Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling to differentiate between pulse and press perturbations

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is great inconsistency in the use of the terms ‘pulse’ and ‘press’ when describing types of perturbations. This is due primarily to a failure to distinguish between the cause and the effect of the perturbation in question. The cause and effect may be either short- or long-term and clearly one may be short-term and the other long-term. Distinction between these two types of disturbance is crucial for management to prevent further impact. Thus, it is important to describe separately these two aspects of a perturbation. Here, we define a protocol for sampling perturbations which enables the cause and effect to be distinguished between short- or long-term. Existing (i.e., already established) assemblages and newly-established assemblages are sampled and compared among disturbed and control locations. Existing assemblages may have been affected by past (pulse) disturbances and/or ongoing (press) disturbances, whereas the establishment of new assemblages can only be influenced by ongoing disturbances. We describe the procedures for assessing impacts of estuarine marinas as an illustration of the issues to be considered in any habitat. Settlement plates and defaunated sediment are suggested for sampling the establishment of new assemblages in aquatic environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambrose, W. G.: 1984, ‘Influence of residents on the development of a marine soft-bottom community’, J. Mar. Res. 42, 633–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, N. L. and Mapstone, B. D.: 1987, ‘Sampling and the description of spatial pattern in marine ecology’, Ann. Rev. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 25, 39–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, S. I.: 1981, ‘Ecosystem response to stress: a review of concepts and approaches’, In: Barrett, G. W. and Rosenberg, R. (eds.), Stress effects on natural ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, pp. 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G. W. and Rosenberg, R.: 1981, Stress effects on natural ecosystems, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, E. A., Case, T. J. and Gilpin, M. E.: 1984, ‘Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practice’, Ecology 65, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. B. and Zalinski, J.: 1983, ‘An optimum sampling design and power tests for environmental biologists’, J. Environ. Manage. 16, 335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. J.: 1991, ‘Effect of patch size on communities of sessile invertebrates in Gulf St Vincent, South Australia’, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 153, 255–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H.: 1978, ‘Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs’, Science 199, 1302–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. H. and Sousa, W. P.: 1983, ‘On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence’, Am. Nat. 111, 1119–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton, P. K.: 1971, ‘Competition, disturbance and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community’, Ecol. Monogr. 41, 351–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detenbeck, N. E., DeVore, P. W., Neimi, G. J. and Lima, A.: 1992, ‘Recovery of temperate-stream fish communities from disturbance: a review of case studies and synthesis of theory’, Environ. Manage. 16, 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, T. H. and Levinton, J. S.: 1985, ‘Disturbance, emigration, and refugia: how the mud snail, Ilyanassa obsoleta (Say), affects the habitat distribution of an epifaunal amphipod, Microdeutopus gryllotalpa (Costa)’, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 92, 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, P. G.: 1990, ‘Sewage and the biota on seashores: assessment of impact in relation to natural variability’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 14, 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, P. G. and Lincoln Smith, M. P.: 1992, ‘The difficulty of assessing environmental impacts before they have occurred: a perspective from Australian consultants’, In: Battershill, C. N. et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Temperate Reef Symposium. NIWA Marine, Wellington, pp. 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, P. W.: 1968, ‘Life histories and community stability’, Ecology 49, 355–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, E. D., Jumars, P. A. and Trueblood, D. D.: 1983, ‘Facilitation of soft-bottom benthic succession by tube builders’, Ecology 64, 1200–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, J. and Patten, B. C.: 1985, ‘System theory formulation of ecological disturbance’, Ecol. Model. 29, 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassle, J. F. and Grassle, J. P.: 1974, ‘Opportunistic life histories and genetic systems in marine benthic polychaetes’, J. Mar. Res. 32, 253–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. H.: 1979, Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists, Wiley Interscience, Chichester, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollick, M.: 1986, ‘Environmental impact assessment: an international evaluation’, Environ. Manage. 10, 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, S. J.: 1984, ‘Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments’, Ecol. Monogr. 54, 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. M. and Keough, M. J.: 1981, ‘Occupation of patches in the epifaunal communities on pier pilings and the bivalve Pinna bicolour at Edithburgh, South Australia’, Oecologia (Berl.) 48, 123–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, P. S.: 1990, ‘Disturbing hard and soft bottom communities: a comparison of marine and freshwater environments’, Aust. J. Ecol. 15, 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenihan, H. S., Oliver, J. S. and Stephenson, M. A.: 1990, ‘Changes in hard bottom communities related to boat mooring and tributyltin in San Diego Bay: a natural experiment’, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 60, 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln Smith, M. P.: 1991, ‘Environmental impact assessment: the roles of predicting and monitoring the extent of impacts’, Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 42, 603–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, K. A.: 1987, ‘Disturbance and organisms on boulders. I. Patterns in the environment and the community’, Oecologia (Berl.) 71, 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. Z.: 1993, Assemblages associated with the tube-dwelling polychaete, Mesochaetopterus sagittarius, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney.

  • Morrisey, D. J. and Underwood, A. J.: 1992, ‘Sampling for spatial variation in the distribution of fauna in sediments’, In: Miskiewicz, A. G. (ed.), Proceedings of a bioaccumulation workshop: assessment of the distribution, impacts and bioaccumulation of contaminants in aquatic environments. Water Board and Australian Marine Sciences Association Inc., Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. N. and Littler, M. M.: 1978, ‘Patterns of algal succession in a perturbated marine intertidal community’, J. Phycol. 14, 506–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg, C. W., Schmitt, R. J., Holbrook, S. J., Abu-Saba, K. E. and Flegal, R.: 1994, ‘Detection of environmental impacts: natural variability, effect size, and power analysis’, Ecol. Appl. 4, 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, R. W.: 1977, ‘The establishment and development of a marine epifaunal community’, Ecol. Monogr. 47, 37–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petraitis, P. S., Latham, R. E. and Niesenbaum, R. A.: 1989, ‘The maintenance of species diversity by disturbance’, Quart. Rev. Biol. 64, 393–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A. and White, P. S.: 1985, The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A., Kolasa, J., Armesto, J. J. and Collins, S. L.: 1989, ‘The ecological concept of disturbance and its expression at various hierarchical levels’, Oikos 54, 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probert, P. K.: 1984, ‘Disturbance, sediment stability, and trophic structure of soft-bottom communities’ J. Mar. Res. 42, 893–921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkle, J. R.: 1985, ‘Disturbance regimes in temperate forests’, In: Pickett, S. T. A. and White, P. S. (eds.), The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, New York, pp. 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russ, G. R.: 1980, ‘Effects of predation by fishes, competition, and the structural complexity of the substratum on the establishment of a marine epifaunal community’, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 42, 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rykiel, E. J.: 1985, ‘Towards a definition of ecological disturbance’, Aust. J. Ecol. 10, 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, S. C., Dixon, J. D., Kastendiek, J. and Smith, R. O.: 1993, ‘Detecting the ecological effects of environmental impacts: a case study of kelp forest invertebrates’, Ecol. Appl. 3, 331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H.: 1973, ‘The evolution of a stress concept’, Am. Sci. 61, 692–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, W. P.: 1984, ‘The role of disturbance in natural communities’, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 353–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart-Oaten, A., Murdoch, W. M. and Parker, K. R.: 1986, ‘Environmental impact assessment: “pseudoreplication” in time?’, Ecology 67, 929–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, J. P.: 1981, ‘The fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina: a study in stability’, Am. Nat. 118, 499–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, J. P. and Karlson, R. H.: 1977, ‘Development and stability of the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina’, Ecol. Monogr. 47, 425–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thistle, D.: 1981, ‘Natural physical disturbances and communities of marine soft bottoms’, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 6, 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J.: 1981, ‘Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology’, Ann. Rev. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 19, 513–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J.: 1989, ‘The analysis of stress in natural populations’, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 37, 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J.: 1991, ‘Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations’, Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res., 42, 569–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J.: 1992, ‘Beyond BACI: the detection of environmental impact on populations in the real, but variable, world’, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 161, 145–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J.: 1993, ‘The mechanics of spatially replicated sampling programmes to detect environmental impacts in a variable world’, Aust. J. Ecol. 18, 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, A. J.: 1994, ‘On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances’, Ecol. Appl. 4, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt, A. S.: 1947, ‘Pattern and process in the plant community’, J. Ecol. 35, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yodzis, P.: 1988, ‘The indeterminacy of ecological interactions as perceived through perturbation experiments’, Ecology 69, 508–515.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glasby, T.M., Underwood, A.J. Sampling to differentiate between pulse and press perturbations. Environ Monit Assess 42, 241–252 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414371

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414371

Keywords

Navigation