Oecologia

, Volume 165, Issue 4, pp 837–846 | Cite as

Joint effect of phosphorus limitation and temperature on alkaline phosphatase activity and somatic growth in Daphnia magna

  • Marcin W. Wojewodzic
  • Marcia Kyle
  • James J. Elser
  • Dag O. Hessen
  • Tom Andersen
Open Access
Physiological ecology - Original Paper

Abstract

Alkaline phosphatase (AP) is a potential biomarker for phosphorus (P) limitation in zooplankton. However, knowledge about regulation of AP in this group is limited. In a laboratory acclimation experiment, we investigated changes in body AP concentration for Daphnia magna kept for 6 days at 10, 15, 20 and 25°C and fed algae with 10 different molar C:P ratios (95–660). In the same experiment, we also assessed somatic growth of the animals since phosphorus acquisition is linked to growth processes. Overall, non-linear but significant relationships of AP activity with C:P ratio were observed, but there was a stronger impact of temperature on AP activity than of P limitation. Animals from the lowest temperature treatment had higher normalized AP activity, which suggests the operation of biochemical temperature compensation mechanisms. Body AP activity increased by a factor of 1.67 for every 10°C decrease in temperature. These results demonstrate that temperature strongly influences AP expression. Therefore, using AP as a P limitation marker in zooplankton needs to consider possible confounding effects of temperature. Both temperature and diet affected somatic growth. The temperature effect on somatic growth, expressed as the Q10 value, responded non-linearly with C:P, with Q10 ranging between 1.9 for lowest food C:P ratio and 1.4 for the most P-deficient food. The significant interaction between those two variables highlights the importance of studying temperature-dependent changes of growth responses to food quality.

Keywords

Cladocerans Compensation mechanisms EQ−10 Growth Q10 value 

Introduction

A significant portion of body phosphorus (P) in fast-growing invertebrates is found in RNA (Elser et al. 2003). Owing to the generally tight coupling between [RNA], protein synthesis, and growth rate in many organisms (Sutcliffe 1970; Elser et al. 2003), dietary P availability can have a strong impact on the somatic growth rate and fitness of zooplankton (Sterner and Elser 2002). Therefore, efficient mobilization of phosphate from organic sources through catalysis by alkaline phosphatase (AP; EC 3.1.3.1) may be crucial for growth in an environment where P is limited. Several studies have shown AP to be indicative of bacterial or algal P status (Thingstad et al. 1998; Sebastian and Ammerman 2009). However, for zooplankton, this is not well studied. In zooplankton, AP activity has been demonstrated both within body tissues as well as in its excretion products (Jansson 1976; Boavida and Heath 1984). Indeed, AP has been partially purified from and characterized for crustaceans (Principato et al. 1984; Chuang and Shih 1990). Additionally, it has been shown that Daphnia’s AP has different biochemical properties than algal AP (Boavida and Heath 1984). In a biochemical study of AP excreted by D. magna, Zhao et al. (2006) presented detailed characteristics of the excreted enzyme and suggested a high relative stability with a potential for long-lasting catalytic activity. Recently, AP has been shown to be over-expressed in biomass of D. magna when raised on P-limited food (McCarthy et al. 2010), which may imply a direct role of animal-AP in P acquisition. In another study, protein-normalized AP in individual D. magna was constant over the first 6 days of development when animals were constantly fed P-rich, low C:P food (Wojewodzic et al., in review).

Temperature is a central regulator of metabolism because it directly influences all physiological and biochemical functions (Hochachka and Somero 1973). Growth, element acquisition, and enzymatic activity are all highly dependent on temperature. However, poikilothermic animals actively adjust after an acute drop in environmental temperature by physiological modifications over a period of acclimation (Nathanailides 1996). One of the prime responses to low temperature is to compensate for reduced catalytic rates of enzymes at low temperatures. At least two types of adaptations can promote high activity of enzymes at low temperatures (Hochachka and Somero 1973; Somero 1995). First, a higher concentration of intracellular enzymes, resulting in an increased number of catalytic sites, can compensate for the lower temperature-induced rate per site. Secondly, a higher inherent catalytic activity per active site can be induced, such that fewer molecules are needed to maintain the same catalytic rate (Somero 2004). Both over-expression of enzymes at lower temperatures and changes of enzyme substrate affinity have been reported in seasonal acclimation studies (Hazel and Prosser 1974; Sidell 1977). The biochemical mechanisms behind low temperature adaptation may also involve adding low-molecular-mass constituents or making covalent modifications to the protein (Somero 2004). Enzymatic temperature compensation has been evaluated in numerous organisms. One of the most studied examples is the temperature adaptation of lactate dehydrogenase orthologs isolated from vertebrates, where increased enzyme efficiency at low temperatures results from an increase in the catalytic constant (kcat) (Fields and Somero 1998; Somero 2004). In contrast to these evolutionary adaptations, compensation mechanisms during physiological acclimatization are limited to changes in enzyme expression, mainly expression of the same isoform or by producing a new isoforms with different kinetic proprieties.

The temperature effect on biological process rates is often described by a Q10 parameter that represents the relative change in the process rate for a 10°C temperature increase. The Q10 itself will not be temperature-independent unless the process rate scales exponentially with temperature. Process rates k1 and k2 at temperatures T1 and T2 will be related through the Q10 by the following relationship:
$$ {\frac{{k_{2} }}{{k_{1} }}} = Q_{{10^{{}} }}^{{{\frac{{T_{2} - T_{1} }}{10}}}} \Leftrightarrow Q_{10} = \left( {{\frac{{k_{2} }}{{k_{1} }}}} \right)^{{{\frac{10}{{T_{2} - T_{1} }}}}} \Leftrightarrow Q_{10} = {\frac{{\left( {{\frac{{k_{1} }}{{k_{2} }}}} \right)^{10} }}{{t_{1} - t_{2} }}} $$
(1)
A value of Q10 > 1 means that the biological process increases with temperature, while a value below 1 suggests a decrease or even potential damage by irreversible loss of function. Typical Q10 values for biological systems are often found to be around 2, especially when the Q10 is studied close to physiological optimum temperatures. D. magna, used in our study, tolerates temperatures between 2 and 30°C (Goss and Bunting 1983), while the optimum temperature range for assimilation, growth, and reproduction has been shown to be in the range 15–25°C (Lampert 1977; Kersting 1978; Goss and Bunting 1983). At the same time, excreted AP from this species has been found to be stable at 13–65°C, with maximum activity between 30 and 35°C (Zhao et al. 2006). The same study revealed that the activity of Daphnia AP increased exponentially with temperature below 30°C but decreased above 35°C, which does not match the optimal temperature for somatic growth of this species. Zhao et al. (2006) determined the Q10 for excreted AP activity to be 2.45. Changes in body concentrations of an enzyme can be expressed as an EQ−10 value, which characterizes how much the activity of enzyme (E) increases with every 10°C drop in temperature acclimation:
$$ EQ_{{ - 10^{{}} }} = \left( {{\frac{{V_{2} }}{{V_{1} }}}} \right)^{{{\frac{ - 10}{{T_{2} - T_{1} }}}}} $$
(2)
where T1 and T2 represent acclimation temperatures (°C) and V1 and V2 are units of enzyme activity measured at the same temperature. The EQ−10 parameter has never been determined for AP from Daphnia. The ratio of EQ−10 − Q10 for an enzyme expresses its compensation efficiency. A value of compensation efficiency close to 1 suggests perfect compensation in the system, while a quotient lower than 1 suggests imperfect compensation (Nathanailides 1996).

Given the major impacts of food quality and temperature on consumer growth rate, it is important to understand how animals cope with P deficiency under various temperatures. Here, we have addressed this by studying AP activity in the key pelagic grazer Daphnia along gradients of dietary C:P and temperature. However, given the likelihood of P-limitation in other organisms, including terrestrial invertebrates (Perkins et al. 2004), we believe these findings should have relevance outside the aquatic realm. We also assess the use of AP to study animal P limitation in situ as an alternative to more traditional and laborious experimental approaches (e.g., P enrichment experiments, such as Elser et al. 2001). Since animal populations in situ experience different temperatures, the effects of temperature on AP activity should also be considered in such studies.

Materials and methods

The green alga, Selenastrum capricornutum Printz (Norwegian Institute of Water Research, Oslo) was grown in continuous culture (dilution rate 0.2 day−1) in 2-L glass vessels. Light levels were nominally at 70 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 using 25-W blue-white fluorescent tubes, and the temperature was 20°C. Sterile media used for growing algae was either complete COMBO with 50 μM P as orthophosphate, or P-limited COMBO with only 2 μM P and the remainder replaced with an equivalent amount of KCl (Kilham et al. 1998). Cultures were used when they reached a stable rate determined by the culture optical density (OD) at 633 nm. Algal biomass was collected on previously pre-combusted (3 h, 500°C) GF/F filters (Whatman, Kent, England) for further determination of particulate C and P content. Filters were dried for carbon analysis or frozen and kept at −20°C for further P analysis. Algal C and N content was measured on a Flash EA™ 1,112 automatic elemental analyzer (Thermo Finnegan, Milan, Italy) and total P content was measured by persulfate digestion followed by a molybdate-blue assay (Menzel and Corwin 1965). A standard reference material (apple leaves, material 1515; National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA) was used to confirm the accuracy of analytical methods for both P and C.

To create a gradient of algal C:P ratio for feeding to animals, P-rich cultures (A) were mixed with P-limited cultures (J) in varying proportions for obtaining the desired food quality, yielding molar C:P ratios of 95 (A), 110 (B), 169 (C), 228 (D), 318 (E), 401 (F), 466 (G), 509 (H), 563 (I) and 663 (J). To make the daily treatments, algal cultures were mixed, concentrated using 0.45-μm millipore filters, washed and re-suspended in 50 mL of N and P free COMBO at a final concentration of 3 mg C L−1. The C content was estimated daily from previously established regression line between OD and C content. Food mixtures were sampled daily for analysis to assure that the C:P range was stable over the duration of the experiment.

Stock cultures of D. magna Straus were kept in the laboratory for >6 months at 20°C in N- and P-free COMBO medium and fed P-sufficient algae ad libitum. Density of cladocerans in the cultures was always kept below stress conditions. All glassware was soda and acid washed, rinsed with distilled water, and autoclaved prior to use to avoid bacterial and phosphate contamination. Animals used in experiments were all from the second brood of their mothers and less than 15 h old.

Feeding experiments were conducted to obtain estimates of food residence time, defined here as the time necessary for animals to replace their gut contents. Since Daphnia does not discriminate between individual particles on a chemosensory basis (DeMott 1986), and filtering efficiency of D. magna is independent of the particle size (Lampert 1987), fluorescent beads were used in three related feeding experiments. First, saturation time was determined by microscopic observations of animals feeding on 6-μm fluorescent beads with concentration 8.7 × 107 particles L−1 (17156, Fluoresbrite YG Microspheres; Polysciences, USA) at 5-min intervals for 30 min. Knowing the saturation time, a second experiment was designed to monitor evacuation rate. Seven-day-old D. magna were fed fluorescent beads for 10 min, washed in COMBO, and transferred to medium containing algae (3 mg C L−1). Six animals at a time were then collected after 0, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 120 min of grazing and washed twice in COMBO medium followed by sonification in 300 μl of new COMBO. Subsamples (200 μL) were transferred to a 96-well plate (655076; Greiner Bio-One, USA) and the fluorescent signal was measured at an excitation wavelength of 460/40 nm and an emission wavelength of 528/20 nm using BioTek FLx800 plate reader (BioTek, USA). In a final experiment under similar conditions, animals were collected at 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, 60, and 120 min and inspected microscopically for any remaining fluorescent signal in the gut (Axio Scope A1 microscope; Zeiss).

Individuals of D. magna, <15 h old, were randomly distributed to 80 sterile 50-mL glass bottles containing algal suspensions with 10 different C:P food levels, all at 3 mg C L−1. Bottles were held at 10, 15, 20 and 25°C in temperature-controlled incubation rooms with a light:dark cycle of 16:8 h. Animals were gently transferred daily by pipette into freshly made food while maintaining treatment temperatures. The temperature of each climate-controlled room was monitored continuously by a data logger (LogTag Recorders, New Zealand). For each treatment (10 different diets × 4 temperatures), there were two replications and four individuals within each replicate. To avoid pseudo-replication, we averaged measurements on the four individuals to get a single value for each replicate bottle (Sokal and Rohlf 2010).

Animals used in the experiment were kept on the same type of food and the same temperature before entering the actual experiment; therefore, any observed differences must be classified as acclimation effects.

To normalize the gut content prior to analysis, individual animals were removed from their experimental treatments after 6 days, and placed into sterile containers with 10 mL of P-rich algae at 3 mg C L−1. They were then allowed to graze for 40 min in order to replace the gut contents with P-rich (low AP) algal food. After this treatment, single animals were washed in P-free COMBO, photographed (Nikon D-50) for body weight estimation, placed individually into pyrophosphate-free microcentrifuge tubes (MCT-150-C; Axygen, USA), and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Animals were stored at −80°C and analyzed within the same week.

Individuals were analyzed for AP activity using the CDP-Star chemiluminescence method (Wojewodzic et al., in review). AP activity was normalized by total protein measured directly in the same extract from a single homogenized individual. Briefly, AP from animals was extracted by 2-min sonification in a cuphorn (Brandson 101147048) with 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, 93443, hereafter called Triton), and chemiluminescent signal measured in plate reader at ambient room temperature (FLx800; BioTek) after addition of ready-made CDP-Star substrate (0.4 mM, T2214; Applied Biosciences, USA). Bovine AP (Sigma-Aldrich, P5521) was used for calibrating the luminescence signal to enzyme activity units. Traditionally one unit (U) is defined as the amount of enzyme required to hydrolyze 1 μmol of 4-nitrophenyl phosphate per min at pH 9.8 at 37°C. Protein content in the residual extract was quantified according to bicinchoninic acid method (Smith et al. 1985) by a commercial kit (Pierce, 23225). Low range standards for this quantification were prepared from bovine serum albumin supplied by the same manufacturer. Protein samples were incubated for 30 min at 37°C before measuring OD at 562 nm using Synergy 4 plate reader (BioTek). Dry weights of the animals were estimated from body length measured from images taken before snap-freezing, converted to dry weight from a previously determined regression relationship.

AP activity in animals from all experimental treatments was measured at standardized conditions (identical gut purging procedure, same AP assay incubation temperature). Since animals raised at different treatment temperatures were extracted and assayed for enzymatic activity at the same incubation temperature (20°C), the temperature response of these measurements would correspond to an EQ−10 as defined by Nathanailides (1996). To correct AP activities measured under the same assay incubation temperature to the actual enzyme activity at the treatment temperature, the Q10 parameter previously determined by Zhao et al. (2006) was applied. Finally, the EQ−10:Q10-ratio was calculated to assess the temperature compensation efficiency of the AP enzyme (Nathanailides 1996).

Both somatic growth and AP activity were analyzed by general linear models using diet, temperature, and their interaction as explanatory variables. The necessity of including the interaction components into models was checked by extra sum of squares tests. We also inspected residual plots to assess if the models fulfilled the assumptions for linear regression (linearity, normality, and homoscedacity). Data were log-transformed to account for the scale effects that could possibly occur in this experimental approach (Stanton and Thiede 2005; Stillwell et al. 2007). Statistics were carried out using either R software (R development core team, Vienna, Austria) or Graph Pad Prizm 5.00 (Graphpad Software, San Diego, USA).

Results

The chemostats used for this study were at steady state as indicated by stable daily readings of OD633 (data not shown). Subsets of the 10 different food treatments were sampled and analyzed for C and P content following daily preparation. Internal controls (apple leaves) included for P and C analysis resulted in 95, 97 and 96% recovery for P, C and N, respectively. Animals in the different treatments received a constant carbon concentration of 3 mg C L−1 (±0.3) while the C:P and C:N ratio differed across food quality treatments and was stable within treatments during the 6-day experiment (Table 1).
Table 1

Food treatments used for the 6-day feeding experiment of Daphnia magna

Diet

Average C:P

SD

Average C:N

SD

n

A

95

2

7.4

0.4

6

B

111

20

8.9

0.8

6

C

167

17

10.1

1.2

6

D

228

16

11.5

0.9

6

E

319

16

11.8

2.1

6

F

401

29

12.0

0.7

6

G

466

31

12.7

1.8

6

H

509

46

12.8

1.9

6

I

563

77

12.3

0.9

6

J

663

68

13.3

1.2

6

A gradient of C:P:N ratios (molar) was obtained by mixing chemostat grown P-limited and P-rich cultures of Selenastrum. Samples were collected daily over the 6-day period

The gut-clearance assessment using animals fed fluorescent beads for 30 min showed that a 10-min feeding period was sufficient for the animals to fill their guts with fluorescent beads (data not shown). Accordingly, we let another set of animals feed on beads for 10 min before washing in COMBO and transferring them to new vials with 3 mg C L−1 of algae. The remaining bead fluorescence was then measured at different time intervals in a plate reader after homogenization. Animals replaced their gut contents relatively quickly, showing a short decay time (Fig. 1). However, it was difficult to determine the exact time when no residual beads were present in the gut. This is probably due to adhesion of the beads to both the external carapace and the antennae of cladocerans (Fig. 1). An additional experiment was then conducted in which animals were visually inspected by epifluorescence microscopy. Here, we found that an incubation time of 40 min was optimal for replacing the gut contents by new algal food (data not shown). Thus, by feeding Daphnia on P-rich food for 40 min prior to collection, we can eliminate potential bias due to differences in AP activity of different food treatments, as the AP activity contributed by P-rich algae in the gut has been found to not interfere with measurements of animal body AP (Wojewodzic et al., in review).
Fig. 1

Time course of gut content replacement for Daphnia magna. Fluorescent signal is residual bead fluorescence in algae-feeding animals that have been grazing 10 min on fluorescent beads (mean ± SD, n = 6). Right corner insetDaphnia magna with the gut filled with fluorescence beads after 10-min grazing period

No mortality was observed during the course of the experiments. Log-transformed body weights on day 6 of the experiment were fit to a linear model with temperature, log-transformed food C:P ratio, and their interaction as independent variables. This model explained 86% of the variance in the observed dry weights of the animals and was highly significant (F3,73 = 150.1, P ≪ 0.001). An extra sums of squares ANOVA test also revealed a significant interaction between the two treatment factors (F1,73 = 23.7, P < 0.001). Temperature explained 46.5% of the observed variation while 35% of this variation was explained by diet and only 4.5% by the interaction. Owing to the interaction effect, the calculated Q10 parameter for somatic growth was dependent on the C:P ratio of the diet (Fig. 2). Q10 values for growth decreased from 1.8 when animals were fed a P-rich diet to 1.4 when P-limited food was offered. Based on differences in body masses, D. magna was severely P-limited at 25°C while only modest P limitation was observed at 10°C.
Fig. 2

Joint effect of dietary C:P ratio (molar) and temperature (10, 15, 20, and 25°C) on body dry mass of 6-day-old Daphnia magna. Each data point represents the mean of one replicate, the average of four animals. The model equation was log10(dry mass) −3.01 + (0.151 × temperature) + 0.0259 (1−0.75 × temperature) × log(C:P ratio). Estimated Q10 parameter was calculated for somatic growth of Daphnia magna (right handy-axis; heavy solid line est. Q10)

Measurements of AP activity were done at the same temperature (20°C), which enabled a comparison of the temperature treatments (Fig. 3). A linear model was used to describe the joint effect of both temperature and dietary C:P ratio on the protein-normalized AP activity in acclimatised animals. The AP activity measurements were log-transformed to ensure normality and homoscedasticity of the residuals. A quadratic term involving diet C:P ratio was needed to remove non-linearity in the residual plots. After simplification by the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC; Schwarz 1978), the model explained 70% of the observed variation in the data. An extra sum of squares test showed that the interaction term was not significant (F2,71 = 0.97, P = 0.38) and therefore was not incorporated into the model. There were strong effects of both temperature and diet (overall F3,73 = 57.9, P ≪ 0.001) on protein-normalized enzyme activity. Additionally, the temperature effect on AP activity was found to be much stronger, explaining 61% observed variation compared to the diet treatments, which explained 9% of the variation (Fig. 3). For all temperatures, the somatic AP activity increased when animals were fed with low-P food; however, a striking decrease of the AP activity was observed when C:P ratio in the offered food exceeded 500.
Fig. 3

Joint effect of C:P food ratio (molar) and temperature (10, 15, 20, and 25°C) on body AP activity of six-day-old Daphnia magna. Each data point represents the mean of one replicate, the average of four animals. The model equation was: log10(AP activity) = 3.62 − (0.0510 × temperature) + 0.00216 × C:P ratio × [0.00000228(C:P ratio)2]−1 AP activity was assayed at 20°C for all temperature and diet treatments

The fitted model had log-transformed AP activity and no interaction terms with temperature, implying that, if the diet C:P ratio is kept constant, AP activity is an exponential function of temperature. This also means that the EQ−10 for AP activity is constant and independent of dietary C:P ratio. Moreover, the EQ−10 can be estimated from the regression coefficient for temperature (−0.051) as EQ−10 = exp[−10 (−0.051)] = 1.67, which implies that activity increased by a factor of 1.67 for every 10°C decrease in temperature.

Finally, to assess the compensation efficiency, the EQ−10:Q10-ratio was calculated. We used the Q10 value reported by Zhao et al. (2006) for AP excreted by D. magna. In our study, cold acclimation resulted in achieving 68% compensation, classifying it, after Nathanailides (1996), as an imperfect compensation.

Discussion

The study design yielded a wide gradient in dietary C:P-ratios. The P-deficient algae also had somewhat lower N-content than the P-sufficient algae, probably due to somewhat reduced protein synthesis under P-deficiency. Over this range of C:P and C:N ratios, it is very unlikely, based on Hessen et al. (2002), that the threshold elemental ratio with regard to N should be exceeded for Daphnia. We also believe that, if any effects of slight nitrogen changes in the diet on AP expression occurred, they were counteracted by normalization of body AP activity against body protein content.

A critical step in performing these experiments was to ensure negligible AP contribution from the gut contents of the experimental animals. Since starvation does not promote gut evacuation in zooplankton (Gillis et al. 2005), it was necessary to actively purge the gut with low AP food to ensure uniform gut content across treatments. The feeding and evacuation experiments with fluorescent beads increased confidence that the chosen experimental protocol achieved this goal. P-sufficient and AP-suppressed algae have been shown not to contribute to the AP signal of the grazer and have been successfully used to eliminate possible interference from foreign AP sources (Wojewodzic et al., in review). This, in combination with the rate measurements, gave us a more precise method for eliminating the interference from the gut content treatments and a rapid exchange of food that would limit any transient effects of the food on expression of the AP by the animal. We realize that such P-rich food might potentially inhibit the animal’s AP activity; however, McCarthy et al. (2010) performed P-spiking experiments on Daphnia extracts without apparent significant inhibition of enzyme activity. In addition, P-rich algae are not necessarily rich in orthophosphate. Therefore, the combination of short grazing times with AP-suppressed algae is an effective means to create a uniform gut content across treatments.

Prior to starting these experiments, we considered use of dietary antibiotics to minimize the impact of bacteria but did not employ them because antibiotics may potentially alter animal AP expression. Instead, we used sterile media, bottles, pipettes and chemostats with sterile COMBO medium. We believe these precautions substantially decreased bacteria growth. We also conclude that bacterial impacts are unlikely given our observation of high AP quantity per individual found at low temperatures compared to animals from higher temperatures—the pattern opposite to what one would expect if bacterial contributions were important.

We used the mild detergent Triton to release AP bound in membranes. Previous histological methods have demonstrated AP activity in the midgut of the copepod Centropages typicus (Arnaud et al. 1984). High AP activity has also been found in shrimp hepatopancreas, a gland tightly associated with digestive systems (Principato 1984; deBacker et al. 2002), suggesting a direct link between enzyme production and excretion into the digestive system. In the decapod, Penaeus japonica, AP has been shown to be anchored by a phosphatidylinositol–glycan into the cell membrane (Chuang and Shih 1990). Interestingly, the genome of D. pulex (a close relative of D. magna) suggests the presence of at least three genes coding for membrane-anchored isoenzymes of AP (McCarthy et al. 2010). Given these findings, it is likely that AP is found in cell membranes of zooplankton and that Triton is a reasonable choice for a detergent to dissolve the membranes and release AP while maintaining the enzyme activity (Boavida and Health 1984).

We measured somatic growth of the animals acclimated for 6 days to the broad range of low-P food and four temperatures. Consistent with previous work (Urabe et al. 1997; Brett et al. 2000; Hessen et al. 2002), the somatic growth rate of cladocerans decreased as the C:P ratios in the diets increased. In our study, this P-limitation effect was most pronounced at 25°C, suggesting that anabolic processes are more P-demanding when animals grow at higher temperatures. On the other hand, the animals kept at 10°C showed only weak signs of P-limitation, suggesting that temperature ameliorates nutritional limitations at low temperatures. Our findings are in agreement with another growth rate study where Daphnia were raised under different temperatures and across C:P ratios, but where the food treatments were created by spiking P-limited algae with different amounts of inorganic P (Persson et al., in review). An increase of temperature promotes somatic growth of Daphnia under three conditions: (1) growth occurs in the physiological optimum temperature range for this species; (2) the food has sufficient P content for the growth requirements; and (3) sufficient food is available. A possible ecological relevance of this finding is that food quality effects may thus co-vary with temperature scales within any given lake—or between lakes. The somatic growth of animals kept on poor quality (low C:P) food will be more affected by the same increase in temperature than those growing on high quality (high C:P) food. This also means that increasing temperature can result in further escalation of P limitation for herbivorous cladocerans. The significant interaction between temperature and food quality makes the Q10 parameter for somatic growth rate dependent on C:P ratio. This again points out that the somatic growth of cladocerans is being shaped by temperature, but in a food quality-dependent manner. Ecological consequences of this interaction could appear along temporal (diurnal cycles, seasons) and spatial (depth, altitude, latitude) temperature gradients. For example, the diel vertical migration of zooplankton, considered one of the largest animal biomass movements relative to body size (Hays 2003), can easily occur across gradients of 15°C. Additionally, the seston composition is often not homogeneously distributed, either quantitatively (Dagg 1977; Dagg et al. 1997) or qualitatively (Williamson et al. 1996), in stratified lakes. Such combinations of factors may result in interactive changes for animal growth dynamics and have further consequences for animal fitness and resource acquisition strategies. Field studies involving AP may have to carefully consider the varying temperature and food regimes animals experience during the course of their daily movements.

While temperature also had the expected positive effect on growth in our experiments, we found the opposite effect on protein-specific AP activity, which actually decreased with increasing temperature. Since all experimental treatments were terminated the same day, animals had different sizes depending on treatment. Owing to the observed C:P ratio and temperature effects on AP, the changes found could potentially be indirect effects of size if AP activity somehow relates to ontogeny. As much as 86% of the observed variance in dry weight could be explained by the C:P ratio in the diet and temperature while only 70% of the variance in AP activity normalized by protein was explained with the same variables. However, since we can explain only 62% of the AP activity variance by animal dry weight (data not presented) and temperature (i.e., less than using C:P ratio and temperature), we infer that the small, but significant, C:P ratio effect on AP normalized by protein is not just animal size in disguise but a real effect of P limitation. The fact that D. magna kept on a P-rich diet during the first 6 days had a constant protein-specific AP activity (Wojewodzic et al., in review) also supports the view that the treatment effects that we see are not ontogeny related.

Our results align well with changes in AP expression within the body of D. magna recently demonstrated as a response to nutritional P limitation by McCarthy et al. (2010), providing further support the hypothesis that AP activity increases in P-limited Daphnia as a potential mechanism for increasing P sequestration from ingested food. McCarthy and colleagues kept Daphnia on P-limited diet and measured AP activity within the body of animals without correcting for differences in the AP activity of the gut contents. While their AP expression patterns were similar to what we report here, McCarthy et al. (2010) did not find any decline in the AP activity at high dietary C:P ratios. This difference could be explained if the data collected from the highest C:P treatments in the McCarthy et al. (2010) study were biased by highly over-expressed AP from P-limited algae in the animal’s guts.

Animals experiencing extreme P limitation exhibit decreases in RNA production and somatic growth along with other physiological malfunctions (Brett et al. 2000; Elser et al. 2001; Hessen et al. 2002; Vrede et al. 2002; Seidendorf et al. 2009). In our study, the down-regulation of AP activity within the body of highly P-limited animals might be due to a decrease in RNA concentrations followed by a general decrease in the efficiency of transcription processes, consequently causing not only a smaller body size phenotype but also impairment of protein synthesis, including the AP enzyme. An alternative explanation for this decline in AP-expression is the possible existence of a trade-off between production of the constitutive proteins (related to somatic growth) and expression of AP in a body already facing growth difficulties. McCarthy et al. (2010) suggested the presence of a trade-off between excreted and membrane-bound AP as a response to increased dietary C:P ratio. They suggested that animals over-express AP within their body while decreasing excreted AP. This was hypothesized as a shift in expression of different AP isoforms from excreted fractions to membrane-anchored forms. Since we did not focus on the measurement of excreted AP, we cannot test this hypothesis.

This is the first time that AP has been studied in the context of P-limitation and temperature simultaneously. AP activity increased with decreasing temperature. Furthermore, temperature effects on AP were much stronger than P effects. We propose that higher AP activity found at low temperature treatments is a compensatory mechanism against decreased enzyme activity at low temperature, a consequence of the Arrhenius law for reaction kinetics. Such a compensation effect was proposed by Somero (2004), and demonstrated for other enzymes (Fudge et al. 1997), and further discussed in the context of ecological stoichiometry (Woods et al. 2003). The estimated EQ−10 coefficient for D. magna AP expression of 1.67 suggests that AP activity increases relatively quickly when temperature decreases. The enzyme temperature stability range of AP (10−60°C, Zhao et al. 2006) excludes the possibility that observed differences were due to loss of function at higher temperature but rather suggests a scenario in which the enzyme molecules are accumulated (over-expressed) as a response to lower temperature. The estimated EQ−10 coefficient for AP expression could be used if comparison of AP data from different temperature sites is desired. The efficiency of this compensation (68%) suggests an imperfect compensation process is taking place (where cold acclimation does not influence the magnitude of the response exhibited), possibly allowing other mechanisms to modulate AP function at lower temperature.

The increased animal AP activity at lower temperatures might be due to an overall increase of enzyme molecule number appearing during the 6-day acclimation of cladocerans to low temperature treatments. When measured under optimal assay conditions, maximal activities of enzymes are thought to accurately reflect the quantity of enzyme molecules present (Sidell 1983). However, many genes coding for AP homologs are known in the genome of D. pulex, and the active products of these genes, different AP enzymes, can potentially vary in biochemical characteristics. Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility that different AP isoenzymes are expressed at different temperatures and that these may also have slightly different biochemical properties, such as half-saturation (Km) and asymptotic rate (Vmax) parameters of the Michaelis–Menten model. Further purification, separation (such as 2D gel analysis), and kinetic characterization (Km and Vmax) performed on extracts from different temperature treatments might answer this question.

Another alternative mechanism for the observed modulation of AP activity is via changes in the membrane milieu where proteins function. One way of achieving this is through changes in the membrane lipid composition, which have been demonstrated previously for Daphnia in response to low temperature (Chapelle 1978; Farkas 1979; Brenner 1984; Pruit 1990). Such a mechanism of modulation would not be detected by our AP quantification method since cell membranes were dissolved during the AP extraction. However, the possibility remains that the mechanisms involved in changing AP activity in D. magna acclimated to different temperatures and diet involved not only an increased number of transporters and different expression patterns of iso-enzymes but also protein function modulation. This could possibly explain the occurrence of imperfect compensation we observed for D. magna AP.

Phosphorus acquisition is an essential process for ensuring satisfactory growth and thus maximizing fitness of an organism. The expression of AP may serve as a crucial tool for acquiring this nutrient under P-limited conditions. Our study demonstrates that quantification of body AP can be successfully used to assess the status of metazoan P limitation in situ in the moderate range of C:P ratio (≲500) which still represents the broad working range of C:P found in freshwater systems. However, as we show here, serious difficulties in data interpretation may occur if seston C:P ratio surpasses the presented limits of the method, at least for D. magna, or the temperature effects on AP enzyme expression are not assessed properly. With these caveats in mind, the presented technique has several advantages relative to more conventional time-consuming experimental approaches, and could be applicable for a wide range of metazoans in various habitats. This will allow a more widespread assessment of the operation of dietary P-limitation of animals under in situ conditions. In fact, despite these difficulties, Elser et al. (2010) were, after temperature correction of AP activity, able to successfully document increased animal P limitation associated with elevated seston C:P ratios in Norwegian lakes receiving elevated atmospheric N deposition. Given the likelihood of P-limitation for other grazers feeding on P-deprived plant matter, including terrestrial invertebrates (Perkins et al. 2004), this method could be relevant in a wide range of organisms.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Krystyjan for assistance during experiments and Berit Kaasa for carbon analysis. This project was financed by Department of Biology, University of Oslo by a special grant in ecological stoichiometry. J.J.E. and M.K. acknowledge support from NSF grant DEB-0516494.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Arnaud J, Brunet M, Mazza J (1984) Cytochemical detection of phosphatase and arylsulphatase activities in the midgut of Centropages typicus (Copepod, Calanoid). Bas Appl Histochem 28:399–412Google Scholar
  2. Boavida MJ, Heath RT (1984) Are the phosphatases released by Daphnia magna components of its food? Limnol Oceanogr 29:641–645. doi:10.4319/lo.1984.29.3.0641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brenner RR (1984) Effect of unsaturated acids on membrane structure and enzyme kinetics. Prog Lipid Res 23:69–96. doi:10.1016/0163-7827(84)90008-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brett MT, Muller-Navarra DC, Park SK (2000) Empirical analysis of the effect of phosphorus limitation on algal food quality for freshwater zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 45:1564–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapelle S (1978) The influence of acclimation temperature on the fatty acid composition of an aquatic crustacean (Carcinus maenas). J Exp Zool 204:337–346. doi:10.1002/jez.1402040304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuang N, Shih S (1990) Purification and some properties of alkaline phosphatase from the hepatopancreas of the shrimp Penaeus japonicus (Crustacea: Decapoda). Comp Biochem Physiol 256:1–7Google Scholar
  7. Dagg M (1977) Some effects of patchy food environments on copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 1:99–107. doi:10.4319/lo.1977.22.1.0099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dagg MJ, Frost BW, Newton JA (1997) Vertical migration and feeding behavior of Calanus pacificus females during a phytoplankton bloom in Dabob Bay, US. Limnol Oceanogr 5:974–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. deBacker M, McSweeney S, Rasmussen HB, Riise BW, Lindley P, Hough E (2002) The 1.9 Å cristal structure of heat-labile shrimp alkaline phosphatase. J Mol Biol 318:1265–1274. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00035-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeMott WR (1986) The role of taste in food selection by freshwater zooplankton. Oecologia 69:334–340. doi:10.1007/BF00377053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elser JJ, Hayakawa K, Urabe J (2001) Nutrient limitation reduces food quality for zooplankton: Daphnia response to seston phosphorus enrichment. Ecology 82:898–903. doi:10.2307/2680208 Google Scholar
  12. Elser JJ, Acharya K, Kyle M, Cotner J, Makino W, Markow T (2003) Growth rate-stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota. Ecol Lett 6:936–943. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00518.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elser JJ, Peace AL, Kyle M, Wojewodzic MW, McCrackin ML, Andersen T, Hessen DO (2010) Atmospheric nitrogen deposition is associated with elevated phosphorus limitation of lake zooplankton. Ecol Lett 13(10):1256–1261. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01519.x Google Scholar
  14. Farkas T (1979) Adaptation of fatty acid compositions to temperature—a study on planktonic crustaceans. Comp Biochem Phys B 64:71–76. doi:10.1016/0305-0491(79)90185-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fields PA, Somero GN (1998) Hot spots in cold adaptation: localized increases in conformational flexibility in lactate dehydrogenase A4 orthologs of Antarctic notothenioid fishes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11476–11481. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.19.11476 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fudge DS, Stevens ED, Ballantyne JS (1997) Enzyme adaptation along a heterothermic tissue: The visceral retia mirabilia of the bluefin tuna. Am J Physiol 41:1834–1840Google Scholar
  17. Gillis PL, Chow-Fraser P, Ranville JF, Ross PE (2005) Daphnia need to be gut-cleared too: the effect of exposure to and ingestion of metal-contaminated sediment on the gut-clearence patters of D. magna. Aquat Toxicol 71:143–154. doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2004.10.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goss LB, Bunting DL (1983) Daphnia development and reproduction: response to temperature. J Therm Biol 8:375–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hays GC (2003) A review of the adaptive significance and ecosystem consequences of zooplankton diel vertical migrations. Hydrobiologia 503:163–170. doi:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008476.23617.b0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hazel JR, Prosser LC (1974) Molecular mechanisms of temperature compensation in poikilotherms. Physiol Rev 54:620–677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hessen DO, Færøvig PJ, Andersen T (2002) Light, nutrients, and P:C ratios in algae: grazer performance related to food quality and quantity. Ecology 83:1886–1898. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1886:LNAPCR]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hochachka PW, Somero GN (1973) Strategies of biochemical adaptation. Saunders, PAGoogle Scholar
  23. Jansson M (1976) Phosphatases in lake water: characterization of enzymes from phytoplankton and zooplankton by gel filtration. Science 194:320–321. doi:10.1126/science.184531 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kersting K (1978) Some features of feeding, respiration and energy conversion of Daphnia magna. Hydrobiologia 59:113–120. doi:10.1007/BF00020771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kilham SS, Kreeger DA, Lynn SG, Goulden CE, Herrera L (1998) COMBO: a defined freshwater culture medium for algae and zooplankton. Hydrobiologia 377:147–159. doi:10.1023/A:1003231628456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lampert W (1977) Studies on the carbon balance of Daphnia pulex De Geer as related to environmental conditions II. The dependence of carbon assimilation on animal size, temperature, food concentration and diet species. Archiv Hydrobiol Suppl 48:310–335Google Scholar
  27. Lampert W (1987) Feeding and nutrition in Daphnia. In: Peters RH, De Bernardi R (eds) Daphniain, vol 45. Memorie dell’istituto italiano di idrobiologia, Italy, pp 143–192Google Scholar
  28. McCarthy SD, Rafferty SP, Frost PC (2010) Responses of alkaline phosphatase activity to phosphorus stress in Daphnia magna. J Exp Biol 213:256–261. doi:10.1242/jeb.037788 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Menzel DH, Corwin N (1965) The measurement of total phosphorus in seawater based on the liberation of organically bound fractions by persulphate oxidation. Limnol Oceanogr 10:280–282. doi:10.4319/lo.1965.10.2.0280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nathanailides C (1996) Are changes in enzyme activities of fish muscle during cold adaptation significant? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:2333–2336. doi:10.1139/cjfas-53-10-2333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perkins MC, Woods HA, Harrison JF, Elser JJ (2004) Dietary phosphorus affects the growth of larval Manduca sexta. Arch Insect Biochem 55:153–168. doi:10.1002/arch.10133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Principato G, Aisa M, Talesa V, Rosi G, Giovannini E (1984) Characterization of the soluble alkaline phosphatase from hepatopancreas of Squilla mantis L. Comp Biochem Phys B 80:801–804. doi:10.1016/0305-0491(85)90464-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pruit NL (1990) Adaptations to temperature in the cellular membranes of crustacea: membrane structure and metabolism. J Therm Biol 15:1–8. doi:10.1016/0306-4565(90)90040-O CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimention of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sebastian M, Ammerman JW (2009) The alkaline phosphatase PhoX is more widely distributed in marine bacteria than the classical PhoA. ISME J 3:563–572. doi:10.1038/ismej.2009.10 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seidendorf B, Meier N, Petrusek A, Boersma M, Streit B, Schwenk K (2009) Sensitivity of Daphnia species to phosphorus-deficient diets. Oecologia 162:349–357. doi:10.1007/s00442-009-1452-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sidell BD (1977) Turnover of cytochrome c in skeletal muscle of green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus, R.) during thermal acclimation. J Exp Zool 199:233–250. doi:10.1002/jez.1401990208 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sidell BD (1983) Cellular acclimation to environmental change by quantitative alterations in enzymes and organelles. Soc Exp Biol Semin Ser 17:103–120Google Scholar
  39. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC (1985) Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem 150:76–85. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(85)90442-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (2010) Biometry, 4th edn. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Somero GN (1995) Proteins and temperature. Annu Rev Physiol 57:43–68. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.000355 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Somero GN (2004) Adaptation of enzymes to temperature: searching for basic “strategies”. Comp Biochem Phys B 139:321–333. doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2004.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stanton ML, Thiede DA (2005) Statistical convenience vs biological insight: consequences of data transformation for the analysis of fitness variation in heterogeneous environments. New Phytol 166:319–338. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01311.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry—the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  45. Stillwell RC, Wallin WG, Hitchcock LJ, Fox CW (2007) Phenotypic plasticity in a complex world: interactive effects of food and temperature on fitness components of a seed beetle. Oecologia 153:309–321. doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0748-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sutcliffe WHJ (1970) Relationship between growth rate and ribonucleic acid concentration in some invertebrates. J Fish Res Bd Can 27:606–609Google Scholar
  47. Thingstad TF, Zweifel UL, Rassoulzadegan F (1998) P limitation of heterotrophic bacteria and phytoplankton in the northwest Mediterranean. Limnol Oceanogr 43(1):88–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Urabe J, Clasen J, Sterner RW (1997) Phosphorus limitation of Daphnia growth: is it real? Limnol Oceanogr 42:1436–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vrede T, Persson J, Aronsen G (2002) The influence of food quality (P:C ratio) on RNA:DNA ratio and somatic growth rate of Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr 47:487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Williamson CE, Sanders RW, Moeller RE, Stutzman PL (1996) Utilization of subsurface food resources for zooplankton reproduction: implications for diet vertical migration theory. Limnol Oceanogr 41:224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woods HA, Makino W, Cotner JB, Hobbie SE, Harrison JF, Acharya K, Elser JJ (2003) Temperature and the chemical composition of poikilotherm organisms. Funct Ecol 17:237–245. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00724.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao X, Liu G, Hu Z, Province H (2006) Physico-chemical properties of alkaline phosphatases released by a planktonic crustacean. Enzyme 79:677–689Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcin W. Wojewodzic
    • 1
  • Marcia Kyle
    • 2
  • James J. Elser
    • 2
  • Dag O. Hessen
    • 1
  • Tom Andersen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations