2001) Direct and indirect effects of sediment pulse duration on stream invertebrate assemblages and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) growth and survival. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:2213–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer U (2000) Benthic microalgal diversity enhanced by spatial heterogeneity of grazing. Oecologia 122:284–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speidel M, Harley CDG, Wonham MJ (2001) Recovery of the brown alga Fucus gardneri following a range of removal intensities. Aquat Bot 71:273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suren AM (2005) Effects of deposited sediment on patch selection by two grazing stream invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 549:205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M et al (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Sahagian D (2000) Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle. Bioscience 50:753–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters TF (1995) Sediment in streams: sources, biological effects and control, 1st edn. Mongraph 7. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

  • White PS, Jentsch A (2001) The search for generality in studies of disturbance and ecosystem dynamics. Prog Bot 62:399–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood PJ, Armitage PD (1997) Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environ Manage 21:203–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang DD, Brecke P, Lee HF, He YQ, Zhang J (2007) Global climate change, war, and population decline in recent human history. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19214–19219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by a postgraduate award to JGM from Trinity College Dublin and a STRIVE grant from the Irish Environmental Protection Agency (2008-FS-W-7-S5) to ID. We thank Clíona Ní Bhréartúin and the staff of the Kippure State, Peter Stafford, Yukiko Kato, Mark Kavanagh, John O’Brien, Alison Boyce and Vesela Evtimova for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College, Zoology Building, Dublin 2, Ireland

    Jorge García Molinos & Ian Donohue

Authors
  1. Jorge García Molinos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ian Donohue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge García Molinos.

Additional information

Communicated by Craig Osenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García Molinos, J., Donohue, I. Temporal variability within disturbance events regulates their effects on natural communities. Oecologia 166, 795–806 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-1923-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-1923-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation