Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of above- and belowground herbivory on growth, pollination, and reproduction in cucumber

  • Plant-Animal interactions - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plants experience unique challenges due to simultaneous life in two spheres, above- and belowground. Interactions with other organisms on one side of the soil surface may have impacts that extend across this boundary. Although our understanding of plant–herbivore interactions is derived largely from studies of leaf herbivory, belowground root herbivores may affect plant fitness directly or by altering interactions with other organisms, such as pollinators. In this study, we investigated the effects of leaf herbivory, root herbivory, and pollination on plant growth, subsequent leaf herbivory, flower production, pollinator attraction, and reproduction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus). We manipulated leaf and root herbivory with striped cucumber beetle (Acalymma vittatum) adults and larvae, respectively, and manipulated pollination with supplemental pollen. Both enhanced leaf and root herbivory reduced plant growth, and leaf herbivory reduced subsequent leaf damage. Plants with enhanced root herbivory produced 35% fewer female flowers, while leaf herbivory had no effect on flower production. While leaf herbivory reduced the time that honey bees spent probing flowers by 29%, probing times on root-damaged plants were over twice as long as those on control plants. Root herbivory increased pollen limitation for seed production in spite of increased honey bee preference for plants with root damage. Leaf damage and hand-pollination treatments had no effect on fruit production, but plants with enhanced root damage produced 38% fewer fruits that were 25% lighter than those on control plants. Despite the positive effect of belowground damage on honey bee visitation, root herbivory had a stronger negative effect on plant reproduction than leaf herbivory. These results demonstrate that the often-overlooked effects of belowground herbivores may have profound effects on plant performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler LS (2008) Selection by pollinators and herbivores on attraction and defense. In: Tilmon KJ (ed) Specialization, speciation, and radiation. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 162–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (1999) Induced responses to herbivory in wild radish: effects on several herbivores and plant fitness. Ecology 80:1713–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Gorski PM, Tallamy DW (1999) Polymorphism in plant defense against herbivory: constitutive and induced resistance in Cucumis sativus. J Chem Ecol 25:2285–2304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen-Wardell G, Bernhardt P, Bitner R, Burquez A, Buchmann S, Cane J, Cox PA, Dalton V, Feinsinger P, Ingram M, Inouye D, Jones CE, Kennedy K, Kevan P, Koopowitz H, Medellin R, Medellin-Morales S, Nabhan GP, Pavlik B, Tepedino V, Torchio P, Walker S (1998) The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conserv Biol 12:8–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett RD, Wardle DA (2003) Herbivore-mediated linkages between aboveground and belowground communities. Ecology 84:2258–2268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett RD, Bowman WD, Kaufmann R, Schmidt SK (2005) A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20:634–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer TM, van Dam NM (2005) Linking aboveground and belowground interactions via induced plant defenses. Trends Ecol Evol 20:617–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown VK, Gange AC (1989) Differential effects of above ground and below ground insect herbivory during early plant succession. Oikos 54:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown VK, Gange AC (1990) Insect herbivory belowground. Adv Ecol Res 20:1–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss OL, Jones CM (1966) Cucurbitacins: specific insect attractants in Cucurbitaceae. Science 153:1392–1393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collison CH (1973) The interrelationships of honey bee activity, foraging behavior, climatic conditions and flower in the pollination of pickling cucumbers, Cucumis sativus L. PhD thesis. Michigan State University, East Lansing

  • De Deyn GB, Van der Putten WH (2005) Linking aboveground and belowground diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 20:625–633

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson HEM, Raguso RA, Knudsen JT, Ayasse M (2005) Scent as an attractant. In: Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC (eds) Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest, Cambridge, pp 197–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis PR, Pink DAC, Barber NE, Mead A (1999) Identification of high levels of resistance to cabbage root fly, Delia radicum, in wild Brassica species. Euphytica 110:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felkl G, Jensen EB, Kristiansen K, Andersen SB (2005) Tolerance and antibiosis resistance to cabbage root fly in vegetable Brassica species. Entomol Exp Appl 116:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gange AC, Brown VK (2002) Soil food web components affect plant community structure during early succession. Ecol Res 17:217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingras D, Gingras J, De Oliveira D (1999) Visits of honeybees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and their effects on cucumber yields in the field. J Econ Entomol 92:435–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamback PA (2001) Direct and indirect effects of herbivory: feeding by spittlebugs affects pollinator visitation rates and seedset of Rudbeckia hirta. Ecoscience 8:45–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67:283–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hladun KR, Adler LS (2009) Influence of leaf herbivory, root herbivory, and pollination on plant performance in Cucurbita moschata. Ecol Entomol 34:144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan I, Halitschke R, Kessler A, Sardanelli S, Denno RF (2008) Constitutive and induced defenses to herbivory in above- and belowground plant tissues. Ecology 89:392–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 29:83–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C, Williams NM, Thorp RW (2002) Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16812–16816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtilä K, Strauss SY (1997) Leaf damage by herbivores affects attractiveness to pollinators in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 111:396–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HO (1910) Biologic notes on species of Diabrotica in southern Texas. USDA Bureau Entomol Bull 82:76–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf RL, Metcalf ER (1992) Plant kairomones in insect ecology and control. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf RL, Metcalf RA, Rhodes AM (1980) Cucurbitacins as kairomones for diabroticite beetles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:3769–3772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mothershead K, Marquis RJ (2000) Fitness impacts of herbivory through indirect effects on plant- pollinator interactions in Oenothera macrocarpa. Ecology 81:30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman JA, Bergelson J, Grafen A (1997) Blocking factors and hypothesis tests in ecology: is your statistics text wrong? Ecology 78:1312–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson S (2007) Nectar consumers. In: Nicolson S, Nepi M, Pacini E (eds) Nectaries and nectar. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 289–342

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poveda K, Steffen-Dewenter I, Scheu S, Tscharntske T (2003) Effects of below- and above-ground herbivores on plant growth, flower visitation and seed set. Oecologia 135:601–605

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poveda K, Steffen-Dewenter I, Scheu S, Tscharntske T (2005a) Effects of decomposers and herbivores on plant performance and aboveground plant–insect interactions. Oikos 108:503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poveda K, Steffen-Dewenter I, Scheu S, Tscharntske T (2005b) Floral trait expression and plant fitness in responses to below- and aboveground plant–animal interactions. Perspect Plant Ecol 7:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanghellini MS, Ambrose JT, Schultheis FR (1997) The effects of honey bee and bumble bee pollination on fruit set and abortion of cucumber and watermelon. Am Bee J 137:386–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanghellini MS, Ambrose JT, Schultheis FR (1998) Seed production in watermelon: a comparison between two commercially available pollinators. Hortic Sci 33:28–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanghellini MS, Ambrose JT, Schultheis JR (2002) Diurnal activity, floral visitation and pollen deposition by honey bees and bumble bees on field-grown cucumber and watermelon. J Apic Res 41:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Steets JA, Hamrick JL, Ashman T-L (2006) Consequences of vegetative herbivory for maintenance of intermediate outcrossing in an annual plant. Ecology 87:2717–2727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Armbruster WS (1997) Linking herbivory and pollination—new perspectives on plant and animal ecology and evolution. Ecology 78:1617–1618

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Murch P (2004) Towards an understanding of the mechanisms of tolerance: compensating for herbivore damage by enhancing a mutualism. Ecol Entomol 29:234–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Conner JK, Rush SL (1996) Foliar herbivory affects floral characters and plant attractiveness to pollinators: implications for male and female plant fitness. Am Nat 147:1098–1107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Conner JK, Lehtilä KP (2001) Effects of foliar herbivory by insects on the fitness of Raphanus raphanistrum: damage can increase male fitness. Am Nat 158:496–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR, Maron JL, Connors PG, Whipple A, Harrison S, Jefferies RL (1995) High mortality, fluctuation in numbers, and heavy subterranean insect herbivory in bush lupine, Lupinus arboreus. Oecologia 104:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy DW, Krischik VA (1989) Variation and function of cucurbitacins in Cucurbita: an examination of current hypotheses. Am Nat 133:766–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy DW, McCloud ES (1991) Squash beetles, cucumber beetles, and inducible cucurbit responses. In: Tallamy DW, Raupp MJ (eds) Phytochemical induction by herbivores. Wiley, New York, pp 155–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson VP, Cunningham SA, Ball MC, Nicotra AB (2003) Compensation for herbivory by Cucumis sativus through increased photosynthetic capacity and efficiency. Oecologia 134:167–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2002) Census of Agriculture, vol 1 chapter 2: US State Level Data, Table 29. Vegetables and melons harvested for sale, 2002 and 1997. USDA, Washington D.C.

  • van Dam NM, Raaijmakers CE, van der Putten WH (2005) Root herbivory reduces growth and survival of the shoot feeding specialist Pieris rapae on Brassica nigra. Entomol Exp Appl 115:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Putten WH, Vet LEM, Harvey JA, Wäckers FL (2001) Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends Ecol Evol 16:547–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Putten WH, Bargett RD, de Ruiter PC, Hol WHG, Meyer KM, Bezemer TM, Bradford MA, Christensen S, Eppinga MB, Fukami T, Hemerik L, Molofsky J, Schädler M, Scherber C, Strauss SY, Vos M, Wardle DA (2009) Empirical and theoretical challenges in aboveground–belowground ecology. Oecologia 161:1–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klioronomos JN, Setälä H, van der Putten WH, Wall DH (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304:16–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York A (1992) Pests of Cucurbit crops: marrow, pumpkin, squash, melon and cucumber. In: McKinlay RG (ed) Vegetable crop pests. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 139–161

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Nancy Hansen and Hampshire College Farm for providing a field site and assisting with cultivation, and J. Calderon-Ayala, A. Roehrig, and N. Scalfone for field assistance. The manuscript benefitted from helpful comments by S. Gillespie, N. Soper Gorden, and two anonymous reviewers. This research was partially supported by USDA NRI 2008-02346 and USDA/CSREES MAS00931. All the work described in this manuscript complies with the current laws of the United States of America.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA

    Nicholas A. Barber, Lynn S. Adler & Holly L. Bernardo

Authors
  1. Nicholas A. Barber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynn S. Adler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Holly L. Bernardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas A. Barber.

Additional information

Communicated by Alice Winn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barber, N.A., Adler, L.S. & Bernardo, H.L. Effects of above- and belowground herbivory on growth, pollination, and reproduction in cucumber. Oecologia 165, 377–386 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1779-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1779-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation